Literature DB >> 3184087

Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?

S G Mellor1, M H Thomas, B S Donnellan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether drains influenced the size of subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy, and if these had any affect on complications. Eighty-five patients undergoing cholecystectomy had either no drain, a narrow bore suction drain or an open corrugated drain. Subhepatic fluid collections were measured by real time ultrasound on the first and fifth postoperative days, and thereafter if necessary. The volumes of fluid drained were also measured and clinical complications recorded. The subhepatic collections were, on average, the same whether a drain was used or not. Drains produced volumes considerably in excess of any subhepatic collection measured, but they did not appear to warn of biliary leakage. More complications (28%) were seen in the drained group compared with the undrained group (10.5%), and furthermore, the complications did not seem to occur in relation to the larger collections. One patient who had had a corrugated drain correctly placed developed biliary peritonitis. We suggest that drainage of simple cholecystectomy is unnecessary and, if an open drain is used, potentially dangerous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3184087      PMCID: PMC1291797          DOI: 10.1177/014107688808101005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  12 in total

1.  Drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F E Weale
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Drain fever, a complication of drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M B MYERS
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-08       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Drainage following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C B Williams; D S Halpin; A J Knox
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Effects of bile, infection and pressure on pancreatic duct integrity.

Authors:  C P Armstrong; T V Taylor; H B Torrance
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Suction drainage of the gallbladder bed does not prevent complications after cholecystectomy: a random control clinical trial.

Authors:  M J Playforth; P Sauven; M Evans; A V Pollock
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A radionuclide study on the effectiveness of drainage after elective cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W van der Linden; V Kempi; S Gedda
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. A randomized, prospective study of 300 patients.

Authors:  D C Budd; R C Cochran; W J Fouty
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C P Chilton; C V Mann
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Death following gallbladder surgery. An enquiry into the cause.

Authors:  F T MacVicar; T J McNair; B J Wilken; J Bruce
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1967-01

10.  A controlled trial of drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A B Gordon; T Bates; R V Fiddian
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Drainage in bile duct surgery--yes or no?].

Authors:  J Alexander-Williams; C Herfarth; E Kern; B Kremer; H W Schreiber; K H Schriefers; J R Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1988

2.  Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Muhammad Shamim
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Cholecystectomy: ironmasters and eggheads.

Authors:  J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 18.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.