| Literature DB >> 35388562 |
Andreas A Bastian1,2,3, Maria Bastian2, Manuel Jäger1, Mark Loznik4,5,3, Eliza M Warszawik4,6, Xintong Yang4,5, Nabil Tahiri1, Peter Fodran1, Martin D Witte1, Anne Thoma5,3, Jens Köhler5, Adriaan J Minnaard1, Andreas Herrmann4,5,3.
Abstract
The continuous emergence of antimicrobial resistance is causing a threat to patients infected by multidrug-resistant pathogens. In particular, the clinical use of aminoglycoside antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibacterials of last resort, is limited due to rising bacterial resistance. One of the major resistance mechanisms in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is phosphorylation of these amino sugars at the 3'-position by O-phosphotransferases [APH(3')s]. Structural alteration of these antibiotics at the 3'-position would be an obvious strategy to tackle this resistance mechanism. However, the access to such derivatives requires cumbersome multi-step synthesis, which is not appealing for pharma industry in this low-return-on-investment market. To overcome this obstacle and combat bacterial resistance mediated by APH(3')s, we introduce a novel regioselective modification of aminoglycosides in the 3'-position via palladium-catalyzed oxidation. To underline the effectiveness of our method for structural modification of aminoglycosides, we have developed two novel antibiotic candidates overcoming APH(3')s-mediated resistance employing only four synthetic steps.Entities:
Keywords: aminoglycoside antibiotics; antimicrobial resistance; catalytic oxidation; epimerization; regioselective modification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35388562 PMCID: PMC9321007 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202200883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.020
Figure 1Structures of aminoglycoside antibiotics and positions modified by aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Modification sites in kanamycin A (1) targeted by N‐acetyltransferases (AACs), O‐phosphotransferases (APHs) and O‐nucleotidyltransferases (ANTs) are indicated with arrows and Arabic numbers in the name of the enzyme. 2‐DOS=2‐desoxystrepamine, AHB=3‐amino‐2‐hydroxybutanoyl.
Figure 2Catalytic regioselective oxidation of monosaccharide 5 (a) and aminoglycoside 7 (b) at C3’‐position, as well as structure confirmation of product 8 by 2D NMR spectroscopy (c). a) Oxidation of methyl alpha‐D‐glucopyranoside 5 with benzoquinone and catalyst 4. b) Selective oxidation of (Cbz)6‐neomycin B 7 to the corresponding 3’‐keto‐derivative 8. c) Confirmation of the selective oxidation of the hydroxyl group at the C3’‐position of 7 employing HSQC NMR spectroscopy.
Selective oxidation of aminoglycosides at the C3’‐position.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Entry |
Sub‐strate |
Pro‐duct |
PG |
R |
|
Catalyts load [%] |
Yield[a] [%] |
|
1 |
|
|
Cbz |
NHBcz |
1 |
2.5 |
29 |
|
2 |
|
|
Cbz |
NHCbz |
20 |
2.5×2 |
41 |
|
3 |
|
|
Boc |
OH |
1 |
2.5 |
59 |
|
4 |
|
|
Boc |
NHBoc |
1 |
6 |
65 |
|
5 |
|
|
Boc |
OH |
2 |
2.5 |
61 |
|
6 |
|
|
Boc |
NHBoc |
2 |
6 |
76 |
PG=Protecting group, t=reaction time, BQ=benzoquinone. [a] Isolated yield. [b] Reaction scale=0.42 mmol, 0.6 g. [c] Reaction scale=0.34 mmol, 0.3 g. [d] Reaction scale=12.43 mmol, 11 g. [e] Reaction scale=15.26 mmol, 15 g.
Scheme 1Epimerization of the C3’‐hydroxyl group in kanamycin A (1 a) in four steps. a) (Boc)2O, Et3N, DMSO, RT, 20 h (56 %); b) Benzoquinone, [(neocuproine)PdOAc]2(OTf)2, DMSO, RT, 1 h (59 %); c) NaBH4, MeOH, 0 °C to RT, 20 h (60 %); d) PhSH, TFA, DCM, 1 h (54 %).
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (μM) of pristine (1 a, 3) and semisynthetic aminoglycosides (13, 15) against E. coli.[a]
|
|
wild type[b] |
APH(3’)Ia[c] |
APH(3’)IIIa[d] |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kanamycin A ( |
8 |
8192 |
4096 |
|
3’‐epi‐Kanamycin A ( |
64 |
512 |
256 |
|
Neomycin B ( |
4 |
4096 |
4096 |
|
3’‐epi‐Neomycin B ( |
32/64 |
64/128 |
32/64 |
[a] Compounds were purified by HPLC and used for in vitro efficacy testing as heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA) salts. [b] MIC values were determined for E. coli 24922 (wild type) carrying no resistance gene. [c] E. coli ATCC 25922 carrying plasmids pET9b(+) encoding APH(3’)Ia. [d] E. coli ATCC 25922 carrying plasmids pAT21‐1(+) encoding APH(3’)IIIa.
Figure 3Complexes of APH(3’)IIIa with docked antibiotics 1 a and 13, and co‐crystallized with kanamycin A 1 a. a) In silico docking of kanamycin A 1 a in kinase APH(3’)IIIa. b) In silico docking of 3’‐epi kanamycin A 13 in APH(3’)IIIa. c) Co‐crystal structure of APH(3’)IIIa with kanamycin A 1 a. The coordinates of APH(3’)IIIa in panels a and b are taken from PDB entry 3TM0, in panel c from PDB entry 1 L8T[23]. In silico docking was performed with LeadIT[25] and scoring by SeeSAR (a and b). All images were generated with PyMol. The protein backbone is shown in green, magnesium ions as grey spheres, and Asp190 side chain is shown as sticks colored by atom: C, grey; O, red. a and b) AMP‐PNP and c) ADP are shown as sticks colored by atom: C, yellow; O, red; N, blue: P, orange. Antibiotics 1 a and 13 in a and b are shown as sticks, hydrogens are indicated as lines. Compounds 1 a and 13 are colored by atom: C, light blue; O, red; N, blue, H, grey. White dashed lines show distances (in Å) between atoms and yellow dashed lines indicate hydrogen bond interactions (length is given in Å).