Literature DB >> 35384928

"Listen to me, learn from me": a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care.

Helen Slater1,2, Joanne E Jordan3, Peter B O'Sullivan1,2, Robert Schütze1,2,4, Roger Goucke5, Jason Chua6, Allyson Browne1,5, Ben Horgan1,2, Simone De Morgan7, Andrew M Briggs1,2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: "not important," 4-6: "equivocal," or 7-9: "important"), "important" items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35384928      PMCID: PMC9578532          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  68 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  Intricacies of good communication in the context of pain: does validation reinforce disclosure?

Authors:  Steven J Linton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Innovations to improve access to musculoskeletal care.

Authors:  Mellick J Chehade; Lalit Yadav; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Mark Merolli; Edward Palmer; Asangi Jayatilaka; Helen Slater
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  Extending evidence to practice: Implementation of Models of Care for musculoskeletal health conditions across settings.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Madelynn Chan; Helen Slater
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Mass media campaigns are needed to counter misconceptions about back pain and promote higher value care.

Authors:  Mary O'Keeffe; Chris G Maher; Tasha R Stanton; Neil E O'Connell; Sameer Deshpande; Douglas P Gross; Kieran O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Lessons from The Lancet Low Back Pain Series media strategy.

Authors:  Mary O'Keeffe; Chris G Maher; Tomas Rozbroj; Mark Schoene; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Low back pain-related beliefs and likely practice behaviours among final-year cross-discipline health students.

Authors:  A M Briggs; H Slater; A J Smith; G F Parkin-Smith; K Watkins; J Chua
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 8.  Validating pain communication: current state of the science.

Authors:  Sara N Edmond; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.926

9.  Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland.

Authors:  Maggie Cunningham; Mary Wells
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Continuing education in pain management: using a competency framework to guide professional development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Devonshire; Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.