BACKGROUND: Evidence points to clinicians' beliefs and practice behaviours related to low back pain (LBP), which are discordant with contemporary evidence. While interventions to align beliefs and behaviours with evidence among clinicians have demonstrated effectiveness, a more sustainable and cost-effective approach to positively developing workforce capacity in this area may be to target the emerging workforce. The aim of this study was to investigate beliefs and clinical recommendations for LBP, and their alignment to evidence, in Australian university allied health and medical students. METHODS: Final-year students in chiropractic, medicine, occupational therapy, pharmacy and physiotherapy disciplines in three Western Australian universities responded to a survey. Demographic data, LBP-related beliefs data [modified Health Care Providers Pain and Impact Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and the Back Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ)] and activity, rest and work clinical recommendations for an acute LBP clinical vignette were collected. RESULTS: Six hundred two students completed the survey (response rate 74.6%). Cross-discipline differences in beliefs and clinical recommendations were observed (p > 0.001). Physiotherapy and chiropractic students reported significantly more helpful beliefs compared with the other disciplines, while pharmacy students reported the least helpful beliefs. A greater proportion of chiropractic and physiotherapy students reported guideline-consistent recommendations compared with other disciplines. HC-PAIRS and BBQ scores were strongly associated with clinical recommendations, independent to the discipline of study and prior experience of LBP. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning cross-discipline university curricula with current evidence may provide an opportunity to facilitate translation of this evidence into practice with a focus on a consistent, cross-discipline approach to LBP management.
BACKGROUND: Evidence points to clinicians' beliefs and practice behaviours related to low back pain (LBP), which are discordant with contemporary evidence. While interventions to align beliefs and behaviours with evidence among clinicians have demonstrated effectiveness, a more sustainable and cost-effective approach to positively developing workforce capacity in this area may be to target the emerging workforce. The aim of this study was to investigate beliefs and clinical recommendations for LBP, and their alignment to evidence, in Australian university allied health and medical students. METHODS: Final-year students in chiropractic, medicine, occupational therapy, pharmacy and physiotherapy disciplines in three Western Australian universities responded to a survey. Demographic data, LBP-related beliefs data [modified Health Care Providers Pain and Impact Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and the Back Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ)] and activity, rest and work clinical recommendations for an acute LBP clinical vignette were collected. RESULTS: Six hundred two students completed the survey (response rate 74.6%). Cross-discipline differences in beliefs and clinical recommendations were observed (p > 0.001). Physiotherapy and chiropractic students reported significantly more helpful beliefs compared with the other disciplines, while pharmacy students reported the least helpful beliefs. A greater proportion of chiropractic and physiotherapy students reported guideline-consistent recommendations compared with other disciplines. HC-PAIRS and BBQ scores were strongly associated with clinical recommendations, independent to the discipline of study and prior experience of LBP. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning cross-discipline university curricula with current evidence may provide an opportunity to facilitate translation of this evidence into practice with a focus on a consistent, cross-discipline approach to LBP management.
Authors: Jocelyn E Blouin; Miranda A Cary; Mackenzie G Marchant; Nancy C Gyurcsik; Danielle R Brittain; Jenelle Zapski Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2019 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Jagjit Mankelow; Cormac G Ryan; Paul C Taylor; Maire-Brid Casey; Jenni Naisby; Kate Thompson; Joseph G McVeigh; Chris Seenan; Kay Cooper; Paul Hendrick; Donna Brown; William Gibson; Mervyn Travers; Norelee Kennedy; Cliona O'Riordan; Denis Martin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Helen Slater; Joanne E Jordan; Peter B O'Sullivan; Robert Schütze; Roger Goucke; Jason Chua; Allyson Browne; Ben Horgan; Simone De Morgan; Andrew M Briggs Journal: Pain Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Andrew M Briggs; Peter Bragge; Helen Slater; Madelynn Chan; Simon C B Towler Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Gregory F Parkin-Smith; Lyndon G Amorin-Woods; Stephanie J Davies; Barrett E Losco; Jon Adams Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.133