Literature DB >> 35383362

Predicting the binding of small molecules to nuclear receptors using machine learning.

Azhagiya Singam Ettayapuram Ramaprasad1, Martyn T Smith2, David McCoy2, Alan E Hubbard2, Michele A La Merrill3, Kathleen A Durkin1.   

Abstract

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are important biological targets of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Identifying chemicals that can act as EDCs and modulate the function of NRs is difficult because of the time and cost of in vitro and in vivo screening to determine the potential hazards of the 100 000s of chemicals that humans are exposed to. Hence, there is a need for computational approaches to prioritize chemicals for biological testing. Machine learning (ML) techniques are alternative methods that can quickly screen millions of chemicals and identify those that may be an EDC. Computational models of chemical binding to multiple NRs have begun to emerge. Recently, a Nuclear Receptor Activity (NuRA) dataset, describing experimentally derived small-molecule activity against various NRs has been created. We have used the NuRA dataset to develop an ensemble of ML-based models to predict the agonism, antagonism, binding and effector binding of small molecules to nine different human NRs. We defined the applicability domain of the ML models as a measure of Tanimoto similarity to the molecules in the training set, which enhanced the performance of the developed classifiers. We further developed a user-friendly web server named 'NR-ToxPred' to predict the binding of chemicals to the nine NRs using the best-performing models for each receptor. This web server is freely accessible at http://nr-toxpred.cchem.berkeley.edu. Users can upload individual chemicals using Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System, CAS numbers or sketch the molecule in the provided space to predict the compound's activity against the different NRs and predict the binding mode for each.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Nuclear Receptor; Super Learner; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35383362      PMCID: PMC9116378          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   13.994


  32 in total

1.  Predicting estrogen receptor binding of chemicals using a suite of in silico methods - Complementary approaches of (Q)SAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  J V Cotterill; L Palazzolo; C Ridgway; N Price; E Rorije; A Moretto; A Peijnenburg; I Eberini
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue.

Authors:  Angel Herráez
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.160

4.  Predictive Structure-Based Toxicology Approaches To Assess the Androgenic Potential of Chemicals.

Authors:  Daniela Trisciuzzi; Domenico Alberga; Kamel Mansouri; Richard Judson; Ettore Novellino; Giuseppe Felice Mangiatordi; Orazio Nicolotti
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  The use of classification trees for bioinformatics.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Minghui Wang; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov       Date:  2011-01-06

6.  Structural Dynamics of Agonist and Antagonist Binding to the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Ettayapuram Ramaprasad Azhagiya Singam; Phum Tachachartvanich; Michele A La Merrill; Martyn T Smith; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Applicability Domains Enhance Application of PPARγ Agonist Classifiers Trained by Drug-like Compounds to Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  Zhongyu Wang; Jingwen Chen; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Structure-based virtual screening of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) as endocrine disruptors of androgen receptor activity using molecular docking and machine learning.

Authors:  Ettayapuram Ramaprasad Azhagiya Singam; Phum Tachachartvanich; Denis Fourches; Anatoly Soshilov; Jennifer C Y Hsieh; Michele A La Merrill; Martyn T Smith; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 9.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: A structural perspective.

Authors:  Emily R Weikum; Xu Liu; Eric A Ortlund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.

Authors:  Davide Chicco; Giuseppe Jurman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sensitive image-based chromatin binding assays using inducible ERα to rapidly characterize estrogenic chemicals and mixtures.

Authors:  Adam T Szafran; Maureen G Mancini; Fabio Stossi; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.