Literature DB >> 29022712

Predictive Structure-Based Toxicology Approaches To Assess the Androgenic Potential of Chemicals.

Daniela Trisciuzzi1, Domenico Alberga1,2, Kamel Mansouri3,4,5, Richard Judson4, Ettore Novellino6, Giuseppe Felice Mangiatordi1,2, Orazio Nicolotti1,2.   

Abstract

We present a practical and easy-to-run in silico workflow exploiting a structure-based strategy making use of docking simulations to derive highly predictive classification models of the androgenic potential of chemicals. Models were trained on a high-quality chemical collection comprising 1689 curated compounds made available within the CoMPARA consortium from the US Environmental Protection Agency and were integrated with a two-step applicability domain whose implementation had the effect of improving both the confidence in prediction and statistics by reducing the number of false negatives. Among the nine androgen receptor X-ray solved structures, the crystal 2PNU (entry code from the Protein Data Bank) was associated with the best performing structure-based classification model. Three validation sets comprising each 2590 compounds extracted by the DUD-E collection were used to challenge model performance and the effectiveness of Applicability Domain implementation. Next, the 2PNU model was applied to screen and prioritize two collections of chemicals. The first is a small pool of 12 representative androgenic compounds that were accurately classified based on outstanding rationale at the molecular level. The second is a large external blind set of 55450 chemicals with potential for human exposure. We show how the use of molecular docking provides highly interpretable models and can represent a real-life option as an alternative nontesting method for predictive toxicology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022712      PMCID: PMC6691737          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  6 in total

1.  Predicting the binding of small molecules to nuclear receptors using machine learning.

Authors:  Azhagiya Singam Ettayapuram Ramaprasad; Martyn T Smith; David McCoy; Alan E Hubbard; Michele A La Merrill; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 13.994

2.  Virtual screening of potentially endocrine-disrupting chemicals against nuclear receptors and its application to identify PPARγ-bound fatty acids.

Authors:  Chaitanya K Jaladanki; Yang He; Li Na Zhao; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Lit-Hsin Loo; Haiwei Song; Hao Fan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Consensus versus Individual QSARs in Classification: Comparison on a Large-Scale Case Study.

Authors:  Cecile Valsecchi; Francesca Grisoni; Viviana Consonni; Davide Ballabio
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Androgen Receptor Binding Category Prediction with Deep Neural Networks and Structure-, Ligand-, and Statistically Based Features.

Authors:  Alfonso T García-Sosa
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Review of in silico studies dedicated to the nuclear receptor family: Therapeutic prospects and toxicological concerns.

Authors:  Asma Sellami; Manon Réau; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Combined Naïve Bayesian, Chemical Fingerprints and Molecular Docking Classifiers to Model and Predict Androgen Receptor Binding Data for Environmentally- and Health-Sensitive Substances.

Authors:  Alfonso T García-Sosa; Uko Maran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.