| Literature DB >> 35382839 |
Damian Dolega-Dolegowski1, Klaudia Proniewska2, Magdalena Dolega-Dolegowska3, Agnieszka Pregowska4, Justyna Hajto-Bryk2, Mariusz Trojak5, Jakub Chmiel6, Piotr Walecki2, Piotr S Fudalej7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Augmented Reality (AR) blends digital information with the real world. Thanks to cameras, sensors, and displays it can supplement the physical world with holographic images. Nowadays, the applications of AR range from navigated surgery to vehicle navigation. DEVELOPMENT: The purpose of this feasibility study was to develop an AR holographic system implementing Vertucci's classification of dental root morphology to facilitate the study of tooth anatomy. It was tailored to run on the AR HoloLens 2 (Microsoft) glasses. The 3D tooth models were created in Autodesk Maya and exported to Unity software. The holograms of dental roots can be projected in a natural setting of the dental office. The application allowed to display 3D objects in such a way that they could be rotated, zoomed in/out, and penetrated. The advantage of the proposed approach was that students could learn a 3D internal anatomy of the teeth without environmental visual restrictions.Entities:
Keywords: Augmented reality; Dental root; Holography; Mixed reality; Root canal; Tooth; Visualization
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35382839 PMCID: PMC8981712 DOI: 10.1186/s13005-022-00307-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Head Face Med ISSN: 1746-160X Impact factor: 2.151
Fig. 1HoloLens 2 glasses
Fig. 2A scheme of the HoloLens-based application development
Fig. 3The root canal configurations from the pulp chamber to the root apex according to Vertucci [23] displayed with our application utilizing the HoloLens device
Fig. 4Experimental holograms projected in the operating room of the dental office
The questionnaire given to the evaluators to complete along with the scores for each question
| Questions | Answer | Students ( | Dentists ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| In your opinion the use of HoloLens 2 goggles was… | |||
| easy | 6 | 5 | |
| a little bit complicated | 0 | 1 | |
| difficult | 0 | 0 | |
| The visualization of the root canal was… | |||
| clear and legible | 2 | 6 | |
| certain areas were blurry, but overall the quality was acceptable | 4 | 0 | |
| blurry and difficult to orientate | 0 | 0 | |
| The visualization with HoloLens 2 goggles provides… | |||
| more information about the anatomy of the canal than visualization on a computer screen | 4 | 6 | |
| as much information about the canal anatomy as visualization on a computer screen | 2 | 0 | |
| less information about the canal anatomy than visualization on a computer screen | 0 | 0 | |
| Do you think that visualization of the root canal anatomy… | |||
| can improve the effectiveness of endodontic treatment? | 6 | 6 | |
| will not improve the effectiveness of endodontic treatment? | 0 | 0 | |
| can reduce the effectiveness of endodontic treatment? | 0 | 0 | |
| Do you think that the visualization of the canal anatomy shown to the PATIENT… | |||
| reduces his/her stress during endodontic treatment? | 3 | 4 | |
| does not affect the level of stress during endodontic treatment? | 2 | 2 | |
| increases his/her stress during endodontic treatment? | 1 | 0 | |
| Your professional status | |||
| student | 6 | ||
| dentist | 6 | ||
| Your gender | |||
| male | 3 | ||
| female | 9 | ||
| other | 0 | ||
| Your age | 28.2 years | ||
The demographic data of the evaluators
| Dental students ( | Dentists ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years (mean, SD, range) | 20.7/2.0/18.0 - 24.0 | 35.7/4.0/29.0 - 42.0 |
| Sex (M/F) | 2 / 4 | 1 / 5 |