Christopher Andrews1, Michael K Southworth2, Jennifer N A Silva3,4,5, Jonathan R Silva6,7. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. 2. SentiAR, Inc, 212 N Kingshighway Blvd, Suite #115, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. jennifersilva@wustl.edu. 4. SentiAR, Inc, 212 N Kingshighway Blvd, Suite #115, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA. jennifersilva@wustl.edu. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, 1 Children's Place, CB 8116 NWT, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA. jennifersilva@wustl.edu. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis School of Engineering and Applied Science, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. jonsilva@wustl.edu. 7. SentiAR, Inc, 212 N Kingshighway Blvd, Suite #115, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA. jonsilva@wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in display technology and computing have led to new devices capable of overlaying digital information onto the physical world or incorporating aspects of the physical world into virtual scenes. These combinations of digital and physical environments are referred to as extended realities. Extended reality (XR) devices offer many advantages for medical applications including realistic 3D visualization and touch-free interfaces that can be used in sterile environments. This review introduces extended reality and describes how it can be applied to medical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The 3D displays of extended reality devices are valuable in situations where spatial information such as patient anatomy and medical instrument position is important. Applications that take advantage of these 3D capabilities include teaching and pre-operative planning. The utility of extended reality during interventional procedures has been demonstrated with through 3D visualizations of patient anatomy, scar visualization, and real-time catheter tracking with touch-free software control. Extended reality devices have been applied to education, pre-procedural planning, and cardiac interventions. These devices excel in settings where traditional devices are difficult to use, such as in the cardiac catheterization lab. New applications of extended reality in cardiology will continue to emerge as the technology improves.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in display technology and computing have led to new devices capable of overlaying digital information onto the physical world or incorporating aspects of the physical world into virtual scenes. These combinations of digital and physical environments are referred to as extended realities. Extended reality (XR) devices offer many advantages for medical applications including realistic 3D visualization and touch-free interfaces that can be used in sterile environments. This review introduces extended reality and describes how it can be applied to medical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The 3D displays of extended reality devices are valuable in situations where spatial information such as patient anatomy and medical instrument position is important. Applications that take advantage of these 3D capabilities include teaching and pre-operative planning. The utility of extended reality during interventional procedures has been demonstrated with through 3D visualizations of patient anatomy, scar visualization, and real-time catheter tracking with touch-free software control. Extended reality devices have been applied to education, pre-procedural planning, and cardiac interventions. These devices excel in settings where traditional devices are difficult to use, such as in the cardiac catheterization lab. New applications of extended reality in cardiology will continue to emerge as the technology improves.
Authors: Maksymilian P Opolski; Artur Debski; Bartosz A Borucki; Marcin Szpak; Adam D Staruch; Cezary Kepka; Adam Witkowski Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Cristian A Linte; John Moore; Chris Wedlake; Daniel Bainbridge; Gérard M Guiraudon; Douglas L Jones; Terry M Peters Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: C-H King; M O Culjat; M L Franco; C E Lewis; E P Dutson; W S Grundfest; J W Bisley Journal: IEEE Trans Haptics Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 2.487
Authors: Jennifer N Avari Silva; Mary Beth Privitera; Michael K Southworth; Jonathan R Silva Journal: Virtual Augment Mixed Real (2020) Date: 2020-07-10
Authors: Christopher M Andrews; Alexander B Henry; Ignacio M Soriano; Michael K Southworth; Jonathan R Silva Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: Damian Dolega-Dolegowski; Klaudia Proniewska; Magdalena Dolega-Dolegowska; Agnieszka Pregowska; Justyna Hajto-Bryk; Mariusz Trojak; Jakub Chmiel; Piotr Walecki; Piotr S Fudalej Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 2.151