| Literature DB >> 35381015 |
Rani Sauriasari1, Afina Irsyania Zulfa1, Andisyah Putri Sekar1, Nuriza Ulul Azmi1, Xian Wen Tan2, Eiji Matsuura2,3,4.
Abstract
Oxidant species is reported as a major determinant in the pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease. However, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in the initial phase and progressing phase of diabetic kidney disease remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to find out what ROS and their modified product are associated with eGFR in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. A cross-sectional study was performed on 227 T2DM patients. The study subjects were divided into three groups based on their eGFR stage (Group 1, eGFR > 89 ml/min/1.73 m2; Group 2, eGFR = 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2; and Group 3, eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure serum oxLDL/β2GPI complex and urinary 8-iso-PGF2α, while ferrous ion oxidation xylenol orange method 1 (FOX-1) was used to measure urinary hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). H2O2 significantly decreased across the groups, whereas OxLDL/β2GPI complex increased, but not significant, and there was no trend for 8-iso-PGF2α. Consistently, in the total study population, only H2O2 showed correlation with eGFR (r = 0.161, p = 0.015). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that significant factors for increased eGFR were H2O2, diastolic blood pressure, and female. Whereas increased systolic blood pressure and age were significant factors affecting the decrease of eGFR. We also found that urinary H2O2 had correlation with serum oxLDL/β2GPI complex in total population. This finding could lead to further research on urinary H2O2 for early detection and research on novel therapies of diabetic kidney disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35381015 PMCID: PMC8982868 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic characteristics of study subjects.
| Characteristic of study subjects | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR > 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 121) | eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 74) | eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 32) | ||
| Mean (%) or Mean ± SEM | ||||
| Gender (%) | ||||
| Men | 19 (15.7) | 18 (24.3) | 10 (31.2) | 0.100c |
| Women | 102 (84.3) | 56 (75.7) | 22 (68.8) | |
| Age (years) | 56.79 ± 0.59 | 60.95 ± 0.82 | 60.91 ± 1.51 |
|
| Weight (kg) | 61.14 ± 0.99 | 62.83 ± 1.25 | 58.17 ± 1.50 | 0.114b |
| Height (cm) | 152.60 ± 0.65 | 153.21 ± 0.93 | 152.75 ± 1.27 | 0.977a |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) (n = 220) | 26.28 ± 0.41 | 26.72 ± 0.51 | 24.97 ± 0.64 | 0.055a |
| Exercise routine (%) (n = 166) | ||||
| Exercise | 59 (66.3) | 31 (56.4) | 14 (63.6) | 0.486c |
| Do not exercise | 30 (33.7) | 24 (43.6) | 8 (36.4) | |
| Smoking habit (%) (n = 167) | ||||
| Smoking | 1 (1.1) | 2 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 0.501c |
| Not smoking | 88 (98.9) | 54 (96.4) | 21 (95.5) | |
| Blood pressure | ||||
| Systole (mmHg) | 128.91 ± 1.86 | 128.57 ± 2.55 | 133.13 ± 3.78 | 0.397a |
| Diastole (mmHg) | 79.78 ± 0.92 | 77.91 ± 0.99 | 77.23 ± 1.86 | 0.215a |
| HbA1c (%) | 9.41 ± 0.57 | 8.24 ± 0.20 | 7.98 ± 0.28 | 0.140a |
| Urinary albumin (mcg/dL) (n = 195) | 6054.82 ± 1996.65 | 4339.73 ± 793.70 | 8483.68 ± 4267.09 | 0.315a |
| Urinary creatinine (mg/dL) (n = 227) | 84.59 ± 5.15 | 86.05 ± 7.13 | 90.40 ± 11.86 | 0.808a |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 1.70 ± 0.16 |
|
| Albuminuria UACR (mcg/mg Cre) (n = 195) | 105.017 ± 28.584 | 88.675 ± 26.007 | 119.600 ± 67.434 | 0.211a |
| Normoalbuminuria (%) | 74 (71.2) | 42 (62.7) | 17 (70.8) | 0.488c |
| Albuminuria (%) | 30 (28.8) | 25 (37.3) | 7 (29.2) | |
Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.
Data were expressed in n (%), Mean ± SEM.
Notes: *p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urine albumin to creatinine ratio; SD, standard deviation; a: Kruskal–Wallis H test; b: one-way ANOVA test; c: chi-square test.
Oxidative stress markers in study subjects.
| Characteristic of study subjects | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR > 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 121) | eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 74) | eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 32) | ||
| Mean ± SE | ||||
| H2O2 (μmol/mg creatinine) | 89.99 ± 27.12 | 45.73 ± 11.66 | 32.83 ± 4.09 |
|
| 8-iso-PGF2α (pg/mg creatinine) | 13,342.32 ± 2,346.87 | 47,356.27 ± 31,982.64 | 13,172.56 ± 3,335.76 | 0.883a |
| OxLDL/β2GPI complex (units/mL) | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.121a |
Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; 8-iso-PGF2α, 8-isoprostaglandin F2α; oxLDL/β2GPI complex, oxidized low-density lipoprotein/beta-2-glycoprotein-I.
Data were expressed in n (%), mean ± SEM.
Notes: p = significance (*p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant); SEM = standard error mean; a = Kruskal–Wallis H tests.
Fig 1Scatter plot for the correlation between eGFR with urine H2O2 in total population (n = 227).
Factors affecting the eGFR level in T2DM patients (n = 189).
| Dependent variable | Adjusted R square | Predictor | Standardized Coefficients β | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.182 | |||
| H2O2 (μmol/mg Cre) | 0.157 | 0.036 | ||
| 8-iso-PGF2α (pg/mg creatinine) | 0.018 | 0.791 | ||
| OxLDL/β2GPI complex (units/mL) | -0.109 | 0.119 | ||
| UACR (mcg/mg Cre) | -0.061 | 0.402 | ||
| HbA1c (%) | 0.113 | 0.098 | ||
| Systole (mmHg) | -0.247 | 0.011 | ||
| Diastole (mmHg) | 0.201 | 0.035 | ||
| Age (years) | -0.268 | <0.001 | ||
| Gender (female) | 0.191 | 0.005 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.057 | 0.404 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urine albumin to creatinine ratio; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; 8-iso-PGF2α, 8-isoprostaglandin F2α; OxLDL/β2GPI complex, oxidized low-density lipoprotein/beta-2-glycoprotein-I; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; BMI, body mass index;
*statistically significant (p<0.05);
**statistically significant (p<0.001).
Fig 2Proposed mechanism of oxidative stress in diabetic kidney disease.
O2−, superoxide anion radical; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; OH, hydroxyl radical; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; oxLDL, oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein; β2GPI, β-2-Glycoprotein-I; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β1; 8-iso-PGF2α, 8-isoprostaglandin F2α; TP receptor, thromboxane-prostanoid receptor; GFR reduction, Glomerular Filtration Rate reduction.