Literature DB >> 35379273

Evolutionary perspective of drug eluting stents: from thick polymer to polymer free approach.

Sadia Hassan1, Murtaza Najabat Ali2, Bakhtawar Ghafoor1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Introduction of Bare Metal Stents (BMS) was itself a revolutionary step in the history of the medical industry; however, Drug Eluting Stents (DES) maintained its superiority over BMS in every aspect from restenosis rate to late lumen loss. The reason behind the magnanimous position of the DES in the stent market is the degree of improvement with which it evolves. New and better stents come into the market every year, surpassing their predecessors by many folds. LITERATURE REVIEW: This review paper discusses the journey of DES with supporting clinical trials in detail. In the first generation, there were stainless-steel stents with thicker coatings. Although they had superior results compared to BMS, there was still room for improvement. Afterward came the second-generation stents, which had superior metal platforms with thinner struts and thin coatings. The drugs were also changed from Paclitaxel and Sirolimus to Zotrolimus and Everolimus. These stents performed best; however, there was an issue of permanent coating, which remained intact over the stent surface after complete drug elution and started to cause issues in longer-term studies. Hence, an improved version of DES was introduced to these permanent coatings called the third generation of drug eluting stents, which initially utilized biodegradable polymer and ultimately moved towards polymer free drug coatings. This generation has introduced a unique amalgam of technologies to achieve its polymer free coatings; however, researchers have numerous prospects of growth in this field. This review paper highlights the major coups of stent technology evolution from BMS to DES, from thick polymeric coatings to thin coatings and from durable polymers to polymer free DES.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, though the medical industry promptly accepted BMS as the best treatment option for cardiovascular diseases; however, DES has provided even better results than BMS. In DES, the first and second generation has ruled the technology for many years and are still on the shelves. Still, the issues aroused due to durable polymer shifted the attention towards biodegradable drug eluting stents, the third generation growing rapidly. But the scientific community has not restricted themselves and is investigating bioresorbable stents that completely eliminate the polymer intervention in drug eluting stent technology.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angioplasty; Bare metal stents; Cardiovascular disease; Sirolimus; Stents; Xience

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35379273      PMCID: PMC8981810          DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01812-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


  70 in total

1.  Two-year clinical outcome of all-comers treated with three highly dissimilar contemporary coronary drug-eluting stents in the randomised BIO-RESORT trial.

Authors:  Marlies M Kok; Paolo Zocca; Rosaly A Buiten; Peter W Danse; Carl E Schotborgh; Martijn Scholte; Marc Hartmann; Martin G Stoel; Gert van Houwelingen; Gerard C M Linssen; Carine J M Doggen; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  Efficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) Investigators.

Authors:  M P Savage; D L Fischman; R Rake; M B Leon; R A Schatz; I Penn; M Nobuyoshi; J Moses; J Hirshfeld; R Heuser; D Baim; M Cleman; J Brinker; S Gebhardt; S Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Coronary stent technology: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel Chen; Nigel Jepson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial.

Authors:  A Kastrati; J Mehilli; J Dirschinger; F Dotzer; H Schühlen; F J Neumann; M Fleckenstein; C Pfafferott; M Seyfarth; A Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Thomas Pilgrim; Dik Heg; Marco Roffi; David Tüller; Olivier Muller; André Vuilliomenet; Stéphane Cook; Daniel Weilenmann; Christoph Kaiser; Peiman Jamshidi; Therese Fahrni; Aris Moschovitis; Stéphane Noble; Franz R Eberli; Peter Wenaweser; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk interventional settings is driven by stent design and deployment and protected by polymer-drug coatings.

Authors:  Kumaran Kolandaivelu; Rajesh Swaminathan; William J Gibson; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Kim-Lien Nguyen-Ehrenreich; Virginia L Giddings; Leslie Coleman; Gee K Wong; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Inder M Singh; Steven J Filby; Fredy El Sakr; Eiran Z Gorodeski; A Michael Lincoff; Stephen G Ellis; Mehdi H Shishehbor
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Patrick W Serruys; Vasim Farooq; Krishnankutty Sudhir; Cecile Dorange; Karine Miquel-Hebert; Susan Veldhof; Richard Rapoza; Yoshinobu Onuma; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Bernard Chevalier
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the safety and stability of the TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent.

Authors:  Mark Boden; Robert Richard; Marlene C Schwarz; Steve Kangas; Barbara Huibregtse; James J Barry
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Cardiovascular stents: overview, evolution, and next generation.

Authors:  Setareh Borhani; Shadi Hassanajili; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Tafti; Shahram Rabbani
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-09-10
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Circulating-Free DNA and Cell-Free RNA in Cancer Management.

Authors:  Sadia Hassan; Adeeb Shehzad; Shahid Ali Khan; Waheed Miran; Salman Khan; Young-Sup Lee
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Non-ST-Segment and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Seung-Woon Rha; Cheol Ung Choi; Byoung Geol Choi; Ji Bak Kim; Soohyung Park; Dong Oh Kang; Ji Young Park; Sang-Ho Park; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.