Literature DB >> 35378187

Characterizing temporal variability in streams supports nutrient indicator development using diatom and bacterial DNA metabarcoding.

Nathan J Smucker1, Erik M Pilgrim2, Huiyun Wu3, Christopher T Nietch2, John A Darling4, Marirosa Molina4, Brent R Johnson2, Lester L Yuan5.   

Abstract

Interest in developing periphytic diatom and bacterial indicators of nutrient effects continues to grow in support of the assessment and management of stream ecosystems and their watersheds. However, temporal variability could confound relationships between indicators and nutrients, subsequently affecting assessment outcomes. To document how temporal variability affects measures of diatom and bacterial assemblages obtained from DNA metabarcoding, we conducted weekly periphyton and nutrient sampling from July to October 2016 in 25 streams in a 1293 km2 mixed land use watershed. Measures of both diatom and bacterial assemblages were strongly associated with the percent agriculture in upstream watersheds and total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations. Temporal variability in TP and TN concentrations increased with greater amounts of agriculture in watersheds, but overall diatom and bacterial assemblage variability within sites-measured as mean distance among samples to corresponding site centroids in ordination space-remained consistent. This consistency was due in part to offsets between decreasing variability in relative abundances of taxa typical of low nutrient conditions and increasing variability in those typical of high nutrient conditions as mean concentrations of TP and TN increased within sites. Weekly low and high nutrient diatom and bacterial metrics were more strongly correlated with site mean nutrient concentrations over the sampling period than with same day measurements and more strongly correlated with TP than with TN. Correlations with TP concentrations were consistently strong throughout the study except briefly following two major precipitation events. Following these events, biotic relationships with TP reestablished within one to three weeks. Collectively, these results can strengthen interpretations of survey results and inform monitoring strategies and decision making. These findings have direct applications for improving the use of diatoms and bacteria, and the use of DNA metabarcoding, in monitoring programs and stream site assessments. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Algae; Bioassessment; Metrics; Nitrogen; Phosphorus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35378187      PMCID: PMC9169572          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  40 in total

Review 1.  Phosphorus runoff from agricultural land and direct fertilizer effects: a review.

Authors:  Murray R Hart; Bert F Quin; M Long Nguyen
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: implication to nutrient criteria development.

Authors:  Lizhu Wang; Dale M Robertson; Paul J Garrison
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Embracing Environmental Genomics and Machine Learning for Routine Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Tristan Cordier; Anders Lanzén; Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil; Thorsten Stoeck; Jan Pawlowski
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 4.  Understanding how microbiomes influence the systems they inhabit.

Authors:  Ed K Hall; Emily S Bernhardt; Raven L Bier; Mark A Bradford; Claudia M Boot; James B Cotner; Paul A Del Giorgio; Sarah E Evans; Emily B Graham; Stuart E Jones; Jay T Lennon; Kenneth J Locey; Diana Nemergut; Brooke B Osborne; Jennifer D Rocca; Joshua P Schimel; Mark P Waldrop; Matthew D Wallenstein
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 17.745

5.  Antecedent moisture controls on stream nitrate flux in an agricultural watershed.

Authors:  Caroline A Davis; Adam S Ward; Amy J Burgin; Terrance D Loecke; Diego A Riveros-Iregui; Douglas J Schnoebelen; Craig L Just; Steven A Thomas; Larry J Weber; Martin A St Clair
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Phosphorus mitigation to control river eutrophication: murky waters, inconvenient truths, and "postnormal" science.

Authors:  Helen P Jarvie; Andrew N Sharpley; Paul J A Withers; J Thad Scott; Brian E Haggard; Colin Neal
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of diatom DNA metabarcoding for WFD bioassessment of Mediterranean rivers.

Authors:  Javier Pérez-Burillo; Rosa Trobajo; Valentin Vasselon; Frédéric Rimet; Agnès Bouchez; David G Mann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Entrapped Sediments as a Source of Phosphorus in Epilithic Cyanobacterial Proliferations in Low Nutrient Rivers.

Authors:  Susanna A Wood; Craig Depree; Logan Brown; Tara McAllister; Ian Hawes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Context is Everything: Interacting Inputs and Landscape Characteristics Control Stream Nitrogen.

Authors:  Jana E Compton; Ryan A Hill; Alan T Herlihy; Robert D Sabo; J Renée Brooks; Marc Weber; Brian Pickard; Steve G Paulsen; John L Stoddard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.357

10.  Temperature and photoperiod interactions with phosphorus-limited growth and competition of two diatoms.

Authors:  Tom Shatwell; Jan Köhler; Andreas Nicklisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing Indicators of Nutrient Pollution in Streams Using 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding of Periphyton-Associated Bacteria.

Authors:  Erik M Pilgrim; Nathan J Smucker; Huiyun Wu; John Martinson; Christopher T Nietch; Marirosa Molina; John A Darling; Brent R Johnson
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.