Literature DB >> 30554770

Embracing Environmental Genomics and Machine Learning for Routine Biomonitoring.

Tristan Cordier1, Anders Lanzén2, Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil3, Thorsten Stoeck4, Jan Pawlowski5.   

Abstract

Genomics is fast becoming a routine tool in medical diagnostics and cutting-edge biotechnologies. Yet, its use for environmental biomonitoring is still considered a futuristic ideal. Until now, environmental genomics was mainly used as a replacement of the burdensome morphological identification, to screen known morphologically distinguishable bioindicator taxa. While prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbial diversity is of key importance in ecosystem functioning, its implementation in biomonitoring programs is still largely unappreciated, mainly because of difficulties in identifying microbes and limited knowledge of their ecological functions. Here, we argue that the combination of massive environmental genomics microbial data with machine learning algorithms can be extremely powerful for biomonitoring programs and pave the way to fill important gaps in our understanding of microbial ecology.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  big data; biomonitoring; environmental genomics; machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554770     DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Microbiol        ISSN: 0966-842X            Impact factor:   17.079


  11 in total

1.  Metagenomics versus total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy and perspectives for ecological assessments.

Authors:  Christopher A Hempel; Natalie Wright; Julia Harvie; Jose S Hleap; Sarah J Adamowicz; Dirk Steinke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 19.160

2.  Developing Indicators of Nutrient Pollution in Streams Using 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding of Periphyton-Associated Bacteria.

Authors:  Erik M Pilgrim; Nathan J Smucker; Huiyun Wu; John Martinson; Christopher T Nietch; Marirosa Molina; John A Darling; Brent R Johnson
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.530

3.  Characterizing temporal variability in streams supports nutrient indicator development using diatom and bacterial DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Nathan J Smucker; Erik M Pilgrim; Huiyun Wu; Christopher T Nietch; John A Darling; Marirosa Molina; Brent R Johnson; Lester L Yuan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 4.  Viral Eco-Genomic Tools: Development and Implementation for Aquatic Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Gomaa Mostafa-Hedeab; Abdou Kamal Allayeh; Hany Abdelfattah Elhady; Abozer Y Eledrdery; Mobarak Abu Mraheil; Ahmed Mostafa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Applying convolutional neural networks to speed up environmental DNA annotation in a highly diverse ecosystem.

Authors:  Benjamin Flück; Laëtitia Mathon; Stéphanie Manel; Alice Valentini; Tony Dejean; Camille Albouy; David Mouillot; Wilfried Thuiller; Jérôme Murienne; Sébastien Brosse; Loïc Pellissier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Metatranscriptomic Analysis of Oil-Exposed Seawater Bacterial Communities Archived by an Environmental Sample Processor (ESP).

Authors:  Kamila Knapik; Andrea Bagi; Adriana Krolicka; Thierry Baussant
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 7.  Advancement of Metatranscriptomics towards Productive Agriculture and Sustainable Environment: A Review.

Authors:  Siti Suhailah Sharuddin; Norhayati Ramli; Mohd Zulkhairi Mohd Yusoff; Nor Azlan Nor Muhammad; Li Sim Ho; Toshinari Maeda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP), enabling access to massive analytics of re-annotated metagenomic data.

Authors:  Intikhab Alam; Allan Anthony Kamau; David Kamanda Ngugi; Takashi Gojobori; Carlos M Duarte; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Analysis of 13,312 benthic invertebrate samples from German streams reveals minor deviations in ecological status class between abundance and presence/absence data.

Authors:  Dominik Buchner; Arne J Beermann; Alex Laini; Peter Rolauffs; Simon Vitecek; Daniel Hering; Florian Leese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA metabarcoding effectively quantifies diatom responses to nutrients in streams.

Authors:  Nathan J Smucker; Erik M Pilgrim; Christopher T Nietch; John A Darling; Brent R Johnson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.