| Literature DB >> 35373519 |
Mahsa Kamali1, Mehran Zarghami2,3, Marzieh Azizi4, Forouzan Elyasi3,5.
Abstract
Sinus tachycardia and orthostatic hypotension have been so far reported among the negative cardiovascular complications of antipsychotic agents. This study aimed to report a case with bradycardia induced by fluphenazine decanoate administration. The patient was a 29-year-old man, admitted to the general teaching hospital in Sari, Iran, with a complaint of abdominal and gastric pain as well as weight loss following 7 months of fasting based on religious delusions. The patient developed bradycardia, 36 hours after fluphenazine decanoate administration. His pulse rate was also 46 beats per min (bpm). The antipsychotic medication was thus held and the patient did not take any drugs. On the 21st day after discontinuing this agent, the pulse rate reached 70 bpm. This case report notifies that much more attention should be paid to all patients before starting fluphenazine decanoate administration, and close cardiac monitoring must be done.Entities:
Keywords: antipsychotic agents; bradycardia; case report; fluphenazine decanoate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35373519 PMCID: PMC9515708 DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ISSN: 2574-173X
FIGURE 1Patient’s ECG, September 20, 2018‐01 (Admission ECG)
FIGURE 2Patient’s ECG, September 26, 2018 (ECG after the administer the fluphenazine decanoate)
FIGURE 3Patient’s ECG, September 29, 2018
FIGURE 4Patient’s ECG, October 3, 2018
FIGURE 5Patient’s ECG, October 13, 2018
CHART 1Trend change in patient’s heart rate
CHART 2Trend change in patient’s blood pressure
Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale: To assess the adverse drug reaction
| Options | Yes | No | Do not know | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Are there previous conclusive reports of this reaction? | * | +1 | ||
| 2. Did the adverse event appear after the drug was given? | * | +2 | ||
| 3. Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was given? | * | +1 | ||
| 4. Did the adverse reaction reappear upon readministering the drug? | * | 0 | ||
| 5. Were there other possible causes for the reaction? | * | +2 | ||
| 6. Did the adverse reaction reappear upon administration of placebo? | * | +1 | ||
| 7. Was the drug detected in the blood or other fluids in toxic concentrations? | * | 0 | ||
| 8. Was the reaction worsened upon increasing the dose? Or, was the reaction lessened upon decreasing the dose? | * | +1 | ||
| 9. Did the patient have a similar reaction to the drug or a related agent in the past? | * | 0 | ||
| 10. Was the adverse event confirmed by any other objective evidence? | * | +1 | ||
| Total score: 9 | ||||