Kenta Yokoi1, Kohei Yamaguchi1, Masakazu Umezawa2, Koji Tsuchiya2, Shin Aoki1,2,3. 1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan. 2. Research Institute for Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan. 3. Research Institute for Biomedical Science (RIBS), Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan.
Abstract
We previously reported that a cyclometalated iridium (Ir) complex-peptide hybrid (IPH) 4 functionalized with a cationic KKKGG peptide unit on the 2-phenylpyridine ligand induces paraptosis, a relatively newly found programmed cell death, in cancer cells (Jurkat cells) via the direct transport of calcium (Ca2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to mitochondria. Here, we describe that CGP37157, an inhibitor of a mitochondrial sodium (Na+)/Ca2+ exchanger, induces paraptosis in Jurkat cells via intracellular pathways similar to those induced by 4. The findings allow us to suggest that the induction of paraptosis by 4 and CGP37157 is associated with membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER, subsequent Ca2+ influx from the ER to mitochondria, and a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). On the contrary, celastrol, a naturally occurring triterpenoid that had been reported as a paraptosis inducer in cancer cells, negligibly induces mitochondria-ER membrane fusion. Consequently, we conclude that the paraptosis induced by 4 and CGP37157 (termed paraptosis II herein) proceeds via a signaling pathway different from that of the previously known paraptosis induced by celastrol, a process that negligibly involves membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER (termed paraptosis I herein).
We previously reported that a cyclometalated iridium (Ir) complex-peptide hybrid (IPH) 4 functionalized with a cationic KKKGG peptide unit on the 2-phenylpyridine ligand induces paraptosis, a relatively newly found programmed cell death, in cancer cells (Jurkat cells) via the direct transport of calcium (Ca2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to mitochondria. Here, we describe that CGP37157, an inhibitor of a mitochondrial sodium (Na+)/Ca2+ exchanger, induces paraptosis in Jurkat cells via intracellular pathways similar to those induced by 4. The findings allow us to suggest that the induction of paraptosis by 4 and CGP37157 is associated with membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER, subsequent Ca2+ influx from the ER to mitochondria, and a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). On the contrary, celastrol, a naturally occurring triterpenoid that had been reported as a paraptosis inducer in cancer cells, negligibly induces mitochondria-ER membrane fusion. Consequently, we conclude that the paraptosis induced by 4 and CGP37157 (termed paraptosis II herein) proceeds via a signaling pathway different from that of the previously known paraptosis induced by celastrol, a process that negligibly involves membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER (termed paraptosis I herein).
Programmed
cell death (PCD)
is an essential mechanism for the control of intracellular homeostasis
for cell survival and proliferation and is also recognized as a cellular
suicide, which is one of the strategies for anticancer therapeutics.[1] Apoptosis, necroptosis, and autophagy are the
three well-known categories of PCD and are classified by their morphological
and physiological features.[2−7] Alternative PCD types such as paraptosis,[8,9] pyroptosis,[10] and ferroptosis[11] have recently been reported and have attracted considerable interest
as a potential new target to eliminate drug-resistant cancer. Among
them, paraptosis is a relatively new type of non-apoptotic PCD, in
which cytoplasm and intracellular organelles undergo vacuolization
by the dilation of mitochondria and/or the endoplasmic reticulum (ER),[12] possibly due to the transfer of calcium (Ca2+) from the ER to mitochondria.[13] Although various inducers of paraptosis, including viruses,[14] natural products,[15−23] organic molecules,[24,25] and metal complexes,[26−34] have been reported, the mechanisms responsible for this process
are complicated and remain unclear. It is assumed that there are some
different intracellular pathways in paraptosis, which are stimulated
by these different types of paraptosis inducers, and that paraptosis
could be classified into some different types.Cyclometalated
iridium (Ir) complexes such as fac-Ir(tpy)31a [tpy = 2-(4′-tolyl)pyridine]
and fac-Ir(ppy)31b (ppy
= 2-phenylpyridine) have high photophysical properties that include
long Stokes shifts, high quantum yields, and long emission lifetimes.[35−37] Therefore, Ir complexes have been proposed as attractive candidates
as phosphorescent materials such as in organic light-emitting diodes
(OLEDs),[38,39] photoredox catalysts,[40,41] bioimaging probes,[42−47] anticancer agents,[48,49] and related tools. We previously
reported Ir complex-peptide hybrids (IPHs) that possess H2N-KK(K)GG peptide sequences (K, lysine; G, glycine) at the 5′-
or 4′-position (the para or meta position with respect to the C–Ir bond) of the ligands, 2 and 3 or 4, respectively (Chart ).[50−59] These IPHs induce cell death in Jurkat cells (T-lymphocyte leukemia)
with EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values
of 1.5–16 μM and are less toxic against IMR90 cells (human
Caucasian fetal lung fibroblasts), which were used as a normal cell
line. In addition, the luminescence emission of IPHs is enhanced in
dead cells, suggesting that IPHs function as not only PCD inducers
in cancer cells but also detectors of dead cells.[50−59] The mechanistic study strongly suggested that 2c, 3b, 3c, and 4 induce paraptotic
cell death in Jurkat cells via a mitochondrial Ca2+ overload,
the decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), and cytoplasmic and mitochondrial vacuolization.[56−58] The findings also suggested the direct transfer of Ca2+ into mitochondria from the ER, an intracellular Ca2+-storing
organelle, during the paraptosis processes.
Chart 1
Chemical Structures
of Iridium(III) Complex-Peptide Hybrids That
Induce Paraptotic Cell Death
Herein, we report on the results of more detailed mechanistic studies
of paraptosis induced by IPH 4, which had the lowest
EC50 value among 2–4 against Jurkat
cells, focusing on the direct influx of Ca2+ from the ER
into mitochondria. The findings indicate that IPH 4 is
transferred to mitochondria,[56,57] where it induces membrane
fusion between mitochondria and the ER and mediates the direct influx
of Ca2+ into mitochondria from the ER, resulting in the
induction of paraptosis. It had been reported that CGP37157 is an
inhibitor of the sodium (Na+)/Ca2+ exchanger
(mNCX) on the outer membrane of mitochondria[60,61] and that it affects the mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration
(Chart ).[62,63] Therefore, we tested the cytotoxicity of CGP37157 against Jurkat
cells and found that this compound also induces paraptosis in Jurkat
cells via similar intracellular pathways to those induced by 4. The mechanism of paraptosis induced by 4 and
CGP37157 was compared with that induced by celastrol, which is a naturally
occurring triterpenoid isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii and has also been reported to be a paraptosis inducer (Chart ).[17,18,56−58] We conclude that the
mechanism for the paraptosis induced by both 4 and CGP37157
includes membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER, while in
the case of celastrol, such a function is negligible.
Chart 2
Chemical
Structures of CGP37157 and Celastrol
Results
and Discussion
Cytotoxicity of 4 against Jurkat Cells, as
Evaluated by MTT
Assays and Microscopic Observations
The cytotoxicity of 4 against Jurkat cells was evaluated by conducting MTT assays
[MTT = 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide] as a function of time and by microscopic observations
to determine the appropriate conditions for mechanistic studies of
paraptosis (Figure ). Jurkat cells were incubated with 4 (0–25 μM)
in 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum)/RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute)
1640 medium for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, and their EC50 values were determined to be 3.2,
2.0, 1.5, 1.2, and 1.7 μM, respectively (Figure A). In microscopic observations, Jurkat cells
were treated with 4 (5 μM) for 30 min, 1 h, 2 h,
and 3 h, and a strong green emission from 4 was observed
in the dead cells in 1–3 h (Figure Bg–o).
Figure 1
(A) MTT assays of Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (0–25
μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 1 h (●), 3 h (■), 6 h (▲), 12 h (○),
and 24 h (□). (B) Microscopic observations (20×) of Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (5 μM) at 37 °C under
5% CO2 for 0–3 h. (a, d, g, j, and m) Bright field
images of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, k, and n) Emission images of 4. (c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image
of panels d and e. (i) Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay
image of panels j and k. (o) Overlay image of panels m and n. Excitation
at 377 nm and emission at 520 nm were used. The scale bar (white)
is 10 μm. (C) Measurement of the intracellular Ir atom in Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (5 μM) for 30 min, 1 h, 2
h, and 3 h by ICP-MS.
(A) MTT assays of Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (0–25
μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 1 h (●), 3 h (■), 6 h (▲), 12 h (○),
and 24 h (□). (B) Microscopic observations (20×) of Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (5 μM) at 37 °C under
5% CO2 for 0–3 h. (a, d, g, j, and m) Bright field
images of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, k, and n) Emission images of 4. (c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image
of panels d and e. (i) Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay
image of panels j and k. (o) Overlay image of panels m and n. Excitation
at 377 nm and emission at 520 nm were used. The scale bar (white)
is 10 μm. (C) Measurement of the intracellular Ir atom in Jurkat
cells treated with 4 (5 μM) for 30 min, 1 h, 2
h, and 3 h by ICP-MS.The time-dependent intracellular
uptake of 4 into
Jurkat cells was measured by ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass
spectrometry). Jurkat cells were treated with 4 (5 μM)
for 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, washed three times with PBS, and lysed with nitric acid at 4 °C
overnight. The lysates were diluted with H2O, and the samples
were analyzed by ICP-MS. As presented in Figure C, the intracellular amount of 4 was increased to 0.64 ± 0.01 fmol/cell after incubation for
30 min and to 1.3 ± 0.1 to 1.5 ± 0.4 fmol/cell after 1–3
h, indicating that the emission enhancement of 4 in Jurkat
cells after 1 h is correlated with the intracellular uptake of 4. On the basis of these results, we decided to perform detailed
mechanistic studies of paraptosis after incubation with 4 at 5 μM for 1 h.
Observations of the Mitochondrion-ER Contact
Site in Cell Death
Induced by 4
The physiological connection between
mitochondria and the ER is well-known as mitochondria-associated membranes
(MAMs), which function to mediate intracellular signaling pathways
for inducing apoptosis and autophagy, Ca2+ transport, the
maintenance of mitochondrial morphology, and the regulation of ER-mitochondrion
tethering.[64−74] Therefore, we observed the relationship between mitochondria and
the ER in Jurkat cells by conducting co-staining experiments using
specific probes, MitoTracker Green (0.5 μM) for mitochondria
and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM) for the ER, by confocal microscopy.
As shown in Figure , the red emission from ER-Tracker Red was observed at a position
close to the green emission from MitoTracker Green and they are partially
overlapped (Figure f–i), indicating a close contact between mitochondria and
the ER.
Figure 2
Confocal microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with MitoTracker Green and ER-Tracker Red. (a) Bright field image
of Jurkat cells. (b and f) Emission images of MitoTracker Green. (c
and g) Emission images of ER-Tracker Red. (d) Overlay image of panels
b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (h) Overlay image
of panels f and g. (i) Enlarged image of the white square region in
panel h. The tethering site between mitochondria and the ER is indicated
by the white arrow. Excitation at 473 nm for MitoTracker Green and
559 nm for ER-Tracker Red were used. Emission from 485 to 545 nm for
MitoTracker Green and from 570 to 620 nm for ER-Tracker Red were used.
The exposure time: 20 μs/pixel. Scale bars are 10 μm (black)
and 5 μm (white).
Confocal microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with MitoTracker Green and ER-Tracker Red. (a) Bright field image
of Jurkat cells. (b and f) Emission images of MitoTracker Green. (c
and g) Emission images of ER-Tracker Red. (d) Overlay image of panels
b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (h) Overlay image
of panels f and g. (i) Enlarged image of the white square region in
panel h. The tethering site between mitochondria and the ER is indicated
by the white arrow. Excitation at 473 nm for MitoTracker Green and
559 nm for ER-Tracker Red were used. Emission from 485 to 545 nm for
MitoTracker Green and from 570 to 620 nm for ER-Tracker Red were used.
The exposure time: 20 μs/pixel. Scale bars are 10 μm (black)
and 5 μm (white).The transfer of Ca2+ from the ER to mitochondria across
the MAMs has been extensively studied.[75−84] It has been established that the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor
(IP3R) functions as a Ca2+ channel to release
Ca2+ to MAMs and the cytosol under the control of IP3 and Ca2+[75] and that
the VDAC (voltage-dependent anion channel) on the outer mitochondrial
membrane (OMM) and mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) complex
on the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) mediate the transfer of
Ca2+ from the ER and cytosol to mitochondria.[76] The mitochondrial permeability transition pore
(mPTP), which is a nonspecific channel located on the IMM, allows
ions such as Ca2+ and small molecules produced by mitochondrial
metabolism to pass through the mitochondrial matrix under the control
of mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and/or oxidative stress.[77,78]Some inhibitors of Ca2+ channels, including 2-aminophenyl
borate (2-APB, an inhibitor of the IP3R),[85] ruthenium red (RuRed, an inhibitor of the MCU complex),[86] and ER-000444793 (an inhibitor of the mPTP),[87] have been reported (the structures of these
inhibitors are shown in Chart S1). The
effect of these inhibitors on the cytotoxicity by 4 and
celastrol, which had been reported to function as a paraptosis inducer,[17,18,56−58] was examined
by microscopic observations and MTT assays (Figures S1 and S2). Jurkat cells were incubated in the presence of
these inhibitors for 1 h and then treated with 4 or celastrol
for 3 or 12 h, respectively. The morphological changes and strong
green emission from 4 were then observed in dead cells,
indicating the negligible inhibitory effects of 2-APB, ER-000444793,
and RuRed on the cell death induced by 4 and celastrol.
Induction of Paraptosis in Jurkat Cells by CGP37157
It was
reported that an inhibitor of a mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (mNCX), which functions to export Ca2+ from the mitochondrial matrix to the cytosol in exchange
with cytosolic Na+, affects the mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration.[60−63,88−90] We therefore
examined the cytotoxicity of CGP37157 (Chart ), a typical inhibitor of mNCX,[60,61,88−90] against Jurkat
cells by means of an MTT assay. Jurkat cells were treated with CGP37157
(0–1000 μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium for 1, 3, 6,
12, and 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, and the EC50 values were determined to be 74 μM for the 12 h incubation
and 55 μM for the 24 h incubation (Figure A).[91] For microscopic
observations, Jurkat cells were treated with CGP37157 (100 μM)
for 0–24 h, and cell death was observed after treatment with
CGP37157 for 12–24 h, by staining with propidium iodide (PI)
(Figure B). Note that
the cell viability does not decrease to 0% even at the high concentrations
of CGP37157 in Figure A, possibly due to its low solubility in water.
Figure 3
(A) MTT assays of Jurkat
cells treated with CGP37157 (0–1000
μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 1 h (●), 3 h (■), 6 h (▲), 12 h (○),
and 24 h (□). (B) Microscopic observations (40×) of Jurkat
cells treated with CGP37157 (100 μM) at 37 °C under 5%
CO2 for 0–24 h. (a, d, g, and j) Bright field images
of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, and k) Emission images of PI. (c) Overlay
image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image of panels d and e. (i)
Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay image of panels j and
k. Excitation at 540 nm and emission at 605 nm were used. The scale
bar (white) is 10 μm.
(A) MTT assays of Jurkat
cells treated with CGP37157 (0–1000
μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 1 h (●), 3 h (■), 6 h (▲), 12 h (○),
and 24 h (□). (B) Microscopic observations (40×) of Jurkat
cells treated with CGP37157 (100 μM) at 37 °C under 5%
CO2 for 0–24 h. (a, d, g, and j) Bright field images
of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, and k) Emission images of PI. (c) Overlay
image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image of panels d and e. (i)
Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay image of panels j and
k. Excitation at 540 nm and emission at 605 nm were used. The scale
bar (white) is 10 μm.The morphological changes in Jurkat cells induced by CGP37157 (Figure B) were similar to
those induced by 4 (Figure B) and confirmed in detail by TEM (transmission
electron microscopy). Jurkat cells were treated with CGP37157 (100
μM) for 12 h, prefixed with glutaraldehyde and postfixed with
osmium tetroxide (OsO4), and included in Poly 812 resin.
The resulting samples were sliced and then observed by TEM. As shown
in Figure , cytoplasmic
vacuolization, a characteristic phenomenon associated with paraptosis,
was induced by CGP37157 (Figure b), which was similar to that for 4 and
celastrol (panels c and d, respectively, of Figure ). Similar TEM images were reported with
respect to paraptosis-inducing natural compounds by some research
groups: (i) paraptosis in MDA-MB 435S cells,[17] HeLa cells,[18] and Jurkat cells (Figure d and in our previous
publications)[56−58] induced by celastrol, (ii) paraptosis in HeLa cells
induced by 8-p-hydroxybenzoyl tovarol,[23] and (iii) paraptosis in A2780 cells and SKOV-3
cells induced by morusin.[22] Therefore,
we believe that Jurkat cells undergo vacuolization in the paraptotic
processes induced by 4 and CGP37157, as well as celastrol.
Figure 4
Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of Jurkat cells
treated with (a) no compound, (b) CGP37157 (100 μM, 12 h), (c) 4 (5 μM, 3 h), and (d) celastrol (1 μM, 24 h)
at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Arrows in panels b–d
indicate vacuolization in the cytoplasm induced by CGP37157, 4, and celastrol, respectively. The white scale bar is 2 μm.
Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of Jurkat cells
treated with (a) no compound, (b) CGP37157 (100 μM, 12 h), (c) 4 (5 μM, 3 h), and (d) celastrol (1 μM, 24 h)
at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Arrows in panels b–d
indicate vacuolization in the cytoplasm induced by CGP37157, 4, and celastrol, respectively. The white scale bar is 2 μm.We then tested several inhibitors of PCD such as
Z-VAD-fmk (a broad
caspase inhibitor and an apoptosis inhibitor),[92] necrostatin-1 (Nec-1, a specific inhibitor of RIPK-1 and
a necroptosis inhibitor),[93] and 3-methyladenine
[3-MA, an inhibitor of type III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K)
and an autophagy inhibitor][94] (the chemical
structures of these inhibitors are shown in Chart S2) with respect to the cell death induced by CGP37157. It
was found that Z-VAD-fmk weakly inhibited the paraptosis induced by
CGP37157, while negligible inhibition by other PCD (necroptosis and
autophagy) inhibitors was observed (Figure S4), indicating very weak relationships between the cell death induced
by CGP37157 and both necroptosis and autophagy.Other characteristic
phenomena of paraptosis such as a mitochondrial
Ca2+ overload and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential
(ΔΨm) induced by CGP37157
were also examined. Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations were
measured by flow cytometry using red-emitting Ca2+ probes,
Rhod-2 (a mitochondrial Ca2+ probe) and Rhod-4 (a cytosolic
Ca2+ probe). Jurkat cells were stained with Rhod-2/AM or
Rhod-4/AM (at 5 μM) and then treated with CGP37157 (100 μM)
or 4 (5 μM) for a given period of incubation, immediately
after which the emission intensity of Rhod-2 and Rhod-4 was measured
by flow cytometry. As shown in panels A and C of Figure , the emission intensity of
Rhod-2 was enhanced 6 h after the treatment with CGP37157 and 10–30
min after the treatment with 4, indicating the induction
of a mitochondrial Ca2+ overload by CGP37157 and 4. On the contrary, a small emission enhancement of Rhod-4
was observed in the cytosol in the presence of CGP37157 and 4 (Figure B,D), suggesting that CGP37157 and 4 induce the direct
transfer of Ca2+ into mitochondria, possibly from the ER,
an intracellular Ca2+-storing organelle, as proposed in
our previous studies.[56−58]
Figure 5
Flow cytometric analysis of Jurkat cells treated with
(A and B)
CGP37157 (100 μM) and (C and D) 4 (5 μM).
Jurkat cells were stained with (A and C) Rhod-2/AM (a mitochondrial
Ca2+ probe) and (B and D) Rhod-4/AM (a cytosolic Ca2+ probe), and then treated with CGP37157 or 4 for a given incubation time. Cytometry profiles at different incubation
times for 4 and CGP37157 are shown in different colors:
control (black), 1 h (red), 3 h (blue), and 6 h (green) in panels
A and B and control (black), 10 min (red), 20 min (blue), and 30 min
(green) in panels C and D.
Flow cytometric analysis of Jurkat cells treated with
(A and B)
CGP37157 (100 μM) and (C and D) 4 (5 μM).
Jurkat cells were stained with (A and C) Rhod-2/AM (a mitochondrial
Ca2+ probe) and (B and D) Rhod-4/AM (a cytosolic Ca2+ probe), and then treated with CGP37157 or 4 for a given incubation time. Cytometry profiles at different incubation
times for 4 and CGP37157 are shown in different colors:
control (black), 1 h (red), 3 h (blue), and 6 h (green) in panels
A and B and control (black), 10 min (red), 20 min (blue), and 30 min
(green) in panels C and D.The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was measured by means of DilC1(5) (1,1′,3,3,3′,3′-hexamethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide), the emission intensity of which responds to ΔΨm.[95] Jurkat cells were treated
with CGP37157 (100 μM) for 1–12 h, stained with DilC1(5)
(5 μM) for 30 min, and observed via confocal microscopy. The
red emission of DilC1(5) was quenched after the treatment with CGP37157
for 6 h, as shown in Figure A, indicating the decrease in ΔΨm. The decrease in ΔΨm with 4 was also observed by confocal microscopy
(Figure B). Jurkat
cells were stained with DilC1(5) and then treated with 4 (5 μM) for 10–30 min, and the decrease in emission
intensity was observed 20 min after the treatment with 4. The change in the emission intensity profiles of DilC1(5) in Figure was analyzed as
shown in Figure ,
which clearly shows the loss of ΔΨm, triggered by CGP37157 (Figure a vs Figure b) and 4 (Figure c vs Figure d).
Figure 6
Confocal microscopic observations (100×) of Jurkat
cells treated
with (A) CGP37157 (100 μM) and (B) 4 (5 μM)
in 10% FBS/RPMI medium for 0–12 and 0–1 h, respectively,
at 37 °C under 5% CO2. The mitochondrial membrane
potential (ΔΨm) was detected
by staining with DilC1(5) (0.5 μM) for 30 min at 37 °C
under 5% CO2. (A) (a, d, g, j, and m) Bright field images
of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, k, and n) Emission images of DilC1(5).
(c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image of panels d
and e. (i) Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay image of panels
j and k. (o) Overlay image of panels m and n. (B) (a, d, h, l, and
p) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (e, i, m, and q) Emission
images of 4. (b, f, j, n, and r) Emission images of DilC1(5).
(c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (g) Overlay image of panels d–f.
(k) Overlay image of panels h–j. (o) Overlay image of panels
l–n. (s) Overlay image of panels p–r. Excitation at
405 nm and emission from 470 to 520 nm for 4 were used.
Excitation at 635 nm and emission from 650 to 750 nm for DilC1(5)
were used. The exposure time was 20 μs/pixel. The scale bar
(white) is 5 μm.
Figure 7
Emission intensity profiles
of DilC1(5) obtained from (a) Figure Ab, (b) Figure Ak, (c) Figure Bb, and (d) Figure Br. Different colors
indicate the intensity profiles of different cells: red for cell 1,
yellow for cell 2, and green for cell 3. The scale bar (white) is
10 μm.
Confocal microscopic observations (100×) of Jurkat
cells treated
with (A) CGP37157 (100 μM) and (B) 4 (5 μM)
in 10% FBS/RPMI medium for 0–12 and 0–1 h, respectively,
at 37 °C under 5% CO2. The mitochondrial membrane
potential (ΔΨm) was detected
by staining with DilC1(5) (0.5 μM) for 30 min at 37 °C
under 5% CO2. (A) (a, d, g, j, and m) Bright field images
of Jurkat cells. (b, e, h, k, and n) Emission images of DilC1(5).
(c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (f) Overlay image of panels d
and e. (i) Overlay image of panels g and h. (l) Overlay image of panels
j and k. (o) Overlay image of panels m and n. (B) (a, d, h, l, and
p) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (e, i, m, and q) Emission
images of 4. (b, f, j, n, and r) Emission images of DilC1(5).
(c) Overlay image of panels a and b. (g) Overlay image of panels d–f.
(k) Overlay image of panels h–j. (o) Overlay image of panels
l–n. (s) Overlay image of panels p–r. Excitation at
405 nm and emission from 470 to 520 nm for 4 were used.
Excitation at 635 nm and emission from 650 to 750 nm for DilC1(5)
were used. The exposure time was 20 μs/pixel. The scale bar
(white) is 5 μm.Emission intensity profiles
of DilC1(5) obtained from (a) Figure Ab, (b) Figure Ak, (c) Figure Bb, and (d) Figure Br. Different colors
indicate the intensity profiles of different cells: red for cell 1,
yellow for cell 2, and green for cell 3. The scale bar (white) is
10 μm.
Induction of Membrane Fusion
between Mitochondria and the ER
by 4 and CGP37157
We hypothesized that 4 and CGP37157 would induce membrane fusion between mitochondria
and the ER, thus allowing the direct transfer of Ca2+ from
the ER to mitochondria. To verify this hypothesis, mitochondria and
the ER were stained with both MitoTracker Green and ER-Tracker Red
in the presence of 4, CGP37157, and celastrol (Figure ). Jurkat cells were
stained with MitoTracker Green (0.5 μM) and ER-Tracker Red (1
μM) and then treated with 4 (5 μM) for 10–30
min (time-dependent microscopic images are presented in Figure S5). It should be noted that the emission
from 4 in Jurkat cells was very weak (excitation at 473
nm for MitoTracker Green, not at 377 nm for the excitation of 4) during a 1 h incubation (Figure S6), indicating that green emission in Figure is mainly from MitoTracker Green. With regard
to CGP37157 and celastrol, Jurkat cells were stained with MitoTracker
Green (0.5 μM) and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM) and then treated
with CGP37157 (100 μM) and celastrol (1 μM) for 1–24
h (Figure and Figure S5). The emission intensity profiles of
these intracellular probes indicated by white lines in panels d, i,
n, s, x, and ac of Figure are discussed in Figure and Figure S7. In panels
a–e, k–o, and u–y of Figure , mitochondria had fragmentated and spherical
morphologies in the absence of 4, CGP37157, and celastrol,
respectively, indicating the “fission state” of mitochondria.
The mitochondrial structure was changed from a fragmentated feature
to a tubule structure that was distributed around the nucleus after
the treatment with 4 (5 μM, 10 min) and CGP37157
(100 μM, 6 h) (Figure g,q), indicating the development of the “fusion state”
of mitochondria. In addition, the green emissions from MitoTracker
Green and the red emissions from ER-Tracker Red were extensively overlapped,
indicating membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER (Figure f–j,p–t).
On the contrary, a fragmentated mitochondrial structure was still
observed 12 h after the treatment with celastrol, and the overlap
of the emission from MitoTracker Green and ER-Tracker Red was negligible
(Figure z–ad).
Figure 8
Confocal
microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with MitoTracker Green (0.5 μM, 1 h) and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM,
1 h) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium and treated with 4 (5 μM,
10 min), CGP37157 (100 μM, 6 h), and celastrol (1 μM,
12 h) in the medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2. (a, f,
k, p, u, and z) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (b, g, l, q,
v, and aa) Emission images of MitoTracker Green. (c, h, m, r, w, and
ab) Emission images of ER-Tracker Red. (d) Overlay image of panels
b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (i) Overlay image
of panels g and h. (j) Overlay image of panels f–h. (n) Overlay
image of panels l and m. (o) Overlay image of panels k–m. (s)
Overlay image of panels q and r. (t) Overlay image of panels p–r.
(x) Overlay image of panels v and w. (y) Overlay image of panels u–w.
(ac) Overlay image of panels aa and ab. (ad) Overlay image of panels
z–ab. Excitation at 473 nm and emission from 485 to 545 nm
were used for MitoTracker Green. Excitation at 559 nm and emission
from 570 to 620 nm were used for ER-Tracker Red. The exposure time
was 20 μs/pixel. Scale bars are 10 μm (black) and 2 μm
(white). The emission intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green and
ER-Tracker Red from the point I to II in panels d, i, n, s, x, and
ac are shown in Figure .
Figure 9
Emission intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green
(green) and ER-Tracker
Red (red) from point I to II in panels d, i, n, s, x, and ac of Figure .
Confocal
microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with MitoTracker Green (0.5 μM, 1 h) and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM,
1 h) in 10% FBS/RPMI medium and treated with 4 (5 μM,
10 min), CGP37157 (100 μM, 6 h), and celastrol (1 μM,
12 h) in the medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2. (a, f,
k, p, u, and z) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (b, g, l, q,
v, and aa) Emission images of MitoTracker Green. (c, h, m, r, w, and
ab) Emission images of ER-Tracker Red. (d) Overlay image of panels
b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (i) Overlay image
of panels g and h. (j) Overlay image of panels f–h. (n) Overlay
image of panels l and m. (o) Overlay image of panels k–m. (s)
Overlay image of panels q and r. (t) Overlay image of panels p–r.
(x) Overlay image of panels v and w. (y) Overlay image of panels u–w.
(ac) Overlay image of panels aa and ab. (ad) Overlay image of panels
z–ab. Excitation at 473 nm and emission from 485 to 545 nm
were used for MitoTracker Green. Excitation at 559 nm and emission
from 570 to 620 nm were used for ER-Tracker Red. The exposure time
was 20 μs/pixel. Scale bars are 10 μm (black) and 2 μm
(white). The emission intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green and
ER-Tracker Red from the point I to II in panels d, i, n, s, x, and
ac are shown in Figure .Emission intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green
(green) and ER-Tracker
Red (red) from point I to II in panels d, i, n, s, x, and ac of Figure .The emission intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green and
ER-Tracker
Red in Figure are
compared, and a detailed analysis of the distribution of mitochondria
and the ER was conducted. In Figure and Figure S7, the emission
intensity profiles of MitoTracker Green and ER-Tracker Red from point
I to II in panels d, i, n, s, x, and ac of Figure and from point III to IV and from point
V to VI in Figure S7 are shown as green
and red curves, respectively, in each figure. It was observed that
the areas of mitochondria and the ER partially overlapped before addition
of 4 (Figure a and Figure S7a), CGP37157 (Figure c and Figure S7c), and celastrol (Figure e and Figure S7e). Interestingly, extensive overlap of MitoTracker Green
and ER-Tracker Red was observed after the treatment with 4 (Figure b and Figure S7b) and CGP37157 (Figure d and Figure S7d). In contrast, the distribution (and weak overlap) of mitochondria
and the ER was negligibly changed after the treatment with celastrol
(1 μM, 24 h), as shown in Figure f and Figure S7f. These
results strongly suggest that 4 and CGP37157 induce membrane
fusion between mitochondria and the ER and that celastrol does not.
Measurements of Intracellular Guanosine Triphosphatases (GTPases)
Related to Mitochondria-ER Membrane Fusion
We next investigated
mitochondrial fusion and fission cycle, which is mediated by intracellular
guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and controls various aspects of
mitochondrial function such as energy metabolism and Ca2+ homeostasis.[96−100] The fusion of the mitochondrial membrane includes the outer membrane
fusion, which is induced by mitofusin 1 (MFN1) and mitofusin 2 (MFN2),
and the inner membrane fusion induced by optic atrophy 1 (OPA1).[99,100] It was reported that MFN1 and MFN2 are localized on the OMM and
ER membrane and exist as homo- or heterodimers that function to induce
the membrane fusion of mitochondria.[101,102] It has also
been reported that these GTPases function to construct mitochondria-ER
tethering sites for Ca2+ transport.[103−106] The fission of the mitochondrial membrane is mediated by dynamin-related
protein 1 (DRP1), which is assembled on the OMM.[107−110]Considering the partial overlaps of MitoTracker Green and
ER-Tracker Red in Jurkat cells (Figure ) and the membrane fusion between mitochondria and
the ER in the presence of 4 and CGP37157 (Figures and 9), we carried out cross co-staining experiments with MitoTracker
Red and ER-Tracker Red with anti-MFN1 and anti-MFN2 antibodies. In
these experiments, Jurkat cells were first stained with MitoTracker
Red or ER-Tracker Red, fixed, permeabilized, and blocked, after which
the cells were treated with anti-MFN1 or -MFN2 primary antibodies,
and an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibody, and then observed
by confocal microscopy. Figure shows the results of these cross co-stainings: (i)
anti-MFN1 antibody and MitoTracker Red (Figure a–e), (ii) anti-MFN1 antibody and
ER-Tracker Red (Figure f–j), (iii) anti-MFN2 antibody and MitoTracker Red
(Figure k–o),
and (iv) anti-MFN2 antibody and ER-Tracker Red (Figure p–t). The green emission
from MFN1 and the red emission from MitoTracker Red and ER-Tracker
Red extensively overlapped, indicating the co-localization of MFN1
and mitochondria and the ER (Figure d,i). On the contrary, the emission from MFN2 in panels
l and q of Figure was weak, indicating low expression levels of MFN2 in Jurkat cells.
Figure 10
Confocal
microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with the anti-MFN1 antibody, the anti-MFN2 antibody (1:100 dilution),
MitoTracker Red (0.5 μM), and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM). (a,
f, k, and p) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (b and g) Emission
images of MFN1. (l and q) Emission images of MFN2. (c and m) Emission
images of mitochondria. (h and r) Emission images of the ER. (d) Overlay
image of panels b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (i)
Overlay image of panels g and h. (j) Overlay image of panels f–h.
(n) Overlay image of panels l and m. (o) Overlay image of panels k–m.
(s) Overlay image of panels q and r. (t) Overlay image of panels p–r.
Excitation at 559 nm and emission from 570 to 620 nm were used for
MitoTracker Red and ER-Tracker Red. Excitation at 635 nm and emission
from 650 to 750 nm were used for the secondary antibody. The exposure
time was 20 μs/pixel. The scale bar (white) is 5 μm.
Confocal
microscopic images (100×) of Jurkat cells stained
with the anti-MFN1 antibody, the anti-MFN2 antibody (1:100 dilution),
MitoTracker Red (0.5 μM), and ER-Tracker Red (1 μM). (a,
f, k, and p) Bright field images of Jurkat cells. (b and g) Emission
images of MFN1. (l and q) Emission images of MFN2. (c and m) Emission
images of mitochondria. (h and r) Emission images of the ER. (d) Overlay
image of panels b and c. (e) Overlay image of panels a–c. (i)
Overlay image of panels g and h. (j) Overlay image of panels f–h.
(n) Overlay image of panels l and m. (o) Overlay image of panels k–m.
(s) Overlay image of panels q and r. (t) Overlay image of panels p–r.
Excitation at 559 nm and emission from 570 to 620 nm were used for
MitoTracker Red and ER-Tracker Red. Excitation at 635 nm and emission
from 650 to 750 nm were used for the secondary antibody. The exposure
time was 20 μs/pixel. The scale bar (white) is 5 μm.The changes in expression levels of MFNs and DRP1
in Jurkat cells
by the treatment with 4, CGP37157, and celastrol were
evaluated by Western blot analyses, and the results are shown in Figure and Figure S8. Jurkat cells were incubated in the
presence of 4 (5 μM) for 0–3 h, celastrol
(1 μM) for 0–24 h, and CGP37157 (100 μM) for 0–24
h [for 30 min with 4 (0–20 μM), 24 h with
celastrol (0–10 μM), and 12 h with CGP37157 (0–100
μM)], and the target proteins were extracted and analyzed by
Western blot analyses. The expression levels of MFN1 and MFN2 were
weakly changed, and DRP1 was somewhat upregulated by 4 at 5 μM for 30 min to 1 h (Figure A) and CGP37157 at 100 μM for 1–6
h (Figure B), and
at its increasing concentration of 4 (after incubation
for 1 h) and CGP37157 (after incubation for 12 h) (panels A and B,
respectively, of Figure S8). In contrast,
celastrol decreased the expression levels of these proteins in a time-
and concentration-dependent manner (Figure C and Figure S8C).
Figure 11
Western blot analyses of mitofusin 1 (MFN1), mitofusin 2 (MFN2),
and dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) in Jurkat cells (A) treated with 4 (5 μM) for 0–3 h, (B) treated with CGP37157
(100 μM) for 0–24 h, and (C) treated with celastrol (1
μM) for 0–24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2.
The intensity of each band was compared on the basis of the condition
in the absence of 4, celastrol, and CGP37157, and the
values are shown at the ends of the bands.
Western blot analyses of mitofusin 1 (MFN1), mitofusin 2 (MFN2),
and dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) in Jurkat cells (A) treated with 4 (5 μM) for 0–3 h, (B) treated with CGP37157
(100 μM) for 0–24 h, and (C) treated with celastrol (1
μM) for 0–24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2.
The intensity of each band was compared on the basis of the condition
in the absence of 4, celastrol, and CGP37157, and the
values are shown at the ends of the bands.It has been reported that intracellular GTPases are related to
signal transduction, endocytosis, and protein biosynthesis for cell
differentiation and proliferation[111,112] and have
also been proposed to be target proteins for cancer therapy.[112] Therefore, we tested the effects of GTPase
inhibitors on the cell death induced by 4 and CGP37157
(the enhancement of expression level of DRP1 by 4 was
observed in Figure A). It was reported that dynasore inhibits the GTPase activities
of dynamin 1/2 and DRP1[113] and that Mdivi-1
(mitochondrial division inhibitor 1) selectively inhibits DRP1.[114] CID1067700 has been reported to be a common
inhibitor of GTPase, especially the Ras superfamily, which is important
in the cell progression through the cell cycle, regulation of cell
morphology, and cell invasion and migration[115,116] (the structures of these inhibitors are shown in Chart S3). Jurkat cells were incubated in the presence of
these inhibitors for 1 h, treated with 4 (5 μM,
1 or 3 h) or CGP37157 (100 μM, 12 h), and subjected to MTT assays.
As shown in Figure S9, however, these GTPase
inhibitors have a negligible effect on the cytotoxicity by 4 and CGP37157, indicating that the mechanism of 4- and
CGP37157-induced paraptosis is unlikely associated with dynamin-related
endocytosis, DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission, and the Ras signaling
pathway.The roles of MFNs in the cell death induced by 4 and
CGP37157 were examined by using small interfering RNA (siRNA) for
MFN1 and MFN2 to knock down (KD) these proteins. The siRNAs for MFN1
(siRNAMFN1) and MFN2 (siRNAMFN2) (5 or 10 nM)
were added to Jurkat cells, and then the cells were incubated for
48 or 72 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 to produce MFN1-
and/or MFN2-KD Jurkat cells. Western blot analyses suggested that
MFN1 and MFN2 were knocked down by the corresponding siRNA (10 nM,
48 h) by 45% and 80%, respectively (Figure S10A). The cytotoxicity of 4 and CGP37157 against MFN1-
and/or MFN2-KD Jurkat cells was evaluated by MTT assays. The results
presented in panels B and C of Figure S10 indicate that the knockdown of MFNs weakly inhibited the cell death
induced by 4 and CGP37157. The effect of a negative control
siRNA (NCsiRNA) on the expression levels of MFNs and the cell viability
of Jurkat cells was negligible, implying that MFNs are somewhat related
to the paraptosis induced by 4 and CGP37157. It should
be noted that the treatment with siRNA at 5 nM for 72 h was toxic
against Jurkat cells in the presence of 4 and CGP37157,
although the efficiency of knockdown of these proteins by siRNA could
be improved by increasing the incubation time, as shown in Figure S11.The cytotoxicity of celastrol
against MFN1- or MFN2-KD Jurkat cells
was also evaluated by MTT assays. As shown in Figure S12, a negligible effect of knockdown of MFNs on the
cell death induced by celastrol was observed.
Plausible Mechanism for
the Paraptosis That Is Induced by 4 and CGP37157
On the basis of the aforementioned
results, proposed plausible mechanisms for the development of paraptosis
in Jurkat cells induced by IPH 4, CGP37157, and celastrol
are shown in Chart . In Chart , black,
red, and blue arrows show the plausible mechanistic pathways of paraptosis
induced by 4, CGP37157, and celastrol, respectively.
Chart 3
Proposed Schemes for Two Types of Paraptotic Cell Death, Paraptosis
I Induced by Celastrol and Paraptosis II Induced by IPH 4 and CGP37157
(1) The Ca2+ channels on the membrane of the ER and
mitochondria such as IP3R, MCU, and mPTP are not major
factors in the transport of Ca2+ from the ER to mitochondria
that is induced by 4, as confirmed by MTT assays using
specific channel inhibitors (Figure S1).(2) Close contact between mitochondria and the ER via mitochondria-associated
membranes (MAMs) was observed in Jurkat cells before the addition
of IPHs (Figures , 8, and 9). We suggested that 4 induces (i) membrane fusion (or tethering) between mitochondria
and the ER via MFNs and related molecules (paraptosis induced by 4 was partially suppressed by the knockdown of MFNs), (ii)
direct transport of Ca2+ from the ER to mitochondria, and
(iii) a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), resulting in paraptosis in
Jurkat cells (Figures –9 and Figures S5, S7, and S10). We assume that the induction of the membrane
fusion of mitochondria and the ER by artificial compounds is one of
the most important findings in this work.(3) We found that
CGP37157, a mNCX inhibitor, induces paraptosis
in Jurkat cells after treatment for 12–24 h (EC50 value of 55 μM for 24 h), as confirmed by microscopic and
TEM observations (Figures and 4). We revealed that CGP37157
also induces membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER for direct
Ca2+ transport and a decrease in ΔΨm (Figures –9 and Figures S5 and S7). This scenario is supported by the results showing
that the knockdown of MFNs partially restored the cell viability of
Jurkat cells (Figure S10).(4) We
observed that 4 and CGP37157 weakly change
the expression levels of dynamine-related protein 1 (DRP1), a mitochondrial
membrane fission protein (Figure and Figure S8). A negligible
effect of DRP1 inhibitors on paraptosis was observed, indicating that
DRP1 is scarcely related to 4- and CGP37157-induced paraptosis
(Figures S9).(5) In the presence
of celastrol, which had been reported to be
a paraptosis inducer,[17,18,56−58] the expression levels of MFNs are suppressed and
membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER was negligible (Figures , 9, and 11 and Figures S5, S7, and S8). We previously reported that celastrol increases
Ca2+ concentrations in the cytoplasm rather than in mitochondria
for the induction of paraptosis and activates the mitogen-activated
protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, resulting in autophagy.[56−58] These data imply that different signaling pathways are involved
in paraptosis induced by different drugs.(6) In our previous
study, we reported that IPHs such as 2–4 are localized
on mitochondria during the early
stages of the cell death process.[52,56−58] These data, considering that CGP37157 is a mNCX inhibitor,[60,61,88−90] strongly suggest
that the main target organelle of these compounds is the mitochondria.
On the contrary, several target proteins of celastrol have been identified,[117−120] such as a heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90)-cell division cycle 37 (Cdc37)
complex that controls protein folding[118] and IκB kinase (IKK) that regulates gene transcription through
NF-κB activation.[119] In addition,
it has been proposed that a quinone methide moiety of celastrol functions
as an acceptor of Michael addition (1,4-addition) reactions with the
thiol residue of the target proteins.[8,119,120] Although the relationship between these target proteins
of celastrol and paraptotic mechanisms in Jurkat cells remains unclear,
it is very likely that these differences result in the different mechanisms
in paraptosis induced by 4 and CGP37157 and in paraptosis
induced by celastrol.These findings allow us to suggest that
paraptosis can be classified
into at least two types. The first is a known type of paraptosis (termed
paraptosis I herein) that is induced by celastrol and negligibly involves
membrane fusion between mitochondria and the ER. The second type of
paraptosis (termed paraptosis II herein) induced by IPHs such as 2–4 and CGP37157 is associated with membrane fusion
between mitochondria and the ER.
Conclusions
In
summary, we report on the results of a series of more detailed
mechanistic studies of paraptotic cell death that is induced by Ir
complex-peptide hybrids (IPHs) that possess basic (cationic) peptides,
focusing on the direct transport of Ca2+ from the ER to
mitochondria. The findings suggest that IPH 4 induces
membrane fusion (or tethering) between the ER and mitochondria. We
also found that CGP37157, an inhibitor of a mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (mNCX), induces paraptosis in Jurkat cells
via intracellular pathways similar to those induced by 4. Importantly, the membrane fusion of the ER and mitochondria by
these two compounds would lead to the direct transport of Ca2+ from the ER to mitochondria. In contrast, celastrol, which had been
known as a naturally occurring paraptosis inducer, negligibly has
such a function. To the best our knowledge, this is the first example
to show the structural fusion of mitochondria with the ER by artificial
molecules and the direct transfer of Ca2+ from the ER to
mitochondria to stimulate intracellular pathways for the induction
of programmed cell death.The results obtained in this work
indicate that paraptosis should
be classified into two types. The first is a known type of paraptosis
induced by celastrol, which is termed paraptosis I herein, which involves
Ca2+ overload in the cytoplasm and hardly involves membrane
fusion between mitochondria and the ER. The second type is a new class
of paraptosis induced by 4 and CGP37157 and is termed
paraptosis II in this work, which involves mitochondria–ER
membrane fusion and subsequent mitochondrial Ca2+ overload.
Because the structures of IPHs and CGP37157 are so different, we do
not exclude the possibility that these two molecules activate different
target molecules to stimulate intracellular signaling pathways involved
in paraptosis II.The findings reported in this study provide
useful information
not only for mechanistic studies of PCD such as paraptosis but also
for the design and synthesis of PCD inducers in cancer cells in the
future. The design and synthesis of IPHs and other types of peptide
hybrids that possess higher anticancer activity and more detailed
mechanistic studies are now underway.
Experimental Section
General
Information
All reagents and solvents were
of the highest commercial quality and used without further purification,
unless otherwise noted. All aqueous solutions were prepared using
deionized water. MitoTracker Green, MitoTracker Red, ER-Tracker Red,
and Opti-modified Eagle’s medium (Opti-MEM) were purchased
from Invitrogen. 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Rhod-2/AM, and Rhod-4/AM were
purchased from Dojindo. Z-VAD-fmk was purchased from the Peptide Institute,
and necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was purchased from Enzo Life Science. Propidium
iodide (PI), 3-methyladenine (3-MA), potassium chloride, and bovine
serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Fujifilm Wako Chemicals. CGP37157
and DilC1(5) (1,1′,3,3,3′,3′-hexamethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Roswell Park Memorial Institute
(RPMI) 1640 medium, minimum essential medium (MEM), Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS),
Tween 20, a 40% (w/v) acrylamide/bisacrylamide solution, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
(Tris), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), ammonium persulfate (APS), glycine,
sodium chloride, and RuRed were purchased from Nacalai tesque. Dynasore
and Mdivi-1 were purchased from TCI (Tokyo Chemical Industry). Celastrol
and 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborate (2-APB) were purchased from Cayman
Chemical Co. ER-000444793 was purchased from MedChemExpress. CID1067700
was purchased from Calbiochem. The Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit was
purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Fetal bovine serum (FBS)
was purchased from Capricorn products Inc. The anti-MFN1 antibody,
anti-MFN2 antibodies, anti-DRP1 antibody, and siRNA for MFN1 (siRNAMFN1) and MFN2 (siRNAMFN2) were purchased from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology. The anti-GAPDH, anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked, and
anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling.
The anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 647-linked antibody was purchased from
Abcam. INTERFERin was purchased from Pulyplus. Stock solutions of 4 in PBS, CGP37157, and celastrol in DMSO were stored at 0
°C. The results of MTT and BCA assays were confirmed by using
a multilabel counter, Wallac 1420 ARVO (PerkinElmer). Fluorescent
imaging studies were conducted using fluorescent microscopes (Biorevo,
BZ-9000, Keyence, and Fluoview, FV-1000, Olympus). The intracellular
uptake of 4 was measured by ICP-MS (NexION300S, PerkinElmer).
The results of Western blot analyses were analyzed on the ChemiDoc
MP system (Bio-Rad). Flow cytometric analyses were performed by using
a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur cytometer, Becton), and data were analyzed
on FlowJo software (FlowJo, LCC). TEM images were obtained by using
the instrument (H-7650, Hitachi).
Cell Cultures
Jurkat, HeLa S3, and A549 cells were
incubated in RPMI 1640 medium, MEM, and DMEM, respectively, supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin
at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
MTT
Assays
HeLa S3 and A549 cells (2.0 × 104 cells/well)
were seeded on a 96-well plate (BD Falcon) in
cell culture medium and incubated overnight at 37 °C under 5%
CO2. Jurkat (2.0 × 104 cells/well), HeLa
S3, and A549 cells were treated with 4 (0–25 μM)
and CGP37157 (0–100 μM) for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h at
37 °C under 5% CO2, after which a MTT solution in
PBS (0.5%, 10 μL) was added to each well. After incubation for
4 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, a 10% SDS in 0.01 N HCl
aqueous solution (100 μL) was used as a formazan lysis solution
and the resulting solutions were incubated overnight under the same
conditions, followed by the measurement of the absorbance at 570 nm
using a multilabel counter, Wallac 1420 ARVO (PerkinElmer).
MTT
Assays in the Presence of Inhibitors
In a 96-well
plate, Jurkat cells (2.0 × 104 cells/well) were incubated
in the presence of 2-APB (50 μM), ER-000444793 (10 μM),
RuRed (10 μM), Dynasore (10–30 μM), Mdivi-1 (10–30
μM), CID1067700 (1–10 μM), Z-VAD-fmk (30 μM),
Nec-1 (30 μM), and 3-MA (5 mM) in 10% FBS RPMI medium (50 μL)
for 1 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, and then solutions
of 4 (10 μM) and celastrol (2 μM) in 10%
FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (50 μL) were added. The final concentrations
of 4 and celastrol were 5 and 1 μM, respectively.
The resulting solutions were incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 1 and 3 h (4) or 24 h (celastrol), after
which a 0.5% MTT solution in PBS (10 μL) was added to each well.
After incubation for 4 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, a
10% SDS in 0.01 N HCl aqueous solution (100 μL) was used as
a formazan lysis solution and the resulting solutions were incubated
overnight under the same conditions, followed by the measurement of
the absorbance at 570 nm using a multilabel counter, Wallac 1420 ARVO
(PerkinElmer).
Microscopic Observations of Jurkat Cells
Treated with 4, CGP37157, and Celastrol
In a
1.5 mL Eppendorf
tube, Jurkat cells (2.0 × 105 cells) were treated
with 4 (5 μM), CGP37157 (100 μM), and celastrol
(1 μM) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL) at 37 °C
under 5% CO2 for different periods of incubation time,
after which the cells were collected by centrifugation and washed
with PBS. For CGP37157 and celastrol, the cells were treated with
propidium iodide (100 μM, 100 μL) in PBS for 30 min at
37 °C under 5% CO2, washed with PBS, and observed
by fluorescence microscopy (Biorevo, BZ-9000, Keyence) using a Greiner
CELLview dish (35 mm × 10 mm). Emission images were obtained
by using an FF01 filter (excitation at 377 nm and emission at 520
nm) for 4 and a TRITC filter (excitation at 540 nm and
emission at 605 nm) for CGP37157 and celastrol.
Confocal
Microscopic Observations of Jurkat Cells Treated with 4, CGP37157, and Celastrol and Stained with MitoTracker Green
and ER-Tracker Red
In a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat cells
(2.0 × 105 cells) were stained with MitoTracker Green
(0.5 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 and then
ER-Tracker Red (1 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL). After being washed
with PBS, the cells were treated with 4 (5 μM)
in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL) for 0–30 min at
37 °C under 5% CO2. For CGP37157 and celastrol, Jurkat
cells were treated with CGP37157 (100 μM) or celastrol (1 μM)
in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL) for 0–24 h, after
which the cells were stained with MitoTracker Green (0.5 μM)
for 1 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 and then ER-Tracker
Red (1 μM) for 1 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in
PBS. The cells were washed with PBS and observed by confocal microscopy
(Fluoview, FV-1000, Olympus) using a Greiner CELLview dish (35 mm
× 10 mm). Excitation at 473 nm and emission from 485 to 545 nm
were used for MitoTracker Green. Excitation at 559 nm and emission
from 570 to 620 nm were used for ER-Tracker Red. The exposure time
was 20 μs/pixel.
Measurement of Intracellular Uptake of 4 in Jurkat
Cells Evaluated by ICP-MS
In a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat
cells (1.0 × 106 cells) were treated with 4 (5 μM) for 0–3 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2 (n = 3). After the cells had been washed three
times with PBS, HNO3 (60%, 0.5 mL) was added to the cells
and the resulting solutions were incubated overnight at 4 °C.
After centrifugation (15000 rpm, 4 °C, 10 min), the supernatant
was transferred to a 15 mL tube, diluted with H2O (4.5
mL), and filtered. The number of iridium atoms was measured by ICP-MS
(NexION300S, PerkinElmer).
Western Blot Analyses
In a 1.5 mL
Eppendorf tube, Jurkat
cells (1.0 × 106 cells) were incubated in the presence
of 4 (5 μM for 0–3 h or 0–20 μM
for 30 min), CGP37157 (100 μM for 0–24 h or 0–100
μM for 12 h), and celastrol (0–10 μM for 24 h or
1 μM for 0–24 h) at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After the cells had been washed twice with PBS, the proteins were
extracted by using RIPA buffer (Nacalai Tesque) and quantified using
a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). Proteins (7.5
μg/well) for MFNs and DRP1 and proteins (5.0 μg/well)
for GAPDH were used for sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) (7.5% for MFNs and DRP1 and
10% for GAPDH) (Bio-Rad). After SDS–PAGE, the proteins were
transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Merck Millipore)
by using a semi dry blotter (Bio-Rad). The membrane was blocked with
Blocking One solution (Nacalai Tesque) for 30 min at room temperature.
After being blocked, the membrane was washed three times with 1×
TBST and treated with primary antibodies overnight (at a dilution
of 1/1000 for MFNs and DRP1 or 1/2000 for GAPDH) in a signal enhancer
HIKARI-solution A (Nacalai Tesque). The membrane was washed three
times with 1× TBST and treated with the anti-mouse or anti-rabbit
IgG HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (at a dilution of 1/4000 for
MFNs and DRP1 or 1/10000 for GAPDH) in 1× TBST for 60 min at
room temperature. The protein signal was spotted with a Chemi-Lumi
One Ultra solution (Nacalai Tesque) using the ChemiDoc MP system (Bio-Rad).
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analyses of Jurkat Cells
Treated with 4, CGP37157, and Celastrol
In a
1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat cells (3.0 × 106 cells)
were incubated with 4 (5 μM for 3 h), CGP37157
(100 μM for 12 h), and celastrol (1 μM for 24 h) in 10%
FBS/RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After
centrifugation (2000 rpm, 3 min, 4 °C), the cells were washed
twice with PBS, prefixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5%) at 4 °C for
40 min, and then washed twice with PBS. Osmium tetroxide (1%) was
used for postfixation, and the solution was incubated at 4 °C
for 30 min. The cells were washed with PBS, included in an agarose
gel, and dehydrated by using 50–100% and anhydrous EtOH. The
cells were embedded into Poly 812 resin (Nisshin EM Co. Ltd.) at 60
°C for 3 days. The resin was sliced with a glass knife (150 nm
thickness) on an ultramicrotome (EM UC6, Leica), and the samples were
stained with EM stainer (Nisshin EM Co. Ltd.) and observed on TEM
instrument (H-7650, Hitachi) with electron irradiation at 100 kV.
Measurement of Intracellular Ca2+ Concentrations
of Jurkat Cells Treated with 4 and CGP37157 by Flow Cytometry
In a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat cells (2.0 × 105 cells) were incubated in the presence of Rhod-2/AM (5 μM,
100 μL) or Rhod-4/AM (5 μM, 100 μL) in 10% FBS/RPMI
1640 medium for 30 min at 37 °C under 5% CO2 and then
treated with 4 (5 μM, 0–30 min) or CGP37157
(100 μM, 0–6 h) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (100 μL)
for 30 min at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Immediately after
the treatment, 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium (300 μL) was added to
the cells and the samples were analyzed on a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur
cytometer, Becton). The data were analyzed on FlowJo software (FlowJo,
LCC).
Measurement of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (ΔΨm) of Jurkat Cells Treated with 4 and CGP37157
In a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat
cells (2.0 × 105 cells) were stained with DilC1(5)
(500 nM, 100 μL) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium for 30 min at 37
°C under 5% CO2, followed by the treatment with 4 (5 μM, 100 μL) in the medium for 0–60
min at 37 °C under 5% CO2. For CGP37157, Jurkat cells
(2.0 × 105 cells) were treated with CGP37157 (100
μM, 100 μL) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium for 0–12
h at 37 °C under 5% CO2, followed by the treatment
with DilC1(5) (500 nM, 100 μL) in PBS. The cells were washed
with PBS and observed by confocal microscopy (Fluoview, FV-1000, Olympus)
using a Greiner CELLview dish (35 mm × 10 mm). Excitation at
405 nm and emission from 470 to 520 nm were used for 4. Excitation at 635 nm and emission from 650 to 750 nm were used
for DilC1(5). The exposure time was 20 μs/pixel.
Immunostaining
of Mitofusins in Jurkat Cells Stained with MitoTracker
Red and ER-Tracker Red
In a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, Jurkat
cells (1.0 × 106 cells) were stained with MitoTracker
Red (0.5 μM, 1 h) or ER-Tracker Red (1 μM, 1 h) in 10%
FBS/RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After
being washed with PBS, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
in PBS (500 μL) for 10 min at 37 °C under 5% CO2, washed with PBS, and permeabilized by using 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS
(200 μL) for 15 min at room temperature. After the cells had
been blocked with 2% BSA in 1× PBST (200 μL) for 1 h at
room temperature and washed with 1× PBST, the cells were treated
an anti-MFN1 or an anti-MFN2 antibody (1:100 dilution in 1× PBST)
at 4 °C overnight. The cells were washed with 1× PBST and
treated with anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 647) (1:100 dilution
in 1× PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed with
1× PBST, the cells were observed by confocal microscopy (Fluoview,
FV-1000, Olympus) using a Greiner CELLview dish (35 mm × 10 mm).
Excitation at 559 nm and emission from 570 to 620 nm were used for
MitoTracker Red and ER-Tracker Red. Excitation at 635 nm and emission
from 650 to 750 nm were used for the detection of MFN1 and MFN2. The
exposure time was 20 μs/pixel.
Knockdown (KD) of Mitofusins
in Jurkat Cells by Small Interfering
RNA (siRNA)
To a solution of transfection reagent (INTERFERin,
5 μL) in OPTI-MEM (0.3 mL) in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube was added
siRNA (10 μM, 1 or 2 μL) in H2O, and the resulting
solution was allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature. The
resulting solution was then added to Jurkat cells (2.0 × 105 cells/mL, 1.5 mL) in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 medium that had been
seeded on a 12-well plate and incubated overnight at 37 °C under
5% CO2 (the final concentration of siRNA was 5 or 10 nM),
and the resulting solution was incubated for 48 or 72 h at 37 °C
under 5% CO2. The cells were collected by centrifugation
(2000 rpm, 3 min, 4 °C), and the expression levels of MFNs were
evaluated by Western blot analysis as described above. The cytotoxicity
of 4 (3 or 5 μM), CGP37157 (50 or 100 μM),
and celastrol (1 μM) against MFNs-KD Jurkat cells was evaluated
by MTT assays as described above.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses of MTT assays
were performed by using Graphpad Prism 9 software with the Student’s t test. Data are presented as means ± the standard
deviation of three independent experiments, and a P of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant
difference.
Authors: Ann Cassidy-Stone; Jerry E Chipuk; Elena Ingerman; Cheng Song; Choong Yoo; Tomomi Kuwana; Mark J Kurth; Jared T Shaw; Jenny E Hinshaw; Douglas R Green; Jodi Nunnari Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Melchior Cini; Huw Williams; Mike W Fay; Mark S Searle; Simon Woodward; Tracey D Bradshaw Journal: Metallomics Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.526