Literature DB >> 29223864

Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.

Rebecca M Foerster1, Werner X Schneider2.   

Abstract

Many everyday tasks involve successive visual-search episodes with changing targets. Converging evidence suggests that these targets are retained in visual working memory (VWM) and bias attention from there. It is unknown whether all or only search-relevant features of a VWM template bias attention during search. Bias signals might be configured exclusively to task-relevant features so that only search-relevant features bias attention. Alternatively, VWM might maintain objects in the form of bound features. Then, all template features will bias attention in an object-based manner, so that biasing effects are ranked by feature relevance. Here, we investigated whether search-irrelevant VWM template features bias attention. Participants had to saccade to a target opposite a distractor. A colored cue depicted the target prior to each search trial. The target was predefined only by its identity, while its color was irrelevant. When target and cue matched not only in identity (search-relevant) but also in color (search-irrelevant), saccades went more often and faster directly to the target than without any color match (Experiment 1). When introducing a cue-distractor color match (Experiment 2), direct target saccades were most likely when target and cue matched in the search-irrelevant color and least likely in case of a cue-distractor color match. When cue and target were never colored the same (Experiment 3), cue-colored distractors still captured the eyes more often than different-colored distractors despite color being search-irrelevant. As participants were informed about the misleading color, the result argues against a strategical and voluntary usage of color. Instead, search-irrelevant features biased attention obligatorily arguing for involuntary top-down control by object-based VWM templates.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Involuntary top-down control; Object-based attention; Oculomotor capture; Visual search template; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223864     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.

Authors:  Yifan Wu; Yi Pan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.

Authors:  Ashley M Phelps; Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.984

4.  Forty years after feature integration theory: An introduction to the special issue in honor of the contributions of Anne Treisman.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Madeleine Y Stepper; Andrew Hollingworth; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-27

8.  Object-based grouping benefits without integrated feature representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Siyi Chen; Anna Kocsis; Heinrich R Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Markus Conci
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object.

Authors:  Edyta Sasin; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

Authors:  Stanislas Huynh Cong; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.