Leah C Spangler1, Mina Yu1, Philip D Jeffrey2, Gregory D Scholes1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States. 2. Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States.
Abstract
Cryptophyte algae are well-known for their ability to survive under low light conditions using their auxiliary light harvesting antennas, phycobiliproteins. Mainly acting to absorb light where chlorophyll cannot (500-650 nm), phycobiliproteins also play an instrumental role in helping cryptophyte algae respond to changes in light intensity through the process of photoacclimation. Until recently, photoacclimation in cryptophyte algae was only observed as a change in the cellular concentration of phycobiliproteins; however, an additional photoacclimation response was recently discovered that causes shifts in the phycobiliprotein absorbance peaks following growth under red, blue, or green light. Here, we reproduce this newly identified photoacclimation response in two species of cryptophyte algae and elucidate the origin of the response on the protein level. We compare isolated native and photoacclimated phycobiliproteins for these two species using spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, and we report the X-ray structures of each phycobiliprotein and the corresponding photoacclimated complex. We find that neither the protein sequences nor the protein structures are modified by photoacclimation. We conclude that cryptophyte algae change one chromophore in the phycobiliprotein β subunits in response to changes in the spectral quality of light. Ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy shows that the energy transfer is weakly affected by photoacclimation.
Cryptophyte algae are well-known for their ability to survive under low light conditions using their auxiliary light harvesting antennas, phycobiliproteins. Mainly acting to absorb light where chlorophyll cannot (500-650 nm), phycobiliproteins also play an instrumental role in helping cryptophyte algae respond to changes in light intensity through the process of photoacclimation. Until recently, photoacclimation in cryptophyte algae was only observed as a change in the cellular concentration of phycobiliproteins; however, an additional photoacclimation response was recently discovered that causes shifts in the phycobiliprotein absorbance peaks following growth under red, blue, or green light. Here, we reproduce this newly identified photoacclimation response in two species of cryptophyte algae and elucidate the origin of the response on the protein level. We compare isolated native and photoacclimated phycobiliproteins for these two species using spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, and we report the X-ray structures of each phycobiliprotein and the corresponding photoacclimated complex. We find that neither the protein sequences nor the protein structures are modified by photoacclimation. We conclude that cryptophyte algae change one chromophore in the phycobiliprotein β subunits in response to changes in the spectral quality of light. Ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy shows that the energy transfer is weakly affected by photoacclimation.
Photoacclimation
is a process performed by photosynthetic organisms
that is used to regulate their internal energy production following
a change in light intensity.[1] For example,
a decrease in light intensity will trigger a photosynthetic organism
to increase its intracellular chlorophyll concentration, allowing
each cell to harvest more light in order to compensate for the loss
of incident light. In addition to compensating for overall changes
in light intensity, photoacclimation can also be used to offset the
loss of light in a specific wavelength region. This unique type of
photoacclimation, known as chromatic acclimation, only occurs in photosynthetic
algae which contain auxiliary light harvesting antennae known as phycobilisomes—large
protein superstructures capable of harvesting light in a region where
chlorophyll cannot: 500–650 nm.[2] Phycobilisomes are primarily found in algae which live deep in the
ocean, such as cyanobacteria and red algae, and thus require the ability
to harvest light across the entire solar spectrum for survival.[3,4] Because of the highly crowded and dynamic nature of their aqueous
environments, these algae species utilize chromatic acclimation to
quickly compensate for changes to the available wavelength regions
of light.[5] This photoacclimation strategy
occurs quickly, often in as little as 7 days, and allows cyanobacteria
to quickly acclimate to fluctuations in visible and far-red light.[6,7] Chromatic acclimation has recently been shown to occur in ∼40%
of cyanobacteria across the globe and is found in both freshwater
and ocean environments.[8,9]The most commonly observed
mechanism for chromatic acclimation
used by cyanobacteria and red algae is the modification of the phycobilisome.[2] Each phycobilisome is made up of two or more
types of phycobiliproteins, each with a unique absorbance region resulting
from the eight tetrapyrrole bilin chromophores housed within the apoprotein
structure. Each type of phycobiliprotein contributes to the overall
absorbance spectra of the phycobilisome and can therefore be used
to control the resultant absorbance spectra used for light harvesting.
To date, researchers have identified six types of chromatic acclimation
in cyanobacteria; four types are used to acclimate to changes of light
in the visible region.[10] Types 1 and 2
involve phycobilisomes with only one type of phycobiliprotein. Acclimation
is achieved by addition, removal, or detachment of the phycobiliproteins
from the rodlike structure of the phycobilisome. Type 3 uses substitution
of the individual protein building blocks of their phycobilisome superstructure.[11] A recently discovered strategy, type 4 chromatic
acclimation, modifies the individual chromophores of the phycobiliproteins,
which remain attached to the phycobilisome.[12]Because the mechanism for chromatic acclimation requires the
phycobilisome
superstructure, this specialized photoacclimation response was previously
believed to occur only in cyanobacteria and red algae.[10] However, a similar photoacclimation response
was recently observed in a species which descended from red algae
but completely lacks a phycobilisome: cryptophyte algae.[13] While cryptophytes no longer contain a phycobilisome,
each species has retained the ability to express phycobiliproteins,
which are instead packed into the thylakoid lumen of the chloroplasts
without any sort of structural arrangement.[14] Additionally, each cryptophyte species is only capable of expressing
one type of phycobiliprotein, meaning that cryptophytes should no
longer be able to photoacclimate to changes in spectral quality.[15] However, the cryptophyte algae Hemiselmis
cryptochromatica was recently discovered to have shifted
phycobiliprotein absorption peaks following growth under red, green,
or blue light.[13] This change in phycobiliprotein
absorbance is surprising—how are cryptophytes, who lack a structured
phycobilisome and variation in phycobiliproteins, able to produce
absorption peak shifts in their phycobiliproteins?To address
this question, we consider the origin of the phycobiliprotein
absorbance peak. In cryptophytes, there are eight unique types of
phycobiliproteins which range from 545 to 645 nm in peak absorbance,
and these spectral differences result not only from the chemistry
of the specific chromophores contained in each phycobiliprotein but
also from the interactions between the chromophores and their protein
surroundings.[16,17] The strong dependence of the
absorbance spectra on each protein’s chromophore composition
and apoprotein structure suggests two potential methods for cryptophyte
photoacclimation: a modification to the chromophore identities within
the phycobiliprotein or a subtle alteration to the apoprotein structure.
The former hypothesis is supported by the existence of the previously
discussed type 4 chromatic acclimation, recently discovered in the
cyanobacteria strain Synechococcus, which does not
swap out entire phycobiliproteins in its phycobilisome but instead
modifies the individual bilin chromophores of each phycobiliprotein,
preserving the original protein structure.[18−20] This new acclimation
mechanism, also known as differential chromophorylation, may be retained
in cryptophyte algae, preserving their ability to photoacclimate following
changes in spectral quality.In this work, we reproduced this
newly discovered photoacclimation
response in two other species of cryptophyte algae, Proteomonas
sulcata and Hemiselmis pacifica, and used
both spectroscopic and biophysical measurements to uncover the origin
of the phycobiliprotein absorbance shifts on a biological level. We
found that both of the cryptophyte species shifted their absorption
spectra following growth under restrictive light conditions. Importantly,
we confirmed that the absorbance shifts originated from the individual
phycobiliproteins and not the cellular environment by isolating the
phycobiliproteins from the cell. An analysis of the phycobiliprotein
structure using mass spectroscopy, CD measurements, and X-ray crystallography
confirmed that there was no change in amino acid sequence or structural
perturbation which could cause an absorbance peak shift. Instead,
we found that cryptophytes appear to have retained the ability to
photoacclimate through differential chromophorylation of their constituent
bilin chromophores. We found that a change in the bilin chromophore
did not affect the ultrafast dynamics of energy transfer in the photoacclimated
phycobiliproteins, indicating that the protein structure continues
to play a dominant role in energy transfer.
Results
In this
work, we chose to study the photoacclimation response of
two species of cryptophyte algae, which differ in genus and phycobiliprotein
production. The first species, Proteomonas sulcata, contains phycoerythrin 545 (PE545), which harvests light in the
520–580 nm region with the major peak at 545 nm (Figure a). The second species, Hemiselmis pacifica, contains phycocyanin 577 (PC577) which
absorbs light in the 550–620 nm region with a major peak at
577 nm (Figure b).
The light absorbance of each phycobiliprotein can be identified in
the absorbance spectra of the whole cell algae (Figure c,d) as peaks that correspond to the isolated
absorbance of the individual phycobiliproteins. In addition to peaks
from the corresponding phycobiliproteins, each whole cell absorbance
spectrum also contains peaks at 435 and 680 nm, resulting from chlorophyll
containing light harvesting complexes and photosystems, used by cryptophytes
for addition light harvesting and photosynthesis. Each spectrum also
contains a peak around 500 nm, which originates from the carotenoid
alloxanthin—these are auxiliary pigments which provide some
additional light harvesting but are mainly believed to be used for
dissipating excess energy under high light conditions to prevent photooxidation
which leads to cell death.[21]
Figure 1
Microscopy
images of cryptophyte algae used for the photoacclimation
study: (a) Proteomonas sulcata and (b) Hemiselmis
pacifica. Callouts show the crystal structure for the phycobiliprotein
expressed in each species. The whole cell absorbance spectra, normalized
to cell concentration after growth to saturation, of (c) P.
sulcata and (d) H. pacifica grown under
normal white light conditions and restricted light conditions, with
labeled peaks originating from the major light harvesting protein
complexes. The shaded overlays correspond to the transmittance of
the filter used for light restriction. (e) P. sulcata and (f) H. pacifica whole cell absorbance, normalized
at the major phycobiliprotein absorbance peak to illustrate shifts
in the major peak wavelengths, with shaded regions showing the standard
deviation in absorbance over three independent cultures. Absorbance
and fluorescence spectra of the purified phycobiliproteins grown under
full light and restricted light from each culture: (g) PE545 and (h)
PC577 extracted from H. pacifica and P. sulcata, respectively. The absorbance spectra of extracted phycobiliproteins
grown under restricted light and then returned to full light for one
generation of growth are also shown to demonstrate reversibility.
Microscopy
images of cryptophyte algae used for the photoacclimation
study: (a) Proteomonas sulcata and (b) Hemiselmis
pacifica. Callouts show the crystal structure for the phycobiliprotein
expressed in each species. The whole cell absorbance spectra, normalized
to cell concentration after growth to saturation, of (c) P.
sulcata and (d) H. pacifica grown under
normal white light conditions and restricted light conditions, with
labeled peaks originating from the major light harvesting protein
complexes. The shaded overlays correspond to the transmittance of
the filter used for light restriction. (e) P. sulcata and (f) H. pacifica whole cell absorbance, normalized
at the major phycobiliprotein absorbance peak to illustrate shifts
in the major peak wavelengths, with shaded regions showing the standard
deviation in absorbance over three independent cultures. Absorbance
and fluorescence spectra of the purified phycobiliproteins grown under
full light and restricted light from each culture: (g) PE545 and (h)
PC577 extracted from H. pacifica and P. sulcata, respectively. The absorbance spectra of extracted phycobiliproteins
grown under restricted light and then returned to full light for one
generation of growth are also shown to demonstrate reversibility.The process of photoacclimation can be induced
by restricting the
amount of available light during algae growth.[22] We restricted the available light spectra using filters
and monitored the effect on the phycobiliproteins using absorbance
spectroscopy. The light transmitted through the filter, shown as the
shaded overlay in Figure c,d, only slightly overlaps the absorbance region of the phycobiliprotein
in each species. We matched the overall light intensity for both white
light and restricted light cultures to avoid changes caused by the
quantity of photosynthetically active light. We monitored the growth
of each culture using daily cell counts to ensure that the growth
rate was unaffected (SI, Figure S1) and
probed the algae for a photoacclimation response by comparing the
absorbance spectra for cultures grown with and without restricted
light conditions throughout the growth period.After 2 weeks
of growth, both P. sulcata and H. pacifica grown under light restricted conditions showed
an increase in the intensity of the absorbance peak corresponding
to the phycobiliprotein (Figure c,d). The absorbance spectra were normalized by cell
concentration (Figure S1), so the absorbance
intensity corresponds to the phycobiliprotein concentration per cell.
Thus, each species demonstrated an increase in phycobiliprotein concentration
per cell. The upregulation of phycobiliprotein production was expected;
this is a common photoacclimation response and was previously observed
in P. sulcata grown under low light conditions.[23] The very minor change in the chlorophyll containing
LHCs and photosystems is also consistent with previous reports of
cryptophyte photoacclimation, which show only regulation of the phycobiliprotein
concentration.[13] The absorbance peak intensity
corresponding to the carotenoid alloxanthin was also unaffected, which
was surprising given that the absorbance peak lies within the region
of available light. The minimal change in carotenoid absorbance intensity
supports previous observations that carotenoids do not play a significant
role in light harvesting.[24]A closer
examination of the whole cell absorbance spectra in the
phycobiliprotein region shows an additional, more subtle photoacclimation
response. We normalized the whole cell absorbance spectra by the relative
center of the absorbance peak corresponding to the phycobiliprotein
(557 nm for PE545 and 600 nm for PC577; Figure e,f) to more clearly illustrate the change.
The absorbance peak corresponding to PC577 in H. pacifica (Figure f) shows
a significant blue shift of the major peak at 577 nm by about 5 nm
and a decrease in the shoulder of the absorbance peak at 620 nm. Both
of these changes were consistent with the newly available light spectrum
under restricted conditions.The change in absorbance to the
phycobiliprotein region in H. pacifica could have
originated in two ways: a modification
to the phycobiliprotein itself or an environmentally induced perturbation
to the protein caused by the cell. To determine whether the change
in absorbance originated from variations in the cellular environment,
we extracted the phycobiliproteins from cultures grown under full
and restricted light conditions and subsequently measured the absorbance
spectra of the purified proteins. We found that PC577 harvested from H. pacifica grown under restricted light conditions maintains
a blue shift in absorbance (Figure h) confirming that the change is not a result of the
cellular environment but indeed a modification to the phycobiliprotein
itself. We also measured the fluorescence spectra of the purified
PC577 and found no observable changes. Phycobiliprotein fluorescence
mainly originates from the lowest energy population of states, indicating
that the final energy transfer step out of the phycobiliprotein remained
unchanged.[25]In contrast to H. pacifica, the whole cell absorbance
spectra of P. sulcata had a small blue shift in the
PE545 absorbance peak (Figure e), but this was not found to be statistically significant
when measured across three independent cultures. Surprisingly, however,
the absorbance spectrum of PE545 was clearly and significantly modified
once extracted from the cellular environment (Figure g). The absorbance spectrum of purified PE545
from restricted light conditions had an enhanced shoulder at 570 nm
and slightly broader absorbance spectra when compared to PE545 extracted
from algae grown under full light. We also observed the disappearance
of a secondary peak at 650 nm, which was not studied in detail but
may result from a secondary population of phycobiliprotein which is
only expressed under normal light conditions. The fluorescence spectra
of PE545 (Figure g)
show no change as a result of growth under restricted light, in agreement
with the results from PC577 and indicating that the change has not
affected the terminal emitter of the phycobiliprotein.The absence
of the PE545 peak shift in the whole cell absorbance
spectra of P. sulcata may result from the role of
PE545 within the cellular environment. PE545 has been shown to adopt
several forms within the thylakoid lumen of the cell depending on
the overall concentration and packing, such as being closely bound
to the photosystem, arranged in stacked rods, or freely dispersed.[27−29] The packing of PE545 affects how energy is funneled to chlorophylls
on both PSI and PSII located in the thylakoid membrane, as energy
transfer rates depend strongly on the angular distribution of PE545
relative to the chlorophylls.[30−32] In photoacclimated P.
sulcata, the relative amount of PE545 was much higher than
that of chlorophyll, indicating that the packing arrangement and angular
distribution of PE545 may be shifted to allow more efficient, vectorial
energy transfer from PE545 to each photosystem. Thus, the changes
to PE545 caused by photoacclimation are likely to enhance energy transfer
efficiency within the cell as opposed to absorbing a wider spectrum
of light. Once the protein is removed from the cell environment, the
modification to the energy landscape of PE545 will change and become
more visible. Regardless, the reproducible modification in absorbance
confirms that photoacclimation has caused a change in PE545 itself.The hallmark of a photoacclimation response is that the response
is reversible; when the algae are returned to typical light conditions,
protein expression reverts back to its original state within one generation.[1] Another possible outcome following growth under
restricted light is photoadaptation, where the restricted light conditions
select for algae which contain a genomic change, resulting in a new
strain of algae with a mutated version of the phycobiliprotein. Photoadaptation,
therefore, stands in stark contrast to photoacclimation because the
change in phycobiliprotein will not be reversible. To confirm that
our observed phycobiliprotein response was reversible and thus a result
of photoacclimation, we placed fresh cultures of H. pacifica and P. sulcata which had previously been grown
under restricted light conditions back under full light conditions
for one generation of growth. Following growth to saturation, we extracted
and purified the phycobiliproteins from each culture and measured
the absorbance of the phycobiliprotein. In both PC577 and PE545, we
found that the absorbance spectra had reverted back to match the absorbance
of phycobiliproteins grown under full light (Figure g,h), indicating that the change in phycobiliprotein
was a controllable photoacclimation response.The changes in
the absorbance peak positions and relative shoulder
intensities clearly indicate that cryptophytes can modify their phycobiliproteins
in response to light. This response has only been observed in one
other cryptophyte species, H. cryptochromatica, containing
the phycobiliprotein PC569.[13] In this case,
growth under restricted light conditions resulted in a change in relative
peak intensity between the main absorbance peak and shoulder of extracted
PC569, a trend that is consistent with our observations regarding
the absorbance spectra shoulders of PC577 and PE545. However, this
specific photoacclimation response does not yet have a clearly identified
biological mechanism. We began to search for a potential mechanism
by studying the relationship between protein structure and function.Specifically, we examined two possible modifications which could
occur on the protein level and influence the resultant phycobiliprotein
absorbance spectra: protein structure and chromophore identity. The
broad peaks of the phycobiliprotein absorbance spectra originate from
eight individually bound bilin chromophores, whose electronic transitions
are strongly tuned by the surrounding protein environment. The bilin
chromophores are linear tetrapyrroles, structurally similar to chlorophyll
but with more conformational flexibility.[33] Each bilin has a site energy based on chemical character which is
also influenced by the protein binding pocket and coupling to nearby
bilin chromophores in the protein, resulting in broad absorbance peaks
as opposed to narrow, discrete peaks for each bilin. The protein structure
of phycobiliproteins is tetrameric, composed of two α and two
β subunits, each of which contains one and three bilin chromophores,
respectively. Generally, two types of tetramer assemblies have been
identified: an open confirmation, where there is a water-filled gap
in the center of the assembly, and a closed conformation, where there
is no gap, and the inner bilin chromophores are closely spaced and
surrounded by the protein matrix.[34]The phycobiliproteins studied here, PE545 and PC577, differ from
each other in both chromophore composition and structural conformation.
PE545 contains three phycoerythrobilin (PEB) chromophores on the β
subunit (β-50/61, β-82, β-158) and one 15,16-dihydrobiliverdin
(DBV) chromophore on the α subunit (α-20), and the protein
assembles into a “closed” phycobiliprotein structure
(Figure a and Figure S2a).[35] PC577,
on the other hand, contains two phycocyanobilin (PCB) chromophores
(β-82, β-158) and one DBV (β-50/61) on the β
subunits and an additional PCB on the α subunit (α-19),
and it adopts an open structure (Figure b and Figure S2b).[36] The bilin chromophores are all attached
through single cysteine linkages, except for one bilin on each β
subunit, which are attached by two cysteine linkages (β-50/61).
In PE545, the DBV chromophores are the lowest in energy and contribute
to the shoulder in the absorbance spectra at 570 nm. In contrast,
the DBV chromophores in PC577 are the highest in energy and contribute
to the main peak at 577 nm, while the PCB attached at β-82 forms
the lowest energy state and terminal emitter, contributing to the
shoulder at 620 nm.[25,33]The inherent dependence
of the absorbance spectra on both chromophore
composition and protein structure complicates the relationship between
the shifts in absorbance to biological changes on the protein level.
We narrowed our search by first examining whether the photoacclimated
phycobiliproteins have changed in protein structure using biophysical
measurements. Changes in protein structure will originate from changes
in the apoprotein amino acid sequence, or from a posttranslational
modification occurring after expression. Either of these changes in
protein structure would result in a change to the protein mass and
can be measured using electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS).
The mass of the α and β subunits from both PE545 and PC577
did not change following growth under restricted light conditions,
demonstrating that there is no change to amino acid sequence or posttranslational
modifications (Table S1). We further probed
for changes in apoprotein structure using CD spectroscopy, which indicates
changes to the tertiary structure. We found that the CD spectra were
identical for proteins from full light and restricted light conditions,
indicating that no major structural change had occurred (Figure S3).Despite the lack of evidence
for a change in amino acid sequence
or posttranslational modification, even slight perturbations to the
apoprotein structure could modify the chromophore environment, resulting
in subtle absorbance peak shifts. To unequivocally determine whether
the protein structure was modified following photoacclimation, we
determined the X-ray crystal structure of PC577 extracted from both
the native and photoacclimated proteins at 1.80 and 2.35 Å resolution,
respectively (Table S2). We found that
the structure for photoacclimated PC577 was identical to the native
structure within experimental error (Figure a) with no evidence of a significant conformational
change or alteration in sequence. An independently determined structure
of PC577 (Dr. Kate Michie and Dr. Paul Curmi, personal communication)
is essentially identical to our native crystal structure. We also
determined the X-ray crystal structure native and photoacclimated
PE545 at 1.96 and 2.80 Å resolution, respectively (Table S3), and again found the structure to be
identical within experimental error.
Figure 2
(a) Resolved crystal structure for photoacclimated
PC577. The α
chain is in purple and the β chain in cyan, and the chromophores
are shown in yellow. There is no significant difference in crystal
structure from the native PC577. Residual maps calculated from the
apoprotein X-ray structure without a chromophore are shown for the
site β-158 in the (b) native and (c) photoacclimated PC577 overlaid
with the PCB to demonstrate that there was no observable change in
the geometry of the chromophore binding pocket following photoacclimation.
The same residual map is also shown at a different angle for photoacclimated
PC577 overlaid with (d) a PCB chromophore and (e) a DBV chromophore
to show that either could fit in the active site. The DBV ligand has
subtle errors in conformation of the first tetrapyrrole ring.
(a) Resolved crystal structure for photoacclimated
PC577. The α
chain is in purple and the β chain in cyan, and the chromophores
are shown in yellow. There is no significant difference in crystal
structure from the native PC577. Residual maps calculated from the
apoprotein X-ray structure without a chromophore are shown for the
site β-158 in the (b) native and (c) photoacclimated PC577 overlaid
with the PCB to demonstrate that there was no observable change in
the geometry of the chromophore binding pocket following photoacclimation.
The same residual map is also shown at a different angle for photoacclimated
PC577 overlaid with (d) a PCB chromophore and (e) a DBV chromophore
to show that either could fit in the active site. The DBV ligand has
subtle errors in conformation of the first tetrapyrrole ring.For PC577, we specifically investigated the conformation
of the
PCB chromophores on the β chain at site 82 and 158 within the
crystal structure to determine whether there was any change in the
geometry of the photoacclimated protein which could potentially shift
the absorbance spectra. We calculated the Fo–Fc difference
maps between an atomic crystal structure model with no chromophores
and the collected electron density from the experiment. The Fo–Fc
maps, shown as a grid for site β-158 in Figure b,c, indicate where the chromophore electron
density was during the X-ray measurement, which essentially represents
the chromophore geometry within the protein. We overlaid a PCB ligand
with the difference density map and found excellent agreement for
both the native and photoacclimated PC577 crystal structures, indicating
that there was no change in chromophore geometry. This result, along
with the consistent ESI-MS and CD results, confirms that photoacclimation
does not cause a change in apoprotein structure or a modification
to the PCB ligand conformation responsible for the shifting absorbance
peak.In the absence of a structural perturbation in the protein,
the
other possible change is to the chromophores. The relative contributions
of each chromophore to the absorbance spectra have previously been
calculated using various computational models, which we apply here
to correlate changes in absorbance to specific chromophores within
the phycobiliproteins.[25,37] In photoacclimated PC577, we
observed an increase in absorbance intensity and a shift on the higher
energy side of the absorbance spectra, which correlates roughly to
the contributions from the DBV chromophores, and a decrease in intensity
of the shoulder at 620 nm, which correlates roughly with the PCB chromophores.
Thus, we hypothesize that PC577 synthesized during photoacclimation
contain more DBV chromophores than PCB. In the case of PE545, we see
an enhancement in the shoulder at 570 nm, which again corresponds
to DBV, and hypothesize that a DBV is attached at one or more of the
PEB chromophore sites when P. sulcata is grown under
restricted light conditions. We cannot rule out the possibility that
one of the bilins has been changed to another type of tetrapyrrole
bilin. Other phycobiliproteins contain alternative chromophores, such
as bilin 584 or mesobiliverdin (MBV).[26] However, we believe that the shifts in absorbance would be more
dramatic than what we observed, as the other bilins have significantly
different independent site energies compared to the original chromophores.
Additionally, cryptophytes have only been observed to produce one
type of phycobiliprotein per species, indicating that the multiple
pathways needed to produce alternative bilin types likely do not exist
in a single cryptophyte species.[16,26]While
the substitution of DBV in both photoacclimated PC577 and
PE545 seems likely based on the changes to the absorbance spectra,
it is difficult to determine the exact location of the PCB or PEB,
respectively, that has been altered. However, we can determine which
subunit contains the alternative bilin by separating, isolating, and
examining the subunits of each phycobiliprotein. Following the method
of Laos et al., the α and β subunits were separated by
lowering the pH of isolated protein solutions to 2 and then immediately
performing HPLC to isolate the subunits from each other. Following
separation, the fraction containing β subunits was concentrated
and titrated back to neutral pH (7.2 for PC577 and 6.6 for PE545).
The β subunits refolded spontaneously at neutral pH but will
aggregate over long times (>4 h) due to the absence of α
subunits
which stabilize the structure.[38] We controlled
for aggregation by keeping the concentration of β subunits within
5–10 μM, the concentration found previously to have the
lowest amount of aggregation. We also confirmed that the β subunits
had refolded using CD measurements (Figure S4) which show consistency with the fully assembled protein and between
native and photoacclimated protein β subunits. The β subunits
from PC577 continue to show a slight blue shift and higher absorbance
intensity in the region corresponding to DBV (Figure b). This confirms that one of the PCBs on
the β subunit has likely been modified to a DBV.
Figure 3
Absorbance spectra for
β subunits separated from (a) PE545
and (b) PC577 from algae grown under both full light and restricted
light conditions.
Absorbance spectra for
β subunits separated from (a) PE545
and (b) PC577 from algae grown under both full light and restricted
light conditions.Using the PC577 crystal
structures collected using X-ray diffraction,
we overlaid the difference density maps with both a PCB and a DBV
ligand to evaluate whether a DBV could fit the binding pocket. We
found that both PCB and DBV generally agree with the difference density
maps for site β-158 (Figure e,f) and β-82 (Figure S5), suggesting that photoacclimated PC577 could possibly have a DBV
bound at these sites, causing a shift in the absorbance spectrum.
However, small changes in the stereochemistry of DBV produce a less
accurate fit. We believe that this discrepancy occurs from our initial
guess at the stereochemistry for DBV, which was based on chemical
identity. This assumption may affect the ability of our protein model
to adequately represent a DBV within the apoprotein structure.In contrast to the results for PC577, the β subunits from
PE545 did not retain the change in absorbance once separated (Figure a). There are several
possible explanations for this. First, the change in the β subunit
may not be observable using steady-state measurements, especially
if the bilin is not the highest energy chromophore, as would be the
case for the PEB in PE545. Such a change would only be observable
in the separated subunit using time-resolved measurements (see below).
The change is likely observable in the assembled protein because of
contributions from both the β and α subunits that amplify
the signal. It is possible that PE545 may be modified on the α
subunit. We were unable to compare the α subunits at neutral
pH because they require the presence of the β subunits to properly
fold. At pH 2, however, the α subunit absorbance spectra are
identical, suggesting that there is no change to the bilin despite
the lack of folded structure (Figure S6). Another complication of spectroscopic analysis is that an alternative
population of α subunits may be mixed with a larger population
of native α subunits. It is likely that two or more populations
of α subunits have been incorporated into both the native and
photoacclimated PE545, supported by the X-ray crystallography results
(see the Methods section in the SI). Recent
work has identified the expression of over 20 types of PE545 α
subunits in the cryptophyte algae Guillardia theta, which likely coexist in a pool within the cell.[40]We investigated whether the modified phycobiliproteins
have changes
in their electronic energy transfer following light absorption using
transient absorption spectroscopy, which tracks the electronic state
of the phycobiliprotein after a light absorption event. PC577 and
PE545 have already been well-characterized using transient absorption
spectroscopy,[36,41,42] so we only briefly summarize the major features here and then highlight
major differences observed in the photoacclimated phycobiliproteins.
Following light excitation at 500 nm, both PC577 and PE545 exhibit
a negative intensity ground state bleach overlapped with a stimulated
emission signal, consistent with their steady-state absorbance and
fluorescence signal, respectively. They also show a positive excited
state absorption on both the blue edge and the red edge, typically
at wavelengths <500 and >660 nm. At short times (<1 ps),
there
is a transfer of intensity in the negative signal from a broad ground
state bleach to the stimulated emission signal, which indicates a
transfer of energy from the higher lying bilin energy states to the
lower energy states. In PC577, this occurs from the DBVs to the PCBs;
in PE545, this occurs from the PEBs to the relatively lower lying
DBVs.Based on the previously presented fluorescence spectra
(Figure g,h), we did
not
anticipate a major change to the stimulated emission signal originating
from the lowest lying energy states. However, we did anticipate a
change in the ground state bleach feature of the transient absorbance
spectra taken at early times as this correlates to the steady-state
absorbance spectra. The spectral trace of the fully assembled PC577
at 250 fs (Figure a) shows a similar blue shift in the ground state bleach signal for
the proteins grown under restricted light conditions. The same shift
is also observed in the transient absorbance spectra of the PC577
isolated β subunit (Figure b). We examined the transfer of energy from the initial
ground state bleach to the stimulated emission population by comparing
the decay kinetics of the peak at 577 and 630 nm, which additionally
correspond to the peaks which were modified in the photoacclimated
proteins. We found no significant change to the kinetics in either
the fully assembled or isolated β subunits of PC577 following
photoacclimation. This result is perhaps unsurprising; previous studies
have demonstrated the strong role played by the protein environment
on energy transfer.[37,41,43,44] As we found no change in protein structure,
we did not expect to see a major change in energy transfer kinetics.
Figure 4
Spectral
slices taken from transient absorption measures on native
and photoacclimated PC577: (a) fully assembled and (b) isolated β
subunits. (c, d) Kinetic traces show no change in decay kinetics in
the photoacclimated proteins.
Spectral
slices taken from transient absorption measures on native
and photoacclimated PC577: (a) fully assembled and (b) isolated β
subunits. (c, d) Kinetic traces show no change in decay kinetics in
the photoacclimated proteins.Similarly to PC577, the spectral traces of assembled PE545 taken
at 500 fs show the preservation of an enhanced absorbance shoulder
at 590 nm (Figure a) matching the change observed in the steady-state absorbance. The
energy transfer kinetics of assembled PE545 also appear to be the
same in both the native and photoacclimated proteins (Figure c). However, the isolated β
subunits from PE545 show strikingly different kinetics in the photoacclimated
case. This result was surprising, as the spectral slices at 500 fs
of the β subunit populations look identical (Figure b), no longer showing an enhanced
GSB around 590 nm at early times which was observed in the fully assembled
protein. However, the kinetic traces are very different: the β
subunits taken from photoacclimated PE545 have longer lifetimes at
both 555 and 570 nm (Figure d) indicating a slower transfer of energy from higher to lower
energy states during the first 50 ps. To ensure that the energy transfer
was not unintentionally changed due to protein structure, we took
CD measurements of the PE545 β subunits immediately before and
after the TA measurements to ensure that the subunits remained properly
folded (Figure S5) and found the CD spectra
to be consistent with the fully assembled PE545 (Figure S2). In the absence of a structural change, we consider
the case where one of the PEBs on the β subunit has been switched
for a DBV resulting in a lower site energy for the chromophore position.
This alteration should result in a change to the energy transfer within
the β subunit as the energy landscape is no longer defined by
three degenerate PEB chromophores. The change in energy transfer was
less noticeable in the assembled PE545, likely due to the presence
of the α subunits that contain the previously identified terminal
emitter of the protein, DBV, and will dominate the overall energy
transfer pathways.[33]
Figure 5
Spectral slices taken
from transient absorption measures on native
and photoacclimated PE545: (a) fully assembled and (b) isolated β
subunits. Kinetic traces show no change to decay kinetics in the assembled
photoacclimated proteins (c) but significant changes in the isolated
β subunits (d).
Spectral slices taken
from transient absorption measures on native
and photoacclimated PE545: (a) fully assembled and (b) isolated β
subunits. Kinetic traces show no change to decay kinetics in the assembled
photoacclimated proteins (c) but significant changes in the isolated
β subunits (d).The modification of a
PEB to a DBV in PE545 is consistent with
the photoacclimation mechanism observed in PC577. However, the shift
in absorbance spectra is counterintuitive to the expected shift following
photoacclimation. As the acclimating cryptophyte algae attempt to
compensate for losses in light irradiance, we anticipated that the
phycobiliprotein absorbance spectra would shift to mirror the regions
of the restricted light spectra with the highest light intensity.
Indeed, this is observed for PC577. Interestingly, however, photoacclimation
in PE545 creates an increased absorbance at 570 nm, opposite of the
highest light intensity region transmitted through the filter, 530–540
nm. This inconsistency likely results from P. sulcata using photoacclimation to enhance energy transfer from PE545 within
the cellular environment, as previously discussed. However, the change
may also result from physical constraints; there are no other known
bilins that absorb at lower wavelengths than PEB.[26] The cryptophyte may also be increasing absorbance in regions
with less light intensity to compensate, rather than shifting the
overall absorbance toward the available light.The original
question of this study was how cryptophyte algae are
capable of photoacclimating to changes in spectral quality if they
lack a phycobilisome. We have found that cryptophytes are capable
of incorporating alternative bilins onto their individual phycobiliproteins
to compensate for changes in the available light spectrum. The mechanism
behind this new photoacclimation pathway is likely the result of the
biosynthetic pathways used by cryptophyte algae to produce and attach
individual bilin chromophores to the apoprotein structure during phycobiliprotein
synthesis. While these pathways are not yet fully elucidated for the
species studied here, the cryptophyte algae Guillardia theta was recently shown to attach PEB chromophores with the same enzymes
used by cyanobacteria, phycobilin lyases.[39] The cyanobacteria Synechococcus possesses a photoacclimation
process known as differential chromophorylation, where individual
bilin chromophores on the phycobilisome are replaced though cellular
regulation of phycobilin lyases within the cell.[18] Cryptophytes are distant relatives of cyanobacteria and
inherited their phycobiliprotein β subunit synthesis pathways.[45] Based on the similarities of our observed photoacclimation
response and the differential chromophorylation mechanism observed
in cyanobacteria, the biosynthetic pathways leading to photoacclimation
appear to be evolutionarily linked.Surprisingly, the overall
energy transfer dynamics in PC577 and
PE545 were not significantly affected by photoacclimation. We believe
that this result shows the importance of the protein structure in
guiding the energy transfer between bilins following the capture of
light, adding further evidence to previous findings which also show
the influence of the protein structure on energy transfer.[37,41,43,44] Here, we have shown the robust nature of energy transfer within
the phycobiliprotein, even after a change in bilin identity.
Conclusion
Herein, we have demonstrated that two cryptophyte algae strains P. sulcata and H. pacifica are capable
of photoacclimation when grown under spectrally restricted light conditions.
Both species undergo photoacclimation by increasing the overall concentration
of phycobiliproteins and through the modification of their phycobiliprotein
absorbance spectra. An in depth analysis of the phycobiliproteins
found no change to protein sequence or structure. Thus, we concluded
that photoacclimation was achieved by changing one or more of the
tetrapyrrole bilin chromophores bound to the protein. The change to H. pacifica’s phycobiliprotein, PC577, was confirmed
to be associated with the β subunit because the shift in the
absorbance spectra was preserved in the isolated β subunit population.
The change to P. sulcata’s phycobiliprotein,
PE545, was also concluded to be located on the β subunits based
on the observation of modified transient absorption kinetics in the
isolated β subunits. We suggest that the photoacclimation mechanism
likely involves control of the identity of bilins attached to the
β subunits during protein synthesis because modification of
the chromophores in the folded protein is unlikely.[39] This research sheds light on a newly identified cryptophyte
photoacclimation process and provides a key insight into how natural
systems regulate photosynthesis using pre-existing biosynthetic pathways.
Authors: Pedro Flombaum; José L Gallegos; Rodolfo A Gordillo; José Rincón; Lina L Zabala; Nianzhi Jiao; David M Karl; William K W Li; Michael W Lomas; Daniele Veneziano; Carolina S Vera; Jasper A Vrugt; Adam C Martiny Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brady R Cunningham; Matthew J Greenwold; Eric M Lachenmyer; Kristin M Heidenreich; Abigail C Davis; Jeffry L Dudycha; Tammi L Richardson Journal: J Phycol Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 2.923
Authors: Stephen J Harrop; Krystyna E Wilk; Rayomond Dinshaw; Elisabetta Collini; Tihana Mirkovic; Chang Ying Teng; Daniel G Oblinsky; Beverley R Green; Kerstin Hoef-Emden; Roger G Hiller; Gregory D Scholes; Paul M G Curmi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joseph E Sanfilippo; Adam A Nguyen; Jonathan A Karty; Animesh Shukla; Wendy M Schluchter; Laurence Garczarek; Frédéric Partensky; David M Kehoe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: I N Stadnichuk; T M Novikova; G S Miniuk; V A Boichenko; Yu V Bolychevtseva; E S Gusev; E P Lukashev Journal: Biochemistry (Mosc) Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.487