Literature DB >> 7795943

Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory.

J Engelkamp1.   

Abstract

It was assumed that self-performing an action necessarily focuses information-processing on action-relevant information in order to guarantee smooth enactment. As a consequence, enacting an action should provide the subjects with excellent item-specific information and hinder the subjects from encoding contextual information that is not a part of the action proper. These hypotheses were tested in paired-associate learning experiments in which unrelated action-verb-pairs served as stimuli. Free recall (FR) of the action verbs was considered to indicate item-specific encoding, and cued recall (CR)--with one element of a pair serving as a cue for the other--to reflect context encoding. The verb-pairs were learned essentially under four types of instructions: under standard learning instructions (as a control), under enactment instructions, under self-imagery instructions, and under other-imagery instructions. The results demonstrated that enactment led to better FR than standard learning and the two imagery conditions, showing that enactment provides excellent item-specific information. CR was equally poor after overt enactment and self-imagined performance and worse after standard learning and after imagining somebody else performing an action, showing that motor encoding hinders pair integration--i.e. efficient context encoding.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7795943     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  12 in total

1.  Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-23

2.  The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: the role of order information in free recall.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Petra Jahn; Kerstin H Seiler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

Review 3.  Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: four hurdles before research can sprint forward.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-31

4.  Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

5.  Win some, lose some: hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing.

Authors:  U Olofsson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  No evidence that low levels of intoxication at both encoding and retrieval impact scores on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.

Authors:  Amelia Mindthoff; Jacqueline R Evans; Nadja Schreiber Compo; Karina Polanco; Angelica V Hagsand
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Recovery of content and temporal order memory for performed activities following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; Adriana M Seelye
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  The relationship between interactive-imagery instructions and association memory.

Authors:  Jeremy J Thomas; Kezziah C Ayuno; Felicitas E Kluger; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  The effects of cognitive load and encoding modality on prospective memory.

Authors:  Guangzheng Li; Mei Li; Jin Wang; Zhanyu Yu; Hangjie Ma; Bing Li
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-03-27

10.  Evaluating the subject-performed task effect in healthy older adults: relationship with neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Ana Rita Silva; Maria Salomé Pinho; Céline Souchay; Christopher J A Moulin
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.