Weifang Xu1, Weizhou Wu2, Suqing Yang1, Tingting Chen1, Xiao Teng1, Danping Gao1, Shankun Zhao3. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China. 2. Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Urology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China. zhaoshankun@tzc.edu.cn.
Abstract
The present study provides evidence that women who underwent hysterectomy without oophorectomies are at a higher risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures than the general population. Early interventions for these susceptible women may help to delay or reduce the risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures. INTRODUCTION: Mounting studies have shown that patients with hysterectomy are at high risk of developing osteoporosis or bone fractures, but the evidence from all the relevant studies has not been previously synthesized. The present study aims to investigate whether women with hysterectomy without oophorectomies have a prominently higher prevalence of osteoporosis or fractures than healthy subjects. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched to identify the eligible studies. The combined effect was assessed by calculating the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). More methodologies for this study were available in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021227255). RESULTS: Finally, three observational studies offering osteoporosis cases and two retrospective studies reporting fracture cases were included. One eligible study has provided independent data from three groups of fractures. Synthetic results revealed that hysterectomy without oophorectomies was significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis as compared to the general population (combined RR from three studies = 1.47, 95%CI 1.253 to 1.725, P < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 76.2%, P = 0.015). Consistently, the prevalence of fractures was also significantly higher in patients with hysterectomy without oophorectomies than in healthy controls (pooled RR from four studies = 2.333, 95%CI: 1.314 to 4.144, P = 0.004; heterogeneity, I2 = 92.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the association between hysterectomy without oophorectomies and osteoporosis/fracture risk through a meta-analysis and has subsequently confirmed its positive relationship. Additional large-sample rigorously prospective cohorts are still warranted to validate the present evidence.
The present study provides evidence that women who underwent hysterectomy without oophorectomies are at a higher risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures than the general population. Early interventions for these susceptible women may help to delay or reduce the risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures. INTRODUCTION: Mounting studies have shown that patients with hysterectomy are at high risk of developing osteoporosis or bone fractures, but the evidence from all the relevant studies has not been previously synthesized. The present study aims to investigate whether women with hysterectomy without oophorectomies have a prominently higher prevalence of osteoporosis or fractures than healthy subjects. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched to identify the eligible studies. The combined effect was assessed by calculating the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). More methodologies for this study were available in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021227255). RESULTS: Finally, three observational studies offering osteoporosis cases and two retrospective studies reporting fracture cases were included. One eligible study has provided independent data from three groups of fractures. Synthetic results revealed that hysterectomy without oophorectomies was significantly associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis as compared to the general population (combined RR from three studies = 1.47, 95%CI 1.253 to 1.725, P < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 76.2%, P = 0.015). Consistently, the prevalence of fractures was also significantly higher in patients with hysterectomy without oophorectomies than in healthy controls (pooled RR from four studies = 2.333, 95%CI: 1.314 to 4.144, P = 0.004; heterogeneity, I2 = 92.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the association between hysterectomy without oophorectomies and osteoporosis/fracture risk through a meta-analysis and has subsequently confirmed its positive relationship. Additional large-sample rigorously prospective cohorts are still warranted to validate the present evidence.
Authors: L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; John B Gebhart; Ebenezer O Babalola; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-01-30 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Trond M Michelsen; Anne Dørum; Milada Cvancarova; Astrid H Liavaag; Alv A Dahl Journal: Gynecol Obstet Invest Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 7.661