Literature DB >> 7784026

Bone loss after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation.

N R Watson1, J W Studd, T Garnett, M Savvas, P Milligan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term effects of hysterectomy with conservation of the ovaries on bone density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of the bone density of 40 postmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy with ovarian conservation before menopause compared with a matched group of 40 women who had not had hysterectomy. The 40 women who had undergone hysterectomy were also compared with a control population, using multiple linear regression analysis. Bone density of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured by quantitative digital radiography.
RESULTS: Bone density in the hysterectomy group was significantly reduced at the spine (P < .05) and at the femoral neck (P < .05) compared with the matched group. Comparisons of the hysterectomy group with the reference group demonstrated that in addition to significant reductions in bone density at the spine (P < .05) and hip (P < .05), bone density at the femoral neck (P < .05), trochanter (P < .05), Ward's triangle (P < .05), and the second (P < .05) and fourth (P < .05) lumbar vertebrae was also significantly less in the hysterectomy group.
CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women who have hysterectomy will have significantly lower bone density than controls, despite conservation of both ovaries at the time of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7784026     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Influence of hysterectomy on long-term fracture risk.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; John B Gebhart; Ebenezer O Babalola; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  European Congress on Osteoporosis. Berlin, Germany, September 11-15, 1998. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Breast cancer risk and ovariectomy, hysterectomy, and tubal sterilization in the women's contraceptive and reproductive experiences study.

Authors:  David J Press; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Giske Ursin; Dennis Deapen; Jill A McDonald; Brian L Strom; Sandra A Norman; Michael S Simon; Polly A Marchbanks; Suzanne G Folger; Jonathan M Liff; Ronald T Burkman; Kathleen E Malone; Linda K Weiss; Robert Spirtas; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Risk of osteoporosis and fracture after hysterectomies without oophorectomies: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Weifang Xu; Weizhou Wu; Suqing Yang; Tingting Chen; Xiao Teng; Danping Gao; Shankun Zhao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.071

5.  Prevalence of osteoporosis and its reproductive risk factors among Jordanian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sireen Shilbayeh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Hysterectomies are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ying-Ting Yeh; Pei-Chen Li; Kun-Chi Wu; Yu-Cih Yang; Weishan Chen; Hei-Tung Yip; Jen-Hung Wang; Shinn-Zong Lin; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.