| Literature DB >> 35344479 |
Nathaniel Storey1,2, Shaun Cawthraw1, Olivia Turner1, Margherita Rambaldi1,3, Fabrizio Lemma1, Robert Horton1, Luke Randall1, Nicholas A Duggett1,4, Manal AbuOun1, Francesca Martelli1, Muna F Anjum1.
Abstract
Food animals may be reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) passing through the food chain, but little is known about AMR prevalence in bacteria when selective pressure from antimicrobials is low or absent. We monitored antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli over 1 year in a UK outdoor pig farm with low antimicrobial usage (AMU) compared to conventional pig farms in the United Kingdom. Short and selected long-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to identify AMR genes, phylogeny and mobile elements in 385 E. coli isolates purified mainly from pig and some seagull faeces. Generally, low levels of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli were present, probably due to low AMU. Those present were likely to be multi-drug resistant (MDR) and belonging to particular Sequence Types (STs) such as ST744, ST88 or ST44, with shared clones (<14 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) apart) isolated from different time points indicating epidemiological linkage within pigs of different ages, and between pig and the wild bird faeces. Although importance of horizontal transmission of AMR is well established, there was limited evidence of plasmid-mediated dissemination between different STs. Non-conjugable MDR plasmids or large AMR gene-bearing transposons were stably integrated within the chromosome and remained associated with particular STs/clones over the time period sampled. Heavy metal resistance genes were also detected within some genetic elements. This study highlights that although low levels of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli correlates with low AMU, a basal level of MDR E. coli can still persist on farm potentially due to transmission and recycling of particular clones within different pig groups. Environmental factors such as wild birds and heavy metal contaminants may also play important roles in the recycling and dissemination, and hence enabling persistence of MDR E. coli. All such factors need to be considered as any rise in AMU on low usage farms, could in future, result in a significant increase in their AMR burden.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial usage; heavy metal resistance; pigs; seagull; wild birds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35344479 PMCID: PMC9176276 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.A whole genome SNP-based maximum-likelihood tree demonstrating phylogenetic relatedness of 385 isolates sequenced during the study. Genetic relatedness of isolates is demonstrated by branch length and confidence in clades by bootstrap confidence values, illustrated by coloured branches. Dominant STs (ring 1), time-points (ring 2) and source animal (ring 3) are illustrated by peripherally coloured rings. Clonal groups (CG) are demonstrated by brackets, while clones are highlighted in the outer ring (ring 4).
Table of the four most frequently observed ST from each media across all time points, alongside count data for each ST and percentage proportion of total isolates for each media. Also shown are total isolate counts across all time points for each media (ECC: Chromagar ECC, CIP: Chromagar ECC+Ciprofloxacin, CTX: Chromagar ECC+Cefotaxime, ESBL: Chromagar ESBL) and associated Shannon Diversity Index H’. Unidentified or novel ST is indicated with ‘-’
|
ECC |
CIP |
CTX |
ESBL | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ST |
Count |
Proportion (%) |
ST |
Count |
Proportion (%) |
ST |
Count |
Proportion (%) |
ST |
Count |
Proportion (%) |
|
10 |
64 |
35.4 |
744 |
107 |
68.6 |
88 |
27 |
73 |
58 |
8 |
66.7 |
|
– |
29 |
16 |
44 |
36 |
23.1 |
2721 |
3 |
8.1 |
48 |
2 |
16.7 |
|
744 |
6 |
3.3 |
1421 |
3 |
1.9 |
58 |
2 |
5.4 |
4156 |
1 |
8.3 |
|
34 |
6 |
3.3 |
117 |
3 |
1.9 |
7401 |
1 |
2.7 |
10 |
1 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
2.84 |
|
0.95 |
|
1.08 |
|
0.98 | ||||
Fig. 2.Comparison of AMR gene counts (including gyrA and parC) conferring resistance to antibiotics listed on the EFSA panel per isolate per time-point and isolation media. Isolation media is demonstrated by colour, and number of isolates analysed per category are indicated below on the X-axis.
Fig. 3.Proportion of total containing each AMR gene shown (see Table S2 for details). The isolates were collected from the duration of the study and all media (Weaner: n=46, Gilt: n=83, Farrowing: n=100, Dry: n=84, Grower/Finisher: n=36, Gull: n=36).
AMR genotypes of 385 isolates as identified by APHA Seqfinder. Total count of isolates containing the genotype is shown alongside the ST most frequently associated with the genotype and fraction (in percentage) of isolates possessing the AMR genotype derived from this ST. Only genotypes with counts >3 isolates are shown
|
AMR Genotype |
Count |
ST (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
28 |
744 (100) |
|
|
28 |
744 (100) |
|
|
20 |
88 (100) |
|
|
20 |
44 (90) |
|
|
16 |
44 (100) |
|
|
13 |
10 (35) |
|
|
11 |
744 (100) |
|
|
10 |
10 (50) |
|
|
9 |
58 (100) |
|
|
8 |
10 (75) |
|
|
7 |
744 (100) |
|
|
7 |
744 (100) |
|
|
6 |
88 (100) |
|
|
5 |
10 (40) |
|
|
5 |
744 (100) |
|
|
5 |
44 (80) |
|
|
4 |
744 (100) |
|
|
3 |
117 (100) |
|
|
3 |
48 (100) |
|
|
3 |
2721 (100) |
|
|
3 |
744 (100) |
|
|
3 |
744 (100) |
|
|
3 |
744 (100) |
Antimicrobial susceptibility values for all isolates. The MICs were determined by broth microdilution and interpreted using ECOFF cut-off values (in columns) in μg ml−1 and show the numbers of isolates (in rows) with MIC above these values for each antimicrobial tested. Full description of the each antimicrobial is given in Methods
|
AMP |
AZI |
FOT |
TAZ |
CHL |
CIP |
COL |
GEN |
MERO |
NAL |
SMX |
TET |
TGC |
TMP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECOFFs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pig: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gull: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ST 744 isolates belonging to the CG-1 clonal group (reference isolate F1T1-M11) alongside SNP differences in comparison to reference isolate, isolate source and AMR genotype
|
Source |
Isolate ID |
SNPs |
AMR Gene Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dry |
F1T1-M11 |
|
|
|
Gilts |
F1T1-M9 |
2 |
|
|
Growers |
F1T1-WGS46 |
3 |
|
|
Dry |
F1T1-WGS83 |
8 | |
|
Dry |
F1T1-WGS88 |
4 | |
|
Dry |
F1T1-WGS91 |
4 | |
|
Farrowing |
F1T2-S57 |
3 | |
|
Dry |
F1T2-S66 |
1 | |
|
Dry |
F1T2-S67 |
2 | |
|
Gull |
F1T3-S132 |
9 | |
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S61 |
3 | |
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S67 |
3 | |
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S69 |
4 | |
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S71 |
4 |
|
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S72 |
5 |
|
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S73 |
6 | |
|
Gilts |
F1T3-S77 |
5 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S80 |
5 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S81 |
7 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S82 |
6 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S83 |
4 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S84 |
7 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S88 |
8 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S89 |
7 | |
|
Dry |
F1T3-S95 |
5 |
Fig. 4.Comparison of the IS1 transposon region of four ST744 isolates (F1T1-M11, F1T3-S132, F1T2-S76 and F1T3-S114), confirmed by hybrid assembly, including two isolates from CG-1 clone (underlined). Nucleotide sequence identity range is demonstrated by gradient scale and gene types and orientations are labelled with coloured arrows; gene annotations are shown above F1T1-M11.