| Literature DB >> 35344294 |
Jiayu Bao1, Lei Tian1, Yifan Meng2, Binge Wu3, Jingyi Wang1, Jing He3, Qiyan Shao3, Chengshuo Wang2, Ying Jie1, Luo Zhang2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although immunoglobulin E (IgE) increases significantly in tears and serum during seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), it is unclear whether tear total IgE can reflect the severity and prognosis of SAC more accurately than serum total IgE. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of measuring the total IgE in tears to evaluate the severity and determine the treatment of SAC.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; prognosis; seasonal allergic conjunctivitis; tears; total IgE
Year: 2022 PMID: 35344294 PMCID: PMC8967263 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Allergy ISSN: 2045-7022 Impact factor: 5.871
FIGURE 1(A) Age distribution of the enrolled patients. (B) Comparison of the baseline levels of the total IgE concentration in tears (left panel) and serum (right panel). The differences between groups were compared using the two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U test. (C) Correlation between tear and serum total IgE levels. (D) Correlation between pollen concentration and total IgE in tears (left panel), and total IgE in serum (right panel). HC, healthy control group (n = 10), AC: SAC group (n = 55). The association between variables was studied by calculating the Spearman's correlation coefficient
Demographic characteristics of the patients
| Characteristic |
|
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SEM | 31.16 ± 1.56 |
| Sex, female/male, No (%) | 36 (65.45)/9 (34.55) |
| Allergen sensitization | Pollen |
| Duration of SAC (year), mean ± SEM | 9.02 ± 0.55 |
| Smoking history, | 0 |
| Drinking history, | 0 |
| Family history, | 15 |
| Pet ownership, | 35 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SEM | 21.87 ± 0.29 |
| Place of birth | |
| City | 35 |
| Country | 20 |
| Premature infant | 3 |
| Total serum IgE (ng/ml), mean ± SEM | 45.99 ± 2.60 |
| Total tear IgE (IU/ml), mean ± SEM | 3.74 ± 0.27 |
Abbreviation: N, number.
FIGURE 2Analysis of the correlation between the tear total IgE or serum total IgE concentration and different symptom scores. The symptoms analyzed included ocular itching (A), redness (B), tearing (C), burning sensation (D), and foreign body sensation (E). The differences between groups were compared using the two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U test
FIGURE 3Analysis of the correlation between the tear total IgE or serum total IgE concentration and scores for different conjunctival reactions in patients with SAC. We analyzed conjunctival reactions including palpebral conjunctiva hyperemia (A), palpebral conjunctiva swelling (B), bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia (C), bulbar conjunctival chemosis (D), palpebral conjunctiva follicle (E), and palpebral conjunctiva papillae (F). The differences between groups were compared using the two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U test
FIGURE 4(A). Patients who improved within 7 days and those who improved after 7 days following treatment were categorized into two separate groups. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the difference in the total IgE concentration between the two groups. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the total IgE concentration measured at the first visit and the number of days needed for improvement. (B) After the follow‐up, the subjects were divided into a recurrence group (palindromia) and a non‐recurrence group (recovery). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the difference between the total IgE concentrations of both groups. Typical findings for a 37‐year‐old male SAC patient with (C) lower palpebral conjunctival and bulbar conjunctival reactions at the first visit; moderate hyperemia and edema are present. The concentration of total IgE in the tears was 7.94 IU/ml. (D) Lower palpebral conjunctival and bulbar conjunctival reaction at the first follow‐up visit; mild hyperemia and edema are present. The total IgE concentration was 2.10 IU/ml. (E) Lower palpebral conjunctival and bulbar conjunctival reactions at the second follow‐up visit. The total IgE concentration was 0.52 IU/ml
FIGURE 5(A) Difference in the tear total IgE concentration compared at each follow‐up visit. (B–D) Total clinical scores, obtained by adding the scores of each symptom and conjunctival reaction. The difference in the total IgE concentration in tears was obtained by subtracting the total IgE concentration measured at each visit. The correlation between the difference in the total IgE concentration and the difference in the total clinical score was analyzed using Spearman's correlation analysis. The D‐value of IgE is the difference between the total IgE concentrations in tears measured at the two visits. The D‐value of the score is the difference between the total clinical scores recorded at the two visits