| Literature DB >> 35338087 |
Xin Liu1,2,3, Yixiang Xu4, Wei Xiong4, Bingnan Yin1,2, Yuqian Huang2,5, Junjun Chu1,2, Changsheng Xing1,2, Chen Qian1,2, Yang Du1,2, Tianhao Duan1,2, Helen Y Wang1,2, Ningyan Zhang4, John S Yu6, Zhiqiang An7, Rongfu Wang8,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current therapeutic antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are capable of recognizing surface antigens, but not of intracellular proteins, thus limiting the target coverage for drug development. To mimic the feature of T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes the complex of major histocompatibility class I and peptide on the cell surface derived from the processed intracellular antigen, we used NY-ESO-1, a cancer-testis antigen, to develop a TCR-like fully human IgG1 antibody and its derivative, CAR-T cells, for cancer immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: antibody affinity; antibody specificity; immunotherapy; receptors, chimeric antigen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35338087 PMCID: PMC8961179 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 12.469
Figure 1Selection of scFvs specific for HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1 complex. (A) The schematic diagram of screening of HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165 complex specific antibodies from human scFv phage-displayed library. Phage library was negative and positive selected against HLA-A2/CMV pp65495-503 and HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165, respectively. Final binders were sequenced and converted to full-length IgG1. (B) Example plate of phage ELISA against biotin conjugated HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165 monomer. Positive clones were considered as three times higher than the threshold calculated by the average value of negative control wells. (C) ELISA validation of purified monoclonal antibodies against HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165 and control pMHC complex at concentration of 1 µg/mL. (D) Antibody titration of positive clone mAb 2D2 via ELISA. mAb, monoclonal antibody; scFvs, single-chain variable antibody fragments.
Figure 2Characterization of mAb 2D2 and its specificity. (A) Binding affinity of mAb 2D2 to the HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165 complex measured by the biolayer interferometry (BLI) on an Octet instrument. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of mAb 2D2 with a series of dilution. HEK 293 T cells were pulsed with 20 µg/mL NY-ESO-1157-165 or CMV pp65495-503 peptide for 1 hour at 37°C. Cells were washed and stained with a series dilution of mAb 2D2 followed by Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated goat-anti-human (H+L) secondary antibody. mAb 2D2 could recognize NY-ESO-1157-165 pulsed HEK 293 T cells but not CMV pp65495-503 peptide-pulsed HEK 293 T cells. (C) Mean fluorescence intensity analysis from panel B. (D) Confocal imaging of mAb 2D2 staining in NY-ESO-1157-165 peptide-pulsed HEK 293T. HEK 293 T cells were pulsed with 20 µg/mL NY-ESO-1157-165 or CMV pp65495-503 peptide for 1 hour. Cells were fixed with 2% PFA and then stained with APC conjugated HLA-A2 and mAb 2D2 followed by Alexa Fluor 594. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. mAb, monoclonal antibody.
Figure 32D2-CAR T cells specifically recognize and lyze HLA-A2+/NY-ESO-1+cells in vitro. (A) Schematic diagram of 2D2 CAR construct. 2D2 scFv was cloned into a pMSGV1 retroviral vector with CD8α hinge and transmembrane, 4-1BB co-stimulatory, and CD3ζ signaling domain. (B) Surface expression of CAR detected by HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157-165 complex. (C) IFN-γ cytokine release measured by ELISA. T2 cells (HLA-A2+) were pulsed with 20 µg/mL NY-ESO-1157-165 or CMV pp65495-503 peptide for 1 hour at 37°C. 2D2-CAR T cells were cocultured with target cells with a 10:1 (E: T) ratio overnight. (D) IFN-γ cytokine release measured by ELISA. 2D2-CAR T cells were cocultured with HEK 293 T cells (HLA-A2+) pulsed with NY-ESO-1157-165 or CMV pp65495-503 peptide, PC3-A2-NY-ESO-1, MDA-MB-231-NY-ESO-1(HLA-A2+) at 10:1 ratio overnight. (E) 2D2-CAR T cells were cocultured with endogenously expression cell lines Mel 586 (A2-/NY-ESO-1+), Mel 624 (A2+/NY-ESO-1+), and Mel 1558 (A2+/NY-ESO-1+) at a 20:1 ratio overnight. (F) LDH cytotoxicity assay. 2D2-CAR T cells were cocultured with T2 cells that were pulsed with 20 µg/mL NY-ESO-1 or CMV peptide for 1 hour for 4 hours. (G) LDH cytotoxicity assay. 2D2-CAR T cells were cocultured with MDA-MB-231-NY-ESO-1 and PC3-A2-NY-ESO-1 and HEK293T for 24 hours, respectively. (H) LDH cytotoxicity assay for 2D2-BBZ and control T cells against Mel 586, Mel 624, and Mel 1558. *P<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; ns, not significant.
Figure 42D2-CAR T cells impair tumor growth and prolong the survival of mice bearing triple-negative breast cancer in vivo. (A) A schematic diagram of the animal experiment. Female NSG mice were injected with 2 million MDA-MB-231 expressing NY-ESO-1 at the fat pad on day 0. On day 4, mice were randomly separated in to control group (n=4) and treatment group (n=5). Ten million 2D2-CAR-T cells or control T cells suspended in 200 µL PBS were injected intravenously followed by three continuous injections of 50,000 units of rhIL-2 intraperitoneally. (B) Representative IFN-γ ELISA with mice serum at day 5 after T cells injected. (C) Tumor growth combined from three independent experiments between the control group (n=12) and 2D2-CAR T cells treated group (n=11) was analyzed. Tumor volume was calculated by ½ (L*W∧2). (D) Representative picture of tumor at the time of endpoint. (E) Tumor weight from three independent experiments was quantified. (F) Representative survival analysis of MBA-MD-231-NY-ESO-1 bearing mice treated with 2D2-CAR T cells compared with the control group. Mice were sacrificed when the tumor reaches 2 cm in diameter, which was considered as an endpoint. Data in figure part B were present as mean (SD). Difference between the control group and treatment group was analyzed by unpaired Students’ t-test. Data in figure parts C and E were presented as mean (SE). Difference was analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment. Data in figure part F was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with a log-rank test. **P<0.01; ***p<0.001. ANOVA, analysis of variance; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor.
Figure 52D2-CAR T cells demonstrate antitumor activity against an endogenously expressing A2/ESO melanoma tumor model in vivo. (A) 2 million Mel 1558 tumor cells were inoculated at the right flank of NSG mice followed by control T (n=5) or 2D2-CAR T cells (n=4) treatment, respectively. IFN-γ was detected from the mice serum harvested 6 days after T cell injection. (B) Tumor growth of Mel 1558 in NSG mice was measured weekly via calipers. 2D2-CAR T cells treated mice had significantly impaired tumor growth. (C) Image of tumor size harvested from mice. (D) Tumor weight of the tumor. (E) T cells infiltration into the tumor were detected by CD3 IHC. (F) T cells infiltration into the tumor were detected by flow cytometry. *P<0.05; ****p<0.0001. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor.
Figure 6Safety assessment of 2D2-CAR T cells in vivo. (A) A schematic diagram of the animal experiment. NSG-A2 mice were infused with 1×107 2D2 CAR T cells or PBS on day 0. Body weight was measured as indicated. On day 7 and day 14, mice were sacrificed for histopathology and hematology assessment. (B) Body weight change after T cells injection. (C) H&E staining for the key organs, heart, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, and liver with 10× magnification. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; ns, not significant.