Literature DB >> 29675462

An MHC-restricted antibody-based chimeric antigen receptor requires TCR-like affinity to maintain antigen specificity.

Marcela V Maus1, Jason Plotkin1, Gopinadh Jakka2, Guillaume Stewart-Jones3, Isabelle Rivière1, Taha Merghoub4, Jedd Wolchok4, Christoph Renner2,5, Michel Sadelain1,6.   

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are synthetic receptors that usually redirect T cells to surface antigens independent of human leukocyte antigen (HLA). Here, we investigated a T cell receptor-like CAR based on an antibody that recognizes HLA-A*0201 presenting a peptide epitope derived from the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1. We hypothesized that this CAR would efficiently redirect transduced T cells in an HLA-restricted, antigen-specific manner. However, we found that despite the specificity of the soluble Fab, the same antibody in the form of a CAR caused moderate lysis of HLA-A2 expressing targets independent of antigen owing to T cell avidity. We hypothesized that lowering the affinity of the CAR for HLA-A2 would improve its specificity. We undertook a rational approach of mutating residues that, in the crystal structure, were predicted to stabilize binding to HLA-A2. We found that one mutation (DN) lowered the affinity of the Fab to T cell receptor-range and restored the epitope specificity of the CAR. DN CAR T cells lysed native tumor targets in vitro, and, in a xenogeneic mouse model implanted with two human melanoma lines (A2+/NYESO+ and A2+/NYESO-), DN CAR T cells specifically migrated to, and delayed progression of, only the HLA-A2+/NY-ESO-1+ melanoma. Thus, although maintaining MHC-restricted antigen specificity required T cell receptor-like affinity that decreased potency, there is exciting potential for CARs to expand their repertoire to include a broad range of intracellular antigens.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29675462      PMCID: PMC5904357          DOI: 10.1038/mto.2016.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics        ISSN: 2372-7705            Impact factor:   7.200


Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are high-affinity ligand or single-chain variable fragment (scFv)-based receptors used to redirect T cells to recognize and lyse tumor cell targets. CD19-specific CAR T cells are emerging as a powerful clinical therapy,, showing impressive outcomes in nonHodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CARs are generally limited to native surface antigen targets., However, most of the known “high-priority” tumor antigens ranked by a National Cancer Institute panel, which includes universal tumor antigens and cancer-testis antigens, and most neoantigens, are intracellular proteins and are thus only subject to immune surveillance as cell surface peptides borne by MHC molecules. Expanding the repertoire of CARs to target intracellular antigens would open new avenues for cancer immunotherapy. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the natural biologic receptor employed by the immune system for surveillance of cytoplasmic antigens. TCRs are typically low-affinity receptors (micromolar kD) that bind to peptide epitopes in the context of host MHC molecules. Several groups have explored retroviral transduction of native TCRs with the goal of redirecting T cells to intracellular antigens. However, these transduced T cells have the potential to express four different T cell receptors (native-alpha/beta, transduced alpha/beta, and native/transduced heterodimers), which is problematic for two crucial reasons: (i) the native/transduced heterodimers have unknown specificity and potential autoimmune consequences,, and (ii) there is dilution of the signal transduction apparatus, since the availability of CD3 complex molecules is limiting. Nevertheless, this approach has been applied in early clinical studies without mispairing-related adverse events., In an effort to resolve the potential mispairing issues, some investigators have also designed single-chain TCRs. Immunoglobulin structures share structural homology with TCRs and may mimic TCR recognition of HLA/peptide complexes. CARs incorporating such recognition elements would be advantageous in that they do not directly compete with the native TCR, and would further provide, in the case of second generation CARs, supportive costimulation to the transduced T cells. Phage display libraries have enabled the rapid isolation of human Fab fragments highly specific to peptide/MHC molecules. In early attempts, these types of antibodies were found to derive most of their affinity from binding to the MHC alpha helix, in a conformation quite different from the binding footprint of TCRs. More recently, a high-affinity Fab restricted to HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1157–165 has been generated (3M4E5) and affinity-matured by shifting the binding affinity from the MHC alpha-helix to the peptide (T1). Crystal structure analysis of these complexes confirmed a binding conformation that was nearly superimposable with the footprint of a TCR specific to the same MHC/antigen complex. Here, we have developed a novel TCR-like antibody into a CAR based on the scFv of a high-affinity antibody (T1) that recognizes HLA-A*0201 in combination with a peptide epitope derived from NY-ESO-1, a cancer testis antigen that is expressed in the cytoplasm in a wide variety of tumors but is not expressed in normal somatic cells. We hypothesized that transduction of T cells with this CAR would efficiently redirect T cells in an HLA-restricted, antigen-specific manner. We have found that, despite the exquisite peptide-specificity of the soluble antibody, the same Fab in the form of a cell-bound antigen receptor lost its epitope specificity. We further found that a targeted mutation to decrease the binding of the Fab to HLA-A2 improved CAR specificity. The affinity of the mutated antibody was in the range of naturally occurring TCRs (micromolar).

Results

High-affinity MHC-restricted CARs do not maintain the specificity, evident in the soluble antibody form

The T1 Fab we used had undergone rational affinity maturation of a parental Fab that was generated by phage display. The T1 antibody displayed high specificity for HLA-A2/NY- ESO-1157–165 by BIAcore and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays. The T1 Fab structure was also determined to bind the NY-ESO-1157–165/HLA-A*0201 complex in a very similar fashion to a native TCR specific for the same MHC/peptide antigen. We constructed a second-generation CAR based on the scFv of the T1 Fab. The scFv of T1 was cloned into the backbone of the CD28-CD3ζ bi-cistronic γ-retroviral vector, which includes an IRES-green fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence to facilitate analysis of transduced cells (Figure 1a).
Figure 1

T1/28z CAR construct. (a) SFG vector indicating LTRs, packaging signal (ψ), splice donor and splice acceptor sites, leader sequence, single-chain variable fragment of the T1 (HLA-A2/NYESO1-specific) antibody fused to human CD28 and human CD3zeta signaling domains. The ires-GFP domain is 3′. (b) Primary human T cells 5 days after transduction with T1/28z retroviral vector, stained with HLA-A2/NYESO pentamer. Cells are gated on FSC/SSC only. Chromium release cytotoxicity assay using T1/28z-transduced T cells as effectors against (c) T2 cells pulsed with 10 μg/ml of either NYESO1 or flu peptide. E:T ratios normalized to pentamer+ cells or (d) human melanoma lines SK Mel 37, SK Mel 23, or SK Mel 52. GFP, green fluorescent protein; E:T, effector:target.

T1/28z CAR construct. (a) SFG vector indicating LTRs, packaging signal (ψ), splice donor and splice acceptor sites, leader sequence, single-chain variable fragment of the T1 (HLA-A2/NYESO1-specific) antibody fused to human CD28 and human CD3zeta signaling domains. The ires-GFP domain is 3′. (b) Primary human T cells 5 days after transduction with T1/28z retroviral vector, stained with HLA-A2/NYESO pentamer. Cells are gated on FSC/SSC only. Chromium release cytotoxicity assay using T1/28z-transduced T cells as effectors against (c) T2 cells pulsed with 10 μg/ml of either NYESO1 or flu peptide. E:T ratios normalized to pentamer+ cells or (d) human melanoma lines SK Mel 37, SK Mel 23, or SK Mel 52. GFP, green fluorescent protein; E:T, effector:target. As with other CARs, primary human T cells were very efficiently transduced with the T1-28z CAR, as measured by GFP expression (42%) and surface staining with A2/NYESO pentamers (38.8%) (Figure 1b). T1-28z CAR T cells were tested for in vitro cytotoxicity against the HLA-A2+ TAP-deficient cell line T2, pulsed with 10 ug/ml of either cognate peptide or the irrelevant HLA-A2 restricted epitope of influenza matrix protein (flu, GILGFVFTL). Although the T1-28z CAR-T cells efficiently lysed NY-ESO-1 pulsed T2 cells even at low effector:target (E:T) ratios, we noted a decrease in specificity of lysis at higher E:T ratios (Figure 1c). Next, we tested a panel of native melanoma tumor cell lines, including SK-Mel-37 (HLA A2+, NYESO1+), SK-Mel-23 (HLA A2+, NYESO1−), and SK-Mel-52 (HLA A2−, NYESO+). We again observed HLA-A2- restricted but NY-ESO-1-independent cytotoxic activity of the T1-28z CAR-T at high E:T ratios. Although it is difficult to directly correlate chromium release in vitro data to in vivo efficacy or specificity, we remained concerned about the high cytotoxic activity toward HLA A2+ targets independent of NY-ESO-1 expression. A possibly related phenomenon is known to occur with very high affinity TCRs.21, 22, 23, 24, 25 We hypothesized that despite the specificity of the high affinity T1 antibody, when the same antigen-binding region in the form of a CAR was subject to antigen-induced receptor clustering (T cell avidity), there was loss of specificity due to excessive CAR binding to HLA. To decrease the affinity of the T1 CAR without losing epitope specificity, we undertook a rational approach to decrease binding of the scFv specifically to the HLA-A2 alpha helix.

Directed mutations based on the crystal structure of the T1 scFv specifically reduce binding to HLA-A2

Based on the crystal structure of the T1 Fab binding to HLA-A2 presenting NY-ESO-1157–165, the amino acid residues in the light chain of the T1 scFv at positions D53 and Y34 were predicted to be essential candidates in stabilizing the binding of the T1 scFv to the HLA A2 alpha helix (Figure 2a). Breaking the salt bridge at D53 was predicted to have a significant impact on binding. Mutating this residue to an asparagine (N) would preserve the steric properties but reduce the salt bridge between the aspartic acid (D53) residue and the basic arginine residue (R65) of MHC. The Y34 ring forms part of an aromatic cluster, while the OH group of tyrosine (Y) hydrogen-bonds to the carbonyl group (CO) at MHC R65. Mutation of this Y34 to a phenylalanine (F) would preserve the aromatic cluster but not maintain the hydrogen bonding. Using a panel of linkers in the T1-28z retroviral construct sequence, we made the D53N and Y34F mutations alone and in combination, expecting to break one salt bridge and decrease hydrogen bonding while preserving the steric properties important for the stability of the complex. A mutation in the heavy chain of the T1 scFv, at the K65 position, was predicted to have a smaller impact on affinity because it is largely solvent-exposed. This residue was mutated to T to retain some of the Ca/Cb stalk that is packed against the CDR2 Y60 in the heavy chain. This mutation was evaluated separately for technical ease of generating the mutants.
Figure 2

Rationally targeted mutations designed to decrease binding of T1 to HLA-A2 alpha helix. (a) Crystal structure of T1 Fab binding HLA-A2/NYESO1, with highlighting of targeted amino acids. (b) A2/NYESO1 pentamer stains of primary human T cells 5 days after transduction with parental (T1), D53N mutant, Y34F, and DNYF mutations in the CAR. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plots are gated on FSC/SSC only. (c) Chromium release assays of corresponding CAR-transduced effectors against T2 cells pulsed with either flu or NYESO peptide as targets. Effector to target ratios are normalized to pentamer+ cells. CAR, Chimeric antigen receptor.

Rationally targeted mutations designed to decrease binding of T1 to HLA-A2 alpha helix. (a) Crystal structure of T1 Fab binding HLA-A2/NYESO1, with highlighting of targeted amino acids. (b) A2/NYESO1 pentamer stains of primary human T cells 5 days after transduction with parental (T1), D53N mutant, Y34F, and DNYF mutations in the CAR. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plots are gated on FSC/SSC only. (c) Chromium release assays of corresponding CAR-transduced effectors against T2 cells pulsed with either flu or NYESO peptide as targets. Effector to target ratios are normalized to pentamer+ cells. CAR, Chimeric antigen receptor. T cells transduced with the T1-28z CAR incorporating the light chain mutations DN, YF, or both (DNYF) were evaluated for pentamer binding by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Figure 2b) and for cytotoxicity against peptide-pulsed T2 cells (Figure 2c). Based on the mean fluorescence intensity of pentamer binding under the same conditions, it was clear that the DN mutation had a significant impact in lowering the affinity of the T1 CAR (Figure 2b). The YF mutant had no significant impact, while the DNYF mutant had a moderate effect on pentamer binding. In vitro cytotoxicity assays against T2 cells pulsed with either NY-ESO-1 or flu peptide revealed distinct separation of the curves with the DN- transduced T cells, with preserved lysis of antigen-bearing targets. The YF mutation had no discernable effect in this in vitro functional assay. The heavy chain mutation K65T alone had no significant effect on pentamer binding or cytotoxicity, and did not appear to have additive effect when combined with the DN mutation (DNKT) (data not shown). Based on these data, the DN mutant version of the T1/28z CAR (DN/28z) became our leading candidate. The K65T mutation had negligible impact compared with the DN mutation (Supplementary Figure S1).

BIAcore measurement of the DN mutation in T1 reveals significant decrease in affinity

To measure the affinity of the DN mutant directly, we generated Fabs with the DN mutation and performed surface plasma resonance (BIAcore). Two versions of the NY-ESO-1 peptide were examined (9C and 9V), because the naturally occurring cysteine (C) at the ninth position in the peptide epitope can sometimes form disulfide bonds that interfere with the binding measurements of interest. The binding of DN Fab to the 9C and 9V peptides was measured over a range of five different concentrations; the kD was calculated at 672 nmol/l (9C) and 715 nmol/l (9V) (Figure 3). The kD of the parental T1 Fab was 2 nmol/l (9C) – 4 nmol/l (9V). Neither Fab bound to flu peptide at all (flat line, data not shown). In a study comparing BIAcore affinities of antiviral TCRs (A2 Tax, A24 EBV, B27 flu, B8 EBNA, and A2 flu) to the tumor-associated antigen TCRs (A2 mel, A2 gp100, and A2 telomerase), the average kD of a viral antigen TCR was 9 ± 7 μmol/l, whereas the average kD of Class I-restricted tumor-associated antigen-specific TCRs was 21 ± 12 μmol/l. Specifically, the 1G4 HLA-A2/NY-ESO-1 specific TCR is in the 6–13 μmol/l range, which is slightly higher than the published BIAcore studies of the affinity of the JM22 TCR specific for HLA-A2/flu. Thus, the antigen-recognition region of the DN Fab has an affinity that is significantly lower than a high-affinity antibody, but slightly higher than naturally occurring TCRs specific for viral antigens (Table 1).
Figure 3

Direct measurement of affinity of the DN mutation in the Fab antibody by BIAcore. Sensograms of DN Fab run over a range of concentrations (18.5 nmol/l – 1187 nmol/l) of HLA-A2 presenting (a) native NYESO1 (SLLMWITQC) or (b) mutant C9V NYESO1 (SLLMWITQV) peptide, which avoids disulfide bonding. Data were fitted (red) in a BIAevaluation 3.0 following a simple 1:1 Langmuir binding model.

Table 1

Comparison of BIAcore affinities of select MHC-restricted antibody- and TCR-based receptors

AnalytePeptideKon, /mol/secondKoff, /secondKD (Koff/Kon), nmol/lReference
DNSLLMWITQC; SLLMWITQV90,100; 56,0000.0606; 0.0401672; 715
T1SLLMWITQC; SLLMWITQV138,375; 249,0000.000674; 0.0008352; 4Stewart-Jones PNAS (2009)18
1G4 TCRSLLMWITQC; SLLMWITQV12,200; 11,8000.17; 0.04913,300; 5,700Chen JEM (2005)27
JM22 TCRGILGFVFTL; GILGFVFTL18,000; 40,0000.03; 0.21,000; 6,000Cole JI 2007; Wilcox Immunity (1999)
FMC63 (aCD19)Antibody; scFv1/4.2 × 10−9; 1/2.3 × 10−9 (∼3 × 108)Nicholson Mol Imm (1997)

scFv, single-chain variable fragment; TCR, T cell receptor.

Direct measurement of affinity of the DN mutation in the Fab antibody by BIAcore. Sensograms of DN Fab run over a range of concentrations (18.5 nmol/l – 1187 nmol/l) of HLA-A2 presenting (a) native NYESO1 (SLLMWITQC) or (b) mutant C9V NYESO1 (SLLMWITQV) peptide, which avoids disulfide bonding. Data were fitted (red) in a BIAevaluation 3.0 following a simple 1:1 Langmuir binding model. Comparison of BIAcore affinities of select MHC-restricted antibody- and TCR-based receptors scFv, single-chain variable fragment; TCR, T cell receptor.

The DN mutation restores specifcity to antigen in transduced T cells

Next, we tested the parental T1-28z CAR and DN-28z CAR T cells for their ability to lyse target cells in an antigen concentration-dependent manner. We found that T1-28z CAR T cells lysed NY-ESO-1-peptide pulsed T2 cells independent of peptide concentration (ranging from 0 to 10 μg/ml, Figure 4a), confirming the peptide-independent lysis observed at high E:T ratios previously. In contrast, DN-28z CAR T cells lysed NY-ESO-1-peptide pulsed T cells in a concentration-dependent fashion, indicating restored antigen specificity with the lower affinity receptor (Figure 4b). Because the potential clinical application of these A2/NY-ESO-1 CARs only applies to patients who have the HLA-A2 genotype, we also examined the growth of the T1 and D53N CARs when transduced into T cells from an individual with the HLA-A*0201 genotype. The CAR T cells were rested for a week after transduction and then stimulated in vitro with mouse-fibroblast-based artificial APCs transduced with HLA-A*0201, β2-microglobulin, and full-length NY-ESO-1 (in addition to CD80, ICAM, and LFA3). We noted that T1-transduced T cells expanded less than DN-CAR T cells over 5 days, suggesting ongoing fratricide in the HLA-A2+ cultures (Figure 4c). Similarly, when HLA-A2+ T cells were stimulated with natural tumor HLA-A2+ NY-ESO-1+ tumor cells (multiple myeloma U266), or peptide-pulsed T2 cells, the proliferative response of T1-28z CAR T cells was impaired compared with CAR T cells transduced with DN-28z CARs. This effect was most pronounced at high levels of antigen expression (U266 and T2+NY-ESO-1) rather than lower levels of antigen expression (SK Mel 37). Interestingly, this could not be solely explained by HLA expression levels (Supplementary Figure S2).
Figure 4

DN mutation restores epitope specificity of T1-antibody-based CAR-transduced T cells. Chromium release assays using (a) T1/28z CAR-transduced or (b) DN/28z CAR- transduced T cells as effectors against target T2 cells pulsed with titrating concentrations of NYESO1 peptide. (c) Expansion of T1/28z and DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells derived from an HLA-A2+ donor. T cells were rested for one week after transduction and then stimulated with artificial APCs. Growth of CD3+GFP+ cells was calculated as total number of lymphocytes × frequency of CD3+GFP+ cells as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) staining. (d) Expansion of HLA-A2+ T cells in response to antigen. Data are shown as fold-increase over unstimulated cells. Mel 37 is the SK-Mel 37 tumor cell line (HLA-A2+, NY-ESO-1+); U266 is the multiple myeloma cell line (also HLA-A2+, NY-ESO-1+). Proliferation was measured 4 days after restimulation. (e)Absolute number of CD3+GFP+ T cells per μl of blood at two timepoints after injection of NSG-HLA-A2 transgenic mice with T1/28z-, DN/28z-, or untransduced HLA-A2+ T. CARs, Chimeric antigen receptors; GFP, green fluorescent protein.

DN mutation restores epitope specificity of T1-antibody-based CAR-transduced T cells. Chromium release assays using (a) T1/28z CAR-transduced or (b) DN/28z CAR- transduced T cells as effectors against target T2 cells pulsed with titrating concentrations of NYESO1 peptide. (c) Expansion of T1/28z and DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells derived from an HLA-A2+ donor. T cells were rested for one week after transduction and then stimulated with artificial APCs. Growth of CD3+GFP+ cells was calculated as total number of lymphocytes × frequency of CD3+GFP+ cells as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) staining. (d) Expansion of HLA-A2+ T cells in response to antigen. Data are shown as fold-increase over unstimulated cells. Mel 37 is the SK-Mel 37 tumor cell line (HLA-A2+, NY-ESO-1+); U266 is the multiple myeloma cell line (also HLA-A2+, NY-ESO-1+). Proliferation was measured 4 days after restimulation. (e)Absolute number of CD3+GFP+ T cells per μl of blood at two timepoints after injection of NSG-HLA-A2 transgenic mice with T1/28z-, DN/28z-, or untransduced HLA-A2+ T. CARs, Chimeric antigen receptors; GFP, green fluorescent protein. We attempted to test the safety of the T1-28 and DN-28z CAR T cells in HLA-A2 transgenic NSG (nonobese diabetic, SCID, gamma-chain knockout) mice, hypothesizing that severe GvHD directed against HLA-A2 would develop in the T1-28z CAR T cell-treated mice. To avoid an allogeneic anti-HLA-A2 response, we used T cells from donors with the HLA-A*0201 genotype. Preliminarily, we found that the expression of HLA-A2 was several logs higher in the human donor T cells than in any of the NSG/A2 transgenic mouse blood cells or tissues (data not shown). Mice were injected with a single dose of either T1-28z or DN-28z CAR T cells, and sacrificed at predetermined intervals for histopathologic analysis of organs that were most likely to be targets of an anti-HLA-A2 response (granulocytes, lungs, liver, and skin). None of the mice developed clinical signs of GvHD-type disease (skin ruffling, weight loss, or loss of fur) over 3 weeks, but they all developed hair loss at 6 weeks; this is typical for NSG mice injected with human T cells, and is thought to be mediated by a xenogeneic response of human T cells directed to mouse MHC molecules. At days 14 and 22, there were higher levels of T cell infiltration into the lungs and livers of mice that received the T1-28z-CAR-T compared with those that received either DN-28z-CAR-T or mock- transduced-T (Supplementary Figure S3), but both forms of CAR T cells resulted in greater lymphocyte infiltrate than untransduced T cells. T cell infiltrates were quantified on a 0–4 grading system developed by expert veterinary pathologists, but these assessments were more qualitative overall than strictly quantifiable (Supplementary Table S1). There was no effect on the white blood cell counts in the mice (data not shown). Interestingly, a greater effect was imparted on the persistence of the HLA-A2+ CD3+ GFP+ human T cells, which had a much higher level of HLA-A2 expression than the mouse tissues. Although all the mice were injected with the same number of CD3+ GFP+ T cells, the DN-28z CAR T cells achieved higher circulating levels of CD3+ T cells in the blood at day 15, again suggesting some degree of fratricide among the T1-28z-transduced HLA-A2+ donor T cells (Figure 4e). Taken together, these data suggest that the DN mutation has a significant impact on specifically detargeting the HLA-A2 molecule.

DN-28z CAR T cells lyse tumor targets as effectively as T1-28z in vitro

Having improved the in vitro and in vivo “safety profile” of the T1 scFv with the D53N mutation, we turned our attention again to the efficacy of the lower affinity DN-28z CAR T cells toward lysing native tumor targets. T cells were transduced with the T1-28z or DN-28z CARs in preparation for the subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies. Here again we confirmed the lower affinity of the DN mutant by mean fluorescence intensity of pentamer staining; T1-28z- transduced T cells had an MFI of 596, while the DN-28z-transduced T cells had an mean fluorescence intensity of 170, after gating on GFP+ cells (Figure 5a,b). About 1 week after transduction, DN-28z CAR T cells were able to lyse NY-ESO-1-peptide pulsed T2 cells and native tumor targets (SK-Mel-37, HLA-A2+/NY-ESO-1+) as well as the T1-28z CAR T cells. Lysis of flu-pulsed T2 targets and HLA-A2+ NYESO1- targets (SK Mel 23), however, was much reduced (Figure 5c,d).
Figure 5

Similar efficacy of T1/28z and DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells. A2/NYESO1 pentamer stains of T cells transduced with (a) T1/28z or (b) DN/28z CAR. MFI shown is mean fluorescence intensity of GFP+ cells. Plots shown are gated only on fsc/ssc. Chromium release assays of (c) T1/28z or (d) DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells against peptide-pulsed T2 cells and against native tumor targets (melanoma cell lines SK- Mel-37 and SK-Mel-23). DN/28z T cell culture was diluted with untransduced T cells to equalize the frequency of pentamer+ cells with the T1/28z T cell culture. Effector: target ratios are normalized to pentamer+ cells. CARs, Chimeric antigen receptors.

Similar efficacy of T1/28z and DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells. A2/NYESO1 pentamer stains of T cells transduced with (a) T1/28z or (b) DN/28z CAR. MFI shown is mean fluorescence intensity of GFP+ cells. Plots shown are gated only on fsc/ssc. Chromium release assays of (c) T1/28z or (d) DN/28z CAR-transduced T cells against peptide-pulsed T2 cells and against native tumor targets (melanoma cell lines SK- Mel-37 and SK-Mel-23). DN/28z T cell culture was diluted with untransduced T cells to equalize the frequency of pentamer+ cells with the T1/28z T cell culture. Effector: target ratios are normalized to pentamer+ cells. CARs, Chimeric antigen receptors.

A2/NYESO-CAR (DN)-transduced T cells specifically infiltrate and delay progression of an NY-ESO-1 expressing tumor in vivo

Next, we set up a xenogeneic mouse model utilizing the NSG strain that permits long- term engraftment of human cells. To address whether human T cells transduced with the DN-28z CAR could specifically home to a NY-ESO1+ tumor, NSG mice were injected subcutaneously on day 0 with 3 × 106 SK-Mel-37 human melanoma cells on one flank and 3 × 106 SK-Mel-23 human melanoma cells on the other. DN-28z CAR T cells were infused at four different doses in each group of five mice. An intermediate dose of 2 × 106 19-28z CAR T cells (using the same vector backbone) was infused in a group of control mice. Tumors were measured until day 33. At the time of sacrifice, the tumors were excised and analyzed by immunohistochemistry for infiltration by human CD3+ T cells. All the subcutaneous tumor implants were noted to exhibit central necrosis, but in the mice injected with DN-28z-transduced T cells, the rim of SK-Mel-37 (NY-ESO-1 positive) tumors demonstrated infiltration by human CD3+ T cells (Figure 6a, c); the total number of T cells per mm2 of tumor was dose-dependent (Figure 6a). In contrast, the SK-Mel-23 (HLA A2+/NYESO-negative) tumor in the same mice was not infiltrated with T cells (Figure 6b,d). In mice that were injected with CD19 CAR-transduced T cells, there was no infiltration of human T cells into either tumor (data not shown).
Figure 6

DN/28z CAR-T cells specifically traffic to and delay progression of an NY- ESO-1-positive melanoma tumor in a xenogeneic mouse model. Subcutaneous tumor implants of mice treated with escalating doses of DN/28z CAR-T cells (or CD19/28z CAR-T cells as a control) were harvested and stained for CD3 by immunohistochemistry. The number of CD3+ T cells infiltrating the (a) SK Mel 37 (NY-ESO-1 positive) and (b) SK Mel 23 (NY-ESO-1 negative) was quantified as cells per mm2. Representative slides of the tumors from mice treated with 8 × 106 CAR-T cells are shown (c,d). The volume of each tumor (e,f) over time in mice treated with the 8 × 106 DN/28z CAR-T cells or control T cells is shown. Lines are plotted as mean ± SEM of five mice for each group. CAR, Chimeric antigen receptor; SEM, standard error of mean.

DN/28z CAR-T cells specifically traffic to and delay progression of an NY- ESO-1-positive melanoma tumor in a xenogeneic mouse model. Subcutaneous tumor implants of mice treated with escalating doses of DN/28z CAR-T cells (or CD19/28z CAR-T cells as a control) were harvested and stained for CD3 by immunohistochemistry. The number of CD3+ T cells infiltrating the (a) SK Mel 37 (NY-ESO-1 positive) and (b) SK Mel 23 (NY-ESO-1 negative) was quantified as cells per mm2. Representative slides of the tumors from mice treated with 8 × 106 CAR-T cells are shown (c,d). The volume of each tumor (e,f) over time in mice treated with the 8 × 106 DN/28z CAR-T cells or control T cells is shown. Lines are plotted as mean ± SEM of five mice for each group. CAR, Chimeric antigen receptor; SEM, standard error of mean. In addition to infiltrating the NY-ESO-1+ tumors, DN28z CAR T cells were detectable in the peripheral blood and spleen of tumor-bearing mice past day 30 (Supplementary Figure S3). At the lowest dose of T cells, DN-28z CAR T cells were detected at a frequency of 5 cells per μl of blood; at the highest dose, the frequency was more variable but ranged from 5 to 30 cells per μl of blood. DN-28z CAR T cells were also detectable in the spleens at similar frequencies at all doses. No CD19-28z CAR T cells were detectable in blood or spleen past day 30, consistent with prior data indicating the need for continued antigen stimulation to maintain 28z-based CAR-transduced T cells. Compared with treatment with T cells transduced with the irrelevant 19-28z CAR, the DN-28z CAR T cells significantly delayed growth of only the NY-ESO-1+ tumor (SK-Mel-37). This was most clearly evident at the highest dose of DN-28z-CAR-T cells (Figure 6e,f). Unfortunately, disease-specific survival could not be measured in this model for two reasons: first, the NY-ESO-1-negative tumor (SK-Mel-23) was much more clinically aggressive, and was not impacted by the DN-28z CAR T cells, making the survival data from these bilateral-tumor experiments not evaluable. Second, the survival of NSG mice injected with human T cells is confounded by a xenogeneic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) effect, which begins to clinically affect the mice 4–6 weeks after T cell infusion (data not shown and ref. ). This model is not aggressive enough to cause lethality in that time frame, and any possible survival data even with a single tumor implant would be confounded by the effect of this xenogeneic GVHD.

Discussion

We sought to extend the applicability of antibody-based CARs to intracellular antigens because this approach has the potential to open access to an unlimited repertoire of monoclonal antibodies, while circumventing the problem of mispairing of transduced receptors with the endogenous TCR α/β chains, and extending the benefits of costimulatory engineering of CARs to HLA-peptide targeting. We found that maintaining the specificity of a CAR-based receptor for an intracellular antigen to be significantly more complex than targeting other cell surface molecules. Specifically, we found that the affinity of the antibody directed to an intracellular antigen and binding to HLA need to be carefully evaluated upon conversion to a CAR and expression in T cells. Minimal binding to HLA may cause loss of CAR specificity, likely owing to the increased avidity resulting from CAR clustering at the cell surface. Currently, there are three examples of CARs based on antibodies that bind HLA/peptide that appear to have high specificity and cytotoxicity in vitro and in xenogeneic mouse models: one is specific to HLA/EBNA3C and resulted in high cytotoxicity when introduced into NK cells; another is specific for HLA-A2/gp100 and was found to suppress melanoma progression in a xenograft model when introduced as a CAR into human T cells, and one is specific for HLA-A2/WT1 and appears to have high specificity and cytotoxicity in vitro and in xenogeneic mouse models of leukemia. Our study and others, however, have further scrutinized the “background activity” of engineered T cells, not just of the scFv. In one such study, an HLA-A2/WT1-specific CAR based on a single-chain variable fragment showed decreased cytotoxicity and poor specificity compared with a low-affinity TCR specific to the same antigen, despite the higher affinity of the scFv. In another study, antibodies specific to MHC/peptide complexes were isolated after immunization of HLA-A2 transgenic mice, and their variable fragments used to design CARs, but these required >100-fold higher antigen density to exert cytotoxicity compared with a cognate T cell clone bearing a natural TCR. The optimal affinity of an antigen receptor that is MHC-restricted and specific to a peptide epitope has not been definitively defined. TCRs target these complexes efficiently but generally with low binding affinity. The range of affinities of naturally-occurring TCRs, even for viral epitopes, is in the micromolar range. Indeed, engineered high affinity TCRs often result in decreased specificity.21, 22, 23 Furthermore, there is evidence that for TCRs, there is a maximum affinity threshold that limits T cell function (kD ∼ <5 μmol/l), beyond which higher affinities do not increase clustering, signaling, lysis or growth. CAR-based receptors that are directed to surface molecules typically have high affinities (in the low nmol/l range), but affinity studies are not required to optimize specificity. On the other hand, very low affinity CARs specific for cell surface proteins may display poor efficacy, independent of epitope location on the target antigen. The minimal affinity of the antigen binding domain of a CAR required to trigger effective signaling has not yet been determined. We found that the low-affinity DN-28z CAR was sufficient to trigger specific lysis of peptide-pulsed targets, and natural HLA-A2-bearing, NY-ESO-1 expressing tumor cells (SK-Mel-37). Interestingly, the decreased HLA binding of the DN CAR relative to T1 also resulted in decreased T cell fratricidal activity. Although our SK-Mel-37 xenogeneic mouse model was not optimized, we were disappointed to find that the tumors were not eradicated despite infiltration of the DN CAR T cells and their persistence in the blood for over 1 month. This is a new xenogeneic model, and it is not clear how sensitive it is to adoptive cell therapies. Nevertheless, we interpret this outcome to reflect insufficient signal strength provided by the low-affinity CAR to effectively eliminate macroscopic tumor deposits. This finding points to the contradictory affinity requirements to achieve T cell potency while maintaining specificity. The signal strength of physiological TCRs is augmented by engagement of additional molecules. Thus, the TCR/MHC interaction is stabilized by MHC binding to CD8 and consequent signaling through lck; the engagement of additional costimulatory receptors receptors, including B7 and TNF receptor family members, trigger separate signaling cascades that influence the function of the responding T cell. The second- generation CAR described here included a CD28 signaling domain, which may be suboptimal in the setting of very low affinity such as with the DN CAR. We previously demonstrated that the in vivo effects of low-activity CARs can be rescued through T-cell encoded costimulatory ligand expression, or the use of chimeric costimulatory receptors., These two approaches may be valuable to enable the use of HLA-restricted CARs to target intracellular proteins.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Blood samples were collected from donors after giving written informed consent. High-resolution HLA-typing was previously known in HLA-A2+ donors, and only confirmed by antibody staining for HLA-A2. Normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were prepared from healthy donors by ficoll gradient centrifugation. T2 cells and the melanoma tumor cell lines SK-Mel-23 and SK- Mel-37 were provided by the Ludwig Center for Immunotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. For transduction with CARs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with PHA at 2 μg/ml on day 0 and transduced with viral supernatants on day 2. Recombinant hIL-2 was added at 50 IU/ml starting on day 2 and replenished every 2–3 days during in vitro culture. T cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and antibiotics. To assess T cell growth, transduced T cells were cultured at a 10:1 ratio with artificial APCs generated in our laboratory and previously described; these were additionally transduced with full-length NY-ESO-1 protein using a retroviral vector. Expression was confirmed by intracellular staining with the E978 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

Generation of retroviral T1-CAR constructs and mutants

The single-chain variable sequence (heavy chain— GSG linker—light chain) for the parental T1 construct was cloned into the SFG-28z-ires-GFP vector previously generated in our laboratory., The D53N, Y34F, and DNYF mutants were generated by a series of linkers and standard molecular biology techniques. All constructs were verified by sequencing (Genewiz). The RD30-HEK293 packaging line was transfected with the construct of SFG DNA, and viral supernatants were collected at days 2 and 3; these supernatants were used to make stable Galv9- HEK293 producer cells, from which viral supernatants were collected from confluent dishes to transduce T cells. Packaging cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and antibiotics.

Staining and flow cytometry

Transduced T cells were analyzed for GFP expression and expression of cell surface molecules by standard staining and flow cytometry techniques. HLA-A2/NYESO1 pentamers were purchased from Proimmune (Oxford, UK). Antibodies to CD3 and HLA- A2 were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Blood samples of 50 μl from mice were ACK-lysed and stained for 20 minutes at 4 °C with CD3 antibody; T cells were quantified with Count Bright counting beads (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY).

Chromium release assays

In vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed according to standard techniques. Briefly, target cells were labeled with 51Cr (sodium chromate) for 90 minutes, then washed and co incubated for 4–6 hours in 96-well round bottom plates in triplicate with diluting ratios of effector T cells. Supernatants were harvested, transferred to Luma Plates (Perkin-Elmer, Shelton, CT) and acquired on a Perkin Elmer Top Count. Percent specific lysis was calculated with the formula (x-spontaneous)/(maximum-spontaneous). Peptide pulsing was performed where indicated either overnight or simultaneous with chromium labeling. HLA-A2 restricted influenza matrix protein (Flu, GILGFVFTL) and NY-ESO-1157–165 (SLLMWITQC) peptides were purchased from Proimmune.

Surface plasmon resonance measurements of affinity

SPR studies were performed using a Biacore 3000 (Biacore AB) as previously described. HLA-A*0201-SLLMWITQC and HLA-A*0201-SLLMWITQV were enzymatically biotinylated by BirA enzyme on the C-terminal biotinylation site and immobilized to CM5 sensor chips via covalently coupled streptavidin. Sensograms were measured over seven concentrations of D53N Fab. Kinetic constants were derived using the curve-fitting facility of the BIAevaluation program (version 3.0; Biacore AB) and rate equations derived from the simple 1:1 Langmuir binding model.

Mouse studies

NSG (stock # 005557-NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ) and HLA-A2-transgenic NSG (stock#009617-NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid) mice were purchased from Jackson laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were injected subcutaneously in each flank with human melanoma cells on day 0. Tumors were measured every 2–3 days with calipers and tumor volume was calculated with the formula (length × width × width × π) / 6. Mice were sacrificed and tumors were excised and stained by standard immunohistochemistry for CD3 to evaluate T cell infiltration.
  46 in total

1.  TCRs with high affinity for foreign pMHC show self-reactivity.

Authors:  Phillip D Holler; Lukasz K Chlewicki; David M Kranz
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Evidence for a TCR affinity threshold delimiting maximal CD8 T cell function.

Authors:  Daphné A Schmid; Melita B Irving; Vilmos Posevitz; Michael Hebeisen; Anita Posevitz-Fejfar; J-C Floyd Sarria; Raquel Gomez-Eerland; Margot Thome; Ton N M Schumacher; Pedro Romero; Daniel E Speiser; Vincent Zoete; Olivier Michielin; Nathalie Rufer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  How a single T cell receptor recognizes both self and foreign MHC.

Authors:  Leremy A Colf; Alexander J Bankovich; Nicole A Hanick; Natalie A Bowerman; Lindsay L Jones; David M Kranz; K Christopher Garcia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Class II-restricted T cell receptor engineered in vitro for higher affinity retains peptide specificity and function.

Authors:  K Scott Weber; David L Donermeyer; Paul M Allen; David M Kranz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Induction of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes by artificial antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  J B Latouche; M Sadelain
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Generation of functional human T-cell subsets with HLA-restricted immune responses in HLA class I expressing NOD/SCID/IL2r gamma(null) humanized mice.

Authors:  Leonard D Shultz; Yoriko Saito; Yuho Najima; Satoshi Tanaka; Toshiki Ochi; Mariko Tomizawa; Takehiko Doi; Akiko Sone; Nahoko Suzuki; Hiroshi Fujiwara; Masaki Yasukawa; Fumihiko Ishikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A major histocompatibility complex-peptide-restricted antibody and t cell receptor molecules recognize their target by distinct binding modes: crystal structure of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1-MAGE-A1 in complex with FAB-HYB3.

Authors:  Martin Hülsmeyer; Patrick Chames; Roman C Hillig; Robyn L Stanfield; Gerhard Held; Pierre G Coulie; Claudia Alings; Gabriele Wille; Wolfram Saenger; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler; Hennie R Hoogenboom; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19.

Authors:  James N Kochenderfer; Wyndham H Wilson; John E Janik; Mark E Dudley; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Steven A Feldman; Irina Maric; Mark Raffeld; Debbie-Ann N Nathan; Brock J Lanier; Richard A Morgan; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  CAR therapy: the CD19 paradigm.

Authors:  Michel Sadelain
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Rational development of high-affinity T-cell receptor-like antibodies.

Authors:  Guillaume Stewart-Jones; Andreas Wadle; Anja Hombach; Eugene Shenderov; Gerhard Held; Eliane Fischer; Sascha Kleber; Natko Nuber; Frank Stenner-Liewen; Stefan Bauer; Andrew McMichael; Alexander Knuth; Hinrich Abken; Andreas A Hombach; Vincenzo Cerundolo; E Yvonne Jones; Christoph Renner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Navigating CAR-T cells through the solid-tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Andrew J Hou; Laurence C Chen; Yvonne Y Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Specificity of bispecific T cell receptors and antibodies targeting peptide-HLA.

Authors:  Christopher J Holland; Rory M Crean; Johanne M Pentier; Ben de Wet; Angharad Lloyd; Velupillai Srikannathasan; Nikolai Lissin; Katy A Lloyd; Thomas H Blicher; Paul J Conroy; Miriam Hock; Robert J Pengelly; Thomas E Spinner; Brian Cameron; Elizabeth A Potter; Anitha Jeyanthan; Peter E Molloy; Malkit Sami; Milos Aleksic; Nathaniel Liddy; Ross A Robinson; Stephen Harper; Marco Lepore; Chris R Pudney; Marc W van der Kamp; Pierre J Rizkallah; Bent K Jakobsen; Annelise Vuidepot; David K Cole
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Developing neoantigen-targeted T cell-based treatments for solid tumors.

Authors:  Tori N Yamamoto; Rigel J Kishton; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  CAR T-cell immunotherapy: a powerful weapon for fighting hematological B-cell malignancies.

Authors:  Jian-Qing Mi; Jie Xu; Jianfeng Zhou; Weili Zhao; Zhu Chen; J Joseph Melenhorst; Saijuan Chen
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Genetically Modified T-Cell Therapy for Osteosarcoma: Into the Roaring 2020s.

Authors:  Christopher DeRenzo; Stephen Gottschalk
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Gene editing for immune cell therapies.

Authors:  Stefanie R Bailey; Marcela V Maus
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Mapping the HLA Ligandome of Colorectal Cancer Reveals an Imprint of Malignant Cell Transformation.

Authors:  Markus W Löffler; Daniel J Kowalewski; Linus Backert; Jörg Bernhardt; Patrick Adam; Heiko Schuster; Florian Dengler; Daniel Backes; Hans-Georg Kopp; Stefan Beckert; Silvia Wagner; Ingmar Königsrainer; Oliver Kohlbacher; Lothar Kanz; Alfred Königsrainer; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Stefan Stevanović; Sebastian P Haen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Novel high-affinity EGFRvIII-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells effectively eliminate human glioblastoma.

Authors:  Rebecca C Abbott; Daniel J Verdon; Fiona M Gracey; Hannah E Hughes-Parry; Melinda Iliopoulos; Katherine A Watson; Matthias Mulazzani; Kylie Luong; Colleen D'Arcy; Lucy C Sullivan; Ben R Kiefel; Ryan S Cross; Misty R Jenkins
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2021-05-09

9.  A single-chain antibody generation system yielding CAR-T cells with superior antitumor function.

Authors:  Toshiki Ochi; Masaki Maruta; Kazushi Tanimoto; Fumitake Kondo; Toshihiro Yamamoto; Mie Kurata; Hiroshi Fujiwara; Junya Masumoto; Katsuto Takenaka; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 10.  The intersection of affinity and specificity in the development and optimization of T cell receptor based therapeutics.

Authors:  Timothy P Riley; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.