| Literature DB >> 35907786 |
Yanli Kang1, Yuhan Gan1, Yingfeng Jiang1, Jianbin You1, Chen Huang2, Qianshun Chen2, Xunyu Xu1, Falin Chen3, Liangyuan Chen4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) have emerged as potential clinical biomarkers targeting immunotherapy. KK-LC-1 is a member of CTAs, which has been demonstrated in a variety of tumors tissues and been found to elicit immune responses in cancer patients. However, the expression level and immune infiltration role of KK-LC-1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains to be elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer-testis antigen; KK-LC-1; Lung adenocarcinoma; Prognosis; Tumor immune infiltration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35907786 PMCID: PMC9339200 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09930-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Fig. 1KK-LC-1 expression in various human cancers and related to prognosis in LUAD. A Human KK-LC-1 expression in various tumors according to the TIMER database. B The expression levels of KK-LC-1 in LUAD and para-cancerous lung tissues. C KK-LC-1 expression in LUAD and matched normal tissues by TCGA database. D The overall survival rate of KK-LC-1 expression in LUAD
Fig. 2KK-LC-1 expression in serum and related to diagnosis in LUAD. A The expression level of KK-LC-1in LUAD serum and healthy person’s serum. ROC curve of serum B KK-LC-1 and C CEA. D KK-LC-1 expression in LUAD patient’s preoperative and postoperative serum. E ROC curve of serum KK-LC-1 to validate pre-operative cases from post-operative in LUAD
Relationship of KK-LC-1 expression and clinicopathologic parameters
| Clinicopathological factor | KK-LC-1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n | Mean ± SEM | P | |
| Age (yr) | 0.5696 | ||
| < 60 | 60 | 1.571 ± 0.2253 | |
| ≥ 60 | 32 | 1.793 ± 0.3247 | |
| Gender | 0.6368 | ||
| Male | 33 | 1.766 ± 0.3441 | |
| Female | 59 | 1.583 ± 0.2159 | |
| Smok | 0.7261 | ||
| Yes | 7 | 1.405 ± 0.5871 | |
| No | 78 | 1.655 ± 0.2057 | |
| Diameter | 0.175 | ||
| < 3 | 72 | 1.627 ± 0.1947 | |
| ≥ 3 | 10 | 2.472 ± 0.9061 | |
| Stage | |||
| I | 65 | 1.340 ± 0.1941 | |
| II + III + IV | 27 | 2.392 ± 0.3912 | |
| CEA | |||
| <5 ng/ml | 75 | 1.476 ± 0.1855 | |
| ≥ 5 ng/ml | 13 | 2.548 ± 0.6442 | |
| NSE | |||
| <16.3 ng/ml | 41 | 1.439 ± 0.2629 | |
| ≥ 16.3 ng/ml | 19 | 2.641 ± 0.4978 |
Fig. 3Association of KK-LC-1 expression with immune infiltration in LUAD according to the TIMER database. A The correlation between KKLC and immune cells by TIMER. B The correlation between KKLC and immune cells by TISIDB. C 22 types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells were analyzed in high and low KK-LC-1 expression groups
Relationship of KK-LC-1 with immune cell type markers by TIMER database
| Description | Marker genes | None Cor | P | Purity Cor | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B Cell | CD19 | 0.097 | * | 0.088 | 0.052 |
| CD79A | 0.095 | * | 0.079 | 0.081 | |
| T Cell | CD3D | 0.019 | 0.672 | −0.016 | 0.722 |
| CD3E | −0.013 | 0.761 | −0.054 | 0.229 | |
| CD2 | −0.037 | 0.403 | − 0.082 | 0.068 | |
| CD8 + T Cell | CD8A | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.015 | 0.738 |
| CD8B | 0.03 | 0.501 | 0.009 | 0.837 | |
| CD45(PTPRC) | −0.099 | * | −0.146 | ** | |
| Monocyte | CD86 | −0.083 | 0.061 | −0.129 | ** |
| CD115(CSF1R) | −0.171 | *** | −0.215 | *** | |
| M1 Macrophage | INOS (NOS2) | 0.123 | ** | 0.114 | * |
| IRF5 | −0.016 | 0.721 | −20.29 | 0.516 | |
| COX2(PTGS2) | 0.065 | 0.14 | 0.058 | 0.196 | |
| M2 Macrophage | CD163 | −0.08 | 0.069 | −0.114 | * |
| VSIG4 | −0.126 | ** | −0.158 | *** | |
| MS4A4A | −0.107 | * | −0.143 | ** | |
| TAM | CD68 | −0.08 | 0.071 | −0.111 | * |
| IL10 | −0.052 | 0.243 | −0.068 | 0.13 | |
| CCL2 | −0.073 | 0.097 | −0.092 | * | |
| Neutrophil | CD66b (CEACAM8) | −0.169 | *** | −0.186 | *** |
| CD15(FUT4) | 0.094 | * | 0.101 | * | |
| CCR7 | −0.03 | 0.493 | −0.061 | 0.173 | |
| Natural killer cell | KIR2DL1 | 0.008 | 0.849 | −0.008 | 0.854 |
| KIR2DL3 | 0.034 | 0.447 | 0.026 | 0.0572 | |
| KIR2DL4 | 0.142 | ** | 0.135 | ** | |
| KIR3DL1 | 0.087 | * | 0.089 | * | |
| KIR3DL2 | 0.047 | 0.288 | 0.045 | 0.318 | |
| KIR3DL3 | 0.116 | 0.087 | 0.116 | ** | |
| KIR2DS4 | 0.024 | 0.585 | 0.022 | 0.623 | |
| Dendritic cell | BDCA-1 (CD1C) | −0.214 | *** | −0.238 | *** |
| BDCA-3 (THBD) | −0.16 | *** | −0.175 | *** | |
| BDCA-4 (NRP1) | −0.032 | 0.472 | −0.036 | 0.426 | |
| CD11c (ITGAX) | −0.053 | 0.227 | −0.088 | 0.051 | |
| Th1 | T-bet (TBX21) | −0.024 | 0.582 | −0.047 | 0.293 |
| STAT4 | −0.014 | 0.752 | −0.046 | 0.309 | |
| TNF-α (TNF) | −0.061 | 0.169 | −0.084 | 0.062 | |
| STAT1 | 0.065 | 0.143 | 0.046 | 0.306 | |
| Th2 | GATA3 | −0.031 | 0.483 | −0.073 | 0.105 |
| STAT5A | −0.122 | ** | −0.152 | *** | |
| STAT6 | −0.027 | 0.534 | −0.033 | 0.465 | |
| Tfh | BCL6 | 0.021 | 0.641 | 0.017 | 0.714 |
| IL21 | 0.047 | 0.292 | 0.021 | 0.641 | |
| Th17 | STAT3 | 0.029 | 0.516 | 0.03 | 0.454 |
| IL17A | 0.055 | 0.214 | 0.05 | 0.266 | |
| Treg | FOXP3 | 0.015 | 0.738 | −0.025 | 0.582 |
| CD25(IL2RA) | −0.026 | 0.553 | −0.059 | 0.195 | |
| CCR8 | 0.007 | 0.882 | −0.082 | 0.542 | |
| TGFβ (TGFB1) | −0.064 | 0.167 | −0.075 | 0.095 | |
| STAT5B | −0.021 | 0.639 | −0.01 | 0.828 | |
| T cell exhaustion | PD-1 (PDCD1) | 0.021 | 0.633 | −0.001 | 0.986 |
| CTLA4 | 0.009 | 0.839 | −0.023 | 0.603 | |
| LAG3 | 0.013 | 0.763 | −0.003 | 0.940 | |
| TIM-3 (HAVCR2) | −0.088 | * | −0.139 | ** | |
| GZMB | 0.13 | ** | 0.114 | * |
Cor, R value of Spearman’s correlation; None, correlation without adjustment;Purity,correlation adjusted by purity; TAM tumor-associated macrophage; Th T helper cell; Tfh Follicular helper T cell; Treg regulatory T cell. (∗p < 0.01, ∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001)
Fig. 4Association of KK-LC-1 expression with immune marker sets in LUAD based on TIMER database. The correlation between KK-LC-1 expression and the gene markers of A Monocyte (CD68 and CSF1R); B TAM (CD68, IL10 and CCL2); C M1 Macrophage (NOS2, IRF5 and PTGS2); D M2 Macrophage (CD163,VSIG4 and MS4A4A)
Fig. 5The prognostic value of high and low expression of KK-LC-1 in LUAD according to immune cell subgroups using Kaplan-Meier potter. The increased and decreased expression of KK-LC-1 in various immune cell subgroups have diverse prognosis in LUAD (A-H)