Literature DB >> 35337035

Sex-Dependent Differences in Predictive Value of the C2HEST Score in Subjects with COVID-19-A Secondary Analysis of the COLOS Study.

Piotr Rola1, Adrian Doroszko2, Małgorzata Trocha3, Katarzyna Giniewicz4, Krzysztof Kujawa4, Marek Skarupski5, Damian Gajecki2, Jakub Gawryś2, Tomasz Matys2, Ewa Szahidewicz-Krupska2, Barbara Adamik6, Krzysztof Kaliszewski7, Katarzyna Kiliś-Pstrusińska8, Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz9, Michał Pomorski10, Marcin Protasiewicz11, Marcin Madziarski12, Urszula Chrostek13, Joanna Radzik-Zając14, Anna Radlińska14, Anna Zaleska14, Krzysztof Letachowicz15, Wojciech Pisarek16, Mateusz Barycki1, Janusz Sokołowski17, Ewa Anita Jankowska18,19, Katarzyna Madziarska15.   

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a growing number of evidence suggests that COVID-19 presents sex-dependent differences in clinical course and outcomes. Nevertheless, there is still an unmet need to stratify the risk for poor outcome at the beginning of hospitalization. Since individual C2HEST components are similar COVID-19 mortality risk factors, we evaluated sex-related predictive value of the score. Material and
Methods: A total of 2183 medical records of consecutive patients hospitalized due to confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were analyzed. Subjects were assigned to one of two of the study arms (male vs. female) and afterward allocated to different stratum based on the C2HEST score result. The measured outcomes included: in-hospital-mortality, three-month- and six-month-all-cause-mortality and in-hospital non-fatal adverse clinical events.
Results: The C2HEST score predicted the mortality with better sensitivity in female population regarding the short- and mid-term. Among secondary outcomes, C2HEST-score revealed predictive value in both genders for pneumonia, myocardial injury, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and acute kidney injury. Additionally in the male cohort, the C2HEST value predicted acute liver dysfunction and all-cause bleeding, whereas in the female arm-stroke/TIA and SIRS.
Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated the better C2HEST-score predictive value for mortality in women and illustrated sex-dependent differences predicting non-fatal secondary outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2HEST score; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; gender differences; mortality; predicting value; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35337035      PMCID: PMC8950798          DOI: 10.3390/v14030628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.048


1. Introduction

Since the outbreak in 2019 in China of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the pandemic has revealed an unprecedented impact on the global health care system, with over 450 million confirmed cases resulting in approximately 6 million of deaths reported worldwide [1]. From the initial phase of the pandemic, a growing number of evidence [2] suggests that COVID-19 presents significant sex-dependent differences in clinical course and mortality. The clinical manifestation of COVID-19 remains unpredictable and varies from asymptomatic to severe or lethal [3,4,5]. Hence, there is an urgent need to introduce a simple and fast triage tool to clinical practice aimed at supporting the decision-making process for the clinicians in terms of appropriate management and optimized use of limited resources. The C2HEST score was originally designed [6] to predict the potential development of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the general population. Lately, a growing body of evidence has appeared, illustrating that the C2HEST score can predict poor outcomes of patients in severe clinical conditions. Our previous study demonstrated the usefulness of the C2HEST-score in predicting the adverse COVID-19-outcomes in hospitalized subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since male sex is postulated to be an independent risk factor of an unfavorable COVID-19 outcome, we aimed to assess the sex-dependent predictive value of the C2HEST-score.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

The study population consisted of 2183 consecutive patients with confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) infection of SARS-CoV-2 admitted to the Medical University COVID-19 Center. All subjects were hospitalized between February 2020 and June 2021. The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee at the Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland (No: KB-444/2021). All medical data were fully anonymized and retrospectively analyzed. Due to the character of the study protocol written informed consent from participants was not required. Subjects were assigned to one of two of the study arms male vs. female. Subsequently, all patients were assigned into one C2HEST score stratum. The C2HEST score value was calculated depending on originally proposed variables; coronary artery disease (CAD) (1 point), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (1 point), hypertension (1 point), elderly (age ≥ 75 years, 2 points), systolic heart failure (HF) (2 points), and thyroid disease (1 point). Based on the calculated score subjects were allocated to one of three stratum -low-risk 0 or 1 point, medium-risk 2 or 3 points, and high-risk 4 and more points.

2.2. Follow-Up and Outcomes

The primary clinical outcome was an in-hospital, three-month-, and six-month-all-cause mortality. Other clinical outcomes focused on in-hospital: end of hospitalization other than death (discharge, deterioration or recovery with subsequent transfer to another hospital) advanced mechanical ventilation support, shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis. Also, other clinical features were collected symptomatic bleeding, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, acute heart failure, myocardial injury, stroke, acute kidney injury, acute liver dysfunction.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statisticians with experience in medical academic research performed the analyses to this manuscript. The R language version 4.0.4 with additional packages-pROC and time-ROC [7], survival [8], coin [9], and odds ratio was used for the purpose of data analysis [10] A level of 0.05 was set as significance value. Descriptive data regarding categorical variables are shown as numbers and percentages, whereas for numerical variables as mean with standard deviation, range (minimum-maximum) along with the number of non-missing values. The omnibus and chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables which exceeded five expected cases in each group. The Fisher exact test was performed for subjects with fewer cell counts. The Welch’s ANOVA was set up for continuous variables in order to adjust for unequal variances between the risk-strata and sample size large sufficient for appropriateness of asymptotic results. For continuous variables, the Games-Howell’s variant of Tukey correction was performed as a part of a post-hoc analysis. On the other hand, for categorical variables, the post-hoc test was analogous to the omnibus test. However, it was performed in subgroups with a Bonferroni correction. Due to a fact that the in-hospital mortality along with the all-cause mortality were available as right-censored data, the time-dependent ROC analysis with inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used to estimate them. The time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the C2HEST score and additionally a confirmation of differences in survival curves among risk strata was obtained by a Log-rank test. Proportional hazard assumption was verified using the Grambsch-Therneau test. During analysis of the hazard ratio (HR) in the C2HEST score, its components, as well as risk strata, a Cox proportional hazard model was used. Dichotomic nature of secondary outcomes resulted in the use of a logistic regression model during their analysis. In order to assess predictive capability, the classical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with an AUC measure was performed. Odds ratio (OR) was presented as a size effect for the influence of the C2HEST score, its components and risk strata.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Demographical and Clinical Features of the Studied Population

The study population was composed of 2183 subjects at mean age 60.1 ±18.8 [17-100] A total of 1101 women at mean age 59.3 ± 21.1 [17-100] were enrolled to this study, who were subsequently assigned to the low-risk n = 682 subjects, medium-risk n = 284 patients, and high-risk n = 135 C2HEST strata, respectively. Simultaneously, a total of 1082 males at mean age of 60.8 ± 16.1 [17-99], were assigned to the low-risk (n = 735), medium-risk (n = 208) and high-risk(n = 139). The baseline clinical data of both study cohorts is presented in Table 1. In both cohorts, higher C2HEST risk was related to a higher number of comorbidities and more advanced age.
Table 1

Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics.

VariablesUnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]OMNIBUSp-Valuep Valuefor Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN = 284MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Demographics
Age, yearsmean ± SD/min-max 47.8 ± 17.117–7454.2 ± 14.017–7476.7 ± 12.029–10074.0 ± 1.237–9981.0 ± 8.747–10076.2 ± 9.438–92 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0 a,b 0.0001 c 0.0 a<0.0001 b0.115 c
Age ≥ 65 yearsn/n(%) 165(24.2)211(28.7)247(87.0)172(82.7)129(95.6)123(88.5) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0339 c <0.0001 a,b0.5515 c
BMI, kg/m2mean ± SD/min-max/N 28.3 ±5.317.1–45.719928.2 ± 4.815.4–49.419830.1 ±5.918.6–47.84828.3 ±5.220.9–46.74227.1 ±6.716.4–45.81728.0 ± 5.617.3–48.2500.12550.9609N/AN/A
Co-morbidities
Hypertensionn/n(%) 179(26.2)236(32.1)213(75.0)144(69.2)126(93.3)123(88.5) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0002 c
Dyslipidaemian/n(%)/N 74(59.2)125138(57.3)24137(44.6)8332(39.0)8229(48.3)6017(29.8)570.0932 0.00011 N/A0.0191 a0.001 b1.0 c
Atrial fibrilation/fluttern/n(%) 14(2.1)35(4.8)60(21.1)46(22.1)65(48.1)70(50.4) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b,c
Previous coronary revascularisationn/n(%) 0(0.0)6(0.8)9(3.2)28(13.5)35(25.9)76(54.7) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b,c
Previous myocardial infarctionn/n(%) 1(0.1)10(1.4)18(6.3)45(21.6)37(27.4)80(57.6) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b,c
Heart failuren/n(%) 0(0.0)0(0.0)20(7.0)33(15.9)91(67.4)111(79.9) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b,c
Moderate/severe valvular heart disease or previous valve heart surgeryn/n(%) 7(1.0)6(0.8)14(4.9)18(8.7)26(19.3)25(18.0) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0012 a <0.0001 b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0467 c
Peripheral artery diseasen/n(%) 7(1.0)19(2.6)14(4.9)17(8.2)11(8.1)32(23.0) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0012 a<0.0001 b0.5813 c 0.0014 a <0.0001 b 0.0006 c
Previous stroke/TIAn/n(%) 17(2.5)30(4.1)33(11.6)26(12.5)24(17.8)34(24.5) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b0.3522 c <0.0001 a,b 0.0183 c
Chronic kidney diseasen/n(%) 33(4.8)37(5.0)26(9.2)44(21.2)39(28.9)52(37.4) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0486 a <0.0001 b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0042 c
Haemodialysisn/n(%) 11(1.6)8(1.1)5(1.8)15(7.2)8(5.9)11(7.9) 0.01467 <0.0001 1.0 a0.0204 b0.0963 c<0.0001 a,b1.0 c
Asthman/n(%) 32(4.7)22(3.0)17(6.0)3(1.4)7(5.2)4(2.9)0.70530.4996N/AN/A
COPDn/n(%) 1(0.1)5(0.7)9(3.2)16(7.7)16(11.9)28(20.1) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0003 a <0.0001 b 0.0041 c <0.0001 a,b 0.0035 c
Hypothyroidismn/n(%) 65(9.5)11(1.5)56(19.7)12(5.8)52(38.5)12(8.6) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0002 c 0.004 a<0.0001 b1.0 c
Hyperthyroidismn/n(%) 3(0.4)1(0.1)7(2.5)3(1.4)3(2.2)4(2.9) 0.0083 0.0009 0.0272 a0.1807 b1.0 c0.1065 a0.0081 b1.0 c

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD, range (minimum–maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; TIA, transient ischemic attack; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red color text = statistically significant values.

Data regarding the relationship between the C2HEST score result and treatment applied before hospitalization is shown in the Table 2. In the both cohorts along with increased C2HEST score, we observed an increasing prevalence drug commonly used in cardiovascular disorders such as angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), b-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, statins, vitamin K antagonists (VKA), novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC), acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y12 inhibitor, metformin, and insulin.
Table 2

Baseline characteristics of the study cohort-treatment applied before hospitalization.

VariablesUnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]OMNIBUSp-Valuep Valuefor Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN = 284MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Treatment applied before hospitalization
ACEIn/n(%) 47(6.9)69(9.4)57(20.1)63(30.3)54(40.0)62(44.6) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0273 c
ARBn/n(%) 33(4.8)43(5.9)26(9.2)12(5.8)14(10.4)16(11.5) 0.0087 0.0413 0.04855 a0.0611 b1.0 c1.0 a0.0724 b0.2546 c
MRAn/n(%) 3(0.4)15(2.0)13(4.6)20(9.6)20(14.8)29(20.9) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0021 c <0.0001 a,b 0.0158 c
β-blockern/n(%) 78(11.4)119(16.2)102(35.9)77(37.0)76(56.3)81(58.3) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0004 c <0.0001 a,b 0.0005 c
Calcium channel blocker dihydropiridinesn/n(%) 37(5.4)66(9.0)48(16.9)36(17.3)34(25.2)40(28.8) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b0.1863 c 0.003 a <0.0001 b 0.0493 c
α-adrenergic blockern/n(%) 10(1.5)35(4.8)6(2.1)28(13.5)8(5.9)31(22.3) 0.0113 <0.0001 1.0 a0.0137 b0.2272 c<0.0001 a,b0.1358 c
Amiodaronen/n(%) 1(0.1)0(0.0)1(0.4)1(0.5)0(0.0)1(0.7)0.61650.1027N/AN/A
Thiazide or thiazide-like diureticn/n(%) 29(4.3)39(5.3)36(12.7)11(5.3)16(11.9)19(13.7) <0.0001 0.0008 <0.0001 a0.0026 b1 c 1.0 a0.0017 b0.0345 c
Loop diureticn/n(%) 13(1.9)26(3.5)25(8.8)40(19.2)33(24.4)48(34.5) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0061 c
Statinn/n(%) 40(5.9)63(8.6)56(19.7)65(31.3)49(36.3)77(55.4) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0012 c <0.0001 a, b, c
Acetylsalicylic acidn/n(%) 35(5.1)46(6.3)44(15.5)51(24.5)33(24.4)49(35.3) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b0.1137 c<0.0001 a,b0.1234 c
The second antiplatelet drugn/n(%) 1(0.1)6(0.8)5(1.8)5(2.4)4(3.0)18(12.9) 0.0009 <0.0001 0.0292 a0.0094 b1.0 c0.2154 a<0.0001 b0.0007 c
LMWHn/n(%) 32(4.7)42(5.7)23(8.1)18(8.7)11(8.1)15(10.8)0.06740.0535N/AN/A
VKAn/n(%) 4(0.6)6(0.8)6(2.1)8(3.8)10(7.4)13(9.4) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.2172 a<0.0001 b0.038 c 0.0129 a<0.0001 b0.1213 c
NOACn/n(%) 6(0.9)12(1.6)22(7.7)15(7.2)23(17.0)29(20.9) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0207 c 0.0002 a <0.0001 b 0.001 c
Insulinn/n(%) 23(3.4)39(5.3)14(4.9)15(7.2)22(16.3)18(12.9) <0.0001 0.0038 1.0 a<0.0001 b0.0007 c 1.0 a0.0047 b0.3296 c
Metforminn/n(%) 40(5.9)64(8.7)35(12.3)32(15.4)22(16.3)29(20.9) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0031 a0.0002 b1.0 c0.022 a0.0001 b0.7261 c
SGLT2 inhibitorn/n(%) 4(0.6)7(1.0)4(1.4)3(1.4)3(2.2)6(4.3)0.12658 0.018 N/A1.0 a0.0286 b0.4938 c
Oral antidiabetics other than SGLT2 inhibitor and metforminn/n(%) 10(1.5)17(2.3)20(7.0)14(6.7)11(8.1)17(12.2) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b1.0 c0.01 a<0.0001 b0.3507 c
Proton pump inhibitorn/n(%) 31(4.5)58(7.9)39(13.7)36(17.3)37(27.4)49(35.3) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0034 c 0.0003 a <0.0001 b 0.0007 c
Oral corticosteroidn/n(%) 31(4.5)31(4.2)17(6.0)7(3.4)5(3.7)1(0.7)0.51640.125N/AN/A
Immuno-suppressionother than oral corticosteroidn/n(%) 24(3.5)25(3.4)12(4.2)10(4.8)2(1.5)0(0.0)0.3606 0.0185 N/A1.0 a0.0686 b0.0209 c

Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above the cut-off point; ACEI, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin receptor blockers; MRAs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; VKA, vitamin K antagonists; NOAC, novel oral anticoagulants; SGLT2 inhibitors, sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red color text = statistically significant values.

Table 3 shows the sex-specific baseline characteristics of patient-reported symptoms, and vital signs during the hospital admission in the studied cohort. The female but not male cohort, had significant differences between the C2HEST strata regarding the prevalence of cough, smell dysfunction, body temperature, and systolic blood pressure, which were decreasing as the score raised. Opposite findings were observed regarding dyspnoea, heart rate, and the diastolic blood pressure.
Table 3

Patient-reported symptoms, vital signs and abnormalities measured during physical examination at hospital admission in the studied cohort.

VariablesUnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]OMNIBUSp Valuep Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN = 284MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Patient-reported symptoms
Coughn/n(%) 219(32.1)236(32.1)71(25.0)53(25.5)27(20.0)42(30.2) 0.0047 0.18590.102 a0.0208 b0.9427 cn/A
Dyspnoean/n(%) 244(35.8)325(44.2)110(38.7)96(46.2)63(46.7)83(59.7)0.0551 0.0035 N/A1.0 a0.0033 b0.0538 c
Chest painn/n(%) 49(7.2)53(7.2)18(6.3)16(7.7)11(8.1)16(11.5)0.78550.2237N/AN/A
Smell dysfunctionn/n(%) 26(3.8)35(4.8)3(1.1)7(3.4)0(0.0)5(3.6) 0.0039 0.61420.0656 a0.0414 b1.0 cN/A
Diarrhoean/n(%) 37(5.4)38(5.2)22(7.7)11(5.3)11(8.1)8(5.8)0.26670.9606N/AN/A
Nausea/Vomitingn/n(%) 36(5.3)21(2.9)18(6.3)9(4.3)11(8.1)3(2.2)0.40650.4662N/AN/A
Measured vital signs
Body temperature, °Cmean ± SD/min-max/N 37.1 ± 0.835.0–40.541637.1 ± 0.934.4–40.039336.9 ± 0.935.8–40.013136.9 ± 1.035.0–40.010436.8 ± 0.935.2–40.06337.1 ± 0.835.5–40.078 0.0456 0.38880.3 a0.07 b0.588 cN/A
Heart rate, beats/minute mean ± SD/min-max/N 85.9 ± 14.648–15049086.9 ± 16.548–16055584.6 ± 17.250–16021783.5 ± 15.552–14017087.4 ± 21.336–17011682.3 ± 15.858–1401240.4159 0.0035 N/A0.045 a0.012 b0.773 c
Respiratory rate breaths/minutemean ± SD/min-max/N 17.9 ± 5.912–5010718.9 ± 5.712–509717.8 ± 3.812–313419.6 ± 6.712–453419.0 ± 4.112–292219.6 ± 7.612–50240.51850.8014N/AN/A
Systolic blood pressure mmHgmean ± SD/min-max/N 128.6 ± 21.374–240488132.6 ± 21.160–220552133.2 ± 24.250–210216135.6 ± 26.750–270169135.6 ± 25.570–210117133.5 ± 24.085–200127 0.004 0.41490.042 a0.018 b0.687 cN/A
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHgmean ± SD/min-max/N 77.4 ± 12.540–15048779.5 ± 12.740–13055077.1 ± 13.740–15721479.3 ± 13.545–1501667.5 ± 15.540–14311775.1 ± 15.240–1201270.8167 0.0091 N/A0.986 a0.007 b0.034 c
SpO2 on room air, % (FiO2 = 21%)mean ± SD/min-max/N 94.4 ± 5.956–10042191.1 ± 7.948–9939390.8 ± 8.550–10016088.2 ± 10.950–9912191.2 ± 6.964–998489.2 ± 9.950–9983 <0.0001 0.0102 <0.0001 a0.0003 b0.934 c0.018 a0.205 b0.79 c
Abnormalities detected during physical examination
Craclesn/n(%) 62(9.1)92(12.5)47(16.5)52(25.0)30(22.2)36(25.9) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0038 a<0.0001 b0.6164 c<0.0001 a0.0002 b1.0 c
Wheezingn/n(%) 32(4.7)62(8.4)23(8.1)33(15.9)32(23.7)37(26.6) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.1611 a<0.0001 b,c 0.0078 a<0.0001 b0.0628 c
Pulmonarycongestionn/n(%) 70(10.3)114(15.5)51(18.0)54(26.0)37(27.4)41(29.5) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0044 a<0.0001 b0.1096 c0.0022 a0.0004 b1.0 c

Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD, range (minimum -maximum) and number of non-missing values. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above the cut-off point; SD, standard deviation. OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable, a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red color text = statistically significant values.

The detailed characteristics of the laboratory parameters measured during the hospitalisation in the study cohort were pooled in Table 4 and Table 5.
Table 4

Patient initial and on discharge laboratory assay in the studied cohort after C2HEST risk stratification.

Parameter Time of AssessmentUnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]p-ValueOMNIBUSp-Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMales
Morphology
Leucocytesn/n(%)/NOn admission>12 × 103/µL85(13.8)615116(16.9)68652(18.8)27732(15.8)20323(17.7)13029(212)1370.30850.3279N/AN/A
4–12× 103/µL467(75.9)615504(73.5)686198(71.5)277147(72.4)20391(70.0)130100(73.0)137
<4 × 103/µL63(10.2)61566(9.6)68627(9.7)27724(11.8)20316(12.3)1308(5.8)137
On discharge >12 × 103/µL81(13.2)615119(17.3)68655(19.9)27748(23.6)20336(27.7)13028(20.4)137 0.0008 0.0028 0.0971 a0.0006 b0.5375 c0.002 a1.0 b0.1331 c
4–12× 103/µL487(79.2)615530 (77.3)686205(74.0)277132(65.0)20385(65.4)130103(75.2)137
<4 × 103/µL47(7.6)61537(5.4)68617(6.1)27723(11.3)2039(6.9)1306(4.4)137
Haemoglobinn/n(%)/NOn admission<12 g/dL females <13 g/dL males anaemia172(28.0)615173(25.2)68691(32.9)277104(51.2)20363(48.5)13084(61.3)137 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.4836 a<0.0001 b0.0106 c <0.0001a,b0.2546 c
On discharge 266(43.3)615244(35.6)686122(44.0)277136(67.0)20379(60.8)13092(67.2)137 0.0011 <0.0001 1.0 a0.0012 b0.0071 c <0.0001 a,b1.0 c
Plateletsmean ± SD/min-max/N On admission ×103/µL244.8 ± 115.74.0–1356615227.4 ± 101.00.0–746.0686244.9 ± 115.841.0–740.0277209.8 ± 108.33.0–730.0203236.9 ± 98.78.0–537.0130198.9 ± 83.615.0–578.01370.7077 0.001 N/A0.099 a0.002 b0.548 c
On discharge 267.7 ± 122.92.0–929.0614273.6 ± 133.06.0–1101.0685259.6 ± 117.127.0–694.0277225.7 ± 124.33.0–606.0203225.6 ± 102.34.0–592.0130203.3 ± 92.315.0–472.0137 0.0003 <0.0001 0.614 a0.0002 b0.009 c <0.0001 a,b0.139 c
Acid -base balance in the arterial blood gas
PHmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admission 7.42 ± 0.087.19–7.58487.43 ± 0.097.04–7.57737.43 ± 0.077.24–7.53377.43 ± 0.077.10–7.54517.39 ± 0.087.09–7.52327.42 ± 0.077.28–7.54350.22870.8496N/AN/A
On discharge 7.43 ± 0.077.22–7.54487.42 ± 0.097.06–7.54737.43 ± 0.067.27–7.53377.42 ± 0.097.01–7.55517.44 ± 0,067.26–7.56327.40 ± 0.067.25–7.52350.87820.5746N/AN/A
PaO2mean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmHg75.3 ± 33.012.8–207.04870.2 ± 22.823.5–136.07380.7 ± 54.228.3–286.03773.2 ± 42.528.6–298.05170.7 ± 25.732.8–134.03270.5 ± 41.423.7–222.0350.5620.9031N/AN/A
On discharge 74.8 ± 27.712.8–207..04875.7 ± 26.023.5–165.07381.9 ± 55.023.3–286.03774.6 ± 43.528.6–298.05169.5 ± 27.628.5–134.03263.6 ± 20.528.5–129.0350.4499 0.0316 N/A0.985 a0.028 b0.268 c
PaCO2mean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmHg38.3 ± 8.220.2–58.04837.8 ± 11.525.7–82.47337.2 ± 9.326.9–79.43736.3 ± 9.620.9–67.05138.6 ± 13.625.0–88,43238.7 ± 8.019.7–61.0350.80840.4415N/AN/A
On discharge 38.3 ± 8.420.2–62.24838.5 ± 10.724.1–75.57338.5 ± 10.027.8–84.43737.5 ± 11.720.9–88.45137.4 ± 11.525.0–88.43239.9 ± 8.726.8–67.8350.90710.5398N/AN/A
HCO3 standardmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmol/L25.0 ± 3.712.5–32.94724.9 ± 3.812.1–32.87324.9 ± 4.416.9–39.53624.0 ± 4.014.3–32.44923.4 ± 4.613.5–32.33224.8 ± 4.517.5–38.6350.26660.4967N/AN/A
On discharge 25.3 ± 3.412.5–35.74724.8 ± 4.012.1–33.67325.7 ± 4.816.9–40.33625.0 ± 6.113.7–51.74925.1 ± 4.317.4–35.83224.7 ± 3.719.4–36.7350.88620.9539N/AN/A
BEmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmol/L0.63 ± 5.06[−]15.7–5.9161.12 ± 4.67[−]9.1–10.5252.96 ± 4.72[−]3.3–15.7170.88 ± 5.59[−]12.5–9.726[−]0.1 ± 4.75[−]7.4–7.972.92 ± 5.21[−]3.3–14.6170.27450.4315N/AN/A
On discharge 1.21 ± 5.91[−]15.7–11.9160.46 ± 5.21[−]11.0–8.3253.54 ± 4.99[−]3.3–17.1171.62 ± 6.58[−]14.7–11.8260.91 ± 4.58[−]7.4–7.971.65 ± 5.0[−]5.3–13.2170.3630.6978N/AN/A
Lactatesmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmol/L2.0 ± 0.80.6–4.3382.7 ± 1.91.1–12.8672.0 ± 1.00.6–5.7322.0 ± 0.70.5–3.8472.9 ± 2.10.8–12.0312.1 ± 1.40.6–5.7300.1027 0.0291 N/A0.02 a0.199 b0.913 c
On discharge 2.1 ± 0.80.7–4.9382.7 ± 1.91.0–12.8672.0 ± 0.90.6–5.7322.2 ± 1.10.5–6.4472.6 ± 1.30.8–6.0312.2 ± 1.10.8–4.3300.05440.239N/AN/A
Electrolytes, inflammatory and iron biomarkers
Namean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmol/L138.3 ± 3.8106.0−155.0605138.2 ± 4.8109.0−159.0683137.7 ± 7.6101.0−175.0272137.7 ± 6.1105.0−158.0203138.3 ± 7.7108.0−174.0130137.6 ± 5.9112.0−158.01370.48030.3745N/AN/A
On discharge 138.9 ± 3.7113.0−167.0605139.3 ± 4.8109.0−175.0683139.0 ± 7.4101.0−172.0272139.4 ± 7.2105.0−165.0203140.7 ± 7.1124.0−172.0130139.8 ± 6.3120.0–157.0137 0.0179 0.63890.977 a0.013 b0.062 cN/A
Kmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmmol/L3.99 ± 0.542.33–6.56094.13 ± 0.612.0–7.56844.06 ± 0.72.42 ± 5.92754.25 ± 0.692.4–7.02024.14 ± 0.742.53–6.61304.43 ± 0.873.0–8.7137 0.0403 0.0002 0.325 a0.059 b0.479 c0.072 a0.0005 b0.1 c
On discharge 4.13 ± 0.562.47–7.46094.33 ± 0.62.0–6.96844.26 ± 0.752.28–6.322754.5 ± 0.772.4–7.02024.36 ± 0.692.53–6.51304.51 ± 0.692.76–6.64137 0.0004 0.0011 0.033 a0.002 b0.373 c0.015 a,b0.983 c
CRPmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/L60.49 ± 72.410.13−531.5859790.54 ± 91.630.32−496.9867774.25 ± 84.610.4−538.5527595.36 ± 88.060.29–487.3820264.75 ± 72.930.4–344.9513087.45 ± 87.370.4–390.941370.06740.69258N/AN/A
On discharge 36.85 ± 64.50.13–494.7359758.33± 88.960.25–496.9867762.6 ± 89.560.22–538.5527586.23± 99.390.46–447.6120263.78± 80.70.4–431.913083.42± 90.910.42–390.94137 <0.0001 0.0001 <0.0001 a0.001 b0.99 c0.001 a0.01 b0.961 c
Procalcitoninmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionng/mL0.33 ± 1.550.01–24.954041.24 ± 5.790.01–61.285142.0 ± 15.130.01–196.041881.62 ± 6.60.01–72.611561.36 ± 6.460.01–60.77981.59 ± 5.810.01–49.831130.09930.7214N/AN/A
On discharge 0.57 ± 3.260.01–41.324041.16 ± 6.140.01–75.165140.86 ± 3.620.01–30.671882.49 ± 8.440.01–81.091561.11 ± 6.170.01–60.77981.19 ± 3.680.01–27.611130.50440.1807N/AN/A
IL-6mean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionpg/mL85.5 ± 660.22.0–9099.019245.2 ± 98.72.0–1000.028834.3 ± 52.72.0–398.08455.9 ± 75.32.0–499.05955.2 ± 94.12.0–421.03869.2 ± 97.82.0–369.0400.26920.2811N/AN/A
On discharge 90.3 ± 672.02.0–9099.019242.0 ± 111.02.0–1000.028828.5 ± 53.52.0–398.08456.5 ± 94.32.0–499.05967.6 ± 170.42.0–1000.03882.3 ± 150.62.0–804.0400.18770.1939N/AN/A
D-dimermean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionµg/mL2.60 ± 8.390.15–-118.324444.63 ± 14.460.18–132.825585.40 ± 12.570.2–107.652067.84 ± 20.750.23–127.241673.78 ± 11.480.24–107.541007.01 ± 21.410.22–128.0103 0.0133 0.11920.011 a0.596 b0.501 cN/A
On discharge 3.17 ± 11.990.15–128.04443.25 ± 9.630.21–115.135584.38 ± 8.280.21–74.282067.2 ± 17.510.23–106.021673.65 ± 11.230.21–107.541003.72 ± 6.90.22–46.721030.3287 0.0215 N/A0.016 a0.821 b0.059 c
INRmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admission 1.07 ± 0.20.82–3.65801.19 ± 0.630.83–15.26471.25 ± 0.690.87–7.82571.27 ± 0.440.89–4.371881.58 ± 1.750.9–18.741271.99 ± 2.980.89–21.1124 <0.0001 0.0031 0.0002 a0.005 b0.112 c0.136 a0.01 b0.023 c
On discharge 1.1 ± 0.40.82–9.25801.17 ± 0.330.87–6.826471.2 ± 0.80.88–13.12571.32 ± 0.70.92–7.851881.4 ± 0.80.9–8.01271.53 ± 1.880.87–21.1124 0.0003 0.0019 0.048 a0.001 b0.251 c0.011 a0.082 b0.452 c
APTTn/n(%)/NOn admission>60 s61.1561223.563031.224742.218464.812454.2120 0.0243 0.57041.0 a0.0337 b0.1964 cN/A
On discharge 142.5561325.163031.224752.718443.212486.71200.34720.2518N/AN/A
Fibrinogenmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissiong/dL4.69 ± 1.530.35–9.041535.11 ± 2.140.44–10.01324.34 ± 1.40.35–6.72294.93 ± 2.00.37–9.2523.62 ± 1.061.78–5.51245.31 ± 1.712.54–9.129 0.0004 0.67650.441 a0.0003 b0.096 cN/A
On discharge 4.58 ± 1.80.44–10.01534.95 ± 2.130.6–10.01325.01 ± 2.110.35–9.4294.98 ± 2.30.37–11.3523.84 ± 1.211.53–5.75245.71 ± 2.072.2–9.0429 0.0184 0.2055 0.561 a0.037 b0.04 c N/A

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD. range (minimum -maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation. OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable, a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red text—statistically significant values.

Table 5

Patient initial and on discharge laboratory assay in the studied cohort after C2HEST risk stratification.

Parameter Time of AssessmentUnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]p-ValueOMNIBUSp-Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMalesFemalesMales
Biochemistry
Glucosemean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL128.1 ± 67.061.0–671.0425139.3 ± 79.528.0–933.0638144.1 ± 74.954.0–662.0257160.5 ± 110.347.0–1026.0192149.1 ± 86.570–685120152.0 ± 109.437.0–1064.0126 0.0035 0.0315 0.014 a0.039 b0.849 c0.038 a0.433 b0.779 c
On discharge 119.0 ± 56.037.0–595.0425127.3 ± 78.850.0–1444.0638136.4 ± 75.354.0–596.0257150.7 ± 92.247.0–578.0192144.8 ± 90.414.0–685.0120143.5 ± 63.137.0–406.0126 0.0003 0.0012 0.004 a0.01 b0.653 c0.005 a0.033 b0.688 c
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)mean ± SD/min-max/NOn admission%7.1 ± 1.94.2–12.2477.9 ± 2.54.9–14.9807.9 ± 2.74.9–16.6397.2 ± 1.44.8–12.2367.2 ± 1.75.1–11.4337.4 ± 1.95.1–13.7280.31820.1497N/AN/A
On discharge 7.0 ± 1.84.2–12.2477.8 ± 2,44.9–14.9807.9 ± 2.74.9–16.8397.1 ± 1.44.7–12.2367.2 ± 1.75.1–11.4337.4 ± 1.95.1–13.7280.22990.1563N/AN/A
Ureamean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL36.3 ± 35.17.0–301.048147.6 ± 35.85.0–307.066460.2 ± 50.68.0–353.025669.9 ± 47.515.0–271.019969.5 ± 48.912.0–336.012484.4 ± 57.117.0–369.0133 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001a,b0.197 c <0.0001a,b 0.042 c
On discharge 35.5 ± 29.67.0–231.048144.9 ± 32.95.0–307.066459.0 ± 48.210.0–353.025675.6 ± 59.812.0–396.019966.9 ± 41.715.0–204.012488.9 ± 58.621.0–342.0133 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001a,b0.236 c<0.0001a,b0.11 c
Creatininemean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL1.0 ± 0.990.34–11.995331.26 ± 1.30.26–14.876831.22 ± 0.970.48–9.562751.76 ± 1.60.58–12.662031.58 ± 1.270.44–8.461302.02 ± 1.810.49–11.3137 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.008 a < 0.0001 b 0.012 c 0.0002 a< 0.0001 b0.369 c
On discharge 0.96 ± 0.860.34–9.115331.16 ± 1.180.26–14.876831.16 ± 0.920.45–9.062751.81 ± 1.720.43–12.35 2031.42 ± 1.210.43–7.661301.89 ± 1.580.43–9.27137 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.009 a0.0002 b0.084 c<0.0001a,b0.877 c
eGFRmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmL/min/1.73 m284.6 ± 32.10.0–207.053185.3 ± 35.93.0–433.068060.8 ± 25.04.0–136.027563.7 ± 33.14.0–149.020349.7 ± 26.45.0–145.013055.3 ± 32.05.0–180.0137 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0 a < 0.0001 b 0.0002 c 0.0 a 0.0 b 0.054 c
On discharge 86.6 ± 32.10.0–207.053191.5 ± 36.53.0–433.068065.0 ± 26.64.0–148.027566.0 ± 36.14.0–208,020358.2 ± 30.35.0–147.013058.6 ± 35.76.0–209.0137 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0 a< 0.0001 b0.076 c<0.0001a,b0.147 c
Total proteinmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissiong/L6.1 ± 0.83.9–8.21456.1 ± 0.83.5–8.11865.8 ± 0.83.6–8.2786.0 ± 1.04.2–9.5745.7 ± 0.93.3–8.1625.7 ± 0.93.4–8.261 0.0235 0.05550.148 a0.033 b0.741 cN/A
On discharge 6.0 ± 0.93.9–8.21456.0 ± 0.93.0–8.11865.7 ± 0.93.7–8.2785.9 ± 0.94.3–9.1745.5 ± 1.03.3–8.1625.7 ± 0.93.4–7.861 0.0012 0.0162 0.049 a0.002 b0.388 c0.799 a0.012 b0.158 c
Albuminmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissiong/L3.1 ± 0.61.6–4.61523.2 ± 0.61.5–5.12223.0 ± 0.51.1–4.3783.2 ± 0.62.1–4.4822.9 ± 0.60.7–3.7623.1 ± 0.61.5–4.967 0.0134 0.30870.287 a0.011 b0.307 cN/A
On discharge 3.1 ± 0.61.1–4.61523.0 ± 0.70.4–5.12223.0 ± 0.51.9–4.2783.1 ± 0.61.7–4,4822.8 ± 0.51.4–3.7622.8 ± 0.70.9–4..567 0.005 0.05490.64 a0.004 b0.277 cN/A
ASTmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admission =IU/L56.8 ± 139.76.0–2405.038462.7 ± 89.45.0–1261.049972.7 ± 343.68.0–477619358.8 ± 49.57.0–323.0154113.5 ± 450.88.0–3866.010460.2 ± 101.810.0–731.01070.38690.7844N/AN/A
On discharge 123.4 ± 1244.410.0–23,896.038468.3 ± 255.15.0–3761.049943.3 ± 46.58.0–380.0193107.5 ± 537.611.0–6591.0154148.9 ± 702.48.0–6088.010497.4 ± 402.47.0–4019.01070.14380.5525N/AN/A
ALTmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionIU/L47.0 ± 87.75.0–1411.043561.4 ± 96.44.0–1278.053752.2 ± 251.25.0–3700.021945.0 ± 43.24.0–270.017257.1 ± 183.65.0–1361.011246.7 ± 88.26.0–612.01130.8212 0.0081 N/A 0.006 a0.256 b0.98 c
On discharge 65.5 ± 265.46.0–5163.043574.3 ± 105.04.0–1217.053738.5 ± 46.15.0–449.021965.1 ± 124.77.0–1247.017274.4 ± 308.85.0–2985.011271.4 ± 207.39.0–1570.01130.06240.6835N/AN/A
Bilirubinmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL0.78 ± 1.680.1–19.13630.88 ± 1.240.1–15.14890.85 ± 0.880.2–9.21950.80 ± 0.490.2–3.11570.77 ± 0.510.1–4.21000.98 ± 0.840.3–6.61030.57710.1292N/AN/A
On discharge 0.77 ± 1.650.1–19.03630.95 ± 1.910.1–25.94890.95 ± 2.550.2–35.31950.76 ± 0.470.2–3.11570.78 ± 0.670.3–6.11001.06 ± 1.330.2–12.81030.6611 0.0224 N/A0.123 a0.754 b0.08 c
LDHmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionU/L404.5 ± 478.550.0–7100.0328448.6 ± 282.2120.0–3194.0448368.2 ± 189.844.0–1357.0156418.9 ± 212.9134.0–1172.0130468.1 ± 1015.371.0–9505.083416.9 ± 269.7113.0–1863.0860.35760.3427N/AN/A
On discharge 387.2 ± 739.350.0–11,227.0328389.2 ± 396.293.0–6577.0448340.3 ± 167.344.0–1357.0156407.1 ± 243.5112.0–1584.0130474.0 ± 1028.1106.0–9505.083388.8 ± 215.497.0–1260.0860.2920.7848N/AN/A
Cardiacbiomarkers
BNPmean ± SD/min-max/N On admission pg/mL152.5 ± 241.11.7–1130.854254.1 ± 763.71.7–6924.2107455.4 ± 872.410.1–4890.650433.3 ± 747.23.0–3153.250711.7 ± 995.622.3–4993.0561432.8 ± 2864.55.9–13,368.442 <0.0001 0.0206 0.054 a0.0004 b0.338 c0.35 a0.031 b0.082 c
On discharge 177.7 ± 308.15.3–1877.054239.8 ± 753.11.7–6924.2107536.1 ± 1562.610.1–10,622.850396.2 ± 697.63.0–3153.250592.3 ± 769.122.3–3729.8561389.2 ± 2735.411.9–13,368.442 0.0008 0.0206 0.257 a0.001 b0.971 c0.412 a0.027 b0.067 c
NT-proBNPmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionng/mL1467.1± 3250.718.7–16,551.7622126.5± 9426.712.0–70,000.01106608.9± 12,708.749.6–70,000.05410,323.4 ± 16,141.418.2–70,000.05514,888.1 ± 18,982.5119.6–70,000.04313,522.6 ± 19,276.7343.7–70,000.055 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.015 a 0.0001 b 0.043 c 0.002 a0.0003 b0.614 c
On discharge 1694.0 ± 5047.828.5–35,000.0621893.4 ± 7660.612.0–70,000.01107852.3 ± 15,159.049.6–70,000.05410,661.5 ± 16,202.218.2–70,000.05513,084.8 ± 17,275.9119.6–69,519.74313,265.6 ± 17,873.3391.3–70,000.055 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.016 a0.0003 b0.267 c0.0009 a<0.0001 b0.703 c
Troponin I,mean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionng/mL53.1 ± 211.10.0–1994.8263189.6 ± 1015.91.3–11,758.2415658.5 ± 7215.31.9–94,365.51713044.2 ± 15,485.91.0–125,592.6134988.4 ± 3316.83.3–21,022.994542.0 ± 1724.64.8–14,128.897 0.015 0.0185 0.517 a0.02 b0.867 c0.087 a0.133 b0.156 c
On discharge 105.7 ± 873.10.2–12,391.6263124.0 ± 797.80.8–11,758.2415692.7 ± 7243.61.9–94,365.51713359.3 ± 18,244.20.8–174,652.6134838.2 ± 3666.21.8–29.828.394493.1 ± 1504.84.8–12,657.2970.0977 0.0095 N/A0.104 a0.055 b0.17 c
n/n(%)/N = F: >46.8 ng/mLM: >102.6 ng/mL>3-fold upper range4617.52636716.14155129.81714735.11344952.1943839.297 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0113 a <0.0001b 0.0017 c <0.0001a,b1.0 c
LDL-cholesterolmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL106.8 ± 64.86.0–510.08596.2 ± 40.527.0–242.014793.9 ± 39.723.0–199.06979.4 ± 40.617.0–230.06083.3 ± 44.214.0–187.04964.2 ± 37.66.0–210.039 0.0498 <0.0001 0.283 a0.038 b0.381 c 0.022 a<0.0001 b0.142 c
HDL-cholesterolmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmg/dL43.9 ± 17.92.0–120.08637.7 ± 14.510.0–101.015044.5 ± 16.712.0–110.06935.2 ± 11.97.0–66.06039.8 ± 17.58.0–79.04834.0 ± 10.317.0–61.0380.3039790.154387N/AN/A
Triglyceridesmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admission mg/dL189.4 ± 154.540.0–1100.0122173.7 ± 105.144.0–664.0237141.0 ± 94.548.0–595.083148.0 ± 98.850.0–550.081133.4 ± 56.746.0–282.060124.8 ± 66.951.0–413.056 0.0022 0.0001 0.016 a0.001 b0.817 c0.117 a<0.0001 b0.232 c
Hormones
25-hydroxy-vitamin Dmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionng/mL27.4 ± 21.83.5–146.19923.4 ± 15.03.5–126.420626.1 ± 17.23.5–77.76322.9 ± 15.45.1–75.64522.4 ± 16.83.5–63.53614.5 ± 9.63.5–39.1250.3738 0.0006 N/A0.974 a0.0006 b0.018 c
TSHmean ± SD/min-max/NOn admissionmIU/L1.55 ± 2.00.01–18.61861.2 ± 1.060.0–6.332551.72 ± 2.980.01–28.811371.31 ± 1.390.01–8.28952.74 ±5.040.0–38.24851.43 ± 1.250.0–6.36620.10630.3834N/AN/A

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD. range (minimum -maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation. OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable, a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red text = statistically significant values.

Both genders revealed significant differences between the C2HEST strata and complete blood count parameters along with ion parameters. Noteworthy, no significant differences between strata in terms of initial inflammatory markers (procalcitonin, IL-6, CRP) along with acid-base balance parameters were noted. The parameters of kidney function, including urea, creatinine, eGFR maintained significantly worse in the high-risk C2HEST stratum for both genders, however baseline serum concentration of protein and albumin was significantly lower only in females with higher C2HEST score value. In both study cohorts we observed increasing level of cardiac injury markers including troponin T and NT-pro-BNP levels in patientsallocated higher-risk group depending on their C2HEST score value. Surprisingly, lipid disorders (level of LDL and triglycerides) noticed at the time of admission were less severe subjects from high-risk stratum in both study cohorts.

3.2. Specific Treatment Applied during Hospitalization

Differences in applied treatment during hospitalization between the C2HEST group among genders are highlighted in Table 6. Women in the higher C2HEST stratum were prone to receive convalescent plasma. We did not observe any differences among the male cohort. In both study arms, we observed changes in the prevalence of antibiotic application. Subjects from the high-risk stratum more often received this type of therapy.
Table 6

Treatment applied during hospitalization.

Variables, UnitsLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]p-ValueOMNIBUSp Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN = 384MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Applied treatment and procedures
Systemic corticosteroidn/n(%)299(43.8)409(55.6)127(44.7)119(57.2)64(47.4)78(56.1)0.74560.9222N/AN/A
Convalescentplasman/n(%)54(7.9)113(15.4)12(4.2)29(13.9)15(11.1)16(11.5) 0.0274 0.47490.1599 a0.8816 b0.0406 c N/A
Tocilizumabn/n(%)11(1.6)11(1.5)0(0.0)2(1.0)1(0.7)0(0.0)0.0540.4308N/AN/A
Remdesivirn/n(%)83(12.2)153(20.8)37(13.0)35(16.8)12(8.9)23(16.5)0.46270.2822N/AN/A
Antibioticn/n(%)338(49.6)408(55.5)157(55.3)146(70.2)88(65.2)103(74.1) 0.0026 <0.0001 0.3633 a 0.0038 b 0.2079 c0.0006 a 0.0002 b1.0 c

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD, range (minimum–maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red text = statistically significant values.

The assignment to specific C2HEST stratum score correlated with the type of respiratory support applied during the hospitalization. Additionally, in the male cohort, it correlated with the prevalence of coronary revascularization procedures during index hospitalization along with the need for the catecholamine’s administration (Table 7).
Table 7

Applied treatment and procedures.

VariablesLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]p ValueOMNIBUSp Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 681MalesN = 734FemalesN= 284MalesN = 207FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Applied treatment and procedures
The most advanced respiratory support applied during the hospitalisationno oxygenn/n(%)409(60.1)332(45.2)140(49.3)62(30.0)50(37.0)39(28.1) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.001a <0.0001 b 0.0114 c 0.0001 a0.0007b1.0 c
low flow oxygen supportn/n(%)199(29.2)252(34.3)103(36.3)85(41.1)65(48.1)59(42.4)
high flow nasal cannulanon-invasive ventilationn/n(%)26(3.8)56(7.6)24(8.5)28(13.5)17(12.6)22(15.8)
invasive ventilationn/n(%)47(6.9)94(12.8)17(6.0)32(15.5)3(2.2)19(13.7)
Oxygenation parameters from the period of qualification for advanced respiratory support:SpO2, %mean ± SD/(min-max/N92.2 ± 6.8(59–100)22188.8 ± 8.6(50–100)18987.0 ± 11.0(55–99)6486.0 ± 8.4(60–99)6986.2 ± 9.3(59–98)4085.1 ± 10.5(60–99)48 <0.0001 0.0159 0.002 a0.0008 b0.908 c0.057 a0.072 b0.87 c
Therapy with catecholaminesn/n(%)/N39(5.7)68292(12.5)73514(4.9)31(14.9)2089(6.7)33(23.7)0.7614 0.0025 N/A1.0 a0.0026 b0.1576 c
Coronary revascularisation or/and an indication for coronary revascularisation,n/n(%)/N1(0.1)6827(1.0)7353(1.1)8(3.8)2081(0.7)6(4.3)0.0795 0.0021 N/A0.0225 a0.0286 b1.0 c
Haemodialysisn/n(%)/N15(2.2)68231(4.2)7352(0.7)11(0.7)2084(3.0)8(5.8)0.14860.6417N/AN/A

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD, range (minimum–maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance;N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red text = statistically significant values.

3.3. Association C2HEST Score with Results and Mortality

In the female cohort, the in-hospital and three-month andsix-month mortality rates were the highest in high-risk C2HEST stratum reaching 31.9%, 48.1%, and 61.4%. Noteworthy, mortality rates in the medium-risk stratum were significantly higher than in low-risk. All data regarding short and long-term mortality were presented in Table 8. Similarly, in the males’ cohort in-hospital, three-month and six-month mortality was also highest in the high-risk C2HEST stratum and come to 38.8%, 59.0%, and 68.8%. Also, in this study arm differences between all C2HEST groups were statistically significant.
Table 8

Total and in-hospital all-cause mortality in the C2HEST risk strata in males’ and females’ cohort.

VariablesLow Risk[0–1]Medium[2–3]High Risk[≥4]p ValueOMNIBUSp Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN = 284MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
All-cause mortality rate
In-hospital mortalityn/n(%)36(5.3)83(11.3)50(17.6)60(28.8)43(31.9)54(38.8) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0048 c <0.0001 a,b0.2029 c
3-month mortalityn/n(%)68(10.0)134(18.2)95(33.5)103(49.5)65(48.1)82(59.0) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.016 c <0.0001 a,b0.3134 c
6-month mortalityn/n(%/)/N72(17.3)415142(31.4)452104(49.3)211 104(60.1)173 70 (61.4)11486(68.8)125 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b0.1454 c<0.0001 a,b0.4696 c
Hospitalization
Duration of hospitalization daysmean ± SD/(min-max)10.4 ±12.7(1–131)12.4 ± 14.4(1–130)12.1 ± 11.9(1–68)14.6 ± 15.6(1–124)18.3 ±17.5(1–87)13.9 ± 13.9(1–121) <0.0001 0.1386 0.128 a <0.0001 b 0.0007 c NA
End of hospitalisation deathn/n(%)36(5.3)83(11.3)50(17.6)60(28.8)43(31.9)54(38.8) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 a,b 0.0143 c <0.0001 a,b0.3663 c
discharge to home–full recovery 515(75.5)478(65.0)141(49.6)79(38.0)57(42.2)46(33.1)
transfer to another hospital –worsening) 60(8.8)79(10.7)59(20.8)38(18.3)17(12.6)27(19.4)
transfer to another hospital –in recovery 71(10.4)95(12.9)34(12.0)31(14.9)18(13.3)12(8.6)

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD, range (minimum–maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Information about the numbers with valid values is provided in the left column. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red text = statistically significant values.

3.4. The All-Cause Mortality Discriminatory Performance of the C2HEST Score

The time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in both study cohorts revealed that the C2HEST scale is more sensitive in the female cohort (Figure 1). The C2HEST predicting AUC in women vs. man cohorts were higher at all calculated periods. Following the 1-month AUC = 72.5 vs. 70.3% 3-month AUC = 74.6 vs. 71.3%, six-month AUC = 73.8 vs. 68.4 %. All of the data were calculated for all-cause death without competing risk Figure 2 present ROC analysis in the male population. Figure 3 presented the time-dependent AUC for the C2HEST score in predicting the all-cause deaths in both cohort, slightly higher AUC value was observed in the female arm. The survival curves for the C2HEST stratum in both study cohorts were estimated using Kaplan-Meier functions. The p value for Log-rank test was <0.0001 (Figure 4). We have observed differences in estimated survival probability in both study cohorts. Practically, starting from admission time, the females were more likely to survive the COVID-19. Estimated six-month survival probability for high-risk subjects reached 0.5 in the female cohort, while for the male subject was below 0.4. Similarly, in medium-risk-stratum for women the survival probability was above 0.6 when compared to 0.5 in men. Additionally, the low-risk subjects in the female cohort maintained at the level of more than 0.9 for the whole observation period while in men reached 0.8, respectively.
Figure 1

The time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for all-cause mortality in female cohort.

Figure 2

The time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for all-cause mortality in male cohort.

Figure 3

Time-dependent ROC analysis for the C2HEST predictive abilities of all cause death in both study cohorts.

Figure 4

The survival curves for the C2HEST stratum in both study cohorts estimated by Kaplan-Meier function.

Subsequently, two Cox models were analyzed to assess the effect of the C2HEST score stratification on COVID-19 mortality. The overall model takes an uncategorized value of the C2HEST score, and it met the hazard proportional assumption in both study cohorts. An additional point in the C2HEST score resulted in increased the total-death intensity approximately in 42.8% in female subjects (HR 1.428, 95% CI 1.349–1.513 p < 0.0001) and respectively in male population 40.0% (HR 1.400, 95% CI 1.331–1.474 p < 0.0001). Furthermore, considering the categorized model, the change from the low to the medium category in the female population increased death expectation 4.267 times, and respectively; 3.289 times for males. Subsequently, transfer between the low-risk stratum to high-risk stratum raised all-cause death intensity 6.52 (female) and 4.476(male) times. The data are shown in Table 9 and Table 10.
Table 9

The total all-cause-death hazard Ratios for C2HEST risk stratification in female cohort.

Total Death
HR 95%CI p Value
Overall 1.4281.349–1.513 <0.0001
Risk strata
Low risk vs. Medium risk 4.2673.170–5.732 <0.0001
Low risk vs. High risk 6.5244.714–9.031 <0.0001

Red text—statistically significant values.

Table 10

The total all-cause-death Hazard Ratios for C2HEST risk stratification in male cohort.

Total Death
HR 95%CI p Value
Overall 1.4001.331–1.474 <0.0001
Risk strata
Low risk vs. Medium risk 3.2892.559–4.227 <0.0001
Low risk vs.High risk 4.4763.438–5.827 <0.0001

Red text = statistically significant values.

The associations of individual C2HEST score components with mortality in both study cohorts are presented in Table 11 and Table 12. The highest prognostic value for all-cause- death in both study groups was noticed for age (in women 2.750 vs. 3.059 in men, respectively). Interestingly, coronary artery disease was associated with higher HR for death only in men, whereas the COPD and hypertension only in woman.
Table 11

Associations of individual C2HEST score components with mortality in female cohort.

ComponentHRCI Min.CI Max.p Value
All-causemortalityCoronaryarterydisease1.1330.7431.7280.5627
COPD2.0831.2993.532 0.0064
Age > 752.7502.0883.6216 <0.0001
Thyroiddisease0.7840.5661.1050.1649
Hypertension1.8811.3942.537 <0.0001
HfrEF1.5841.1342.212 0.007

Abbreviations: COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HfrEF, heart failure with reduce ejection fraction. Red text = statistically significant values.

Table 12

Associations of individual C2HEST score components with mortality in male cohort.

ComponentHRCI Min.CI Max.p Value
All-causemortalityCoronaryarterydisease1.5681.1802.084 0.0019
COPD1.1820.7861.6150.4227
Age > 753.05412.4113.869 <0.0001
Thyroiddisease1.1260.6881.8420.6378
Hypertension1.2000.9521.5130.1233
HfrEF1.4151.0551.899 0.0206

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HfrEF, heart failure with reduce ejection fraction. Red text = statistically significant values.

Additionally, we verified whether the original cut-off values for particular C2HEST score risk (the low/medium/high-risk categories for 0–1/2–3/≥4 points, respectively) is potentially the best possible stratification system. Regarding the difference in Kaplan-Meier survival curves, all of the possible C2HEST intervals were analyzed in both study cohorts, and for each, we calculated the log-rank statistics (Table 13 and Table 14). The highest value of log-rank test statistics, presenting the best cut-off point for high (h) and medium (m) strata was obtained for the original C2HEST-score risk strata in the female population (m2 and h4, respectively). On the other hand, in male cohort the highest value of the Log-rank corresponded with m2 and h5, which reflects the following strata: 0–1 low, 2–4 medium, 5–8 high.
Table 13

The log-rank statistics for matching the C2HEST risk strata for in-hospital mortality in female cohort.

H2h3h4h5h6h7h8
m1 164.317148.669142.661121.294105.396105.53310.259
m2 158.373 166.213 158.483155.603155.94012.436
m3 122.464116.484116.367116.19010.699
m4 79.81386.50582.8468.919
m5 45.42340.9466.156
m6 3.8201.793
m7 0.139

Abbreviations: m, medium; h, high. Red text = statistically significant values.

Table 14

The Log-rank statistics for matching the C2HEST risk strata for in-hospital mortality in male cohort.

H2h3h4h5h6h7h8
m1 152.361134.106118.904112.78598.64984.1498.929
m2 152.619154.813 159.181 155.352149.99712.183
m3 116.694121.473118.900115.00410.673
m4 84.07982.38979.8658.909
m5 58.58658.2447.628
m6 32.3265.686
m7 2.769

Abbreviations: m, medium; h, high. Red text = statistically significant values.

3.5. Relationship of C2HEST Score with Non-Fatal Outcomes

Clinical non-fatal events in the C2HEST risk strata in both study arms are presented in Table 15. In both study cohorts, the subjects assigned to the C2HEST high-risk stratum were characterized by greater prevalence of pneumonia, acute kidney injury, and cardiovascular disorders during hospitalization. This observation regards myocardial injury, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, and cardiogenic shock. Additional, female subjects with higher C2HEST values were more prone to subject a new episode of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) during hospitalization. On the other hand, a high C2HEST score in the male subpopulation was associated with a higher probability of shock, acute liver dysfunction, and bleeding occurrence.
Table 15

Clinical non-fatal events in the C2HEST risk strata in both study arms.

VariablesLow Risk[0,1]Medium[2,3]High Risk[≥4]p-ValueOMNIBUSp-Value for Post-Hoc Analysis
FemalesN = 682MalesN = 735FemalesN= 284MalesN = 208FemalesN = 135MalesN = 139FemalesMalesFemalesMales
Shockn/n(%)34(5.0)74(10.1)15(5.3)31(14.9)11(8.1)22(15.8)0.3314 0.0443 N/A0.2006 a0.1958 b1.0 c
Hypovolemic shockn/n(%)9(1.3)13(1.8)4(1.4)3(1.4)5(3.7)1(0.7)0.13620.811N/AN/A
Cardiogenic shockn/n(%)2(0.3)5(0.7)1(0.4)10(4.8)5(3.7)9(6.5) 0.0018 <0.0001 1.0 a0.0055 b0.0439 c 0.0007 a0.0002 b1.0 c
Septic shockn/n(%)26(3.8)62(8.4)12(4.2)18(8.7)4(3.0)18(12.9)0.81980.2296N/AN/A
Venous thromboembolic diseasen/n(%)30(4.4)53(7.2)18(6.3)12(5.8)8(5.9)7(5.0)0.40930.5447N/AN/A
Pulmonary embolismn/n(%)24(3.5)44(6.0)15(5.3)11(5.3)8(5.9)5(3.6)0.55160.8214N/AN/A
Myocardial infarctionn/n(%)2 (0.3)6(0.8)3(1.1)7(3.4)3(2.2)5(3.6) 0.0251 0.0038 0.464 a0.1026 b1.0 c0.035 a0.0586 b1.0 c
Myocardial injury, 3x,n/n(%)/N46(17.5)26367(16.1)41551(29.8)17147(35.1)13449(52.1)9438(39.2)97 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0114 a <0.0001 b 0.0017 c <0.0001 a,b1.0 c
Acute heart failuren/n(%)5(0.7)3(0.4)8(2.8)14(6.7)24(17.8)22(15.8) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0777 a<0.0001 b,c <0.0001 a,b 0.0329 c
Stroke/TIAn/n(%)4(0.6)14(1.9)12(4.2)7(3.4)4(3.0)3(2.2) 0.0002 0.41670.0006 a0.0872 b1.0 cN/A
Pneumonian/n(%)268(39.3)414(56.3)164(57.4)141(67.8)88(65.2)98(70.5) <0.0001 0.0004 <0.0001 a, b0.5343 c0.0117 a0.0076 b1.0 c
Complete respiratory failuren/n(%)/N23(47.9)4834(46.6)7316(43.2)3730(58.8)5120(62.5)3223(65.7)350.25280.1348N/AN/A
SIRSn/n(%)/N53(8.2)64789(12.6)70522(7.8)28320(9.7)20621(15.7)13415(10.8)139 0.0158 0.48181.0 a0.0343 b0.0636 cN/A
Sepsisn/n(%)/N3(1.0)2886(2.1)2883(2.9)1044(5.1)793(5.3)574(5.9)680.0530.1334N/AN/A
Acute kidney injuryn/n(%)37(5.4)73(9.9)30(10.6)37(17.8)28(20.7)31(22.3) <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0193 a <0.0001 b 0.0229 c 0.0083 a0.0002 b1.0 c
Acute liver dysfunctionn/n(%)/N11(1.9)59219(2.9)66412(4.5)26810(5.1)1975(4.0)1269(7.1)1270.0619 0.0458 N/A0.5214 a0.0936 b1.0 c
Multiple organ dysfunction syndromen/n(%)7(1.0)14(1.9)3(1.1)5(2.4)4(3.0)4(2.9)0.16740.6162N/AN/A
Bleedingsn/n(%)27(4.0)37(5.0)13(4.6)12(5.8)9(6.7)16(11.5)0.3758 0.0128 N/A1.0 a0.0184 b0.2545 c

Continuous variables are presented as: mean ± SD range (minimum-maximum) and number of non-missing values. Categorized variables are presented as: a number with a percentage. Abbreviations: N, valid measurements; n, number of patients with parameter above cut-off point; SD, standard deviation; OMNIBUS, analysis of variance; TIA, transient ischemic attack; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; N/A, non-applicable; a low risk vs. medium risk, b low risk vs. high risk, c medium risk vs. high risk. Red color text = statistically significant values.

Additionally, the overall odds ratio for the discriminatory performance of the C2HEST score on the clinical non-fatal events was summarized in Figure 5 (female) and Figure 6 (male). Noteworthy, the highest predictive of C2HEST score value in the female cohort was achieved for, acute heart failure (ORoverall = 2.180, 95%CI 1.778–2.724, p = 0.0034). Similar findings were observed in the male cohort -the highest value was observed for acute heart failure (ORoverall = 1.861, 95%CI 1.574–2.229, p < 0.0001).
Figure 5

The overall odds ratio for the discriminatory performance of the C2HEST score on the clinical non-fatal events in female cohort. Abbreviations: MODS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; TIA, transient ischemic attack; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Significance code: * <0.05; ** <0.01; *** <0.001; **** <0.0001.

Figure 6

The overall odds ratio for the discriminatory performance of the C2HEST score on the clinical non-fatal events in female cohort. Abbreviations: MODS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; TIA, transient ischemic attack; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Significance code: * <0.05; ** <0.01; *** <0.001; **** <0.0001.

4. Discussion

Several studies demonstrated [11] no significant differences regarding the susceptibility to the SARS-CoV-2 infection between biological genders. Nevertheless, male gender is an independent risk factor for the poor outcome of COVID-19 including higher severity and fatality rates [12]. Various biological factors may play a role in sex-dependent different responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Biological sex affects the initial phase of infection mainly by sex-based differences in the expression of the ACE2 receptor responsible for the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 into the cells [13]. Sex differences affect also an immune response to viral infection. Females tend to have a lower potency to develop an uncontrolled inflammatory response process [14] with coexisting decreased viral load during the infection. The physiological mechanism of this process is multifactorial [15,16] and includes the sex-specific transcriptional regulatory network, various gen variants especially connected with chromosome X, epigenetic modifications, transcription factors, and sex steroids. Noteworthy, different social, behavioral, and comorbid factors are also postulated [17] to worsen the prognosis in men. The previously observed sex-dependent dichotomy in the COVID-19 mortality was also confirmed in our study. For all of the three C2HEST strata, greater fatality rate in the male cohort compared to the female one was noted. Independently, we confirmed the previously reported usefulness of the C2HEST score in predicting the adverse COVID-19 outcomes, including the mortality in both genders. However, despite lower mortality observed in women, the ROC analysis revealed that the C2HEST-score is a more sensitive tool in women regarding the short- and mid-term (up to 6 month-) mortality (for 1-month the AUC = 72.5 vs. 70.3%and for 6-month AUC = 73.8 vs. 68.4 % in men, respectively). Gender is often considered among the variables defining the probability of a severe clinical outcome of infection. Analysis of individual C2HEST score variables in both cohorts revealed differences between gender in features significantly affecting mortality. Beyond age and previously diagnosed heart failure common for both sexes, in the female group, only hypertension and COPD reached statistical significance. On the other hand, in the male cohort such observation was made for coronary artery disease. Although the pathophysiology underlying severe COVID-19 course remains not fully understood, it can be hypothesized that endothelial dysfunction induced by hypertension [18] might abolish the initial favorable female immune response [14] to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, the endothelial dysfunction promotes microvascular thrombi and pro-thrombotic state associated with respiratory failure and fatal outcome in COVID-19 [19]. On the other hand, the increased mortality rate of COVID-19 male patients with CAD is probably related to the presence of multiple comorbidities [20] or direct myocardial injury connected with enhanced platelet activation induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection [21]. It is noteworthy that, besides observed in both genders significant differences in mortality between the C2HEST strata, a similar relationship was noticed in the prevalence of pneumonia and cardiovascular non-fatal secondary outcomes (myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and acute kidney failure). Our study revealed that in the male cohort alongside with higher C2HEST stratum, a greater rate of acute liver injury (ALI), bleedings and shock was present. This observation supports the previously described relationships between male gender and liver impairment in COVID subjects [22]. Although the mechanism of liver injury in SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear, a combination of direct viral inclusion of hepatocytes, as well as the result of uncontrolled immune, may be responsible for the damage, which interestingly, have also been associated with poor outcomes in COVID patients [23]. Furthermore, some data [5,24] suggests that individuals with gastrointestinal problems particularly those with earlier stages of liver impairment are more prone to develop severe COVID-19 disease with advanced respiratory failure. Concerning epidemiological data a higher prevalence of liver disorders [25] with coexisting higher susceptibility for endothelial dysfunction [26,27] may be important factors affecting outcomes in the male population. It is possible that acute liver injury in the male cohort may be also partially responsible for the higher rate of bleedings as a result of coagulation systems disorders (mild elevations of INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT)) observed in patients with ALI in course of COVID-19 [23,28]. Initial higher level of INR in males high-risk C2HEST score stratum seems to support this thesis. Although the principal clinical manifestation of severe COVID-19 is a respiratory failure with a coexisting uncontrolled immune reaction, subjects with COVID-19 show a high incidence of thromboembolic events [29], particularly in fatal cases [30], however antithrombotic treatment prior to COVID-19 infection is unlikely to have a protective effect [31]. Bleeding complications in subjects with COVID-19 give rise to justifiable concerns [32,33] and should always be considered before applying anticoagulation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore several predictive scores [34] focused on identifying patients at increased risk for major bleeding have been recently proposed. Results of our study suggest that the C2HEST score might be also useful in the identification of the “high-risk for bleeding” subpopulations. However, subsequent studies are needed to define predictive value of the C2HEST score in terms of bleedings.

Limitations

We have observed several limitations of this study including the retrospective, single-center, character. These factors could affect the validity of our conclusions. Additionally, the study population was homogeneous and consisted of hospitalized patients and not involved ambulatory subjects. Furthermore, all hospitalizations were carried out in the face of limited resources (global COVID-19 pandemic) probably these extraordinary circumstances could partially affect the clinical outcomes.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first demonstration of the sex-dependent differences in the predictive value of the C2HEST score in subjects admitted to hospital due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This simple risk score evaluated during the hospital admission could predict adverse outcomes in both including in-hospital and six-month-mortality and other clinical events such as acute kidney injury, myocardial injury acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock. Additionally in the male cohort, it well correlated with acute liver injury and prevalence of all kinds of bleeding. The simplicity of this scale allows assuming that C2HEST-score might become a useful triage tool for risk stratification in both genders with COVID-19.
  30 in total

1.  Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19.

Authors:  Maximilian Ackermann; Stijn E Verleden; Mark Kuehnel; Axel Haverich; Tobias Welte; Florian Laenger; Arno Vanstapel; Christopher Werlein; Helge Stark; Alexandar Tzankov; William W Li; Vincent W Li; Steven J Mentzer; Danny Jonigk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sex-Based Differences in Susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection.

Authors:  Rudragouda Channappanavar; Craig Fett; Matthias Mack; Patrick P Ten Eyck; David K Meyerholz; Stanley Perlman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Immunological co-ordination between gut and lungs in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Shruti Ahlawat; Krishna Kant Sharma
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.303

5.  Relationships between Viral Load and the Clinical Course of COVID-19.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsukagoshi; Daisuke Shinoda; Mariko Saito; Kaori Okayama; Mitsuru Sada; Hirokazu Kimura; Nobuhiro Saruki
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Effects of SARS-CoV-2 on Cardiovascular System: The Dual Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the Virus Receptor and Homeostasis Regulator-Review.

Authors:  Aneta Aleksova; Giulia Gagno; Gianfranco Sinagra; Antonio Paolo Beltrami; Milijana Janjusevic; Giuseppe Ippolito; Alimuddin Zumla; Alessandra Lucia Fluca; Federico Ferro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) Related Thrombotic and Bleeding Complications in Critically Ill Patients: Experience from an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Thejus Jayakrishnan; Aaron Haag; Shane Mealy; Corbyn Minich; Abraham Attah; Michael Turk; Nada Alrifai; Laith Alhuneafat; Fadi Khoury; Adeel Nasrullah; Patrick Wedgeworth; Melissa Mosley; Kirtivardan Vashistha; Veli Bakalov; Abhishek Chaturvedi; Swathi Sangli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Possible mechanisms responsible for acute coronary events in COVID-19.

Authors:  Aakash R Sheth; Udhayvir S Grewal; Harsh P Patel; Samarthkumar Thakkar; Subhash Garikipati; Jashwanth Gaddam; Danish Bawa
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 9.  Is COVID-19 Gender-sensitive?

Authors:  Shreya Mukherjee; Kalipada Pahan
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 7.285

10.  Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission.

Authors:  Hannah Peckham; Nina M de Gruijter; Charles Raine; Anna Radziszewska; Coziana Ciurtin; Lucy R Wedderburn; Elizabeth C Rosser; Kate Webb; Claire T Deakin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 17.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Usefulness of C2HEST Score in Predicting Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 in Heart Failure and Non-Heart-Failure Cohorts.

Authors:  Piotr Rola; Adrian Doroszko; Małgorzata Trocha; Katarzyna Giniewicz; Krzysztof Kujawa; Jakub Gawryś; Tomasz Matys; Damian Gajecki; Marcin Madziarski; Stanisław Zieliński; Tomasz Skalec; Jarosław Drobnik; Agata Sebastian; Anna Zubkiewicz-Zarębska; Barbara Adamik; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Katarzyna Kiliś-Pstrusinska; Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz; Michał Pomorski; Marcin Protasiewicz; Janusz Sokołowski; Szymon Włodarczak; Ewa Anita Jankowska; Katarzyna Madziarska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  The Usefulness of the C2HEST Risk Score in Predicting Clinical Outcomes among Hospitalized Subjects with COVID-19 and Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Piotr Rola; Adrian Doroszko; Małgorzata Trocha; Damian Gajecki; Jakub Gawryś; Tomasz Matys; Katarzyna Giniewicz; Krzysztof Kujawa; Marek Skarupski; Barbara Adamik; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Katarzyna Kiliś-Pstrusińska; Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz; Michał Pomorski; Marcin Protasiewicz; Marcin Madziarski; Marta Madej; Grzegorz Gogolewski; Goutam Chourasia; Dorota Zielińska; Szymon Włodarczak; Maciej Rabczyński; Janusz Sokołowski; Ewa Anita Jankowska; Katarzyna Madziarska
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 5.818

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.