| Literature DB >> 35336907 |
Naru Zhang1, Qianting Ji1, Zezhong Liu2, Kaiming Tang3, Yubin Xie3, Kangchen Li1, Jie Zhou2, Sisi Li1, Haotian Shang1, Zecan Shi1, Tianyu Zheng1, Jiawei Yao1, Lu Lu2, Shuofeng Yuan3, Shibo Jiang2.
Abstract
The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become more serious because of the continuous emergence of variants of concern (VOC), thus calling for the development of broad-spectrum vaccines with greater efficacy. Adjuvants play important roles in enhancing the immunogenicity of protein-based subunit vaccines. In this study, we compared the effect of three adjuvants, including aluminum, nanoparticle manganese and MF59, on the immunogenicity of three protein-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates, including RBD-Fc, RBD and S-trimer. We found that the nanoparticle manganese adjuvant elicited the highest titers of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a, as well as neutralizing antibodies against infection by pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 and its Delta variant. What is more, the nanoparticle manganese adjuvant effectively reduced the viral load of the authentic SARS-CoV-2 and Delta variant in the cell culture supernatants. These results suggest that nanoparticle manganese, known to facilitate cGAS-STING activation, is an optimal adjuvant for protein-based COVID-19 subunit vaccines.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; MF59; SARS-CoV-2; aluminum; nanoparticle manganese; subunit vaccines; variants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336907 PMCID: PMC8950793 DOI: 10.3390/v14030501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Schematic diagram of immunization strategy and sample collection. Twelve groups of mice (five mice/group) were intramuscularly immunized with RBD-Fc, RBD and S-trimer plus PBS, alum, MF59 or nanoparticle manganese adjuvant, respectively, three times at two-week intervals. Sera were collected one week after each immunization for antibody detection and viral load reduction assay.
Figure 2RBD-specific IgG detection in immunized mouse sera. The IgG in immunized mouse sera were detected with ELISA using the RBD protein to coat the plates. (A) RBD-specific IgG endpoint titer on day 21 in all groups of immunized mice. (B) RBD-specific IgG endpoint titer on day 35 in all groups of immunized mice. (C) The curve of RBD-specific IgG in immunized mice on day 21. (D) The curve of RBD-specific IgG in immunized mice on day 35. Geometric mean was calculated for each set of data, as shown and compared. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA and is indicated as follows: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 3Titers of serum IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies to RBD protein in immunized mouse sera. RBD-specific IgG1 endpoint titer on day 21 (A) and on day 35 (B) in vaccinated mouse sera. RBD-specific IgG2a endpoint titer on day 21 (C) and on day 35 (D) in vaccinated mouse sera. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA and is indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 4Neutralization activity observed in vaccinated mouse sera on days 21 and 35 against pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (D614G) and Delta variant. Mice immunized with different formulations were capable of producing neutralizing antibody responses to varying extents. Sera collected from mice on days 21 and 35 were evaluated for their content of neutralization antibodies. (A) nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (D614G) pseudovirus by mouse sera collected on day 21. (B) nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (D614G) pseudovirus by mouse sera collected on day 35. (C) nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant pseudovirus by mouse sera collected on day 21. (D) nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant pseudovirus by mouse sera collected on day 35. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA and is indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 5Viral load reduction assay in vaccinated mouse sera on days 21 and 35 against both the authentic SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (HKU-001a strain) and Delta variant. VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells were used for viral infection, and the virus copies in the cell culture supernatants were quantified by real-time one-step (qRT-PCR). (A) Viral load reduction assay on SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (HKU-001a strain) by mouse sera collected on day 21. (B) Viral load reduction assay on SARS-CoV-2 wild-type (HKU-001a strain) by mouse sera collected on day 35. (C) Viral load reduction assay on SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by mouse sera collected on day 21. (D) Viral load reduction assay on SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by mouse sera collected on day 35. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA and is indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Error bars represent SD.