| Literature DB >> 35335268 |
Hammad Ullah1, Yaseen Hussain2,3,4, Cristina Santarcangelo1, Alessandra Baldi1, Alessandro Di Minno1, Haroon Khan3, Jianbo Xiao5,6, Maria Daglia1,6.
Abstract
Food spoilage makes foods undesirable and unacceptable for human use. The preservation of food is essential for human survival, and different techniques were initially used to limit the growth of spoiling microbes, e.g., drying, heating, salting, or fermentation. Water activity, temperature, redox potential, preservatives, and competitive microorganisms are the most important approaches used in the preservation of food products. Preservative agents are generally classified into antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-browning agents. On the other hand, artificial preservatives (sorbate, sulfite, or nitrite) may cause serious health hazards such as hypersensitivity, asthma, neurological damage, hyperactivity, and cancer. Thus, consumers prefer natural food preservatives to synthetic ones, as they are considered safer. Polyphenols have potential uses as biopreservatives in the food industry, because their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities can increase the storage life of food products. The antioxidant capacity of polyphenols is mainly due to the inhibition of free radical formation. Moreover, the antimicrobial activity of plants and herbs is mainly attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds. Thus, incorporation of botanical extracts rich in polyphenols in perishable foods can be considered since no pure polyphenolic compounds are authorized as food preservatives. However, individual polyphenols can be screened in this regard. In conclusion, this review highlights the use of phenolic compounds or botanical extracts rich in polyphenols as preservative agents with special reference to meat and dairy products.Entities:
Keywords: dairy products; food preservation; food spoilage; meat products; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335268 PMCID: PMC8954466 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Antioxidant potential of some selected botanical sources.
| Plant Species | Part Used | Extract | Total Phenolic Contents | Antioxidant Activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruits | 50% ethanol | 69.4 mg GAE/g dry weight | DPPH: 295 mM TE/g | [ | |
| Leaves | Methanol | 1.60 mg GAE/g dry weight | DPPH: IC50 34.58 (µg/mL) | [ | |
| Pomace | Methanol | 74.75 mg GAE/g dry weight | ABTS: 485.42 µM TEAC/g | [ | |
| Peel powder extract | Methanol | 54.84 mg GAE/g | DPPH: 88.82% inhibition | [ | |
| Leaves | Distilled water | 12.49 mg GAE/g dry weight | DPPH: EC50 15.50 mg/mL | [ | |
| Rice bran | 10% glycerol | 523.2 mg GAE/100 g dry weight | DPPH: 42.9% inhibition | [ | |
| Fruit peel extract | 75% ethanol | 53.12 mg GAE/g dry weight | DRAP: EC50 1217 µg/mL | [ |
Gallic acid equivalent (GAE); Trolox equivalent (TE); Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC); 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS); ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP).
Phenolic compounds and their antimicrobial activity.
| Compound | Source | Antimicrobial Activity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid, | [ | ||
| Chlorogenic acid |
|
| [ |
| Flavonoids (luteolin, apigenin, quercetin, acacetin), | [ | ||
| Phenolic acid, |
| [ | |
| Gallic acid, |
| [ | |
| Phenolic acids, |
| [ | |
| Tannins, |
| [ | |
| Proanthocyanidins | Grape seed extract |
| [ |
| Proanthocyanidins | Cranberry |
| [ |
| Proanthocyanidins | Peanut |
| [ |
| Anthocyanins | Wild blueberries | [ | |
| Anthocyanins |
|
| [ |