| Literature DB >> 30343444 |
Selvaraj Arokiyaraj1, Rajaraman Bharanidharan2,3, Paul Agastian4, Hakdong Shin5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the present study, hexane: methanol (50:50) leaf extract of Marisela minuta has been evaluated for its chemical composition, antioxidant effect and the antimicrobial mechanism of action against food borne pathogenic bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Docking analysis; Leaf extract; Marsilea minuta; Natural preservative
Year: 2018 PMID: 30343444 PMCID: PMC6768035 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-018-0476-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
GC–MS analysis of Marsilea minuta leaves extract
| Peak no | Components | Class of compound | Retention time | Area % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Phenol, 2,4-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl) | Phenol | 13.52 | 8.37 |
| 2. | Benzoic acid, 4-ethoxy-, ethyl ester | Aromatic acid ester | 13.76 | 43.39 |
| 3. | 1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol,3,7,11-trimethyl | Oxygenated sesquiterpene | 14.20 | 2.61 |
| 4. | Trans-Farnesol | Oxygenated sesquiterpene | 16.00 | 5.11 |
| 5. | 2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol,3,7,11-trimethyl-acetate | Sesquiterpene | 16.96 | 1.71 |
| 6. | Farnesol, acetate | Sesquiterpene | 17.22 | 18.42 |
| 7. | Phthalic acid, isobutyl undecyl ester | Diester | 17.54 | 4.91 |
| 8. | 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione | Spirolactone | 18.05 | 1.84 |
| 9. | Oxacycloheptadec-8-en-2-one | Lactone | 18.46 | 5.68 |
| 10. | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl-2-methylpropylester | Diester | 18.51 | 4.84 |
| 11. | Octadec-9-enoic acid | Unsaturated fatty acid | 19.64 | 1.89 |
| 12. | Oleic acid | Unsaturated fatty acid | 21.23 | 1.22 |
Compound proportions were calculated from the chromatograms obtained on the TG-5MS column. The percentage of the compounds detected in the GC that was calculated based on the relative area of individual compounds to the total area of the components identified from the extract
Fig. 1a FRAP scavenging activity of M. minuta leaves extract (%), b percentage inhibition of DPPH free radical by M. minuta leaves extract. Values represent the mean ± SEM of triplicate, independent experiments; the values labeled with Asterisk indicate statistically significant difference compared with standard compound as determined by Student t-test (p < 0.05)
IC50 value of FRAP and DPPH radical scavenging activity
| Antioxidant activity |
| EDTA | Vitamin C |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRAP µg/ml | 37.48 | 7.42 | – |
| DPPH µg/ml | 8.94 | – | 5.77 |
Antibacterial activity (zone of inhibition, mm) of M. minuta leaves extract
| Bacterial species |
| Streptomycin |
|---|---|---|
|
| 16 ± 0.42 | 26 ± 0.72 |
|
| 16 ± 0.38 | 24 ± 0.45 |
|
| 17 ± 0.27 | 25 ± 0.33 |
|
| 12 ± 0.34 | 26 ± 0.76 |
Values are mean of experiments performed in triplicate and data are expressed as mean ± SD
Minimum inhibitory concentration of M. minuta leaves extract
| Species | MICs (µg/ml) |
|---|---|
|
| 250 |
|
| 250 |
|
| 125 |
|
| 250 |
Fig. 2a Quantification of SOD level in M. minuta leaves extract treated bacterial species; b quantification of ALP level in M. minuta leaves extract treated bacterial species; c quantification of LDH level in M. minuta leaves extract treated bacterial species; d assessment of intracellular protein leakage of bacterial species treated with M. minuta leaves extract. Values represent the mean ± SEM of triplicate, independent experiments; the values labeled with Asterisk indicate statistically significant difference compared with untreated bacteria as determined by Student t-test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Morphological comparison of bacteria treated with M. minuta leaves extract by scanning electron micrograph. Arrows indicates swollen cells, leakage of cell contents and change in cell shape. A1—Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Control); A2—Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Treatment); B1—Klebsiella pneumonia (Control); B2—Klebsiella pneumonia (Treatment); C1—Enterococcus faecalis (Control); C2—Enterococcus faecalis (Treatment); D1—Bacillus subtilis (Control); D2—Bacillus subtilis (Treatment)
The docking scores of the ligands with the target protein
| Protein | Ligand | Binding energy (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| TEM-72 (PDB ID: 3P98) | Benzoic acid-4-ethoxy-ethyl ester | − 4.35 |
| SHV-2 (PDB ID: 1N9B) | Farnesol acetate | − 4.27 |
| Topoisomerase IV (PDB ID: 3LPS) | Farnesol acetate | − 5.19 |
Fig. 4Putative binding poses of ligands docked with TEM-72, SHV-2 and topoisomerase IV. The yellow dotted line indicates the H-bonding between the ligand and protein. a Molecular interaction of ligand benzoic acid-4-ethoxy-ethyl ester with TEM-72. b Molecular interaction of ligand farnesol acetate with SHV-2. c Molecular interaction of ligand farnesol acetate with Topoisomerase IV