| Literature DB >> 35334956 |
Velia Cassano1, Sofia Miceli1, Giuseppe Armentaro1, Gaia Chiara Mannino1, Vanessa Teresa Fiorentino1, Maria Perticone1, Elena Succurro1,2, Marta Letizia Hribal1,2, Francesco Andreozzi1,2, Francesco Perticone1, Giorgio Sesti3, Angela Sciacqua1,2.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible correlation between oxidative stress and subclinical myocardial damage, assessed with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in normal glucose tolerance (NGT) patients with one-hour plasma glucose values ≥ 155 mg/dL (NGT ≥ 155), comparing them to NGT < 155 subjects, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) newly diagnosed patients. We enrolled 100 Caucasian patients. All subjects underwent OGTT. The serum values of oxidative stress markers (8-isoprostane and Nox-2) were assessed with an ELISA test. Echocardiographic recordings were performed using an E-95 Pro ultrasound system. We observed significant differences, among the four groups, for fasting plasma glucose (p < 0.0001), one-hour postload (p < 0.0001), and two-hour postload plasma glucose (p < 0.0001). As compared with NGT < 155, NGT ≥ 155 exhibited significantly worse insulin sensitivity and higher values of hs-CRP. No significant differences were observed between NGT ≥ 155 and IGT patients. There was a significant increase in 8-isoprostane (p < 0.0001) and Nox-2 (p < 0.0001), from the first to fourth group, indicating an increase in oxidative stress with the worsening of the metabolic status. Serum levels of 8-isoprostane and Nox-2 were significantly increased in NGT ≥ 155 compared to the NGT < 155 group, but similar to IGT. The global longitudinal strain (GLS) appeared progressively lower proceeding from the NGT < 155 to T2DM group (p < 0.0001). For similar values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NGT ≥ 155 exhibited reduced GLS compared to NGT < 155 (p = 0.001), but similar to IGT patients. Our study demonstrated that NGT ≥ 155 subjects exhibit early functional impairment of myocardial contractile fibres, these alterations are correlated with increased oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: global longitudinal strain; hyperglycaemia; organ damage; oxidative stress; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334956 PMCID: PMC8950717 DOI: 10.3390/nu14061299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Anthropometric, hemodynamic, and biochemical characteristics of the study population according to glucose tolerance status.
| Variables | All | NGT < 155 | NGT ≥ 155 | IGT | T2DM (ND) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61/39 | 13/17 | 15/9 | 21/7 | 12/6 | 0.080 | |
| 61.4 ± 10.7 | 58.0 ± 12.2 | 65.0 ± 8.0 | 61.6 ± 11.2 | 62.2 ± 9.4 | 0.120 | |
| 30.5 ± 5.0 | 29.6 ± 5.7 | 31.6 ± 4.6 | 31.1 ± 5.1 | 29.7 ± 4.0 | 0.402 | |
| 134.4 ± 11.4 | 130 ± 13.0 | 134.6 ± 10.0 | 135.3 ± 9.0 | 139.8 ± 12.0 | 0.031 | |
| 79.9 ± 9.6 | 79.0 ± 8.8 | 81.2 ± 10.9 | 79.1 ± 9.8 | 80.8 ± 9.1 | 0.766 | |
| 54.7 ± 12.2 | 51.1 ± 13.1 | 53.4 ± 13.2 | 56.2 ± 11.1 | 60.4 ± 8.8 | 0.061 | |
| 69.9 ± 6.2 | 69.2 ± 5.3 | 68.6 ± 5.9 | 69.6 ± 5.6 | 73.5 ± 7.8 | 0.054 | |
| 99.2 ± 17.0 | 88.1 ± 11.7 | 95.9 ± 18.7 | 101.5 ± 12.5 | 118.4 ± 9.8 | <0.0001 | |
| 180.7 ± 47.7 | 127.1 ± 24.1 | 183.9 ± 31.7 | 197.9 ± 21.5 | 238.8 ± 31.0 | <0.0001 | |
| 154.6 ± 48.3 | 115.9 ± 29.6 | 125.0 ± 27.6 | 174.7 ± 14.6 | 227.4 ± 23.5 | <0.0001 | |
| 15.5 ± 6.0 | 11.2 ± 3.4 | 14.4 ± 4.3 | 18.7 ± 5.9 | 19.2 ± 6.6 | <0.0001 | |
| 100.6 ± 50.8 | 79.6 ± 38.4 | 119 ± 31.1 | 113.8 ± 66.3 | 90.4 ± 50.7 | 0.001 | |
| 98.1 ± 42.0 | 76.8 ± 24.0 | 80.9 ± 18.5 | 119.7 ± 48.1 | 122.8 ± 52.2 | <0.0001 | |
| 50.6 ± 20.9 | 73 ± 15.3 | 49.5 ± 11.2 | 38.0 ± 13.4 | 34.6 ± 16.5 | <0.0001 | |
| 179.2 ± 39.0 | 189.7 ± 40.0 | 178.8 ± 35.3 | 169.9 ± 34.5 | 176.5 ± 47.0 | 0.280 | |
| 138.1 ± 61.1 | 115.8 ± 31.0 | 123.0 ± 54.1 | 132.5 ± 71.4 | 203.9 ± 46.7 | <0.0001 | |
| 47.9 ± 12.1 | 50.5 ± 12.4 | 50.3 ± 11.9 | 45.5 ± 10.1 | 44.3 ± 13.5 | 0.170 | |
| 118 ± 36.7 | 124.9 ± 41.5 | 118.4 ± 33.5 | 111.4 ± 29.0 | 116.2 ± 43.5 | 0.576 | |
| 3.2 ± 2.4 | 1.5 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 1.9 | 4.2 ± 3.0 | 4.3 ± 1.7 | <0.0001 | |
| 103.5 ± 25.7 | 119.6 ± 28.0 | 102.3 ± 20.0 | 93.2 ± 21.3 | 94.4 ± 23.1 | <0.0001 | |
| 14.0 ± 1.5 | 14.0 ± 1.3 | 14.0 ± 1.6 | 13.4 ± 1.6 | 13.4 ± 1.8 | 0.464 |
NGT = Normal Glucose Tolerance; IGT = Impaired Glucose Tolerance; T2DM = Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; BMI = Body Mass Index; SBP = Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure; PP = Pulse Pressure; HR = Heart Rate; FPG = Fasting Plasma Glucose; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; e-GFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb = haemoglobin. Data are mean ± SD. a = Overall difference among groups (ANOVA).
Figure 1Serum levels of 8-isoprostane (pg/mL) in the four groups according to glucose tolerance status. * p < 0.0001 (ANOVA test); ** p < 0.0001 vs. NGT < 155 (Bonferroni post hoc test).
Figure 2Serum levels of Nox-2 (nmol/L) in the four groups according to glucose tolerance status. * p < 0.0001 (ANOVA test); ** p < 0.0001 vs. NGT < 155 (Bonferroni post hoc test).
Morpho-functional echocardiographic parameters of the study population according to glucose tolerance.
| Variables | All | NGT < 155 | NGT ≥ 155 | IGT | T2DM (ND) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 0.347 | |
| 1.22 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | <0.0001 | |
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | <0.0001 | |
| 198.5 ± 37.2 | 172.7 ± 22.1 | 193.7 ± 30.3 | 209.8 ± 32.4 | 230.2 ± 42.6 | <0.0001 | |
| 109 ± 19.7 | 94.2 ± 10.8 | 107.3 ± 17.6 | 116.8 ± 15.7 | 124 ± 22.7 | <0.0001 | |
| 78.9 ± 16.4 | 77.6 ± 12.3 | 74.5 ± 16.0 | 82 ± 16.4 | 81.5 ± 22.2 | 0.325 | |
| 61.1 ± 4.2 | 62.7 ± 4.4 | 61 ± 4.7 | 60.3 ± 3.3 | 60 ± 3.5 | 0.052 | |
| −19.4 ± 2.4 | −21.1 ± 1.8 | −19.1 ± 2.2 | −18 ± 1.4 | −18.1 ± 2.1 | <0.0001 | |
| −21.6 ± 2.9 | −24.0 ± 1.5 | −21.7 ± 2.2 | −20.1 ± 2.3 | −19.7 ± 3.7 | <0.0001 | |
| −16.1 ± 2 | −16.1 ± 1.3 | −16.5 ± 2 | −15.5 ± 2 | −16.3 ± 2.8 | 0.340 | |
|
| 1.34 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 |
| 2045.7 ± 370.5 | 2096.6 ± 491.4 | 1954.6 ± 285.5 | 2068.4 ± 311.9 | 2047.4 ± 325.0 | <0.0001 | |
| 2114.2 ± 407.1 | 2457.5 ± 419.8 | 2074.4 ± 220.2 | 1944.9 ± 350.2 | 1858.4 ± 279.2 | <0.0001 | |
| 93 ± 46.7 | 55.6 ± 25.6 | 100.3 ± 36.6 | 106.3 ± 44.7 | 125.3 ± 51.3 | <0.0001 | |
| 95.5 (93–97.75) * | 98.0 ± 0.3 | 94.5 ± 0.6 | 94.0 ± 0.7 | 93.0 ± 1.2 | <0.0001 | |
| 21.6 ± 3.0 | 24.0 ± 2.8 | 21.5 ± 2.5 | 20.9 ± 2.3 | 19.2 ± 1.9 | <0.0001 | |
| 31.9 ± 6.8 | 26.4 ± 5.7 | 33.1 ± 6.5 | 33.9 ± 5.4 | 36.3 ± 5.4 | <0.0001 | |
| 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | <0.0001 | |
| 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 | |
| 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | <0.0001 |
|
| 12.9 ± 3.4 | 9.3 ± 2.0 | 13.2 ± 1.5 | 14 ± 2.2 | 16.2 ± 3.2 | <0.0001 |
| 33.9 ± 5.0 | 30.4 ± 4.5 | 34.2 ± 3.5 | 34.5 ± 4.9 | 38.7 ± 3.1 | <0.0001 |
LVDD = Left Ventricular diastolic diameter; dIVSd = diastolic interventricular septum, dPW = diastolic posterior wall; LVM = Left Ventricular Mass; LVMI = Left ventricular Mass Index; LVEF = Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; GLS = Global longitudinal strain; GLS endo = GLS Endocardial; GLS epi = GLS epicardial; GLS endo/epi ratio = GLS Endocardial/Epicardial strain ratio; GWI = Global work index; GCW = Global Constructive Work; GWW = Global myocardial wasted work; GWE = Global myocardial work efficiency, TAPSE = Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; s-PAP = systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; LAVI = left atrial volume index; E = Wave E; A = Wave A. Data are mean ± SD. * Log-transformed (ln) variables. a = Overall difference among groups (ANOVA).
Figure 3Global longitudinal strain (%) according to different groups of glucose tolerance. * p < 0.0001 (ANOVA test); ** p < 0.0001 vs. NGT < 155 (Bonferroni post hoc test).
Figure 4Global myocardial work values (mmHg%) according to different groups of glucose tolerance. * p < 0.0001 (ANOVA test); ** p < 0.0001 vs. NGT < 155, *° p = 0.016 vs. NGT < 155; # p = 0.001 vs. NGT < 155 (Bonferroni post hoc test).
Linear regression analysis between GLS endo/epi ratio, GLS, GWE, and different covariates in the whole study population.
| GLS Endo/Epi Ratio | GLS | GWE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| r/p | r/p | r/p | |
| 0.280/0.002 | −0.184/0.034 | 0.199/0.023 | |
|
| 0.541/<0.0001 | −0.538/<0.0001 | 0.496/<0.0001 |
| 0.029/0.388 | −0.195/0.026 | 0.347/0.001 | |
| −0.559/<0.0001 | 0.564/<0.0001 | −0.420/<0.0001 | |
| −0.086/0.198 | 0.160/0.056 | −0.237/0.009 | |
| −0.537/<0.0001 | 0.445/<0.0001 | −0.279/0.002 | |
| −0.276/0.003 | 0.370/<0.0001 | −0.465/<0.0001 | |
| −0.551/<0.0001 | 0.468/<0.0001 | −0.336/<0.0001 | |
| −0.069/0.249 | 0.140/0.082 | −0.086/0.198 | |
|
| −0.494/<0.0001 | 0.473/<0.0001 | −0.359/<0.0001 |
| −0.401/<0.0001 | 0.408/<0.0001 | −0.302/0.001 |
eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; PP = Pulse Pressure; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HR = Heart Rate; LVMI = Left Ventricular Mass Index; Hb = haemoglobin; GLS = Global Longitudinal Strain; GLS endo/epi ratio = GLS Endocardial/Epicardial strain ratio; GWE = Global myocardial work efficiency.