| Literature DB >> 35334932 |
Alex Brocchi1, Eleni Rebelos2, Angela Dardano1, Michele Mantuano1, Giuseppe Daniele1.
Abstract
We are facing an obesity epidemic, and obesity itself and its close companion, type 2 diabetes, are independent risk factors for neurodegeneration. While most medical treatments fail to induce a clinically meaningful improvement in neurodegenerative disorders, lifestyle interventions have emerged in the spotlight. A recently rediscovered approach is intermittent fasting (IF), which, compared to the classic caloric restriction regimens, limits only the time of eating, rather than the number of calories allowed per day. There is already a large amount of evidence from preclinical and clinical studies showing the beneficial effects of IF. In this review, we specifically focus on the effects of IF on brain metabolism. Key molecular players modified during IF and involved in its beneficial central effects (ketone bodies, BDNF, GABA, GH/IGF-1, FGF2, sirtuin-3, mTOR, and gut microbiota) are identified and discussed. Studies suggest that IF induces several molecular and cellular adaptations in neurons, which, overall, enhance cellular stress resistance, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis. Still, the absence of guidelines regarding the application of IF to patients hampers its broad utilization in clinical practice, and further studies are needed to improve our knowledge on the different IF protocols and long-term effects of IF on brain metabolism before it can be widely prescribed.Entities:
Keywords: intermittent fasting; ketone bodies; neuroprotection
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334932 PMCID: PMC8954770 DOI: 10.3390/nu14061275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Summarizes the systemic and central effects of intermittent fasting, which ultimately confer neuroprotection. arrows pointing up, increased levels; arrows pointing down, decreased levels.
Summary of the studies on animals and humans employing IF and its effects on cognitive function *.
| Reference | Population | IF Regimen | IF Duration | Effects of IF Cognitive Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Models | ||||
| Liu et al. [ | T2D mice | ADF | 28 days | Improvement in spatial memory and cognitive function |
| Hu et al. [ | Vascular dementia rat model | ADF | 12 weeks | Better cognitive performance |
| Fontán-Lozano et al. [ | Mice | ADF | 6–8 months | Improved spatial learning and memory |
| Halagappa et al. [ | Alzheimer disease mice model | ADF | 14 months | Better spatial memory acquisition and cognitive performance |
| Jeong et al. [ | Thoracic spinal cord contusion injury rat model | ADF | 3 weeks or –24 hrs before trauma to 10 weeks after | Decreased brain damage and stimulated cognitive brain recovery after injury |
|
| ||||
| BaHammam et al. [ | 8 healthy men | Ramadan | 2 weeks | no effect in reaction time |
| Ooi et al. [ | 99 MCI Malay adults | ADF (5/2days) | 36 months | Better cognitive performance |
| Anton et al. [ | 10 Overweight, sedentary subjects with mild to moderate functional limitations | TRF (16/8h) | 4 weeks | No differences in cognitive function tests |
| Currenti et al. [ | 883 elderly Italians | TRF | observational | lower risk for cognitive impairment |
| Currenti et al. [ | 1572 Italian adults | TRF | observational | decreased risk for mental health distress |
* studies assessing the effect of Ramadan on cognition apart from the study from Bahammam et al. are not reported in this table due to the presence of possible confounders (for instance on the quality of sleep). A recent review on this topic is provided in the main text.