Molecular imaging of humain hair with MeV-SIMS: A case study of cocaine detection and distribution in the hair of a cocaine user.

Human hair absorbs numerous biomolecules from the body during its growth. This can act as a fingerprint to determine substance intake of an individual, which can be useful in forensic studies. The cocaine concentration profile along the growth axis of hair indicates the time evolution of the metabolic incorporation of cocaine usage. It could be either assessed by chemical extraction and further analysis of hair bundels, or by direct single hair fibre analysis with mass spectroscopy imaging (MSI). Within this work, we analyzed the cocaine distribution in individual hair samples using MeV-SIMS. Unlike conventional surface analysis methods, we demonstrate high yields of nonfragmented molecular ions from the surface of biological materials, resulting in high chemical sensitivity and non-destructive characterisation. Hair samples were prepared by longitudinally cutting along the axis of growth, leaving half-cylindrical shape to access the interior structure of the hair by the probing ion beam, and attached to the silicon wafer. A focused 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ beam was scanned across the intact, chemically pristine hair structure. A non-fragmented protonated [M+ H]+ cocaine molecular peak at m/z = 304 was detected and localized along the cross-section of the hair. Its intensity exhibits strong fluctuations along the direction of the hair's growth, with pronounced peaks as narrow as 50 micrometres, corresponding to a metabolic incorporation time of approx. three hours.

Introduction

The presence of illegal chemical substances in human body is usually monitored by bulk chemical analysis, or by spectroscopic methods of biological specimens [1-5], such as urine, saliva, sweat, and hair. Drugs and their metabolites remain chemically stable in hair over longer periods of time, whereas the traces of drugs in urine or other body fluids typically wash out over a period of few days. The analysis of drugs and pharmaceutical compounds in human hair enables an insight into the recent history of (ab)use, recorded in a hair structure by the incorporation of molecules and their metabolic fragments [6-8]. Various pharmaceutical substances, as well as illegal substances were detected in hair [9, 10] with a variety of analytical techniques. Illegal substances detected in hair include cocaine [11], heroin [12], morphine [13], Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) [14], codeine [15], amphetamines [16] and anabolic steroids [17] as well as prescriptive medication [18] and cosmetic products [19]. Mass spectrometry of human hair samples has even proven to be a useful tool to monitor patient’s adherence to a drug treatment protocol [20].

Drugs or chemicals may enter the hair’s structure by passive diffusion from the blood capillaries into the growing cells at the base of the hair follicle. With some time delay, the drugs may enter also into keratogenous zone during the formation of the hair shaft. In addition, drugs may enter by diffusion from sweat or sebum secretions [21]. The rate of drug incorporation into the hair depends on the melanin content of the hair, the lipophilicity and the basicity of the drug substance [22] as well as the growth phase of the hair. It is of great interest to know the scale and the intensity of the concentration fluctuation on a short time scale, i.e., daily or hourly, as this may reflect the short-time variations in the body liquid concentrations, revealing the frequency and the dosage of exposure, as well as the response of metabolism after the drug uptake.

Typical cocaine concentration values in hair samples after its administration have been reported from 0.5 to 216 ng/mg [23]. Chemical extraction is widely used to detect the presence of cocaine in hair, applying either standard acid hydrolysis, extraction with organic solvents or advanced methods of extraction, i.e. supercritical fluid extraction, followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [24, 25]. By consecutive extractions of hair strand segments, typically 1 cm long, long-term records of (ab)use may be obtained. The fluctuations in cocaine concentration on a shorter length scale could be measured with several MSI methods [26, 27]. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) has been widely applied to study the longitudinal distribution of cocaine in human hair. Porta et al. presented fast screening of 60 mm of hair by MALDI, covering the growth period of approx. half year, with reported spatial resolution of 1 mm [28]. Approximately the same spatial resolution has been reported by Cuypers et al. [29], who studied the effect of hair bleaching on the ability to detect the cocaine in human hair, as well as cocaine reaction products after bleaching. Additional description of MALDI technique on the human hair can be found in a compendium edited by Simona Francese [30].

Longitudinal sectioning of the hair, which reveals its interior, allows the primary ion beam, used for Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS), to access the hair matrix, thus enabling the detection of chemicals embedded in the hair. In this way, position-sensitive detection of cocaine and its metabolites in hair become feasible, characterized by high lateral resolution of SIMS method. Flinders et al. [31] reported MetA-SIMS analysis of longitudinally cut hair samples, coated by a gold layer to increase chemical sensitivity of conventional SIMS method.

The primary ion impact in SIMS triggers a cascade of billiard-ball-like nuclear collisions and induces dissociation and fragmentation of organic sample material, resulting in low yields of high-mass molecules ejected from the analysed samples, and correspondingly, to a low chemical sensitivity for m/z > 500. In a classic SIMS set-up, the absolute yields range from 10−4 to 10−3 per single impinging particle. To increase absolute molecular yields and the associated chemical sensitivity, cluster beams were introduced in SIMS, such as , , , and clusters with n = 55–3000 [32, 33]. More recently, the use of water clusters in SIMS has been demonstrated to improve both aspects even further [34, 35].

Alternatively, atomic heavy ions with energies in the MeV range may be applied in an innovative analytical technique now referred to as MeV-SIMS [36-38]. In contrast to standard SIMS the ion beam interacts with the electrons instead of the nuclei in the sample. Dense energy transfer from the projectile to the electrons along the primary ion track induces shock waves in the target material and results in high probability for desorption of large, non-fragmented secondary molecular ions [36, 39–41], therefore, absolute yields can be as high as 10–1−10−2 per primary ion [41]. Upper limit of detected non-fragmented molecular masses is strongly dependent on the electron stopping power for the applied ion, and may expand to several 10 kDa for very heavy swift ions applied as primary beams, i.e. 90 MeV 127I. The technique features a high potential lateral resolution; as no sample-surface pre-processing is required and the damage cross-section associated with the impact of an individual primary ion is in the order of few square nanometers [42], the lateral resolution of MeV SIMS is primarily determined by the size of the primary ion beam. Submicrometer lateral resolution studies with MeV-SIMS were recently reported [43, 44]. Our results show that MeV-SIMS allows determining cocaine concectration in human hair with a lateral resolution down to 50 μm without the need for a chemical preparation of the sample.

Experimental

Time-Of-Flight (TOF) mass spectrometer for purpose of MeV-SIMS analysis has been implemented at the high-energy focused-ion-beam facility of the Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI) (Fig 1). The ion focusing system equipped with magnetic quadrupole triplet lens is able to focus ion beams in the geometrical centre of the chamber. A motorised, five-axis vacuum goniometer, optical zoom microscope, two X-ray detectors for low and high X-ray energies, a detector for backscattered ions, and an on-off axis STIM detector are integrated together with the TOF spectrometer in the measuring chamber [45]. The TOF spectrometer is installed at the angle of 55° in respect to the primary beam direction. The descibed system has since been further upgraded.

Fig 1

Schematic view of the MeV-SIMS setup at the JSI tandem accelerator.

A 35Cl− beam is extracted from a negative caesium sputtering ion source and accelerated with a 2 MV tandem accelerator. A beam of 35Cl6+ ions is selected among the charge states at the exit of the accelerator by a switching magnet. This primary ion beam is pulsed using a combination of a parallel-plate deflector positioned 9.5 metres from the sample and a collimating slit positioned two metres from the sample [45]. One of the deflector plates is biased at a constant voltage of +900 V, and the second is connected to a fast, high-voltage switch that is able to raise the voltage with a 10 ns risetime to a potential of 900 V and thus bring the beam into a non-deflected (open) position for periods ranging between 20 ns and 230 ns. Data is collected and proccessed using a combination of software supplied by Oxford Microbeams and in-house-written code.

The schematic operating principle of the linear Time-Of-Flight (TOF) mass spectrometer is shown in Fig 2. Short pulse of primary 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ ions hits the sample. A constant bias voltage of +3 kV applied to the sample accelerates the desorbed secondary ions from the sample towards the grounded extraction electrode of the TOF mass spectrometer. An electrostatic Einzel lens directs the secondary-ion flow towards the microchannel plate (MCP) positioned at the end of a 1 m long field-free drift tube [45]. The surface of the first MCP is biased at a fixed voltage of −2.2 kV and provides an additional acceleration for the positive secondary ions, which increases the efficiency of the MCP detector. By inverting the target bias voltage to negative −3.4 kV, the system allows the operation in negative ion mode, where negatively charged secondary ions are detected.

Fig 2

Operation of a linear TOF mass spectrometer mounted at 55° to the beam-line direction.

The secondary ions are extracted by a voltage applied to the sample holder and directed by an Einzel lens toward the microchannel plate detector positioned at the end of a 1-m-long field-free drift region.

MeV-SIMS is performed directly at the pristine sample surface. Due to the high yield of secondary ions, extremely low primary ion currents in the fA range can be applied in MeV-SIMS, which diminishes the surface charging of any non-conductive sample materials to an extent where it does not significantly deteriorate the mass spectral quality. Sample coating with dedicated matrices, as is the case with MALDI, or by conductive layers in MetA-SIMS, is not required for MeV-SIMS. The damage cross section, associated with the impact of single primary ion, is in the order of few square nanometers [42]. As a result, the lateral size of the primary ion beam predominantly determines the spatial resolution of MeV-SIMS. The achievable beam size at the high-energy focused ion-beam facility at JSI depends on the brightness of the ion source, and amounts 600 × 600 nm2 for protons [46]. For the chlorine ions used for MeV-SIMS, the existing brightness of the sputter ion source is significantly lower, resulting in a 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ beam with sufficient ion current for MeV-SIMS with a beam size of approx. 10 × 10 μm2 in a pulsed beam mode. If the thickness of an analysed sample is less than 10 μm, then an alternative aproach with a continuous primary ion beam can improve the beam resolution to sub micrometre level. However, such approach is not possible with human hair samples [43].

Calibration

We deposited three distinct chemical compounds (arginine, leucine and cholesterol) with controlled molecular composition and molecular masses ranging from 174 to 384 on a clean silicon wafers to compare and contrast the molecular information obtained by standard TOF SIMS technique and by MeV-SIMS. TOF mass spectra were measured by commercially available state-of-the-art IONTOF TOF.SIMS 5 spectrometer applying 25 keV primary ion beam, and by home-built TOF spectrometer for MeV-SIMS applying 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ primary ion beam. Spectral resolution m/Δm was 300 for MeV-SIMS and 104 for regular SIMS.

Fig 3 shows keV-SIMS and MeV-SIMS mass spectra of arginine, cholesterol and leucine using a 25 keV Bi3+ (lower orange spectra) and 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ (upper blue spectra) primary ion beams, respectively. The mass resolution m/Δm of the home-made linear TOF for MeV-SIMS method amounts 400 at m/z value of 300, whereas the IONTOF TOF.SIMS 5 spectrometer mass resolution is one order of magnitude higher at the same m/z value. The mass spectral composition in the low mass region is remarkably similar within the limits of comparison given the different mass resolution of the two instruments. The protonated molecular peak of arginine at an m/z of 175.2 is very pronounced, together with the fragments [C4H8N]+, [CH5N3]+ and [CH3N2]+ with m/z values of 70, 59 and 43, respectively. The cholesterol spectrum features a protonated molecular peak [M+H]+ at 385 m/z. In both cases, the normalized yield of non-fragmented protonated parent molecules is much stronger in MeV-SIMS spectra. Normalized yields of MeV-SIMS for the case of leucine and arginine were approx. 3 × 10−2 detected [M+H]+ molecular ions per single 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ primary ion [41], which is typically 3 orders of magnitude higher than in the comparable keV-SIMS setups with Bi3+ clusters. This illustrates the advantage MeV SIMS over regular SIMS introduced above.

Fig 3

A qualitative comparison of 5.8 MeV 35Cl6+ MeV-SIMS (blue) and 25 keV Bi3+ IONTOF TOF.SIMS 5 (orange) spectra of arginine, cholesterol and leucine used for calibration.

The keV SIMS method does indeed offer better resolution, especially at lower energies, while MeV-SIMS gives higher yields for non-fragmented protonated molecules.

Sample preparation

A set of hair samples, which were previously analyzed by means of MALDI TOF-MS technique, was used to examine the evolution of the cocaine signal by MeV-SIMS along the hair longitudinal cross-section. All of the samples were collected post-mortem and were used previously by Cuypers et al. [29] and Flinders et al. [31]. Within these works, more sets of samples from the same subject were analyzed, and provided similar results within the sets. Approval for this study was received from the Medical Ethics Committee of the faculty of Medicine of the University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium on June 27 2017 and it was registered under the national number NH019-2017-06-01 in Belgium. The first of the samples was from an actual cocaine user, the second one was artificially contaminated (soaked in a cocaine-HCl solution) and the last sample was control [29]. For our purposes the analysed hair was sliced longitudinally using a dedicated tool with a cryotome knife [31], an upgrade of the earlier suggested cutting equipment [47]. The hair sample was positioned inside a machined groove on a metallic block, with its depth individually selected for each hair, varying from 30 to 70 micrometers in 5-micrometer step. A cutting device with an incorporated cryotome knife is designed to accurately slide over the metallic block. A single pass of the cutting device over the hair sample positioned in a groove results in an evenly opened longitudinal half-cross-section of the hair sample with a length of 4 cm. The processed samples were stretched over a silicon wafer and attached at the end sections by a metallic tape, facing the opened flat surface of hair shaft upwards to enable the access of the probing primary ion beam. The mounted samples are shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4

Left: Hair samples attached to a silicon wafer. Right: One of the samples as seen under the microscope.

Measurements

Hair samples were raster-scanned with the primary beam, using magnetic beam deflection. The basic scanning frame consists of 256 × 256 measuring points, yielding a square shaped scanning field in the case of perpendicular beam impact. For MeV-SIMS, the sample holder is tilted 55 degrees with regards to the primary beam axis in order to be positioned perpendicularly to the axis of the TOF spectrometer. The individual scanning frame is consequently rectangular, with horizontal dimension equal to 1/ cos55° of the vertical one. In our case, the dimension of the individual scanning frame was selected to be 250 × 436 μm2.

Results and discussion

The spectra from one of the measurements of the longitudinally cut hair samples are shown in Fig 5. The ion beam was focused on the inside of the hair and did not probe the edges. The exact mass of cocaine at m/z = 304.1540 has before been measured by MALDI MS/MS on another set of samples (see Ref. [31]). In contrast with comparable MetA-SIMS measurements, no other significant mass peaks were observed in the m/z range between 200 and 350. Both the spectra obtained for the control sample and for the normal hair sample dipped in cocaine solution show absence of the cocaine peak at m/z = 304. The hair sample dipped in a saturated cocaine water solution and air-dried show no signs of cocaine diffusion or permeability even in the outer rim of the hair. This might be due to the primary beam probing of the interior, not the exterior of the hair due to the sample sectioning and mounting geometry, where the contaminated surface of the hair is not directly exposed to the analytical beam. This result indicates high sensitivity for cocaine metabolically incorporated in the interior hair structure, which is not affected by external contamination of the hair.

Fig 5

Measured MeV-SIMS spectra of three hair samples.

The cocaine peak was measured only in the sample from the actual cocaine user, while the spectra of the artificially contaminated hair exhibits no such peak as the ion beam was focused on the inside of the hair samples.

We measured a series of rectangular frames along the hair of the cocaine user, each with lateral dimensions of 250 × 400 μm2 to obtain information on the longitudinal variations in the concentration of cocaine. To be able to compare the relative yields of the peak at m/z = 304 in the sequence of frames, an overlapping region of 20 micrometres was used during the acquisition of consecutive frames to renormalize the yields in the individual scans. The resulting image and the integrated m/z 304 intensity distribution along the hair are shown in Fig 6. Three regions of corresponding elevated cocaine intensities were observed. The first broad region corresponds to the longitudinal scale in Fig 6 from −0.8 mm to −0.55 mm. The other two peaks at 0.02 mm and 0.21 mm centroid positions are significantly narrower.

Fig 6

Top: The distribution of the cocaine signal along the user’s hair sample. Bottom: Laterally integrated cocaine intensity along the hair sample. Different colours represent different peaks or regions of interest in the spectrum. As explained in the text, the time scale was approximated with the average hair-growth rate of 0.4 mm/day.

An approximate time scale could be estimated with an assumed average hair-growth rate [6] of 0.4 mm/day. Based on this scale, the two peaks at the 0.02 mm and 0.21 mm positions are approximately 12 hours apart. The pronounced peak in the cocaine concentration at the 0.02 mm position spans over a longitudinal distance of 50 micrometres. Converted to time scale, this distance approximately corresponds to a hair-growth period of 3 hours suggesting a temporal regime of cocaine intake.

Conclusion

MeV-SIMS combines high chemical sensitivity and good lateral resolution, a combination appropriate to measure the distribution of the pharmaceutical compounds and drugs incorporated in the human hair. In the reported case of cocaine detection in human hair, we observe pronounced longitudinal spikes of cocaine’s relative concentration. Results indicate highly spatially structured incorporation of cocaine in hair, that are indicative of rapid fluctuations of its body concentrations. Due to the highly focused 10 × 10 μm2 primary beam coupled with precise scanning across the sample we were able to distinguish peaks as narrow as 50 μm. These correspond to a temporal resolution on an hourly level, allowing us to reconstruct a detailed history of cocaine intake. Additionally, exposing the sample core by cutting the sample longitudinally nullifies any false signals due external contamination of an otherwise ‘clean’ sample.

The specific desorption and ionization process of sample material in MeV-SIMS is based on energy deposition in the sample material via electronic stopping. This introduces specific advantages in comparison with other comparable secondary ion MS techniques: a higher yield of non-fragmented secondary molecular ions per primary ion impact. This enables surface analysis in a strictly static regime directly on intact biological materials, where the sample is neither coated nor significantly chemically altered. In turn, this facilitates subsequent additional chemical analysis at the same surface (volume) region of the sample which shows how the technique could be used complementarily with more standard forensic methods.

7 Dec 2021

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Joseph Banoub, Ph,D., D. Sc.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

Work at JSI was supported by the Slovenian research agency grants No. P1-0112, I0-0005, J7-9398 and N1-0090. Additionally, resources and within the EU H2020 project No. 824096 “RADIATE ” and IAEA CRP projects F11019 “Development of Molecular Concentration Mapping Techniques Using MeV Focused Ion Beams" and

F11021 ”Enhancing Nuclear Analytical Techniques to Meet the Needs of Forensic Science”. N.O.

acknowledges funding by the European Union, European Social Fund, and the support

from FP7 European Union Marie Curie IAPP Program, BRAINPATH. A traveling

grant for a long stay abroad of E.C was awarded by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

(FWO).

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

Work at JSI was supported by the Slovenian research agency grants No. P1-0112, 231

I0-0005, J7-9398 and N1-0090. Additionally, resources and within the EU H2020 project 232

No. 824096 “RADIATE” and IAEA CRP projects F11019 “Development of Molecular 233

Concentration Mapping Techniques Using MeV Focused Ion Beams” and F11021 234

”Enhancing Nuclear Analytical Techniques to Meet the Needs of Forensic Science”. N.O. 235

acknowledges funding by the European Union, European Social Fund, and the support 236

from FP7 European Union Marie Curie IAPP Program, BRAINPATH. A traveling 237

grant for a long stay abroad of E.C was awarded by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 238

(FWO).

Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

Work at JSI was supported by the Slovenian research agency grants No. P1-0112, I0-0005, J7-9398 and N1-0090. Additionally, resources and within the EU H2020 project No. 824096 “RADIATE ” and IAEA CRP projects F11019 “Development of Molecular Concentration Mapping Techniques Using MeV Focused Ion Beams" and

F11021 ”Enhancing Nuclear Analytical Techniques to Meet the Needs of Forensic Science”. N.O.

acknowledges funding by the European Union, European Social Fund, and the support

from FP7 European Union Marie Curie IAPP Program, BRAINPATH. A traveling

grant for a long stay abroad of E.C was awarded by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

(FWO).

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments:

I have added the second referee comments below.

Please try to answer the comments of referee #1 when you resubmit this manuscript.

Referee #2 comments

The paper by Jeromel,L. et al looks at distribution of cocaine in human hair, using TOF-SIMS. The paper is well written and edited, and is recommended for publications. However the authors may clarify a few points listed below in the manuscript. These are suggestions only.

Somewhere in the introduction, the question regarding the standards such as cholesterol or the specific amino acids should be clarified. Why were these specific standards used, considering cholesterol is hydrophobic compared to the amino acids. Do these ions have any specific desorption rates compared to cocaine? Was free cocaine in solution form studied?

I am not sure how changes occur in “post mortem” state of the hair cells? Kindly clarify.

In the last figure the zones of high concentration (red) of cocaine at specific spots of the hair is due to especial location of the hair due to any structures of the hair? Why are the signals stronger from these specific areas? Kindly describe the figure in more details.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the manuscript “Molecular imaging of humain hair with MeV-SIMS: a case study of cocaine detection and distribution in the hair of a cocaine user”, Jeroma et al. test a methodology for examining cocaine distribution within human hair. For this reviewer, it took a little time to discern whether the authors were presenting a research article or a methodology article. Regardless, the examination of cocaine in hair is far from novel, and there are a number of methodologies for this purpose, including mass spectrometry based; the authors did provide a sufficient introduction to cover some of these methodologies. Specific comments are as follows:

1. The authors need to examine the same hair more than once, to show the variability of the method.

2. More than one hair sample should be examined, to ensure comparable spectra can be obtained from cocaine users.

3. Please provide the ms/ms spectra for m/z 304, to verify to a reader that the ion is indeed cocaine.

4. Can the cocaine be quantified (rather than providing relative intensity information) using this method? This would be quite important.

5. Some modest edits to language (including within the title) are needed.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: KN PLOS ONE Review Joe.docx

Click here for additional data file.

13 Jan 2022

List of changes made based on the remarks of the Reviewer 1:

Technical questions Reviewer #1

“The authors need to examine the same hair more than once, to show the variability of the method.”

We have analyzed the sample more than once, and the measurements have been done over a long period of time (several months). Results remained the same, however the ion yield of molecules, such as cocaine, has been reduced when the samples aged due to the oxidation of the samples. We revised the text accordingly so it is now clear that the measurements were performed multiple times

“More than one hair sample should be examined, to ensure comparable spectra can be obtained from cocaine users.”

Due to the strict ethical clearance policy, we only obtained one sample. However, multiple samples of the same subject were analyzed within the work of Flinders (see ref 31), and later one of these samples was forwarded to Jožef Stefan Institute. The manuscript was changed accordingly.

“Please provide the ms/ms spectra for m/z 304, to verify to a reader that the ion is indeed cocaine.”

Samples of the same subject were analyzed with MALDI MS/MS mass spectrometry imaging, where the exact mass of cocaine is measurable. See ref 31. After MeV-SIMS analysis, the same set of samples was also measured by DAPNe analysis, where Orbi trap mass spectrometer also confirmed the presence of cocaine molecular peak. The text was changed accordingly.

“Can the cocaine be quantified (rather than providing relative intensity information) using this method? This would be quite important.”

Quantification with MeV-SIMS, as well as common SIMS, is not possible due to the high impact the surrounding matrix on the ionization probability. A standardization of secondary ion yield of the molecule in relation to the concentration, given the constant matrix (e.g. collagen in human hair) would be possible, however even such approach would lead to questionable results due to uneven composition of biological tissues. Our scope remained only on providing relative intensity information.

“Some modest edits to language (including within the title) are needed.”

We have revised the text again.

Technical questions Reviewer #2

“Somewhere in the introduction, the question regarding the standards such as cholesterol or the specific amino acids should be clarified. Why were these specific standards used, considering cholesterol is hydrophobic compared to the amino acids. Do these ions have any specific desorption rates compared to cocaine? Was free cocaine in solution form studied?”

Amino-acids, such as arginine, leucine, phenylalanine, etc. as well as cholesterol are, to our knowledge, commonly used in SIMS community as a reference/calibration standards. Therefore, we could draw some explicit comparisons between sputtering rate of MeV and keV ions, not only from the keV-SIMS measurements done at JSI, but also worldwide, and the results encouraged us to develop the method further. The masses of such amino acids and cholesterol are also within the same domain as the mass of cocaine, so such standards provided us the information about expected molecular yields from human hair.

“I am not sure how changes occur in “post mortem” state of the hair cells? Kindly clarify.”

We measured the samples several time over a significant period of time (several months), so we gained some insight into aging of the samples. The localization of cocaine and other hair-specific molecules remained the same, at least on the above cellular size level. However, the intensity of the signal was rapidly diminishing, due to deposition of oxidation layers on the sample.

“In the last figure the zones of high concentration (red) of cocaine at specific spots of the hair is due to especial location of the hair due to any structures of the hair? Why are the signals stronger from these specific areas? Kindly describe the figure in more details.”

The concentration distribution of cocaine is highly unique compared to distribution of other hair – specific ions. Latter are distributed very homogeneously, which indicates, that there are no significant structural impacts on the secondary ion yield. Indeed, this can greatly influence the results of surface sensitive methods, therefore we were very observant on the intensities of the total ion yield, as well as some other peaks. Among those, the cocaine peak is the only one showing uneven distribution. As it can be seen in the last figure, the gap between the intensiy peaks is speculated to be due to the detection of each individual dose of cocaine that the subject has taken. Through this conclusion, we speculate, that the second dose was taken 12 hours after the first one, and in both cases the cocaine was depositing on the hair for approx. 3 hours.

Editorial changes

Technical

-Page 5, line 150, sample preparation, technical: “A set of hair samples previouisly analysed using the MALDI TOF-MS technique was used to examine the evolution of the cocaine signal by MeV-SIMS along the hair longitudinal cross-section. All of the samples were collected post-mortem and were used previously by Cuypers et al. [29] and Flinders et al. [31].”

has been changed to:

“A set of hair samples, which were previously analyzed by means of MALDI TOF-MS technique, was used to examine the evolution of the cocaine signal by MeV-SIMS along the hair longitudinal cross-section. All of the samples were collected post-mortem and were used previously by Cuypers et al. [29] and Flinders et al. [31]. Within these works, more sets of samples from the same subject were analyzed, and provided similar results within the sets”

-Page 5, line 178, Results and discussion, technical: “The spectra obtained from the surface of the longitudinally cut hair samples are shown in Fig. 5. “,

has been changed to:

“The spectra from one of the measurements of the longitudinally cut hair samples are shown in Fig. 5.”

-Page 5, line 181, Results and discussion, technical:

After

“The molecular peak of cocaine at m/z of 304 was detected only in the hair 181 sample of the drug user.”

we added:

“The exact mass of cocaine at m/z=304.1540 has before been measured by MALDI MS/MS on another set of samples (see ref 31)”

Language

- Page 1, abstract, language:

“During the growth of human hair, several biomedical substances present in the human body are incorporated into the hair”

has been changed to:

“Human hair absorbs numerous biomolecules from the body during its growth”

-Page 1, abstract, language:

“.It could be either assessed by chemical extraction and analysis of hair bundels, or by direct single hair fibre analysis by mass spectroscopy imaging (MSI).”

has been changed to:

“It could be either assessed by chemical extraction and further analysis of hair bundels, or by direct single hair fibre analysis with mass spectroscopy imaging (MSI).”

-Page 1, abstract, language:

“In this work, we analyzed the cocaine distribution in individual hair samples using MeV-SIMS.”

has been changed to:

“Within this work, we analyzed the cocaine distribution in individual hair samples using MeV-SIMS.”

-Page 1, line 1, Introduction, language:

“The presence of illegal chemical substances in human body is usually monitored by bulk chemical analysis or spectroscopic methods of biological specimens [1-5] such as urine, saliva, sweat, and hair”

has been changed to:

“The presence of illegal chemical substances in human body is usually monitored by bulk chemical analysis, or by spectroscopic methods of biological specimens [1-5], such as urine, saliva, sweat, and hair”

-Page 2, line 9, Introduction, language:

“A number of pharmaceutical substances, as well as illegal substances were detected in hair [9, 10] with a variety of analytical techniques.”

has been changed to:

“Various pharmaceutical substances, as well as illegal substances were detected in hair [9, 10] with numerous analytical techniques.”

-Page 2, line 26, Introduction, language:

“Typical cocaine concentrations found in hair samples after its administration range from 0.5 to 216 ng/mg [23].”

has been changed to:

“Typical cocaine concentration values in hair samples after its administration have been reported from 0.5 to 216 ng/mg [23].”

-Page 2, line 42, Introduction, language:

“Longitudinal sectioning of hair, which reveals its interior, allows the probing primary ion beam with energies of a few keV used in Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS) to access the hair matrix and enables the detection of chemicals embedded in the hair.”

has been changed to:

“Longitudinal sectioning of the hair, which reveals its interior, allows the primary ion beam, used for Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS), to access the hair matrix, thus enabling the detection of chemicals embedded in the hair.”

-Page 2, line 52, Introduction, language:

“In a classic SIMS set-up, absolute yields range from 10−4 to 10−3 per single impinging particle. To increase the absolute molecular yields and the associated chemical sensitivity, cluster beams are introduced in SIMS, such as Au+ n , SF+ 5 , C+ 60, Bi+ 3 and Ar+ (n) clusters with n= 55 60–3000 [32, 33] and, more recently, the use of water clusters in SIMS improves both aspects even further [34, 35].”

has been changed to:

“In a classic SIMS set-up, the absolute yields range from 10−4 to 10−3 per single impinging particle. To increase absolute molecular yields and the associated chemical sensitivity, cluster beams were introduced in SIMS, such as Au+ n , SF+ 5 , C+ 60, Bi+ 3 and Ar+ (n) clusters with n= 55 60–3000 [32, 33]. More recently, the use of water clusters in SIMS has been demonstrated to improve both aspects even further [34, 35].”

-Page 3, line 76, Experimental, language:

“Time-Of-Flight (TOF) mass spectrometer for MeV-SIMS is installed at the high-energy focused-ion-beam facility of the Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI) (Fig.1).”

has been changed to:

“Time-Of-Flight (TOF) mass spectrometer for purpose of MeV-SIMS analysis has been implemented at the high-energy focused-ion-beam facility of the Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI) (Fig.1).”

-Page 5, line 173, Measurements, language:

“For MeV-SIMS, the sample holder is tilted for 55 degrees in order to be positioned perpendicularly to the axis of the TOF spectrometer.”

has been changed to:

“For MeV-SIMS, the sample holder is tilted 55 degrees with regards to the primary beam axis in order to be positioned perpendicularly to the axis of the TOF spectrometer.”

-Page 6, line 190, Results and discussion, language:

“This result indicates the method’s high sensitivity for cocaine metabolically incorporated in the interior hair structure and its insensitivity to eventual external contamination of the hair.”

has been changed to:

“This result indicates high sensitivity for cocaine metabolically incorporated in the interior hair structure, which is not affected by external contamination of the hair.”

-Page 6, line 212, Conclusion, language:

“In the reported case of cocaine detection in human hair, we observe pronounced longitudinal spikes of the cocaine levels.”

has been changed to:

“In the reported case of cocaine detection in human hair, we observe pronounced longitudinal spikes of cocaine’s relative concentration.”

Submitted filename: Letter_to_Editor_manuscript_Jeromel_et_al.docx

Click here for additional data file.

18 Jan 2022

Molecular imaging of human hair with MeV-SIMS: a case study of cocaine detection and distribution in the hair of a cocaine user

PONE-D-21-29597R1

Dear Dr. Barba,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Joseph Banoub, Ph,D., D. Sc., FCIC, FRCS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

17 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-29597R1

Molecular imaging of humain hair with MeV-SIMS: a case study of cocaine detection and distribution in the hair of a cocaine user

Dear Dr. Barba:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Joseph Banoub

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE