| Literature DB >> 35331232 |
Melanie Mindt1,2, Arman Beyraghdar Kashkooli1, Maria Suarez-Diez3, Lenny Ferrer4, Tatjana Jilg4, Dirk Bosch1, Vitor Martins Dos Santos3,5, Volker F Wendisch4, Katarina Cankar6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nitrogen containing aromatic compound indole is known for its floral odor typical of jasmine blossoms. Due to its characteristic scent, it is frequently used in dairy products, tea drinks and fine fragrances. The demand for natural indole by the flavor and fragrance industry is high, yet, its abundance in essential oils isolated from plants such as jasmine and narcissus is low. Thus, there is a strong demand for a sustainable method to produce food-grade indole.Entities:
Keywords: Bioconversion; Bioprospecting; Corynebacterium glutamicum; Flavor and fragrance applications; In situ product recovery; Indole; Tryptophan; Tryptophanase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35331232 PMCID: PMC8944080 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01771-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Proof of principle for biotechnological indole production in C. glutamicum C1*. Schematic view of TNA reaction for indole production (A). Production of indole upon expression of E. coli tnaA and Trp importer genes tnaB and aroP (B). Strains were grown in minimal medium CGXII supplemented with 40 g L−1 glucose and 1 g L−1 Trp . EV: empty vector pGold; EcTNA: TNA derived from E. coli; EcTnaB: Trp permease from E. coli; CgAroP: aromatic amino acid permease from C. glutamicum
Fig. 2Bioreactor cultivation of Trp biotransformation is depicted as one representative of three comparable cultivations
Fig. 3Indole production by strains equipped with different TNA enzymes in C1* upon 1 g L−1 Trp supplementation. Samples were taken from duplicate cultures 40 h after inoculation. Means and arithmetic errors of duplicate cultures are shown. Ec: tnaA from E. coli; Hs: tnaA from Histophilus somni; Mi: tnaA from Mageeibacillus indolicus; Ss: tnaA from Synechocystis sp.; Pr: tnaA from Proteiniclasticum ruminis; Cx: tnaA from Corynebacterium xerosis; Eh: tnaA from Escherichia hermannii; Cb: tnaA from Clostridiales bacterium; Pre: tnaA from Providencia rettgeri; Pp: tnaA from Prevotella pallens; Sm: tnaA from Sciscionella marina; Ns: tnaA from Nocardioides sp.; Rs: tnaA from Rhodobacter sphaeroides; Pp: tnaA from Photobacterium sp.; Pv: tnaA from Proteus vulgaris; EV: empty vector pGold
Fig. 4Biotransformation of Trp to indole using strains equipped with seven different TNA enzymes. The six most promising TNA candidates were co-expressed in C1* with CgaroP and their performance was compared to tnaA from E. coli. A tnaA from E. coli; B tnaA from Histophilus somni; C tnaA from Mageeibacillus indolicus; D tnaA from Proteiniclasticum ruminis; E tnaA from Providencia rettgeri; F tnaA from Prevotella pallens; G tnaA from Proteus vulgaris. Means and arithmetic errors of duplicate cultures are shown
Kinetic constants of TNAs derived from E. coli (EcTNA), M. indolicus (MiTNA), P. rettgeri (PreTNA) and P. vulgaris (PvTNA)
| TNA | KM (Trp) [mM] | kcat [s−1] | kcat/KM [mM−1 s−1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| EcTNA | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 1.65 ± 0.04 | 11.8 ± 3.5 |
| MiTNA | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 2.41 ± 0.06 | 8.3 ± 2.1 |
| PreTNA | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.4 |
| PvTNA | 0.03 ± 0.003 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 26.0 ± 5.8 |
Kinetic constants were determined in triplicates, variation is shown as standard deviation
Overview of indole production upon several optimization strategies
| Strain | Media components | Indole determination (sampling time) | Trp conversion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon source | Nitrogen source | Trp | Indole | |||
| C1*(pGold- | 40 g L−1 glucose | 20 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 5 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.35 ± 0.01 g L−1 (24 h) 0.25 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 61 mol-% (24 h) 44 mol-% (48 h) |
| C1*(pGold- | 40 g L−1 gluconate | 20 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 5 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.21 ± 0.01 g L−1 (24 h) | 37 mol-% |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 20 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 5 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.45 ± 0.01 g L−1 (24 h) 0.44 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 78 mol-% (24 h) 77 mol-% (48 h) |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.51 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 89 mol-% |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 2 g L−1 | – | 0.77 ± 0.01 g L−1 (24 h) 0.91 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 67 mol-% (24 h) 79 mol-% (48 h) |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 2 g L−1 (0 h) 2 g L−1 (24 h) | – | 0.94 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 41 mol-% |
| C1* | 40 g L−1 glucose | 20 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 5 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.28 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 49 mol-% |
| C1* | 40 g L−1 gluconate 1 g L−1 glucose | 20 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.18 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 31 mol-% |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.38 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 66 mol-% |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.37 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 66 mol-% |
| C1*(pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 1 g L−1 | – | 0.37 ± 0.01 g L−1 | 66 mol-% |
| IVO20 (pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 2 g L−1 (0 h) 2 g L−1 (24 h) | – | 0.68 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 30 mol-% (48 h) |
| IVO38 (pGold- | 10 g L−1 glucose | 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 1.25 g L−1 urea | 2 g L−1 (0 h) 2 g L−1 (24 h) | – | 0.63 ± 0.01 g L−1 (48 h) | 27 mol-% (48 h) |
When not specified otherwise, media components were added with inoculation and indole was determined in culture supernatants 24 h after inoculation
TNA activity in soluble protein fraction of C1*
| Strain | spec. TNA activity [mU mg−1] |
|---|---|
| C1*(pGold) | 11 ± 2 |
| C1*(pGold- | 87 ± 3 |
| C1*(pGold- | 210 ± 10 |
One unit (U) is defined as the amount of enzyme required to convert 1 µmol substrate within 1 min
Fig. 5In situ product recovery enabled production of indole in g per liter scale. C1*(pGold-PretnaA-CgaroP) was cultivated in CGXII supplemented with 10 g L−1 glucose, 2 g L−1 Trp and 20% (v/v) dibutyl sebacate. Production titer at 3 h, 6 h and 9 h is shown. 24 h+: indole accumulation in dibutyl sebacate, when additional 2 g L−1 Trp were supplemented 9 h after inoculation. 24 h ++: indole accumulation in dibutyl sebacate, when additional 8 g L−1 Trp were supplemented 9 h after inoculation. Indole concentrations were determined in solvent layer by HPLC exclusively, since aqueous phase was not enriched by the same. Indole concentrations were normalized to the volume of the medium phase, as they were 5-times concentrated in the overlay phase. Means and arithmetic errors of duplicate cultures are shown. A HPLC chromatograms of the overlay of the cultivation 24 h ++ recorded at 270 nm and of an indole standard (Ind) are shown (B)
Bacterial strains used in this study
| Strain | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| WT |
| American Type Culture Collection |
| C1* | Genome reduced chassis strain derived from WT | [ |
| C1* Δ | C1* with in-frame deletion of pyruvate kinase gene | This work |
| IVO20 | Strain evolved from WT in the presence of indole after 20 transfers | [ |
| IVO38 | Strain evolved from WT in the presence of indole after 38 transfers | [ |
Vectors used in this study
| Strain | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| pGold | KmR, Ptrc | [ |
| pK19 | KmR, | [ |
| pACYCDuet-1 | CmR, | Novagen |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold-Cx | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pGold- | pGold expressing | This work |
| pK19- Δ | pK19 | [ |
| pACYCDuet- | pACYCDuet-1 expressing | This work |
| pACYCDuet- | pACYCDuet-1 expressing | This work |
| pACYCDuet- | pACYCDuet-1 expressing | This work |
| pACYCDuet- | pACYCDuet-1 expressing | This work |
Oligonucleotides used in this study
| Oligonucleotide | Sequence 5′-> 3′ |
|---|---|
|
| GGTCTCTGCAACTAGGAGGATTACAAAATGACTGATCAAGCTGAAAAA |
|
| GGTCTCAATACTTAGCCAAATTTAGGTAACACG |
|
| GGTCTCTGCAACTAGGAGGATTACAAAATGGCTAAATCTAATGAAGGG |
|
| GGTCTCAATACTCAGTTCAAGTCGGAAGGG |
|
| cctgcaggtcgactctagagTATTAATAAGGAGGTAACATGAGCAAAACTATCGCGAC |
|
| attcgagctcggtacccgggTTAGCGACGAACAGCGATC |
|
| cctgcaggtcgactctagagATCATAAAGGAGGTATATTTATGGTAGAAAGAACCGCTG |
|
| attcgagctcggtacccgggTTACTGCTCAGGGATGCG |
| PretnaA_artRBS_fw | gaGGTCTCTCAGATGGCCGTAGCTTAAGGAGGTATAGTATGGCAAAGCGCATCGTTG |
| PretnaA_rv | tccGGTCTCATTGCTTACTTGATTGGCTTCAGACG |