| Literature DB >> 35329892 |
Hiroyuki Inose1, Tsuyoshi Kato2,3, Shoichi Ichimura4, Hiroaki Nakamura5, Masatoshi Hoshino5,6, Shinji Takahashi5, Daisuke Togawa7,8, Toru Hirano9, Yasuaki Tokuhashi10, Tetsuro Ohba11, Hirotaka Haro11, Takashi Tsuji12, Kimiaki Sato13, Yutaka Sasao14, Masahiko Takahata15, Koji Otani16, Suketaka Momoshima17, Takashi Hirai3, Toshitaka Yoshii3, Atsushi Okawa3.
Abstract
Although osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture, few reports have investigated the factors contributing to residual low back pain in the chronic phase after OVFs by using radiographic evaluation. We examined the contribution of nonunion, vertebral deformity, and thoracolumbar alignment to the severity of residual low back pain post-OVF. This post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study included 195 patients with a 48-week follow-up period. We investigated the associations between radiographic variables with the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain at 48 weeks post-OVF using a multiple linear regression model. Univariate analysis revealed that analgesic use, the local angle on magnetic resonance imaging, anterior vertebral body compression percentage on X-ray, and nonunion showed a significant association with VAS scores for low back pain. Multiple regression analysis produced the following equation: VAS for low back pain at 48 weeks = 15.49 + 0.29 × VAS for low back pain at 0 weeks + (with analgesics: +8.84, without analgesics: -8.84) + (union: -5.72, nonunion: -5.72). Among local alignment, thoracolumbar alignment, and nonunion, nonunion independently contributed to residual low back pain at 48 weeks post-OVF. A treatment strategy that reduces the occurrence of nonunion is desirable.Entities:
Keywords: Cobb angle; alignment; nonunion; osteoporotic vertebral fractures; radiographic evaluation; residual low back pain; thoracolumbar alignment; vertebral deformity; visual analog scale
Year: 2022 PMID: 35329892 PMCID: PMC8950593 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Study participant flow diagram. During the study period, 382 patients were assessed for eligibility. The original study enrolled 284 patients. During the follow-up period, an additional 89 patients were excluded. MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging.
Patient demographics.
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age, years (SD) | 75.3 (5.3) |
| Fracture level, | |
| T10 | 4 |
| T11 | 13 |
| T12 | 75 |
| L1 | 67 |
| L2 | 36 |
| 48 weeks variables | |
| Use of analgesics, | 30 (15.4) |
| VAS for low back pain, point (SD) | 27.5 (26.4) |
| Local angle, degree (SD) | −17.7 (6.3) |
| T10/L2 Cobb angle, degree (SD) | −16.1 (10.4) |
| T10/L5 Cobb angle, degree (SD) | 18.6 (11.6) |
| Lumbar lordosis, degree (SD) | 27.3 (13.4) |
| Sacral slope, degree (SD) | 35.8 (8.0) |
| AVBCP, % (SD) | 54.3 (16.4) |
| Nonunion, | 35 (18) |
| Secondary fracture, | 11 (6) |
AVBCP, anterior vertebral body compression percentage; VAS, visual analog scale. SD, standard deviation.
Univariate regression analysis. Association of baseline and 48 weeks variables with low back pain at 48 weeks after OVF.
| Characteristic | B | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline variables | |||
| Age | 0.18 | −0.54–0.89 | 0.63 |
| Fracture level | −6.32 | −12.89–0.26 | 0.06 |
| VAS 0 week | 0.34 | 0.20–0.48 | <0.0001 * |
| 48 weeks variables | |||
| Use of analgesics | 10.44 | 5.47–15.41 | <0.0001 * |
| Local angle | −0.66 | −1.24–−0.07 | 0.03 * |
| T10/L2 Cobb angle | −0.33 | −0.69–0.03 | 0.08 |
| T10/L5 Cobb angle | −0.12 | −0.46–0.21 | 0.47 |
| Lumbar lordosis | 0.06 | −0.23–0.34 | 0.70 |
| Sacral slope | −0.07 | −0.55–0.42 | 0.78 |
| AVBCP | −0.30 | −0.52–−0.07 | 0.01 * |
| Nonunion | 6.69 | 1.91–11.48 | 0.01 * |
| Secondary fracture | 5.79 | −2.28–13.86 | 0.16 |
B, partial regression coefficient; AVBCP, anterior vertebral body compression percentage; VAS, visual analog scale; CI, confidence interval; * p < 0.05.
Multiple regression analysis: independent factors contributing to low back pain at 48 weeks after OVF.
| Factor | B | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAS at 0 week | 0.29 | 0.15–0.42 | <0.0001 * |
| Use of analgesics at 48 weeks | 8.84 | 4.10–13.59 | 0.0003 * |
| Nonunion | 5.72 | 1.30–10.15 | 0.01 * |
B, partial regression coefficient; VAS, visual analog scale; OVF, osteoporotic vertebral fractures; CI, confidence interval. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2Observed versus predicted plots of multiple linear regression model for the VAS score for low back pain (48 weeks). The red line indicates regression line. The red dashed curve indicates a 0.05 level of significance. The blue dashed line indicates the mean VAS score for low back pain at 48 weeks. RMSE, Root mean squared error, VAS, visual analog scale.
Forced-entry multiple regression analysis: independent factors contributing to low back pain at 48 weeks after OVF.
| Factor | B | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAS at 0 week | 0.29 | 0.15–0.43 | <0.0001 * |
| Use of analgesics at 48 weeks | 8.03 | 3.16–12.91 | 0.001 * |
| Nonunion | 6.23 | 1.30–11.16 | 0.01 * |
| AVBCP | −0.13 | −0.36–0.10 | 0.26 |
| T10/L5 Cobb angle | −0.04 | −0.35–0.27 | 0.82 |
B, partial regression coefficient; AVBCP, anterior vertebral body compression percentage; VAS, visual analog scale; CI, confidence interval. * p < 0.05.