Literature DB >> 27544377

Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

William Clark1, Paul Bird2, Peter Gonski3, Terrence H Diamond4, Peter Smerdely5, H Patrick McNeil6, Glen Schlaphoff7, Carl Bryant8, Elizabeth Barnes9, Val Gebski9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that vertebroplasty provides effective analgesia for patients with poorly controlled pain and osteoporotic spinal fractures of less than 6 weeks' duration. The effectiveness of vertebroplasty, using an adequate vertebral fill technique, in fractures of less than 6 weeks' duration has not been specifically assessed by previously published masked trials.
METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vertebroplasty in four hospitals in Sydney, Australia. We recruited patients with one or two osteoporotic vertebral fractures of less than 6 weeks' duration and Numeric Rated Scale (NRS) back pain greater than or equal to 7 out of 10. We used an automated telephone randomisation service provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council to assign patients (1:1; stratified according to age, degree of vertebral compression, trauma, corticosteroid use, and hospital) to either vertebroplasty or placebo, immediately before the procedure. Patients received conscious sedation. Vertebroplasty was done with the adequate vertebral fill technique and the placebo procedure with simulated vertebroplasty. Follow-up was for 6 months. Outcome assessors and patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with NRS pain below 4 out of 10 at 14 days post-intervention in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01482793.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2011, and Dec 5, 2014, 120 patients were enrolled. 61 patients were randomly assigned to vertebroplasty and 59 to placebo. 24 (44%) patients in the vertebroplasty group and 12 (21%) in the control group had an NRS pain score below 4 out of 10 at 14 days (between-group difference 23 percentage points, 95% CI 6-39; p=0·011). Three patients in each group died from causes judged unrelated to the procedure. There were two serious adverse events in each group, related to the procedure (vertebroplasty group) and the fracture (control group).
INTERPRETATION: Vertebroplasty is superior to placebo intervention for pain reduction in patients with acute osteoporotic spinal fractures of less than 6 weeks' in duration. These findings will allow patients with acute painful fractures to have an additional means of pain management that is known to be effective. FUNDING: Education grant from CareFusion Corporation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544377     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  88 in total

1.  Evaluation of pain reduction and height restoration post vertebral augmentation using a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer implant for the treatment of split (Magerl A2) vertebral fractures: a prospective, long-term, non-randomized study.

Authors:  Georgios Velonakis; Dimitrios Filippiadis; Stavros Spiliopoulos; Elias Brountzos; Nikolaos Kelekis; Alexis Kelekis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for patients over 90 years old.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kamei; Tomoyuki Noguchi; Yoshitaka Shida; Takashi Okafuji; Kota Yokoyama; Fumiya Uchiyama; Hiroshi Nakatake; Tsuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty : A critical statement].

Authors:  Sönke Langner; Christian Henker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Testing for blinding in sham-controlled studies for procedural interventions: the third-party video method.

Authors:  Jennifer Gill; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Vertebral augmentation reduces the 12-month mortality and morbidity in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Teodora Bellone; Marco Scardapane; Pierre De Marini; Pierre-Alexis Autrusseau; Pierre Auloge; Julien Garnon; Jack W Jennings; Afshin Gangi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Decision Making: Osteoplasty, Ablation, or Combined Therapy for Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  William Lea; Sean Tutton
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Options-a Literature Review.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-11-09

9.  What are the predictors of clinical success after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures?

Authors:  Elsa Denoix; Flore Viry; Agnes Ostertag; Caroline Parlier-Cuau; Jean-Denis Laredo; Martine Cohen-Solal; Valérie Bousson; Thomas Funck-Brentano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Mario Muto; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Nicole Carter; Paola Crivelli; Emanuele Piras; Luca Saba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.