| Literature DB >> 35328120 |
Giovanna Albertin1,2, Barbara Ravara1,3,4,5, Helmut Kern6,7, Sandra Zampieri1,3,4,5, Stefan Loefler6,7, Christian Hofer6,7, Diego Guidolin2, Francesco Messina8, Raffaele De Caro2, Mauro Alaibac8, Ugo Carraro3,4.
Abstract
Langerhans cells represent the first immune cells that sense the entry of external molecules and microorganisms at the epithelial level in the skin. In this pilot case-study, we evaluated Langerhans cells density and progression of epidermal atrophy in permanent spinal cord injury (SCI) patients suffering with either lower motor neuron lesions (LMNSCI) or upper motor neuron lesions (UMNSCI), both submitted to surface electrical stimulation. Skin biopsies harvested from both legs were analyzed before and after 2 years of home-based Functional Electrical Stimulation for denervated degenerating muscles (DDM) delivered at home (h-bFES) by large anatomically shaped surface electrodes placed on the skin of the anterior thigh in the cases of LMNSCI patients or by neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for innervated muscles in the cases of UMNSCI persons. Using quantitative histology, we analyzed epidermal thickness and flattening and content of Langerhans cells. Linear regression analyses show that epidermal atrophy worsens with increasing years of LMNSCI and that 2 years of skin electrostimulation reverses skin changes, producing a significant recovery of epidermis thickness, but not changes in Langerhans cells density. In UMNSCI, we did not observe any statistically significant changes of the epidermis and of its content of Langerhans cells, but while the epidermal thickness is similar to that of first year-LMNSCI, the content of Langerhans cells is almost twice, suggesting that the LMNSCI induces an early decrease of immunoprotection that lasts at least 10 years. All together, these are original clinically relevant results suggesting a possible immuno-repression in epidermis of the permanently denervated patients.Entities:
Keywords: Langerhans cells; electrical stimulation; epidermis atrophy; lower or upper motor neuron injury; skin biopsy; spinal cord injury
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328120 PMCID: PMC8947052 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Characteristics of UMNSCI patients.
| Analysis | Gender | Age | Years from UMNSCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMNSCI.1 | M | Pre NMES | 20 | 1.8 |
| Post NMES | 22 | 3.8 | ||
| UMNSCI.2 | F | Pre NMES | 26 | 3.8 |
| Post NMES | 28 | 3.8 | ||
| UMNSCI.3 | M | Pre NMES | 40 | 3.8 |
| Post NMES | 42 | 3.8 |
Characteristics of UMNSCI patients: 1, UMNSCI.2 and UMNSCI.3; M = male, F = female; PreNMES = before to start the NMES; PostNMES = after 2 years of NMES; age = the age before starting the NMES and after 2 years of NMES; years from UMNSCI = period from injury.
Figure 1Histological sections of 5 µm thickness were collected and stained by (A) standard Hematoxilin-Eosin (H-E) stain protocol and (B) with a standard immunohistochemical procedure to analyze CD1a, a specific marker of Langerhans Cells (LCs); * = the distance between the outermost surface of the epidermis (excluding the stratum corneum) and the dermo–epidermal junction; ** = outline of total area of epidermis.
Multiple regression analysis of the epidermis parameters (thickness and INT index) at baseline (pre-treatment) with both age and time from injury on LMNSCI before the h-bFES.
| Age | Injury Time | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson’s R |
| Pearson’s R |
| Multiple R |
| |
| Epidermis thickness | −0.532 | 0.003 | −0.487 | 0.006 | 0.595 | 0.007 |
| INT index | −0.667 | 0.001 | −0.693 | 0.001 | 0.792 | 0.001 |
Figure 2Multiple regression analysis on LMNSCI before the h-bFES, indicating a moderate (R < 0.7) but significant (p < 0.01, see Table 2) change of epidermis thickness with both age (A) and time from injury (B) and change of Interdigitation index (INT index) with both age (C) and time from injury (D). The indicated Johnson’s weight estimates the relative impact of each of the two factors on the multiple correlation factors.
Epidermis thickness (µm): UMNSCI pre and post NMES.
| Analysis | Parameter | Pre | Post | Δ% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-E UMNSCI.1 | L | 58.48 | 69.52 | ||||
| R | 61 | 66.42 | |||||
| Average | 59.74 | 67.97 | 12 | ||||
| H-E UMNSCI.2 | L | 45.17 | 56.44 | ||||
| R | 35.68 | 40.94 | |||||
| Average | 40.43 | 48.69 | 16 | ||||
| H-E UMNSCI.3 | L | 57.36 | 36.73 | ||||
| R | 80.63 | 60.85 | |||||
| Average | 69 | 48.79 | 41 | ||||
| Analysis | n | pre ± SEM | n | post ± SEM | Δ% |
| |
| H-E UMNSCI | thickness | 6 | 56.39 ± 6.24 | 6 | 55.15 ± 5.50 | −2.2 | 0.85 |
Morphometric analyses of epidermis: Evaluation of thickness on epidermal sections between before and after (Pre and Post) 2 years of NMES in UMNSCI. Δ% is the differential percentage of the thickness; Data are mean ± SEM; n = number of biopsies for the analysis to calculate the average. Statistical significance at p < 0.05, paired t test. Data (µm) were taken from roughly three subjects (from left L and right R leg and each average).
Epidermis thickness (µm) in UMNSCI vs. LMNSCI.
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| thickness | 55.8 ± 3.97 | 12 | 46.25 ± 1.87 | 26 | −17.1 | 0.018 |
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | <1-year LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| thickness | 55.8 ± 3.97 | 12 | 54.66 ± 3.30 | 6 | 2.04 | 0.86 |
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | 5–7 year LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| thickness | 55.8 ± 3.97 | 12 | 40.94 ± 3.20 | 8 | 46.2 | 0.015 |
Morphometric analyses of epidermis: Evaluation of thickness on epidermal sections of pre + post 2 years of NMES in UMNSCI and pre h-bFES in LMNSCI and different periods of denervation (<1 year or 5–7 years). Δ% is the differential percentage of the thickness; data are mean ± SEM; n = number of biopsies for each analysis. Statistical significance at p < 0.05, unpaired t test.
Epidermis Interdigitation index: UMNSCI pre and post NMES.
| Analysis | Parameter | Pre | Post | Δ% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-E UMNSCI.1 | L | 1.57 | 1.58 | ||||
| R | 1.38 | 1.38 | |||||
| Average | 1.47 | 1.48 | 0.39 | ||||
| H-E UMNSCI.2 | L | 1.19 | 1.19 | ||||
| R | 1.53 | 1.45 | |||||
| Average | 1.36 | 1.32 | −2.91 | ||||
| H-E UMNSCI.3 | L | 1.44 | 1.13 | ||||
| R | 1.43 | 1.61 | |||||
| Average | 1.43 | 1.37 | −4.13 | ||||
| Analysis | n | pre ± SEM | n | post ± SEM | Δ% |
| |
| H-E UMNSCI Int. index | 6 | 1.42 ± 0.05 | 6 | 55.15 ± 5.50 | −2.2 | 0.63 |
Morphometric analyses of epidermis: Evaluation of interdigitation index on epidermal sections between before and after (Pre and Post) 2 years of NMES in UMNSCI. Δ% is the differential percentage of the index; data are mean ± SEM; n = number of biopsies for the analysis. Statistical significance at p < 0.05, paired t test. Data (µm) are taken from three subjects (from left L and right R leg and average).
Epidermis Interdigitation index in UMNSCI vs. LMNSCI.
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| INTindex | 1.41 ± 0.05 | 12 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 26 | −20.2 | <0.0001 |
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | <1-year LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| INTindex | 1.41 ± 0.05 | 12 | 1.31 ± 0.037 | 6 | 7.6 | 0.20 |
|
| ||||||
| UMNSCI | (Pre + Post NMES) | 5–7 year LMNSCI (Pre h-bFES) | ||||
| mean ± SEM | n | mean ± SEM | n | Δ% |
| |
| INTindex | 1.41 ± 0.05 | 12 | 1.09 ± 0.014 | 8 | −29.8 | <0.0001 |
Morphometric analyses of epidermis interdigitation index: Evaluation of index on epidermal sections before + after (Pre + Post) 2 years of NMES in UMNSCI and before (pre) in LMNSCI at different periods of denervation (<1 year and 5–7 year). Δ% is the differential percentage of the index; data are mean ± SEM; n = number of biopsies for each analysis. Statistical significance at p < 0.05, unpaired t test.
Figure 3Quantitative analysis of CD1a-immunostained epidermal sections from UMNSCI patients before (pre) and after (post) 2 years of NMES. IR% represents the immunoreactive area occupied in the epidermis by Langerhans cells, while n/mm2 is their numerical density. Data are mean ± SEM; * = p < 0.05, paired t-test.
Figure 4Langerhans cells (CD1a positive) in UMNSCI vs LMNSCI: Quantitation in immunostained epidermal sections of CD1a before + after (Pre + Post) 2 years of NMES on UMNSCI and before (pre) in LMNSCI. IR% is the percentage of immunoreactivity for CD1a; n/mm2 is the number of LC bodies per square millimeter of epidermis; data are mean ± SEM; statistical significance at p < 0.05 (*) p < 0.0001 (**), unpaired t test.