Literature DB >> 28451468

A Feasibility Study of Intermittent Electrical Stimulation to Prevent Deep Tissue Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.

Angela Kane1, Robyn Warwaruk-Rogers1, Chester Ho1, Ming Chan2, Richard Stein3, Vivian K Mushahwar2, Sean P Dukelow1.   

Abstract

Objective: The primary goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of utilizing intermittent electrical stimulation (IES) in an intensive care environment as a potential method for preventing pressure ulcers. Furthermore, we wished to evaluate the practicality of the innovation and end-user acceptability. Approach: Twenty immobile subjects, age ranging from 19 to 86 years old with a Braden Scale score ranging from 9 to 16 (very high to moderate risk of developing pressure ulcers), were enrolled. Intermittent 35 Hz electrical stimulation was administered through surface electrodes to the gluteal muscles causing them to contract for 10 s every 10 min. Subjects utilized IES on a program that increased from 4 to 24 h per day over 8 days and lasted up to a maximum of 4 weeks.
Results: Bedside nurses reported that IES was simple to use, took an average of 6 min to apply, and 2 min to remove. Furthermore, IES could be easily incorporated into routine patient care. No pressure ulcers occurred in any subject during the study. No untoward reactions or adverse events had occurred directly as a result of IES. Innovation: IES represents a potential method of preventing bedsores. This study represents a necessary pilot study, investigating safety and feasibility before proceeding with a larger randomized controlled trial to determine efficacy.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that IES is both safe and feasible to implement in intensive care units.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intensive care unit; intermittent electrical stimulation; pressure sore; pressure ulcer; prevention

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451468      PMCID: PMC5385581          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2016.0686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  40 in total

1.  Distribution of internal pressure around bony prominences: implications to deep tissue injury and effectiveness of intermittent electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leandro R Solis; Adrian Liggins; Richard R E Uwiera; Niek Poppe; Enid Pehowich; Peter Seres; Richard B Thompson; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Reliability and validity of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk.

Authors:  Daria L Kring
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  New opportunities to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: implications of the CMS inpatient hospital care present on admission indicators/hospital-acquired conditions policy: a consensus paper from the International Expert Wound Care Advisory Panel.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Elizabeth A Ayello; Kathleen Leask Capitulo; Evonne Fowler; Diane L Krasner; Jeffrey M Levine; R Gary Sibbald; Adrianne P S Smith
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 4.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

5.  Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.

Authors:  Li-Hua Wang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hong-Yan Yan; Jian-Hua Gao; Fang Wang; Yue Ming; Li Lu; Jing-Jing Ding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Temporal effects of mechanical loading on deformation-induced damage in skeletal muscle tissue.

Authors:  S Loerakker; A Stekelenburg; G J Strijkers; J J M Rijpkema; F P T Baaijens; D L Bader; K Nicolay; C W J Oomens
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Pressure ulcer accelerated healing with local injections of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor.

Authors:  N S El Saghir; A R Bizri; N S Shabb; T W Husami; Z Salem; A I Shamseddine
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.072

8.  An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Ruud Halfens; Theo Dassen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 9.  Clinical application of growth factors and cytokines in wound healing.

Authors:  Stephan Barrientos; Harold Brem; Olivera Stojadinovic; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Intensivists' base specialty of training is associated with variations in mortality and practice patterns.

Authors:  Emma O Billington; David A Zygun; H Tom Stelfox; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of Bimodal High-Voltage Monopulsed Current in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Bojun Li; Zhichao Wang; Lina Wu; Lili Song; Yexiang Yao
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.429

2.  Trauma of Peripheral Innervation Impairs Content of Epidermal Langerhans Cells.

Authors:  Giovanna Albertin; Barbara Ravara; Helmut Kern; Sandra Zampieri; Stefan Loefler; Christian Hofer; Diego Guidolin; Francesco Messina; Raffaele De Caro; Mauro Alaibac; Ugo Carraro
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.