| Literature DB >> 27478562 |
Kyle Joseph Edmunds1, Magnus K Gíslason1, Iris D Arnadottir1, Andrea Marcante2, Francesco Piccione2, Paolo Gargiulo3.
Abstract
Medical imaging is of particular interest in the field of translational myology, as extant literature describes the utilization of a wide variety of techniques to non-invasively recapitulate and quantity various internal and external tissue morphologies. In the clinical context, medical imaging remains a vital tool for diagnostics and investigative assessment. This review outlines the results from several investigations on the use of computed tomography (CT) and image analysis techniques to assess muscle conditions and degenerative process due to aging or pathological conditions. Herein, we detail the acquisition of spiral CT images and the use of advanced image analysis tools to characterize muscles in 2D and 3D. Results from these studies recapitulate changes in tissue composition within muscles, as visualized by the association of tissue types to specified Hounsfield Unit (HU) values for fat, loose connective tissue or atrophic muscle, and normal muscle, including fascia and tendon. We show how results from these analyses can be presented as both average HU values and compositions with respect to total muscle volumes, demonstrating the reliability of these tools to monitor, assess and characterize muscle degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: FES; Quantitative Computed Tomography; advanced muscle assessment; image analysis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27478562 PMCID: PMC4942705 DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2016.6015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Transl Myol ISSN: 2037-7452
Fig 2.Patient A – an example of irreversible Conus and Cauda Equina syndrome who underwent five years of compliance with h-b FES treatment, followed by another five years of non-compliance to h-b FES. As is evident above, the 3D volume and density analyses readily identify changes in Rectus femoris volume and density (average HU value) over the timespan of the study.
Fig 3.3D soft tissue segmentation of Patient B to compare the compositional changes between the calf muscles in both legs (A, before and B, after h-bFES rehabilitation). Note that soft tissue segmentation colorizations are defined thus: subcutaneous fat (yellow HU), Intramuscular fat (orange), low density muscle (cyan), muscle (red) and fibrous connective tissue (gray). E and F depict the HU distributions and changes within both legs (cyan: pre-rehabilitation, red; post-rehabilitation), and the pie charts contain corresponding compositional data changes. It is important to notice the qualitative muscle volume and quality differences between the SCI patient and a healthy subject (C+D).
Fig 4.HU distribution comparison between left and right legs of Patient C, as assessed at the mid-thigh. Note that compositions in the left and right rectus femoris muscles changed very little in the same time span, which is to be expected due to h-bFES being withheld in this region.