| Literature DB >> 35323485 |
Charifat Saïd Hassane1, Gaëtan Herbette2, Elnur Garayev3, Fathi Mabrouki3, Patricia Clerc1, Nicole J de Voogd4,5, Stephane Greff3, Ioannis P Trougakos6, Jamal Ouazzani7, Mireille Fouillaud1, Laurent Dufossé1, Béatrice Baghdikian3, Evelyne Ollivier3, Anne Gauvin-Bialecki1.
Abstract
The biological screening of 44 marine sponge extracts for the research of bioactive molecules, with potential application in the treatment of age-related diseases (cancer and Alzheimer's disease) and skin aging, resulted in the selection of Scopalina hapalia extract for chemical study. As no reports of secondary metabolites of S. hapalia were found in the literature, we undertook this research to further extend current knowledge of Scopalina chemistry. The investigation of this species led to the discovery of four new compounds: two butenolides sinularone J (1) and sinularone K (2), one phospholipid 1-O-octadecyl-2-pentanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (3) and one lysophospholipid 1-O-(3-methoxy-tetradecanoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (4) alongside with known lysophospholipids (5 and 6), alkylglycerols (7-10), epidioxysterols (11 and 12) and diketopiperazines (13 and 14). The structure elucidation of the new metabolites (1-4) was determined by detailed spectroscopic analysis, including 1D and 2D NMR as well as mass spectrometry. Molecular networking was also explored to complement classical investigation and unravel the chemical classes within this species. GNPS analysis provided further information on potential metabolites with additional bioactive natural compounds predicted.Entities:
Keywords: Scopalina hapalia; bromotyrosine; butenolides; diketopiperazines; lipids; molecular networking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323485 PMCID: PMC8951328 DOI: 10.3390/md20030186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chemical structures of new (1–4) and known (5–14) metabolites isolated from Scopalina hapalia.
NMR Spectroscopic data for 1 in CD3OD at 600 (1H) and 150 (13C) MHz.
| No. | 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | HMBC, H → C | |
| 1 | 173.8, OC=O | ||
| 2 | 128.4, =CH | ||
| 3 | 158.4, =CH | ||
| 4 | 111.9, C | ||
| 5 | 36.5, CH2 | 1.95 (m) | C-4, C-6, C-7 |
| 6 | 23.8, CH2 | 1.24 (m) | |
| 7–12 | 30.8–30.5, CH2 | 1.33–1.27 (m) | |
| 13 | 27.7, CH2 | 1.59 (brqt 7.4) | C-12, C-14, C-15 |
| 14 | 39.1, CH2 | 2.15 (brt7.8) | C-12, C-13, C-15 |
| 15 | 183.0, C | ||
| 16 | 8.2, CH3 | 1.84 (q, 1.2) | C-1, C-2, C-3 |
| 17 | 10.9, CH3 | 1.90 (q, 1.2) | C-2, C-3, C-4 |
| 18 | 50.5, CH3 | 3.07 (s) | C-4 |
Figure 2Key COSY (bold bonds) and HMBC (blue arrows) correlations for compound 1.
NMR Spectroscopic data for 2 in CD3OD at 600 (1H) and 150 (13C) MHz.
| No. | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| δC a, Type | δH ( | HMBC, H → C | |
| 1 | 173.8, OC=O | ||
| 2 | 128.4, =CH | ||
| 3 | 158.4, =CH | ||
| 4 | 111.9, C | ||
| 5 | 36.6, CH2 | 1.96 (m) | C-4, C-6, C-7 |
| 6 | 23.9, CH2 | 1.24 (m) | |
| 7–18 | 31.0–30.6, CH2 | 1.33–1.27 (m) | |
| 19 | 27.8, CH2 | 1.59 (qt, 7.5) | |
| 20 | 39.2, CH2 | 2.16 (t, 7.5) | C-18, C-19, C-21 |
| 21 | 182.9, C | ||
| 22 | 8.3, CH3 | 1.83 (q, 1.1) | C-1, C-2, C-3 |
| 23 | 10.9, CH3 | 1.90 (q, 1.1) | C-2, C-3, C-4 |
| 24 | 50.5, CH3 | 3.07 (s) | C-4 |
a δC were determined from HSQC and HMBC experiments.
Figure 3HMBC (blue arrows) correlations for compound 2.
NMR Spectroscopic data for 3 in CD3OD at 600 (1H) and 150 (13C) MHz.
| No. | 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| δC a, Type | δH ( | HMBC, H → C | |
| 1 | 70.2, CH2 | 3.59 (1H, dd 10.9, 5.9) | C-2, C-3, C-1’ |
| 2 | 73.2, CH | 5.17 (1H, m) | C-1, C-3, C-1’’’ |
| 3 | 65.5, CH2 | 3.97 (1H, dt 11.1, 6.1 b) | C-1, C-2 |
| 1’ | 72.7, CH2 | 3.43 (1H, dt 9.3, 6.6) | C-1, C-2’, C-3’ |
| 2’ | 30.8, CH2 | 1.54 (2H, brqt 6.8) | |
| 3’ | 27.6, CH2 | 1.35–1.25 (30H, ov c) | |
| 4’–15’ | 30.7, CH2 | 1.33–1.27 (m) | |
| 16’ | 33.2, CH2 | 1.59 (qt, 7.5) | |
| 17’ | 23.8, CH2 | 2.16 (t, 7.5) | |
| 18’ | 14.5, CH3 | 0.90 (3H, t 7.1) | C-16’, C-17’ |
| 1’’ | 60.5 (d 5.4) b, CH2 | 4.27 (2H, m b) | |
| 2’’ | 67.4 (m) b, CH2 | 3.65 (2H, m) | C-1’’, N+(CH3)3 |
| N+(CH3)3 | 54.7 (m) b, CH3 | 3.23 (brs) | C-2’’, N+(CH3)3 |
| 1’’’ | 174.4, C | ||
| 2’’’ | 34.6, CH2 | 2.42 (2H, brt 7.5) | C-1’’’, C-4’’’ |
| 3’’’ | 22.1, CH2 | 1.90 (2H, brqt 7.5) | C-1’’’, C-5’’’ |
| 4’’’ | 35.9, CH2 | 2.31 (2H, brt 7.3) | C-2’’’, C-5’’’ |
| 5’’’ | 178.7, C | ||
a δC were determined from HSQC and HMBC experiments; b 1H−31P couplings; c overlapping signals.
Figure 4Key COSY (bold bonds) and HMBC (blue arrows) correlations for compound 3.
NMR Spectroscopic data for 4 in CD3OD at 600 (1H) and 150 (13C) MHz.
| No. a | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| δC b, Type | δH ( | COSY, H → H | |
| 1 | 66.0, CH2 | 4.19 (dd, 10.9; 4.7) | |
| 2 | 69.4, CH | 3.98 (m) | |
| 3 | 67.4, CH2 | 3.90 (m) | |
| 1’ | no | - | |
| 2’ | 39.9, CH2 | 2.54 (dd, 15.3; 7.3) | 3’ |
| 3’ | 78.8, CH | 3.66 (m) | 2’ |
| 4’ | 34.5, CH2 | 1.53 (m) | |
| 5’–12’ | 33.2, CH2 | 1.35–1.25 (ov c) | 14’ |
| 13’ | 23.4, CH2 | 2.16 (t, 7.5) | |
| 14’ | 14.1, CH2 | 0.90 (t, 7.1) | 13’ |
| OCH3 | 56.9, CH3 | 3.34 (s) | |
| 1’’ | 60.1, CH2 | 4.29 (m) | 2’’ |
| 2’’ | 67.0, CH2 | 3.65 (m) | 1’’ |
| N+(CH3)3 | 54.3, CH3 | 3.23 (s) | |
a All assignments are based on 1H NMR and 2D NMR measurements (COSY, HSQC); b δC were determined from HSQC experiment; c overlapping signals.
Figure 5Key COSY (bold bonds) correlation for compound 4.
Figure 6(A) Molecular Network constructed using MS/MS data from fractions of Scopalina hapalia, obtained after the removal of non-polar lipids of organic crude extract, with a cosine similarity cutoff of 0.7. Edge thickness corresponds to relative cosine score similarity between nodes. Annotated clusters are enlarged. (B) Cluster MN1 based on compounds 1 and 2 (octagonal nodes) related to butenolide derivatives. (C) Cluster MN2 and MN3 related to bromotyrosine metabolites.