| Literature DB >> 35323420 |
Ting-Wei Wang1,2,3, Jhen-Yang Syu3, Hsiao-Wei Chu3, Yen-Ling Sung3,4,5,6, Lin Chou3, Endian Escott7, Olivia Escott7, Ting-Tse Lin5,6,8,9, Shien-Fong Lin3.
Abstract
Continuous blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for long-term cardiovascular monitoring, especially for prompt hypertension detection. However, most of the continuous BP measurements rely on the pulse transit time (PTT) from multiple-channel physiological acquisition systems that impede wearable applications. Recently, wearable and smart health electronics have become significant for next-generation personalized healthcare progress. This study proposes an intelligent single-channel bio-impedance system for personalized BP monitoring. Compared to the PTT-based methods, the proposed sensing configuration greatly reduces the hardware complexity, which is beneficial for wearable applications. Most of all, the proposed system can extract the significant BP features hidden from the measured bio-impedance signals by an ultra-lightweight AI algorithm, implemented to further establish a tailored BP model for personalized healthcare. In the human trial, the proposed system demonstrates the BP accuracy in terms of the mean error (ME) and the mean absolute error (MAE) within 1.7 ± 3.4 mmHg and 2.7 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively, which agrees with the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). In conclusion, this work presents a proof-of-concept for an AI-based single-channel bio-impedance BP system. The new wearable smart system is expected to accelerate the artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) technology for personalized BP healthcare in the future.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence; bio-impedance measurement; continuous blood pressure measurement; impedance plethysmography; intelligent system
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35323420 PMCID: PMC8946827 DOI: 10.3390/bios12030150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the IPG technique for hemodynamic measurement. (b) Physiological correlation between arterial impedance and blood pressure.
Figure 2Schematic of the proposed proof-of-concept wearable intelligent bio-impedance system for continuous BP monitoring, including IPG sensing, IPG excitation functions, and AI-based BP estimation.
Comparison of different lightweight deep learning models.
| Model | SSR-Net | MobileNet-V2 | LSTM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model size | 213 KB | 13,932 KB | 8744 KB |
| Model parameters | 0.04 M | 3.50 M | 215.99 M |
| Inference time on CPU | 0.17 s | 0.29 s | 0.25 s |
Figure 3(a) Experiment flow chart for physiological acquisition, data pre-processing, and BP estimation. (b) Synchronous measurement between the proposed sensor and cuff-based device. (c) IPG signals were pre-processed for further BP feature extraction, including signal segmentation and continuous wavelet transform.
Figure 4(a) Reference SBP and (b) DBP distribution for six participants. (c) Statistical BP results in quartiles 1, 2, and 3 within six subjects. (d) Performance evaluation of model convergence for the penalty terms with different weighting in the interval below quartile 1 and above quartile 3.
Figure 5(a) IPG signals from a carotid artery for 30 minutes’ measurement. (b) Five consecutive IPG waveforms before and after the operating time of the cuff device. (c) IPG signal segmentation and further continuous wavelet transform.
Figure 6Box plot analysis for subject’s (a) SBP and (b) DBP distribution from the cuff device and proposed IPG-based system. Bland–Altman plot analysis in terms of ME for (c) SBP and (d) DBP, respectively. Estimation Error in terms of MAE for (e) SBP and (f) DBP.
Comparison of cuffless continuous BP measurement technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||||
| Miao et al. [ | ECG, 2-PPW | - | ME ± SD | 1.62 ± 7.76 | 1.49 ± 5.52 |
| Tabei et al. [ | 2-PPG | - | MAE ± SD | 2.07 ± 2.06 | 2.12 ± 1.85 |
| Marzorati et al. [ | PPG, PCG | - | ME ± SD | 1.47 ± 3.76 | 0.01 ± 7.55 |
| Miao et al. [ | ECG | Res-LSTM | ME ± SD | −0.22 ± 5.82 | −0.75 ± 5.62 |
| El-Hajj et al. [ | PPG | Attention based-RNN | ME ± SD | −0.52 ± 4.22 | −0.66 ± 2.07 |
| MAE ± SD | 2.58 ± 3.35 | 1.26 ± 1.63 | |||
| Our work | IPG | SSR-Net | ME ± SD | 1.69 ± 3.28 | 1.56 ± 3.32 |
| MAE ± SD | 2.63 ± 2.58 | 2.66 ± 2.52 | |||