| Literature DB >> 35321750 |
Robert Landsiedel1,2, Daniela Hahn3, Bennard van Ravenzwaay1, Juergen Schnekenburger4, Rainer Ossig3, Sabrina Ritz3, Lydia Sauer3, Roland Buesen1, Sascha Rehm5,6, Wendel Wohlleben7, Sibylle Groeters1, Volker Strauss1, Saskia Sperber1, Haleluya Wami8, Ulrich Dobrindt8, Karola Prior9, Dag Harmsen9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The oral uptake of nanoparticles is an important route of human exposure and requires solid models for hazard assessment. While the systemic availability is generally low, ingestion may not only affect gastrointestinal tissues but also intestinal microbes. The gut microbiota contributes essentially to human health, whereas gut microbial dysbiosis is known to promote several intestinal and extra-intestinal diseases. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites, which are found in the blood stream, serve as key molecular mediators of host metabolism and immunity.Entities:
Keywords: Gut microbiota; Intestinal microbiome; Metabolomics; Nanomaterial; Oral nanoparticle administration; SiO2 nanoparticles; Silver nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35321750 PMCID: PMC8941749 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-022-00459-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Overview of findings per test groups upon 28-day oral gavage administration of the respective nanomaterials
| Parameter | Control group | SiO2 | Ag | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight: day 28 (g) | Mean: 286.2 SD: 27.5 | Mean: 294.5 SD: 18.1 | Mean: 296.1 SD: 21.8 | ||
| Hematology: RBC (tera/L) | Mean: 7.94 SD: 0.24 | Mean: 8.27 SD: 0.46 | Mean: 8.4 SD: 0.21 | ||
| Hematology: RET (%) | Mean: 2.2 SD: 0.3 | Mean: 2.1 SD: 0.3 | Mean: 1.7 SD: 0.3 | ||
| Hematology: MCHC (mmol/L) | Mean: 20.58 SD: 0.07 | Mean: 20.81 SD:0.38 | Mean: 20.41 SD: 0.12 | ||
| Hematology: Eos. (%) | Mean: 1.5 SD: 0.5 | Mean: 1 SD: 0.3 | Mean: 1.7 SD: 0.5 | ||
| Clinical chemistry: Hapt. (ng/mL) | Mean: 234.02 SD: 103.09 | Mean: 413.56 SD: 198.9 | Mean: 287.83 SD: 179.12 | ||
| Urine-analysis | Various data sets | Not sign. different from control | Not sign. different from control | ||
| Relative liver weights (g) | Mean: 2.445 SD: 0.108 | Mean: 2.706 SD: 0.117 | Mean: 2.586 SD: 0.142 | ||
| Relative organ weights | Various data sets | Not sign. different from control | Not sign. different from control | ||
| Gross lesions | Discolouration of the content of the glandular stomach, jejunum, cecum, and/or colon | ||||
| Histopathology | Various data sets | Not sign. different from control | Not sign. different from control | ||
SiO2: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day SiO2 NP; Ag: 100 mg/kg body weight/day Ag NP, assessed as incidental or test substance-related (see Additional file 1: Tables S2–S5 for details on the respective findings and Buesen et al. 2014 for SiO2 data [51]). RBC red blood cells, MCHC mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, WBC white blood cells, Eos eosinophils, Hapt haptoglobin. N = 5
aStudent t-test (two sided)
bWilcoxon test (two-sided)
cWilcoxon test (one-sided)
Fig. 1Relative abundance of bacterial phyla (a), classes (b), order (c) and family (d) in the gut microbiota of male Wistar rats after exposure to vehicle control, Ag or SiO2 nanoparticles. VC, Vehicle control (nanoparticle-free PBS + BSA); Ag50, Ag nanoparticles (100 mg/kg body weight/day); SiO2, SiO2 nanoparticles (1000 mg/kg body weight/day). Mean values of the relative abundance of the different ASVs from gut microbiota after a 25-day oral gavage, analyzed from feces samples of five animals in each group (N = 5). Values with abundance ≥ 1% in at least one group are shown for each taxonomic level
Fig. 2Scatter plots obtained for selected most abundant genera after exposure either to Ag or to SiO2. VC, vehicle control; Ag50, Ag nanoparticles (100 mg/kg body weight/day); SiO2, SiO2 nanoparticles (1000 mg/kg body weight /day); The median relative abundance of the selected genera displayed was ≥ 0.2% in at least one group (further abundant genera are shown in Fig. S4 (Additional file 1). p values were obtained by Mann–Whitney-U-test. N = 5 for each group
Significantly increased (red) or decreased (blue) metabolite levels in rat plasma
SiO2 nanoparticles: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day or Ag nanoparticles: 100 mg/kg body weight/day, mean values relative to vehicle controls (N = 5 per group, Welch t test; p < 0.05)
*Indicates gut microbiota-dependent metabolite
Summary of key effects on gut microbiome and plasma metabolome determined after orally administration of Ag NP or SiO2 NP
| Nanomaterial | Effects on the microbiome | Effects on the metabolome | Possible adverse effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | Adverse effects on the immune system [ | ||||
| Ag | Allantoin | ↑ | Sign of oxidative stress [ | ||
| SiO2 | Adverse effects on the immune system [ | ||||
| SiO2 | Elevated inflammation [ | ||||
| SiO2 | Increased growth of pathogens [ | ||||
| SiO2 | Proteobacteria | Panthotenic acid (Vitamine B5) | Adverse effects on the immune system [ | ||
| SiO2 | Pseudouridine | ↑ | Sign of stress response [ | ||
| Ag/SiO2 | Prevotellacea | ↑ | Members of this family can trigger IBD [ | ||
| Ag/SiO2 | Catecholamines | Disturbed production of neurotransmitters [ | |||
| Ag/SiO2 | Indole-3-acetic-acid | Enhanced susceptibility to chronic intestinal diseases [ | |||
Ag: effects only observed in rats treated with Ag NP, SiO2: effects only observed in rats treated with SiO2 NP, Ag/SiO2: similar effects observed in rats treated either with Ag NP or with SiO2 NP
Key findings of the combined microbiome-/metabolome profiling for toxicological endpoints
| Endpoint | Key finding |
|---|---|
| Clinical pathology | High dose oral application of SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles had no detectable effects on established clinical pathology endpoints in male Wistar rats |
| Gut microbiome | Ingested SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles altered the gut microbiome significantly |
| SiO2 and Ag NP influence the level of microbial genera some of which are known to mediate probiotic or adverse effects | |
| The gut microbiome is a sensitive indicator for possible hazards caused by orally administrated NP | |
| Plasma metabolome | Orally applied SiO2 and Ag NP led to changes in the level of several plasma metabolites known to be crucial for human health |
| Key plasma metabolites (e.g. gut-microbiota derived IAA) are suitable markers for potential adverse effects induced by orally applied NP | |
| Combined gut microbiome and plasma metabolome | The combination of gut microbiome and plasma metabolome profiling has a strong potential as a sensitive tool to disclose early detrimental effects of ingested NP |