Literature DB >> 35320381

Utility of an automatic adaptive iterative metal artifact reduction AiMAR algorithm in improving CT imaging of patients with hip prostheses evaluated for suspected bladder malignancy.

Payam Mohammadinejad1, Ashish Khandelwal1, Akitoshi Inoue1, Hiroaki Takahashi1, Mariana Yalon1, Zaiyang Long1, Ahmed F Halaweish2, Shuai Leng1, Lifeng Yu1, Yong S Lee1, Cynthia H McCollough1, Joel G Fletcher3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the utility of a novel metal artifact reduction algorithm to standard imaging in improving visualization of key structures, diagnostic confidence, and patient-level confidence in malignancy in patients with suspected bladder cancer.
METHODS: Patients with hip implants undergoing CT urography for suspected bladder malignancy were enrolled. Images were reconstructed using 3 methods: (1) Filtered Back Projection (FBP), (2) Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR), and (3) Adaptive Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (AiMAR) strength 4. In multiple reading sessions, three radiologists graded visualization of critical anatomic structures and artifact severity (6-point scales, lower scores desirable), and diagnostic confidence in blinded fashion. They also graded patient-level confidence in malignancy based on imaging findings in each patient.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (8 females) with a mean age of 74.5 ± 8.5 years were included. The median (range) visualization scores for FBP, iMAR, and AiMAR were 3.6 (1.1-4.9), 1.6 (0.3-2.8), and 1.6 (0.3-2.6), respectively. Both iMAR and AiMAR had anatomic visualization and artifact scores better than FBP (P < 0.001 for both) and similar to each other (P > 0.05). Structures with the most improvement in visualization score with the use of metal artifact reduction algorithms included the obturator internus muscle, internal and external iliac nodal chains, and vagina. iMAR and AiMAR improved diagnostic confidence (P < 0.001) and patient-level confidence in malignancy (P ≤ 0.24).
CONCLUSION: For patients with hip prostheses and suspected bladder malignancy, the use of iMAR or AiMAR was shown to significantly reduce metal artifacts, thus improving diagnostic confidence and patient-level confidence in malignancy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Artifacts; Bone-implant interface; Hip; Replacement; Tomography; Urography; X-Ray computed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35320381     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03475-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  28 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Sungjun Kim; Sung-Ah Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Yong-Min Huh; Dae-Hong Kim; Seung Hwan Han; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  64-Slice CT urography: 30 months of clinical experience.

Authors:  P Martingano; F Stacul; M Cavallaro; F Casagrande; S Cernic; M Belgrano; M Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Current and Novel Techniques for Metal Artifact Reduction at CT: Practical Guide for Radiologists.

Authors:  Masaki Katsura; Jiro Sato; Masaaki Akahane; Akira Kunimatsu; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Metal artifact reduction: standard and advanced magnetic resonance and computed tomography techniques.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Naveen Subhas; Andrew N Primak; Mathias Nittka; Kecheng Liu
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  CT Metal Artifact Reduction in the Spine: Can an Iterative Reconstruction Technique Improve Visualization?

Authors:  A L Kotsenas; G J Michalak; D R DeLone; F E Diehn; K Grant; A F Halaweish; A Krauss; R Raupach; B Schmidt; C H McCollough; J G Fletcher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Soo-Youn Park; Han Jong Ahn; Chung Soo Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Dirk R Larson; Cynthia S Crowson; Walter K Kremers; Raynard E Washington; Claudia A Steiner; William A Jiranek; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  CT Dental Artifact: Comparison of an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Technique with Weighted Filtered Back-Projection.

Authors:  Felix E Diehn; Gregory J Michalak; David R DeLone; Amy L Kotsenas; E Paul Lindell; Norbert G Campeau; Ahmed F Halaweish; Cynthia H McCollough; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-11-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Metal-Artifact-Reduction Algorithm in FD-CT Angiography in Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Coiling or Surgical Clipping.

Authors:  Felix Eisenhut; Manuel Alexander Schmidt; Alexander Kalik; Tobias Struffert; Julian Feulner; Sven-Martin Schlaffer; Michael Manhart; Arnd Doerfler; Stefan Lang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.