Literature DB >> 20574699

64-Slice CT urography: 30 months of clinical experience.

P Martingano1, F Stacul, M Cavallaro, F Casagrande, S Cernic, M Belgrano, M Cova.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography urography (CTU) in evaluation of the urinary tract.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 322 CTU procedures were carried out in 317 consecutive patients (mean age 64.4 years). The findings were compared with previous and subsequent patient workup considering both laboratory and imaging studies, such as urine cytology, abdominal ultrasound and CT, cystoscopy, retrograde pyelography, surgery and pathology.
RESULTS: Out of 322 CTU examinations, 169 showed significant urinary tract changes, whereas 153 revealed no urinary disease, in good agreement with the follow-up. In particular, in bladder evaluation, for which we have a direct comparison with cystoscopy in 125 patients, we calculated a CTU sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of 85%, 94%, 92%, 89% and 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CTU was accurate for urinary tract evaluation, but it cannot replace cystoscopy in patients in whom a malignant bladder disease is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574699     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0567-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  21 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria.

Authors:  Christine L Gray Sears; John F Ward; Stephen T Sears; Michael F Puckett; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Renal multidector row CT.

Authors:  Ercan Kocakoc; Shweta Bhatt; Vikram S Dogra
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: Many roads lead to Rome.

Authors:  Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Nigel Cowan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; John R Leyendecker; E Stephen Amis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Current use of computed tomographic urography: survey of the society of uroradiology.

Authors:  Brent A Townsend; Stuart G Silverman; Koenraad J Mortele; Kemal Tuncali; Richard H Cohan
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 6.  CT urography: the end of IVU?

Authors:  F Stacul; A Rossi; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Computed tomography urography technique, indications and limitations.

Authors:  Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Computerized tomography tailored for the assessment of microscopic hematuria.

Authors:  Erich K Lang; Richard J Macchia; Raju Thomas; Gilberto Ruiz-Deya; Richard A Watson; Frank Richter; Robert Irwin R; Michael Marberger; Jack Mydlo; Gerhard Lechner; Kyunghee C Cho; Brian Gayle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  MDCT urography of upper tract urothelial neoplasms.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Richard H Cohan; Prasuna Inampudi; James H Ellis; Rajal B Shah; Gary J Faerber; James E Montie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  CT urography.

Authors:  Akira Kawashima; Terri J Vrtiska; Andrew J LeRoy; Robert P Hartman; Cynthia H McCollough; Bernard F King
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance urography vs computed tomography urography in the evaluation of patients with haematuria.

Authors:  Paola Martingano; Marco Francesco M Cavallaro; Michele Bertolotto; Fulvio Stacul; Maja Ukmar; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Glycosylated phospholipid-coated upconversion nanoparticles for bioimaging of non-muscle invasive bladder cancers.

Authors:  Bowen Sun; Sneha Sree Mullapudi; Yong Zhang; Koon Gee Neoh
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 3.  Imaging in Localized Bladder Cancer: Can Current Diagnostic Modalities Provide Accurate Local Tumor Staging?

Authors:  Sandeep Gurram; Akhil Muthigi; Jillian Egan; Lambros Stamatakis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Utility of an automatic adaptive iterative metal artifact reduction AiMAR algorithm in improving CT imaging of patients with hip prostheses evaluated for suspected bladder malignancy.

Authors:  Payam Mohammadinejad; Ashish Khandelwal; Akitoshi Inoue; Hiroaki Takahashi; Mariana Yalon; Zaiyang Long; Ahmed F Halaweish; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Yong S Lee; Cynthia H McCollough; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-23

5.  Imaging features of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of bladder outlet and urethra: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Keping Zhang; Lihui Guan; Nuan Wen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 0.496

Review 6.  Advances in bladder cancer imaging.

Authors:  Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.