Vaidya Govindarajan1, Ashish H Shah2, Long Di1, Sarah Rivas3, Robert K Suter4, Daniel G Eichberg1, Evan Luther1, Victor Lu1, Alexis A Morell1, Michael E Ivan1, Ricardo J Komotar1, Nagi Ayad4, Macarena De La Fuente5. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. Electronic address: ashah@med.miami.edu. 3. Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 4. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%. CONCLUSION: IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%. CONCLUSION: IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
Authors: V Moreno; J M Sepulveda; M Vieito; T Hernández-Guerrero; B Doger; O Saavedra; O Ferrero; R Sarmiento; M Arias; J De Alvaro; J Di Martino; M Zuraek; T Sanchez-Pérez; I Aronchik; E H Filvaroff; M Lamba; B Hanna; Z Nikolova; I Braña Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Lenny Dang; David W White; Stefan Gross; Bryson D Bennett; Mark A Bittinger; Edward M Driggers; Valeria R Fantin; Hyun Gyung Jang; Shengfang Jin; Marie C Keenan; Kevin M Marks; Robert M Prins; Patrick S Ward; Katharine E Yen; Linda M Liau; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Shinsan M Su Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ina Oehme; Hedwig E Deubzer; Dennis Wegener; Diana Pickert; Jan-Peter Linke; Barbara Hero; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Frank Westermann; Scott M Ulrich; Andreas von Deimling; Matthias Fischer; Olaf Witt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Evanthia Galanis; S Keith Anderson; C Ryan Miller; Jann N Sarkaria; Kurt Jaeckle; Jan C Buckner; Keith L Ligon; Karla V Ballman; Dennis F Moore; Michael Nebozhyn; Andrey Loboda; David Schiff; Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia; Eudocia Q Lee; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Glenn J Lesser; Michael Prados; Stuart A Grossman; Jane Cerhan; Caterina Giannini; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Kalipso Halkidou; Luke Gaughan; Susan Cook; Hing Y Leung; David E Neal; Craig N Robson Journal: Prostate Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Catherine Hanna; Kathreena M Kurian; Karin Williams; Colin Watts; Alan Jackson; Ross Carruthers; Karen Strathdee; Garth Cruickshank; Laurence Dunn; Sara Erridge; Lisa Godfrey; Sarah Jefferies; Catherine McBain; Rebecca Sleigh; Alex McCormick; Marc Pittman; Sarah Halford; Anthony J Chalmers Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Huili Li; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Angela A Guzzetta; Hariharan Easwaran; Ray-Whay Chiu Yen; Rajita Vatapalli; Michael J Topper; Jianjun Luo; Roisin M Connolly; Nilofer S Azad; Vered Stearns; Drew M Pardoll; Nancy Davidson; Peter A Jones; Dennis J Slamon; Stephen B Baylin; Cynthia A Zahnow; Nita Ahuja Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-02-15