Literature DB >> 34504304

Grading of adult diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

Takashi Komori1.   

Abstract

The grading of gliomas based on histological features has been a subject of debate for several decades. A consensus has not yet been reached because of technical limitations and inter-observer variations. While the traditional grading system has failed to stratify the risk of IDH-mutant astrocytoma, canonical histological and proliferative markers may be applicable to the risk stratification of IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. Numerous studies have examined molecular markers in order to obtain more clinically relevant information that will improve the risk stratification of gliomas. The CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and the following three criteria for IDH-wild-type astrocytoma: the concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10, TERT promoter mutations, and EGFR amplification, were identified as independent molecular markers of the worst clinical outcomes. Therefore, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System adopted these molecular markers into the revised grading criteria of IDH-mutant and -wild-type astrocytoma, respectively, as a grading system within tumor types. Of note, several recent studies have shown that some low-grade IDH-wild-type astrocytoma lacking both the molecular glioblastoma signature and genetic alterations typical of pediatric-type gliomas may demonstrate a relatively indolent clinical course, suggesting the existence of lower-grade adult IDH-wild-type astrocytoma. In terms of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, and 1p/19q codeleted, consistent makers that predict poor outcomes have not yet been identified, and, thus, the current criteria have remained unchanged. Molecular testing to fulfill the revised WHO criteria is, however, not always available worldwide, and in that case, an integrated diagnosis combining all available complementary information is highly recommended. This review discusses controversial issues surrounding legacy grading systems and newly identified potential genetic markers of adult diffuse gliomas and provides perspectives on future grading systems.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34504304     DOI: 10.1038/s41374-021-00667-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  96 in total

1.  Grading of diffuse astrocytic gliomas: Broders, Kernohan, Zülch, the WHO… and Shakespeare.

Authors:  David N Louis; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 17.088

2.  James Watson Kernohan (1896–1981: Frontiers in neuropathology.

Authors:  Denzil Etienne; Anna Zurada; Petru Matusz; Mohammadali M Shoja; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Updated 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the CNS: turning the corner where molecule meets pathology.

Authors:  Takashi Komori
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Updating the grading criteria for adult diffuse gliomas: beyond the WHO2016CNS classification.

Authors:  Takashi Komori
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Reclassification of 400 consecutive glioma cases based on the revised 2016WHO classification.

Authors:  Yojiro Akagi; Koji Yoshimoto; Nobuhiro Hata; Daisuke Kuga; Ryusuke Hatae; Takeo Amemiya; Yuhei Sangatsuda; Satoshi O Suzuki; Toru Iwaki; Masahiro Mizoguchi; Koji Iihara
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Grading of astrocytomas. A simple and reproducible method.

Authors:  C Daumas-Duport; B Scheithauer; J O'Fallon; P Kelly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Albert C. Broders' paradigm shifts involving the prognostication and definition of cancer.

Authors:  James R Wright
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Development of the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Bernd W Scheithauer
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.508

Review 9.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 10.  Correlation between IDH, ATRX, and TERT promoter mutations in glioma.

Authors:  Shigeo Ohba; Kiyonori Kuwahara; Seiji Yamada; Masato Abe; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Targeting interleukin-13 receptor α2 (IL-13Rα2) for glioblastoma therapy with surface functionalized nanocarriers.

Authors:  Ruijia Liang; Cheng Wu; Shiming Liu; Wenyan Zhao
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.819

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Epigenetic Therapies for Treatment of IDH-mutant Glioma.

Authors:  Vaidya Govindarajan; Ashish H Shah; Long Di; Sarah Rivas; Robert K Suter; Daniel G Eichberg; Evan Luther; Victor Lu; Alexis A Morell; Michael E Ivan; Ricardo J Komotar; Nagi Ayad; Macarena De La Fuente
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 3.  Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Technique in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment.

Authors:  Rajneesh Mungur; Jiesheng Zheng; Ben Wang; Xinhua Chen; Renya Zhan; Ying Tong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Identification of hub genes and biological pathways in glioma via integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Lulu Chen; Tao Sun; Jian Li; Yongxuan Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.573

5.  Circulating miRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  Jianing Wu; Abdulrahman Al-Zahrani; Ozal Beylerli; Rinat Sufianov; Rustam Talybov; Svetlana Meshcheryakova; Galina Sufianova; Ilgiz Gareev; Albert Sufianov
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Impact of CDKN2A/B Homozygous Deletion on the Prognosis and Biology of IDH-Mutant Glioma.

Authors:  L Eric Huang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  A Custom DNA-Based NGS Panel for the Molecular Characterization of Patients With Diffuse Gliomas: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Elena Tirrò; Michele Massimino; Giuseppe Broggi; Chiara Romano; Simone Minasi; Francesca Gianno; Manila Antonelli; Gianmarco Motta; Francesco Certo; Roberto Altieri; Livia Manzella; Rosario Caltabiano; Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo; Francesca Romana Buttarelli; Gaetano Magro; Felice Giangaspero; Paolo Vigneri
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Dynamic Intercell Communication between Glioblastoma and Microenvironment through Extracellular Vesicles.

Authors:  Gloria Krapež; Katarina Kouter; Ivana Jovčevska; Alja Videtič Paska
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 9.  Systems Biology Approaches to Decipher the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Ali Kaynar; Ozlem Altay; Xiangyu Li; Cheng Zhang; Hasan Turkez; Mathias Uhlén; Saeed Shoaie; Adil Mardinoglu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Targeting AVIL, a New Cytoskeleton Regulator in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Robert Cornelison; Laine Marrah; Drew Horter; Sarah Lynch; Hui Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.