Literature DB >> 35313420

Usefulness of the automated multiband imaging system for EUS-FNA biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

Kosuke Okuwaki1, Hiroshi Imaizumi1, Mitsuhiro Kida1, Hironori Masutani1, Tomohisa Iwai1, Masafumi Watanabe1, Kai Adachi1, Masayoshi Tadehara1, Rikiya Hasegawa1, Seigo Nakatani1, Takahiro Kurosu1, Akihiro Tamaki1, Wasaburo Koizumi1.   

Abstract

Background and
Objectives: Sample isolation processing by stereomicroscopy (SIPS) was recently introduced as an alternative to rapid on-site cytologic evaluation and showed high accuracy for use in pathologic diagnoses. SIPS is a useful, but slightly complicated procedure; therefore, a new, more straightforward method for the objective estimation of the core tissue amount required during the sampling is desirable. We evaluated the usefulness of the automated multiband imaging system (AMUS) for calculating whitish core amounts in EUS-FNA biopsy (EUS-FNAB) samples from patients with subepithelial lesions (SELs).
Methods: Four EUS-FNAB specimens per patient were obtained from 20 patients with upper gastrointestinal SELs. The correlation between the whitish core amount calculated by AMUS, length of the manually measured whitish cores (stereomicroscopically visible white core [SVWC]), and sample suitability for pathologic evaluation were analyzed.
Results: We identified 13 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, five with leiomyomas, one with a schwannoma, and one with an ectopic pancreas. The histological diagnostic accuracy was 100%, median SVWC length was 9 mm, and median whitish core area, calculated using AMUS, was 10 mm2. SVWC length correlated with whitish core amount (ρ = 0.81, P < 0.01) and adequacy score (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.01). Whitish core amount correlated with adequacy score (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.01). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve calculated for whitish core amount with respect to the histological diagnosis was 0.83 (P < 0.01; cutoff ≥4 mm2, sensitivity 98.4%). Conclusions: AMUS, a simple on-site verification instrument, is an alternative to SIPS for determining the appropriate SEL tissue sampling quantity with high diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EUS; EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy; automated multiband imaging system; histopathology; stereomicroscopy; subepithelial lesions

Year:  2022        PMID: 35313420      PMCID: PMC9526098          DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound        ISSN: 2226-7190            Impact factor:   5.275


  15 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant submucosal tumors.

Authors:  M Polkowski
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction.

Authors:  H Gerke; M K Rizk; A D Vanderheyden; C S Jensen
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.073

3.  A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Glenn M Eisen; Lars Aabakken; Todd H Baron; Matt M Hutter; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Albert Nemcek; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Irving M Pike; Linda Rabeneck; Joseph Romagnuolo; John J Vargo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  On-site stereomicroscope quality evaluations to estimate white core cutoff lengths using EUS-FNA biopsy sampling with 22-gauge needles.

Authors:  Hironori Masutani; Kosuke Okuwaki; Mitsuhiro Kida; Tsutomu Yoshida; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Hiroshi Yamauchi; Tomohisa Iwai; Toru Kaneko; Rikiya Hasegawa; Eiji Miyata; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).

Authors:  Takuji Iwashita; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Shinpei Doi; Masanori Nakashima; Shinya Uemura; Masatoshi Mabuchi; Masahito Shimizu; Yuichiro Hatano; Akira Hara; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Gross visual inspection by endosonographers during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Junya Sato; Shinya Fujie; Keiko Sasaki; Junichi Kaneko; Tatsunori Satoh; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Yoshihiro Kishida; Masao Yoshida; Sayo Ito; Noboru Kawata; Kenichiro Imai; Naomi Kakushima; Kohei Takizawa; Kinichi Hotta; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis of subepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Kida; Yusuke Kawaguchi; Eiji Miyata; Rikiya Hasegawa; Toru Kaneko; Hiroshi Yamauchi; Shuko Koizumi; Kosuke Okuwaki; Shiro Miyazawa; Tomohisa Iwai; Hidehiko Kikuchi; Maya Watanabe; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 7.559

8.  Macroscopic on-site evaluation after EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may replace rapid on-site evaluation.

Authors:  Hoonsub So; Dong-Wan Seo; Jun Seong Hwang; Sung Woo Ko; Dongwook Oh; Tae Jun Song; Do Hyun Park; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

9.  New image-processing technology for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kosuke Okuwaki; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hironori Masutani; Masafumi Watanabe; Kai Adachi; Masayoshi Tadehara; Akihiro Tamaki; Tomohisa Iwai; Hiroshi Yamauchi; Rikiya Hasegawa; Toru Kaneko; Takahiro Kurosu; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Macroscopic onsite evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy as an alternative to rapid onsite evaluation.

Authors:  En-Ling Leung Ki; Anne-Isabelle Lemaistre; Fabien Fumex; Rodica Gincul; Christine Lefort; Vincent Lepilliez; Bertrand Pujol; Bertrand Napoléon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.