Literature DB >> 25440688

Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).

Takuji Iwashita1, Ichiro Yasuda2, Tsuyoshi Mukai1, Shinpei Doi2, Masanori Nakashima1, Shinya Uemura1, Masatoshi Mabuchi2, Masahito Shimizu1, Yuichiro Hatano3, Akira Hara3, Hisataka Moriwaki1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although rapid on-site cytologic evaluation provides high efficacy of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), its availability is limited. Alternatively, macroscopic on-site quality evaluation (MOSE) may increase the efficacy of EUS-FNA.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of MOSE in estimating the adequacy of histologic core specimens obtained by EUS-FNA using a standard 19-gauge needle (19GN) for solid lesions.
DESIGN: A prospective pilot study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred patients with solid lesions (n = 111 lesions).
INTERVENTIONS: EUS-FNA using 19GN MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The relation of a macroscopic visible core (MVC) in the FNA specimens on MOSE with histologic core and the diagnostic yields were studied.
RESULTS: The feasibility of EUS-FNA using a 19GN was 99%. The final diagnoses were malignancy in 83 lesions and benign in 28. MOSE revealed MVC in 91.1% with the median length of 8 mm. Histologic core was confirmed in 78.9%. The receiver-operating characteristic curve of the length of MVC for the presence of histologic core showed the cut-off MVC length of 4 mm with area under the curve of .893. Comparisons of per-pass diagnostic yields showed significantly superior histologic, cytologic, and overall diagnostic yields in MVC ≥ 4 mm as compared with <4 mm. The multivariate analysis for false-negative pass identified lesion in the pancreas and MVC < 4 mm as significant risk factors. No adverse events were seen. LIMITATIONS: Single center, limited operators
CONCLUSION: MVC of ≥4 mm on MOSE can be an indicator of specimen adequacy and can improve diagnostic yield; however, additional FNA may be recommended for pancreatic lesions. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000010417.).
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440688     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  46 in total

1.  Feasibility of Using an Enzymatically Activatable Fluorescence Probe for the Rapid Evaluation of Pancreatic Tissue Obtained Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kazumichi Kawakubo; Shunsuke Ohnishi; Yutaka Hatanaka; Kanako C Hatanaka; Hidetaka Hosono; Yoshimasa Kubota; Mako Kamiya; Masaki Kuwatani; Hiroshi Kawakami; Yasuteru Urano; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using 22-Gauge Franseen Needle for the Histological Diagnosis of Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Naoki Mita; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Yuhei Iwasa; Katsuhisa Toda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Ichiro Yasuda; Masahito Shimizu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

5.  Usefulness of the automated multiband imaging system for EUS-FNA biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Kosuke Okuwaki; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hironori Masutani; Tomohisa Iwai; Masafumi Watanabe; Kai Adachi; Masayoshi Tadehara; Rikiya Hasegawa; Seigo Nakatani; Takahiro Kurosu; Akihiro Tamaki; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.275

6.  Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center.

Authors:  Jian-Han Lai; Ching-Chung Lin; Hsiang-Hung Lin; Ming-Jen Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges.

Authors:  Benedetto Mangiavillano; Leonardo Frazzoni; Thomas Togliani; Carlo Fabbri; Ilaria Tarantino; Luca De Luca; Teresa Staiano; Cecilia Binda; Marianna Signoretti; Leonardo H Eusebi; Francesco Auriemma; Laura Lamonaca; Danilo Paduano; Milena Di Leo; Silvia Carrara; Lorenzo Fuccio; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Yawen Li; Yun Wang; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Guiding Treatment Plans for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Jeong Seop Moon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 10.  Efforts to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Akane Yamabe; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Goro Shibukawa; Mariko Fujisawa; Ai Sato; Yoshitsugu Yoshida; Noriyuki Arakawa; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Ryo Igarashi; Takumi Maki; Shogo Yamamoto
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.