| Literature DB >> 35310940 |
Haley A Petersen1, Abdulaziz W Alherz2, Taylor A Stinson1, Chloe G Huntzinger1, Charles B Musgrave1,2,3, Oana R Luca1.
Abstract
This work maps the thermodynamics of electrochemically generated C-nucleophiles for reactive capture of CO2. We identify a linear relationship between the pKa, the reduction potential of a protonated nucleophile (E red ), and the nucleophile's free energy of CO2 binding ( Δ G b i n d ). Through synergistic experiments and computations, this study establishes a three-parameter correlation described by the equation Δ G b i n d = - 0.78 p K a + 4.28 E r e d + 20.95 for a series of twelve imidazol(in)ium/N-heterocyclic carbene pairs with an R 2 of 0.92. The correlation allows us to predict the Δ G b i n d of C-nucleophiles to CO2 using reduction potentials or pKas of imidazol(in)ium cations. The carbenes in this study were found to exhibit a wide range CO2 binding strengths, from strongly CO2 binding to nonspontaneous. This observation suggests that the Δ G b i n d of imidazol(in)ium-based carbenes is tunable to a desired strength by appropriate structural changes. This work sets the stage for systematic energetic tuning of electrochemically enabled reactive separations.Entities:
Keywords: Applied chemistry; Chemistry; Computational chemistry; Electrochemistry; Theoretical chemistry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35310940 PMCID: PMC8927916 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Scheme 1Reactions of imidazolium cations
Generation of NHCs (Im) from their imidazolium precursors (A and B) and Im binding to CO2 (C) along with the three properties associated with these reactions: (A) E, (B) pK, and (C) ΔG. R1 and R2 substituents are described in Figure 1.
Figure 1Imidazol(in)ium-based NHCs used in the correlation studies
Structures of each compound under study. See also Figure S1 and Table S1 for applicable experimental values associated with each NHC. Imidazolium counterparts (protonated NHCs) are abbreviated as "NHC"H in this work.
Figure 2Linear correlations of pKa, free energy of CO2 binding, and reduction potential
The three linear two-way correlations of (left) reduction potential and pK, (middle) free energy of CO2 binding and pK, and (right) reduction potential and free energy of CO2 binding for the compounds under study. Optimized molecular coordinates are available in Data S1.
Figure 33D correlation provides greater predictive power for estimating the free energy of CO2 binding
Three-parameter linear relationship providing stronger correlation between Ered, pKa, and ΔGbind for the compounds under study
Comparison of DFT-calculated ΔG values with those estimated using experimental reduction potentials and pK value
| ImH | Exp. Ered (V vs. Fc/Fc+) | Exp. pKa | Est. ΔGbind (kcal/mol) | DFT ΔGbind (kcal/mol) | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMesH | −2.64 | 19.4 | −5.4 | −5.8 | 6 |
| IPrH | −2.63 | 19.3 | −5.3 | −6.0 | 12 |
| IMeH | −2.83 | 22.0 | −8.3 | −8.3 | 0.2 |
| EtMeH | −2.87 | 22.1 | −8.5 | −8.2 | 4 |
| BMIM | −2.84 | 22.0 | −8.3 | −8.4 | 1 |
Comparison of estimated pK values from Equation 4 and experimental pK values
| ImH | Exp. Ered (V vs. Fc/Fc+) | Est. pKa | Exp. pKa | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMesH | −2.64 | 22.2 | 19.4 | 15 |
| IPrH | −2.63 | 22.2 | 19.3 | 15 |
| IMeH | −2.83 | 23.8 | 22.0 | 8 |
| EtMeH | −2.87 | 24.1 | 22.1 | 9 |
| BMIM | −2.84 | 23.9 | 22.0 | 8 |
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-imidazolium chloride (IMesHCl) | Strem Chemicals | Cat#07-0299; CAS-No. 141556-45-8 |
| 1,3-Bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazolium chloride (SIMesHCl) | Strem Chemicals | Cat#07-4011; CAS-No. 173035-10-4 |
| 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-imidazolium chloride (IPrHCl) | Strem Chemicals | Cat#07-0590; CAS-No. 250285-32-6 |
| 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazolium chloride (SIPrHCl) | TCI Chemicals | Cat# B3157; CAS-No. 258278-25-0 |
| 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (SIPrH BF4) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# 693553-1G; CAS-No. 282109-83-5 |
| 1,3-dimethylimidazolium chloride (IMeHCl) | TCI Chemicals | Cat#D3341; CAS-No. 79917-88-7 |
| 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (IEtMeHCl) | Alfa Aesar | Cat# L19762; CAS-No. 155371-19-0 |
| 1,3-di-t-butylimidazolium chloride (ItBuHCl) | Strem Chemicals | Cat#07-0368; CAS-No. 157197-54-1 |
| 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (BMIM TFSI) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat#77896-1G-F; CAS-No. 174899-83-3 |
| Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate | Sigma Aldrich | Cat#86874-100G; CAS-No. 3109-63-5 |
| Acetonitrile | Pharmco | Cat#300000DIS; CAS-No. 75-05-8 |
| Methanol | Macron Fine Chemicals | Cat#3016-16; CAS-No. 67-56-1 |
| MN15 Functional | N/A | |
| 6-311+G(d,p) Basis Set | N/A | |
| SMD Solvent Model | N/A | |
| McLean-Chandler (12s,9p) → (621111,52111) basis sets | N/A | |
| N/A | ||
| CPCM Solvent Model | N/A | |
| Gaussian 16 | N/A | |
| Optimized molecular coordinates | Used in | |
| OriginPro 2019b | OriginLab | N/A |