| Literature DB >> 35310094 |
Jianfeng Bao1,2, Hui Tu1, Yijia Li1, Jubao Sun3, Zhigang Hu1, Fengshou Zhang1, Jinghua Li1.
Abstract
Background: Axons and myelin sheaths are the physical foundation for white matter (WM) to perform normal functions. Our previous study found the metabolite abnormalities in frontal, parietal, and occipital normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) regions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients by applying a 2D 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging method. Since the metabolite changes may associate with the microstructure changes, we used the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) method to assess the integrity of NAWM in this study. Method: Diffusion tensor imaging scan was performed on 17 clinically definite RRMS patients and 21 age-matched healthy controls on a 3.0-T scanner. DTI metrics including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were extracted from 19 predefined regions of interest (ROIs), which were generated by removing a mask of manually drawn probabilistic lesion map from the Johns Hopkins University white-matter atlas. The mean values of FA, MD, AD, and RD were compared between different groups in the same ROIs.Entities:
Keywords: diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; normal-appearing white matter; probabilistic lesion map; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; white matter tracts atlas
Year: 2022 PMID: 35310094 PMCID: PMC8924457 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.837452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1All WM tracts, extracted from JHU white-matter atlas, are analyzed in this work. SCR, superior corona radiata; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; ACR, anterior corona radiata; PCR, posterior corona radiata; BCC, body of the corpus callosum; CIN, cingulate; EC, external capsule; GCC, genu of the corpus callosum; PTR, posterior thalamic radiation; SCC, splenium of the corpus callosum; TAP, tapetum.
FIGURE 2Overlaying the probabilistic lesion map (hot color, threshold 0.3) on the NAWM tracts. The other colors represent the same WM tracts as in Figure 1.
Comparison of DTI metrics of FA and MD in NAWM tracts between RRMS patients and controls using two-tailed Student’s t-test.
| Location | Side | FA (mean ± SD) | MD (mean ± SD) 10–3 mm2 s–1 | ||
| RRMS | Control | RRMS | Control | ||
| SCR | Left | 0.3816 ± 0.0375 | 0.4307 ± 0.0577 | 0.7769 ± 0.0664 | 0.6785 ± 0.0199 |
| SCR | Right | 0.3918 ± 0.0331 | 0.4824 ± 0.0450 | 0.7976 ± 0.0731 | 0.6954 ± 0.0429 |
| SLF | Left | 0.3418 ± 0.0221 | 0.3769 ± 0.0386 | 0.8127 ± 0.0618 | 0.7523 ± 0.0380 |
| SLF | Right | 0.3377 ± 0.0352 | 0.3871 ± 0.0458 | 0.8106 ± 0.0510 | 0.7611 ± 0.0333 |
| ACR | Left | 0.3425 ± 0.0400 | 0.3975 ± 0.0200 | 0.8397 ± 0.0716 | 0.7418 ± 0.0226 |
| ACR | Right | 0.3390 ± 0.0393 | 0.4034 ± 0.0292 | 0.7403 ± 0.0817 | 0.8474 ± 0.0279 |
| BCC | – | 0.3831 ± 0.0389 | 0.4503 ± 0.0334 | 1.0156 ± 0.1421 | 0.9606 ± 0.1271 |
| CIN | Left | 0.2707 ± 0.0423 | 0.3045 ± 0.0514 | 0.8690 ± 0.0659 | 0.8140 ± 0.0377 |
| CIN | Right | 0.2642 ± 0.0381 | 0.0304 ± 0.0460 | 0.8361 ± 0.0586 | 0.7950 ± 0.0510 |
| EC | Left | 0.3295 ± 0.0221 | 0.3423 ± 0.0205 | 0.8242 ± 0.0569 | 0.7698 ± 0.0392 |
| EC | Right | 0.3294 ± 0.0213 | 0.3331 ± 0.0191 | 0.8322 ± 0.0504 | 0.7775 ± 0.0243 |
| GCC | – | 0.3549 ± 0.0423 | 0.4227 ± 0.0369 | 1.1287 ± 0.0906 | 1.0199 ± 0.0898 |
| PTR | Left | 0.4035 ± 0.0614 | 0.4472 ± 0.0318 | 0.945 ± 0.1245 | 0.8181 ± 0.0534 |
| PTR | Right | 0.3930 ± 0.0508 | 0.4534 ± 0.0266 | 0.8538 ± 0.0974 | 0.7432 ± 0.0832 |
| SCC | – | 0.4159 ± 0.0464 | 0.5087 ± 0.0393 | 1.1251 ± 0.1456 | 1.0363 ± 0.0937 |
| TAP | Left | 0.3685 ± 0.0540 | 0.3703 ± 0.0965 | 1.2971 ± 0.2899 | 1.5991 ± 0.3597 |
Significant differences of FA and MD between RRMS patients and healthy controls are shown by FDR adjusted *p < 0.01 and highly significant differences by **p < 0.001.
Comparison of DTI metrics of AD and RD in NAWM tracts between MS patients and controls using two-tailed Student’s t-test.
| Location | Side | AD (mean ± SD) 10–3 mm2 s–1 | RD (mean ± SD) 10–3 mm2 s–1 | ||
| RRMS | Control | RRMS | Control | ||
| SCR | Left | 1.1090 ± 0.0726 | 1.0465 ± 0.0528 | 0.6109 ± 0.0662 | 0.4945 ± 0.0352 |
| SCR | Right | 1.1312 ± 0.0782 | 1.0353 ± 0.0903 | 0.6307 ± 0.0750 | 0.5253 ± 0.0467 |
| SLF | Left | 1.0892 ± 0.0517 | 1.0523 ± 0.0382 | 0.6742 ± 0.0696 | 0.6018 ± 0.0496 |
| SLF | Right | 1.0980 ± 0.0577 | 1.0650 ± 0.0247 | 0.6667 ± 0.0504 | 0.6090 ± 0.0451 |
| ACR | Left | 1.1471 ± 0.0689 | 1.0733 ± 0.0285 | 0.6857 ± 0.0772 | 0.5761 ± 0.0246 |
| ACR | Right | 1.1546 ± 0.0902 | 1.0812 ± 0.0258 | 0.6938 ± 0.0828 | 0.5700 ± 0.0341 |
| BCC | – | 1.4285 ± 0.1643 | 1.4462 ± 0.1588 | 0.8091 ± 0.1362 | 0.7179 ± 0.1157 |
| CIN | Left | 1.1032 ± 0.0565 | 1.0712 ± 0.0486 | 0.7517 ± 0.0776 | 0.6850 ± 0.0520 |
| CIN | Right | 1.0569 ± 0.0522 | 1.0430 ± 0.0430 | 0.7258 ± 0.0680 | 0.6708 ± 0.0640 |
| EC | Left | 1.1107 ± 0.0595 | 1.0496 ± 0.0404 | 0.6807 ± 0.0576 | 0.6296 ± 0.0410 |
| EC | Right | 1.1239 ± 0.0542 | 1.0536 ± 0.0306 | 0.6865 ± 0.0510 | 0.6394 ± 0.0244 |
| GCC | – | 1.5264 ± 0.0845 | 1.4680 ± 0.0957 | 0.9300 ± 0.0995 | 0.7960 ± 0.0937 |
| PTR | Left | 1.3435 ± 0.1189 | 1.2040 ± 0.0593 | 0.6940 ± 0.1061 | 0.5160 ± 0.0363 |
| PTR | Right | 1.3212 ± 0.1056 | 1.1318 ± 0.0503 | 0.6849 ± 0.0982 | 0.6065 ± 0.1065 |
| SCC | – | 1.1090 ± 0.0726 | 1.0465 ± 0.0528 | 0.8805 ± 0.1494 | 0.7519 ± 0.0905 |
| TAP | Left | 1.7470 ± 0.3212 | 2.1038 ± 0.3082 | 0.7721 ± 0.2768 | 0.73465 ± 0.3890 |
Significant differences of AD and RD between RRMS patients and healthy controls are shown by FDR adjusted *p < 0.01 and highly significant differences by **p < 0.001.