| Literature DB >> 35309515 |
Wei Gu1,2,3, Hao Wang4, Man Su5, Yiwei Wang1,2, Fei Xu1,2, Qinglian Hu2, Xuyi Cai2, Jinyun Song6, Huangjin Tong7, Yuerong Qian1,2, Hongyu Zhao6, Jun Chen1,2.
Abstract
Carbonizing by stir-frying (CSF) is the most common technology in botanical folk medicines to enhance the convergence, hemostasis, and antidiarrheal effects. Sanguisorbae Radix (SR), a well-known herbal medicine in China, has extensive therapeutic functions, while charred SR is known as an additional product obtained from SR after CSF. In this study, mass spectrometry was used to investigate the effect of charring on tannins transformation of SR. The findings showed that the content level of tannins in SR decreased significantly after carbonizing process, while their three categories, gallotannins, ellagitannins, and procyanidins, had downward trends in general. Moreover, CSF also induced the polyphenol in SR to release relevant monomers from its origins. Significant amount of hydrolyzable tannins were detected by mass spectrometry, including gallotannins and ellagitannins, suggesting that hydrolysis during CSF yielded gallic and ellagic acid and their derivatives, in addition to sugar moieties. Subsequently, gallic and ellagic acid can further polymerize to form sanguisorbic acid dilactone. The amount of proanthocyanidins, the oligomers of catechin, including procyanidin, procyanidin C2, procyanidin B3, and 3-O-galloylprocyanidin B3, decreased to form catechin and its derivatives, which may further degrade to protocatechualdehyde. Quantitative analysis illustrated that the amount of gallic, pyrogallic, and ellagic acid and methyl gallate, the essential effectors in SR, significantly increased after CSF, with increased ratios of 1.36, 4.28, 10.33, and 4.79, respectively. In contrast, the contents of cathechin and epigallocatechin dropped remarkably with increased ratios of 0.04 and 0.02. Tannins exhibit moderate absorption, while their relevant monomers have a higher bioavailability. Therefore, CSF is proved here to be an effective technique to the release of active monomers from the original polyphenol precursor. This study explored the mechanism by which tannins are transformed upon CSF of SR.Entities:
Keywords: Sanguisorba officinalis L; Sanguisorbae radix; carbonizing by stir-frying; processing; tannins
Year: 2022 PMID: 35309515 PMCID: PMC8924296 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.762224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
MS/MS parameter of eight analytes.
| Compounds | Polarity | MW (Da) | Precursor-product ion transition (m/z) | Declustering potential (Volts) | Collision energy (Volts) | Retention time/min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | MS2 | ||||||
| Gallic acid | [M-H]- | 170.12 | 169.1 | 125.0 | −40.98 | −20.25 | 1.16 |
| 79.0 | −20.41 | −26.12 | |||||
| Pyrogallic acid | [M-H]- | 126.11 | 124.9 | 79.0 | −46.36 | −24.87 | 1.51 |
| 69.1 | −84.36 | −22.24 | |||||
| Epigallocatechin | [M-H]- | 306.27 | 305.1 | 125.0 | −80.33 | −24.04 | 2.06 |
| 137.0 | −49.96 | −30.13 | |||||
| Catechin | [M-H]- | 290.27 | 289.1 | 245.1 | −22.9 | −19.02 | 2.26 |
| 203.0 | −17.18 | −25.71 | |||||
| Protocatechnic aldehyde | [M-H]- | 138.12 | 137.1 | 108.1 | −69.47 | −31.85 | 2.34 |
| 91.9 | −64.23 | −30.66 | |||||
| Methyl gallate | [M-H]- | 184.15 | 183.1 | 124.1 | −39.54 | −22.3 | 2.40 |
| 168.0 | −69.64 | −19.4 | |||||
| Ellagic acid | [M-H]- | 302.28 | 301.2 | 284.1 | −86.86 | −39.11 | 3.07 |
| 145.1 | −59.11 | −47.71 | |||||
| Ethyl gallate | [M-H]- | 198.17 | 197.0 | 123.7 | −53.6 | −24.02 | 3.28 |
| 168.9 | −44.55 | −18.72 | |||||
FIGURE 1The representative images of SR and CSR.
FIGURE 2The relative contents calculated by peak area normalization of all tannins in SR/CSR(n = 3) (Note: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3Structure transformation of gallotannins in Sanguisorbae Radix during carbonizing by stir-frying (Note: The compound identified in blue means the relative content in SR decreased during carbonizing, while in red indicates an increase).
FIGURE 4Structure transformation of ellagitannins in Sanguisorbae Radix during carbonizing by stir-frying (Note: The compound identified in blue means the relative content in SR decreased during carbonizing, while in red indicates an increase.)
FIGURE 5Structure transformation of proanthocyanidins in Sanguisorbae Radix during carbonizing by stir-frying (Note: The compound identified in blue means the relative content in SR decreased during carbonizing, while in red indicates an increase.)
FIGURE 6Chemical structures and MS/MS scan spectrums.
FIGURE 7MRM chromatograms of eight analytes in Mixed standard solution, SR solution and CSR solution.
Stability and recovery of the eight analytes (n = 3).
| Compounds | Stability | Recovery | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High concentration | Medium concentration | Low concentration | |||||
| RSD% | Mean % | RSD % | Mean % | RSD % | Mean % | RSD % | |
| Gallic acid | 1.25 | 104.73 | 1.85 | 98.23 | 1.21 | 100.55 | 1.88 |
| Pyrogallic acid | 1.59 | 103.24 | 1.54 | 103.43 | 1.99 | 102.73 | 1.05 |
| Protocatechnic aldehyde | 1.66 | 105.82 | 1.76 | 108.63 | 2.78 | 117.18 | 6.54 |
| Catechin | 0.96 | 96.70 | 3.47 | 100.97 | 8.97 | 107.59 | 10.39 |
| Methyl gallate | 1.68 | 105.14 | 2.52 | 107.39 | 2.14 | 114.77 | 5.28 |
| Ethyl gallate | 1.85 | 104.43 | 3.42 | 104.53 | 3.33 | 107.87 | 1.76 |
| Ellagic acid | 1.82 | 97.90 | 2.84 | 99.08 | 1.29 | 97.47 | 3.62 |
| Epigallocatechin | 1.90 | 98.75 | 5.77 | 99.96 | 5.19 | 104.75 | 4.30 |
Regression equation, correlation coefficients, and linearity ranges for the eight analytes.
| Compounds | Linear range (ng/ml) | Regression equation | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 9.6–288.0 | y = 57965x + 433072 | 0.9995 |
| Pyrogallic acid | 11.0–220.0 | y = 4761.1x + 9548.5 | 0.9999 |
| Protocatechnic aldehyde | 10.0–201.0 | y = 32231x + 331924 | 0.9953 |
| Catechin | 5.6–225.0 | y = 8608.1x + 14476 | 0.9999 |
| Methyl gallate | 10.6–212.0 | y = 23157x + 115120 | 0.9997 |
| Ethyl gallate | 10.7–213.0 | y = 48759x + 155259 | 0.9998 |
| Ellagic acid | 10.8–215.0 | y = 5277.8x + 45490 | 0.9995 |
| Epigallocatechin | 11.2–223.0 | y = 13198x − 3383.7 | 1.0000 |
y, the peak area of analytes; x, the concentration of analytes.
Quantitative results of the eight analytes in the extracts of SR and CSR (n = 3).
| Compounds | Content (mg/g) | Increased ratio after charring | Trend after charring | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR | CSR | Calculated by quantitative results | Calculated by peak area normalization | ||
| Epigallocatechin | 2.29 ± 0.51 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.02 | ↓↓ | ↓↓ |
| Catechin | 17.43 ± 0.23 | 0.76 ± 0.09 | 0.04 | ↓↓ | ↓↓ |
| Ethyl gallate | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.50 | ↓ | ↓ |
| Gallic acid | 12.49 ± 0.70 | 16.96 ± 0.43 | 1.36 | ↑ | ↑ |
| Pyrogallic acid | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 2.57 ± 0.08 | 4.28 | ↑↑ | ↑↑ |
| Methyl gallate | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 1.34 ± 0.02 | 4.79 | ↑↑ | ↑↑ |
| Ellagic acid | 6.89 ± 0.40 | 71.18 ± 1.94 | 10.33 | ↑↑ | ↑↑ |
| Protocatechualdehyde | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.00 | ∞ | ↑↑ | ↑↑ |