| Literature DB >> 35309032 |
Sadhana Sanwatsarkar1, Sanjeev Palta2, Satyen Parida3, Chaitanya Kamat4, H Bala Subramanya5.
Abstract
The topics for postgraduate teaching-learning tools are Journal club in-house with one speaker and a moderator, Seminars- with multiple speakers and a co-ordinator, and Webinars- online seminars with one or multiple speakers choosing multiple mediums of communication. They largely affect the working mechanism of a clinician as they help us upgrade with the recent development in our fields. Making them interesting for us as well as our colleagues is necessary. This article presents a few facts as well as tips and tricks to compile the literature in a manner, which includes all the necessary points for better learning. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Communication; evidence-based practice; reading; technology; webinar
Year: 2022 PMID: 35309032 PMCID: PMC8929318 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1108_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Anaesth ISSN: 0019-5049
Steps for presentation in the journal club
| Conclusions should be reviewed by the moderator before the final presentation. |
| Editorial comments on the article should be checked. |
| The soft or hard copy of the article should be circulated one week prior. |
| The journal, title and authors are to be identified. |
| The background should be presented. |
| The presenter should interpret the article and explain rather than reading the entire article/PowerPoint presentation |
| Research questions, methods, results and conclusions should be summarised. |
| The critical review should be presented |
| Important points/key comments should be explained well and repeated at the end. |
| Two to three cross-references should be mentioned. |
| The presentation should be confident. |
Common mistakes made while preparing a journal club
| Ignorance of available online resources. |
| Rapid review of the entire contents of several journals in a short time |
| Using very simplistic and fixed frameworks to analyse varied types of articles like original articles, meta-analysis, case series, etc., |
| Restricting journal clubs to only original articles excluding case studies |
| Expecting students to have expertise with recent and advanced statistical tests |
| Making arrogant, superficial comments and judgments about the paper or review process. |
Parameters for evaluating the seminar
| Parameter | Score (1 to 4) |
|---|---|
| Whether other relevant publications consulted | |
| Whether cross-references consulted | |
| Completeness of Preparation | |
| Clarity of Presentation | |
| Understanding of subject | |
| Ability to answer questions | |
| Time scheduling | |
| Appropriate use of Audio-Visual aids | |
| Overall Performance |
*(Poor -0, Below average -1, Average - 2, Good -3, Very good -4)
Figure 1Feedback model for Seminar